AMD EPYC 7713P vs Intel Core Ultra 5 226V Comparison

The AMD EPYC 7713P and Intel Core Ultra 5 226V occupy opposite ends of the computing spectrum: a 64-core server behemoth designed for rack density versus an 8-core mobile chip built for battery efficiency. The recorded benchmarks show a complete sweep in raw performance, but the architectural story is far more nuanced than a simple score comparison.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite delivers a decisive victory for the AMD EPYC 7713P across every single test. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the EPYC scores 6978 against the Intel Ultra 5's 1501, a delta of 364.9%. The single-core R15 test shows a similar pattern: 984 versus 267, a 268.5% advantage for AMD. These margins are not incremental; they represent fundamentally different performance classes.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the EPYC 7713P posts 29076 multicore points compared to the Ultra 5's 6381, a 355.7% lead. The single-core R20 result is equally lopsided at 4104 versus 900, a 356% gap. The most extreme disparity appears in Cinebench R23 multicore, where the EPYC reaches 69229 against the Ultra 5's 9848, a staggering 603% delta. Even in R23 single-core, the EPYC's 9773 dwarfs the Ultra 5's 1744 by 460.4%.

The head-to-head table shows 6 wins for the AMD EPYC 7713P and 0 for the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V. However, context matters. The EPYC's average benchmark score of 20024 places it at the 74th percentile of all CPUs, while the Ultra 5's 19368 average sits at the 73rd percentile. Their nearest rivals reveal why: the EPYC trades blows with the Intel Core i7-11800H (0.1% delta) and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (0.5% delta), while the Ultra 5 matches the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS (0% delta) and trails the Intel Core i7-8700K by 0.7%. The Cinebench sweep reflects the EPYC's extreme multicore focus, but the overall database scores show both chips operating in a similar competitive tier relative to the broader market.

Architecture Differences

The silicon foundations could not be more different. The AMD EPYC 7713P uses TSMC's 7 nm process with a massive 33,200 million transistors spread across 8x 81 mm² dies. It deploys 64 Zen 3 cores and 128 threads, a configuration designed for virtualization, database workloads, and high-core-count compute. The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V moves to TSMC's 3 nm node and packs just 8 Lunar Lake cores with 8 threads, favoring efficiency and compactness for thin-and-light notebooks.

Cache hierarchies reflect these divergent missions. The EPYC provides 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, plus a colossal 256 MB shared L3 cache. The Ultra 5 counters with 192 KB L1 and 2.5 MB L2 per core, but only 8 MB shared L3. This 32x difference in L3 capacity directly supports the EPYC's server role, where large working sets and multi-tenant workloads demand massive on-die storage.

Memory and I/O diverge sharply. The EPYC supports DDR4 over an eight-channel memory bus, delivering 204.8 GB/s of bandwidth with ECC capability. The Ultra 5 uses dual-channel memory with support dependent on motherboard design and no ECC. PCIe connectivity also separates them: the EPYC offers Gen 4 with 128 lanes, while the Ultra 5 provides only Gen 5 with 4 lanes. The EPYC's lane count enables dense GPU and NVMe arrays, whereas the Ultra 5 targets integrated mobile use.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The Ultra 5 boosts to 4.50 GHz versus the EPYC's 3.68 GHz, and its base clock of 2.10 GHz exceeds the EPYC's 2.00 GHz. The Ultra 5 also includes integrated Arc 130V graphics, while the EPYC has no integrated GPU. The TDP gap is enormous: 17 watts for Intel versus 225 watts for AMD, underscoring the mobile versus server design philosophy. The EPYC uses AMD Socket SP3 and was released on 2021-03-14, while the Ultra 5 uses Intel BGA 2833 and launched on 2024-09-23.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The AMD EPYC 7713P scores 69229 versus the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V's 9848, a 603% advantage. This is the largest margin in the head-to-head benchmark set.

Q: Are these chips in the same performance class despite the score gap?

A: The database shows the EPYC at the 74th percentile with an average score of 20024, while the Ultra 5 sits at the 73rd percentile with 19368. Their nearest rivals are similarly positioned, with the EPYC matching the Intel Core i7-11800H (0.1% delta) and the Ultra 5 matching the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS (0% delta).

Q: How do their core counts and threads compare?

A: The EPYC 7713P has 64 cores and 128 threads, while the Ultra 5 226V has 8 cores and 8 threads. This 8x core difference and 16x thread difference drives the multicore benchmark results.

Q: What are the cache capacity differences?

A: The EPYC provides 256 MB shared L3 cache, 512 KB L2 per core, and 64 KB L1 per core. The Ultra 5 provides 8 MB shared L3, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 192 KB L1 per core.

Q: Which chip supports ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD EPYC 7713P supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V does not support ECC.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The EPYC 7713P has a 225 W TDP, while the Ultra 5 226V has a 17 W TDP. This 208 W gap reflects their server versus mobile positioning.

The Verdict

The data supports clear conclusions for distinct buyers. The AMD EPYC 7713P is the choice for server and workstation deployments where multicore throughput dominates. Its 64 cores, 128 threads, and 256 MB L3 cache deliver 603% higher Cinebench R23 multicore scores than the Ultra 5, and its eight-channel DDR4 with ECC and 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes enable the dense, high-bandwidth systems that enterprise workloads require. The launch MSRP of $5010 reflects its professional positioning.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V targets mobile users who prioritize power efficiency and portability. Its 17 W TDP, 4.50 GHz boost clock, and integrated Arc 130V graphics suit thin laptops where sustained multicore loads are secondary. Its 8 MB L3 and dual-channel memory are adequate for everyday productivity, and its 73rd percentile average score shows it competes well against other mobile and older desktop parts like the Intel Core i7-8700K (0.7% delta).

There is no single winner; the benchmark results simply confirm that each processor excels in its intended environment. The EPYC dominates sustained parallel workloads but demands a server platform and significant power. The Ultra 5 offers a compact, efficient package for on-the-go use, but its performance ceiling is orders of magnitude lower in threaded tasks. Users needing heavy compute should select the EPYC; users needing mobility and efficiency should select the Ultra 5.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD EPYC 7713P | Intel Core Ultra 5 226V |

|---------------|----------------|-------------------------|

| Cores | 64 | 8 |

| Threads | 128 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.68 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 225 W | 17 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket SP3 | Intel BGA 2833 |

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Lunar Lake |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 3 nm |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 256 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | unknown, depends on motherboard |

| Memory Bus | Eight-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | Not specified |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 128 lanes | Gen 5, 4 lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Arc 130V |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2021-03-14 | 2024-09-23 |

| Launch MSRP | $5010 | Not specified |

| Transistors | 33,200 million | Not specified |

| Die Size | 8x 81 mm² | Not specified |