AMD EPYC 8024P vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 and AMD EPYC 8024P are fundamentally different processors aimed at opposite ends of the computing spectrum: one is a mobile chip designed for efficiency, the other a server part built for throughput. The benchmark data reveals a clear split in their strengths, with the EPYC dominating heavy multi-threaded workloads while the Ryzen AI 7 445 claims a decisive victory in single-threaded tests.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic divergence appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the AMD EPYC 8024P scores 17,472 against the Ryzen AI 7 445's 10,590. That is a 39.4% advantage for the EPYC, a gap that underscores its server-class design with 8 cores and 16 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads on the mobile chip. The EPYC also wins Cinebench R15 multi-core, but only by a slim margin: 1,761 versus 1,723, a 2.2% difference. This suggests that in shorter, less sustained workloads, the Ryzen AI 7 445's higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz can partially compensate for fewer cores.

Single-core results tell a different story. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the EPYC wins with 2,466 against 1,806 — a 26.8% lead that is surprising given the Ryzen AI 7 445's higher boost frequency. However, the PassMark single-thread test flips the outcome entirely. The Ryzen AI 7 445 scores 3,591 versus 2,371 for the EPYC, a massive 51.5% advantage. This inconsistency between Cinebench and PassMark likely reflects different instruction mixes and workload sensitivities, but the PassMark result is the more emphatic single-threaded statement.

The EPYC's dominance in core-heavy tasks extends across several PassMark sub-tests. In physics simulation, it scores 1,905 versus 976 — a 48.8% lead. Prime number finding shows a 48.6% advantage (109 versus 56). Data encryption is 33.5% faster (15,809 versus 10,519), and random string sorting is 32.1% faster (34,613 versus 23,488). The EPYC also leads in data compression by 7.1% (232,242 versus 215,812) and integer math by 6.1% (62,128 versus 58,332).

The Ryzen AI 7 445 counters in two other areas. Floating-point math sees the mobile chip ahead by 13.2% (39,362 versus 34,757), and extended instructions (likely AVX-512 or similar) show an 11.1% edge (15,826 versus 14,251). These wins indicate that despite fewer cores, the Zen 5 architecture in the Ryzen AI 7 445 handles certain vectorized workloads more efficiently than the Zen 4c cores in the EPYC. Overall, the EPYC wins 10 of the 15 head-to-head benchmarks, with the Ryzen AI 7 445 taking 5.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on different process nodes and core designs. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 uses TSMC's 4 nm process with Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The thermal design power is 28 watts, reflecting its mobile market segment. The chip is built for AMD Socket FP8 and includes integrated Radeon 840M graphics, a feature absent from the EPYC.

The AMD EPYC 8024P uses the older 5 nm process from TSMC but employs Zen 4c architecture, codenamed Siena, part of the EPYC 8004 series. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.00 GHz. The TDP is 90 watts, significantly higher than the Ryzen AI 7 445, and it is designed for AMD Socket SP6. The EPYC has no integrated graphics, as it targets server and workstation workloads where discrete GPUs are standard. The EPYC also has a stated transistor count of 8,875 million on a 73 mm² die, while the Ryzen AI 7 445's transistor count and die size are not listed.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The Ryzen AI 7 445 offers 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and only 4 MB of L3 cache total. The EPYC has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, but a much larger 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This eightfold difference in L3 capacity is critical for server workloads that repeatedly access large datasets.

Memory support also separates the two. The Ryzen AI 7 445 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The EPYC supports only DDR5 but in a six-channel configuration delivering 230.4 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe capabilities are another major differentiator: the Ryzen AI 7 445 provides Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, while the EPYC offers Gen 5 with 96 lanes — a massive expansion for adding NVMe drives, network cards, and accelerators.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD EPYC 8024P is the clear choice for throughput-oriented, heavily parallel workloads. Its 48.8% lead in physics simulation and 48.6% lead in prime number finding point to tasks that scale with core count and thread count. Data encryption with a 33.5% advantage and random string sorting with a 32.1% lead further cement its role in server-side data processing. The eight-core, sixteen-thread configuration with 32 MB of L3 cache and six-channel memory makes it suited for virtualization, database workloads, and content rendering that can utilize all available threads. The EPYC also wins Cinebench R23 multi-core by 39.4%, which is a strong indicator for long-running CPU rendering tasks.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 wins in scenarios that favor high clock speeds and newer architecture efficiency. Its 51.5% lead in PassMark single-thread performance is a decisive marker for everyday responsiveness, light multitasking, and applications that are not well-optimized for multi-core scaling. The 13.2% advantage in floating-point math and 11.1% in extended instructions suggest it excels in scientific simulations, financial modeling, or media encoding that use vectorized operations. As a mobile chip with a 28-watt TDP, it is designed for tasks where power efficiency and portability are paramount, such as laptops and compact devices. It also includes integrated Radeon 840M graphics, meaning a discrete GPU is not required for basic display output or light graphical tasks.

The benchmark results show a clear split: the EPYC is the workhorse for server and workstation environments where raw multi-threaded horsepower and memory bandwidth are essential, while the Ryzen AI 7 445 is the efficient performer for client devices where single-threaded speed and power conservation matter more.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

A: The AMD EPYC 8024P is significantly faster, winning Cinebench R23 multi-core by 39.4% (17,472 versus 10,590) and Cinebench R15 multi-core by 2.2% (1,761 versus 1,723).

Q: Does the Ryzen AI 7 445 have any clear advantages?

A: Yes, the Ryzen AI 7 445 wins PassMark single-thread by 51.5% (3,591 versus 2,371), floating-point math by 13.2% (39,362 versus 34,757), and extended instructions by 11.1% (15,826 versus 14,251).

Q: What is the core and thread difference?

A: The EPYC 8024P has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 7 445 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The EPYC also has a higher base clock (2.40 GHz versus 2.00 GHz), but the Ryzen AI 7 445 has a higher boost clock (4.60 GHz versus 3.00 GHz).

Q: How do their memory systems compare?

A: The EPYC 8024P uses six-channel DDR5 with 230.4 GB/s bandwidth, while the Ryzen AI 7 445 uses dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X with 89.6 GB/s. The EPYC also has 32 MB of shared L3 cache versus only 4 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 445.

Q: Which processor has better single-core performance?

A: It depends on the benchmark. The EPYC wins Cinebench R23 single-core by 26.8% (2,466 versus 1,806), but the Ryzen AI 7 445 wins PassMark single-thread by 51.5% (3,591 versus 2,371). The PassMark result may better reflect general single-threaded application performance.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. Additionally, the EPYC 8024P has a launch MSRP of $409, while no launch MSRP is listed for the Ryzen AI 7 445.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 | AMD EPYC 8024P |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 3.00 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 90 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | AMD Socket SP6 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Zen 4c |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Siena |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | Not listed | 8,875 million |

| Die Size | Not listed | 73 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Six-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 230.4 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes | Gen 5, 96 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | None |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2023-09-17 |

| Part Number | 100-000001935 | 100-000001136 |