CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9015

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 64 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 125W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6780E

CORE STATE Sierra Forest

CORE SPECS 144 Cores / 144 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 108 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 330W

ARCHITECTURE Sierra Forest

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression

353,014

2,557,582

passmark_data_encryption

17,790

193,004

passmark_extended_instructions

27,970

114,008

passmark_find_prime_numbers

304

708

passmark_floating_point_math

61,615

433,862

passmark_integer_math

92,524

641,817

passmark_multithread

30,689

86,734

passmark_physics

2,893

10,951

passmark_random_string_sorting

39,772

326,954

passmark_single_thread

3,265

1,923

passmark_singlethread

3,265

1,923

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

N/A

7,431

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

N/A

1,049

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

N/A

30,963

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

N/A

4,371

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

N/A

73,723

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9015 vs Intel Xeon 6780E

The comparison between AMD EPYC 9015 by AMD and 6780E (Intel) indicates remarkably comparable benchmark scores. These options achieve similar numbers over many workloads, positioning the choice primarily based on price. The test figures demonstrates this observation. Not one chip holds a clear lead. Users could pick based on secondary considerations.

Looking at a engineering standpoint, AMD EPYC 9015 by AMD and 6780E (Intel) share comparable specs. Core configurations, speed rates, and cache hierarchy sizes are virtually equivalent. This hardware balance supports the close benchmark data. Neither possesses a significant specification lead. This comparison is level.

No CPU possesses a decisive edge here. AMD EPYC 9015 by AMD leads narrowly in some tests, while 6780E (Intel) takes different ones. This trading behavior implies fundamental balance between these two. The gaps are slight and likely unnoticeable in practical usage. Each provide strong performance.

Ultimately: AMD EPYC 9015 by AMD and 6780E (Intel) are closely balanced. None of the deserves a definite recommendation over the alternative. Allow value and platform choices influence your ultimate choice. The two processors will satisfy you adequately. It's a safe choice.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9015

6780E

Core Specs

Cores

144 +1700.0%

Threads

144 +800.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.6

2.2 -38.9%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.1

3 -26.8%

Frequency (GHz)

3.6

2.2 -38.9%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.1

3 -26.8%

Multiplier

22 -38.9%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

96 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

4 MB (per module)

L3 Cache

64 MB (shared)

108 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

125

330 +164.0%

Configurable TDP

120-155 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Sierra Forest

Codename

Turin

Sierra Forest

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Sierra Forest-SP)

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

16,630 million

—

Die Size

2x 70.6 mm²

578 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

Gen 2.0

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$527

$11350

Part Number

100-000001553

SRPG3

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

106°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9015 Details View Xeon 6780E Details