CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9015

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 64 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 125W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Core 7 250H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H

CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo

CACHE 24 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 45W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression

353,014

303,269

passmark_data_encryption

17,790

18,206

passmark_extended_instructions

27,970

17,318

passmark_find_prime_numbers

304

106

passmark_floating_point_math

61,615

65,094

passmark_integer_math

92,524

99,100

passmark_multithread

30,689

27,030

passmark_physics

2,893

1,824

passmark_random_string_sorting

39,772

34,136

passmark_single_thread

3,265

4,148

passmark_singlethread

3,265

4,148

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

N/A

2,315

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

N/A

326

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

N/A

9,649

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

N/A

1,362

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

N/A

22,975

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

N/A

3,243

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9015 vs Intel Core 7 250H

If processing power is this matched, the evaluation between Intel Core 7 250H (Intel) and AMD EPYC 9015 grows increasingly complex. Both options exchange victories across diverse benchmarks. This aggregate assessment is one of impressive equivalence. Neither appears as a clear winner. This choice hinges on personal requirements.

Neither processor maintains a definitive superiority between them. Intel Core 7 250H (Intel) beats barely in specific benchmarks, while AMD EPYC 9015 takes different ones. The trading dynamic implies core parity between the processors. The deltas are marginal and likely invisible in actual usage. Both provide excellent throughput.

In-game benchmarks likewise indicate similar numbers between Intel Core 7 250H (Intel) and AMD EPYC 9015. Frame rates deltas often fall inside testing variance. This small differences are rarely detectable during everyday play sessions. The two chips deliver smooth experiences. Gamers could decide comfortably between the options.

In the end, consumers could pick based on platform preference rather than raw scores solely. The two Intel Core 7 250H (Intel) and AMD EPYC 9015 offer excellent capability for the respective segments. The choice comes down to individual requirements. Each option is reasonable. You won't go badly with either.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9015

7 250H

Core Specs

Cores

14 +75.0%

Threads

20 +25.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.6

2.5 -30.6%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.1

5.4 +31.7%

Frequency (GHz)

3.6

2.5 -30.6%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.1

5.4 +31.7%

Multiplier

25 -30.6%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

64 MB (shared)

24 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

125

45 -64.0%

PL1

—

45 W

PL2

—

115 W

Configurable TDP

120-155 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Raptor Lake

Codename

Turin

Raptor Lake-H

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

16,630 million

—

Die Size

2x 70.6 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

5200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel BGA 1744

Chipsets

—

WM790, HM770

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)

Intel Hybrid

Hybrid Cores

—

P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8

E-Core Frequency

—

1800 MHz up to 4 GHz

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Mobile

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$527

$502

Part Number

100-000001553

SRQ6UQ5MK

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-BGA16F

Tj Max

—

100°C

View EPYC 9015 Details View Core 7 250H Details