CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9175F

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 4.2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo

CACHE 512 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 320W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Core 7 250H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H

CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo

CACHE 24 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 45W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

5,636

3,147

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

795

298

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

23,487

9,697

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

3,315

1,368

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

55,923

16,561

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

7,895

1,931

passmark_data_compression

867,186

303,269

passmark_data_encryption

42,297

18,206

passmark_extended_instructions

70,529

17,318

passmark_find_prime_numbers

741

106

passmark_floating_point_math

145,939

65,094

passmark_integer_math

219,800

99,100

passmark_multithread

67,634

27,030

passmark_physics

9,984

1,824

passmark_random_string_sorting

95,783

34,136

passmark_single_thread

4,256

4,148

passmark_singlethread

4,256

4,148

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9175F vs Intel Core 7 250H

If you're comparing AMD EPYC 9175F from AMD compared to Intel Core 7 250H by Intel, the performance gap is clearly visible. Featuring higher parallel throughput, AMD EPYC 9175F from AMD offers substantially faster performance in heavy applications. This processor design edge translates clearly into actual gains. Performance figures demonstrates this observation. Buyers looking for peak power might benefit from what AMD EPYC 9175F from AMD provides to the table.

Gaming benchmarks furthermore favor AMD EPYC 9175F from AMD in this evaluation. Improved frame rates and improved reliable performance result from the better IPC capability. Players should experience enhanced gameplay, specifically in CPU-demanding games. This advantage holds across various settings. Competitive gaming particularly benefits from this capability superiority.

Intel Core 7 250H by Intel isn't dismissed altogether, but the speed difference against AMD EPYC 9175F from AMD is difficult to overlook. For price-aware builders, Intel Core 7 250H by Intel may still offer a choice when its lower cost accounts for its lesser performance. However, for peak power, AMD EPYC 9175F from AMD remains the clear champion. The assessment is straightforward. Speed seekers might gravitate toward AMD EPYC 9175F from AMD.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9175F

7 250H

Core Specs

Cores

14 -12.5%

Threads

20 -37.5%

Base Clock (GHz)

4.2

2.5 -40.5%

Boost Clock (GHz)

5.4 +8.0%

Frequency (GHz)

4.2

2.5 -40.5%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

5.4 +8.0%

Multiplier

25 -40.5%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

512 MB (shared)

24 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

320

45 -85.9%

PL1

—

45 W

PL2

—

115 W

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Raptor Lake

Codename

Turin

Raptor Lake-H

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

133,040 million

—

Die Size

16x 70.6 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

5200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel BGA 1744

Chipsets

—

WM790, HM770

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)

Intel Hybrid

Hybrid Cores

—

P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8

E-Core Frequency

—

1800 MHz up to 4 GHz

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Mobile

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$4256

$502

Part Number

100-000001145

SRQ6UQ5MK

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-BGA16F

Tj Max

—

100°C

View EPYC 9175F Details View Core 7 250H Details