AMD EPYC 7713P vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data in this comparison is strikingly one-sided. Across six Cinebench tests, the AMD EPYC 7713P wins every single matchup, with the Ryzen 5 5600GT failing to take a single benchmark. The margins are enormous, ranging from 300.8% to 301.6% in favor of the EPYC processor. This is not a close contest by any measure.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the EPYC 7713P scores 69,229 against the Ryzen 5 5600GT's 17,272, a 300.8% advantage. The single-core R23 result tells a similar story: 9,773 for the EPYC versus 2,438 for the Ryzen, a 300.9% gap. Interestingly, the single-core margins are nearly identical to the multi-core margins, which suggests the EPYC's advantage is not merely a matter of core count but also of per-thread performance in this particular workload.

Cinebench R20 follows the same pattern. The EPYC 7713P posts 29,076 in multi-core, while the Ryzen 5 5600GT manages 7,254, a 300.8% difference. In R20 single-core, the scores are 4,104 and 1,023 respectively, a 301.2% gap. The R15 results are consistent: 6,978 versus 1,740 for multi-core (301% delta) and 984 versus 245 for single-core (301.6% delta).

The data shows that the EPYC 7713P is not just faster; it is roughly four times faster across every Cinebench test. The Ryzen 5 5600GT, despite being a capable desktop processor in its own right, is completely outclassed in these rendering workloads. The wins tally of 6 for the EPYC and 0 for the Ryzen leaves no ambiguity about which processor dominates in CPU-bound compute tasks.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is vast, and it explains the benchmark results. Both chips are built on Zen 3 architecture and manufactured by TSMC on a 7 nm process, but that is where the similarities end.

The EPYC 7713P is a 64-core, 128-thread monster from the EPYC 7003 series, codenamed Milan. It runs at a base clock of 2.00 GHz and boosts to 3.68 GHz. The Ryzen 5 5600GT is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop part from the 5000 series, codenamed Cezanne, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost of 4.60 GHz. The Ryzen has a significantly higher clock speed, but the EPYC has over ten times the core count.

Cache configurations differ dramatically. The EPYC 7713P carries 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a massive 256 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen 5 5600GT also has 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, but only 16 MB of L3. The EPYC's L3 is 16 times larger, which helps with large working sets in server workloads.

The transistor counts reflect the scale difference. The EPYC 7713P has 33,200 million transistors spread across 8 dies, each 81 mm². The Ryzen 5 5600GT has 10,700 million transistors on a single 180 mm² die. The EPYC is a multi-chiplet design, while the Ryzen uses a monolithic die.

Memory support is another major differentiator. The EPYC 7713P supports DDR4 with an eight-channel memory bus and a peak bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Ryzen 5 5600GT supports DDR4 with a dual-channel bus and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, with no ECC support. The EPYC has four times the memory channels and four times the bandwidth.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The EPYC 7713P offers Gen 4 with 128 lanes from the CPU, while the Ryzen 5 5600GT offers Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The EPYC is designed for massive I/O expansion, while the Ryzen is a mainstream desktop part. The Ryzen does include integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics, whereas the EPYC has no integrated graphics at all.

The sockets are different as well: the EPYC uses AMD Socket SP3, while the Ryzen uses AMD Socket AM4. The EPYC carries a 225 W TDP, while the Ryzen is rated at 65 W. The EPYC's power budget is more than three times larger, which is typical for a server processor.

Release dates are far apart. The EPYC 7713P launched in March 2021, while the Ryzen 5 5600GT arrived in January 2024. Both are still in active production. The EPYC is not multiplier-unlocked, while the Ryzen is. The market segments are clear: the EPYC targets server and workstation use, while the Ryzen targets desktop consumers.

The Verdict

The benchmark data dictates a straightforward verdict. For any workload measured by Cinebench, the AMD EPYC 7713P is the definitive winner. Its scores are approximately four times higher than the Ryzen 5 5600GT across all six head-to-head tests. The EPYC's 64 cores and 128 threads, combined with 256 MB of L3 cache and eight-channel memory, make it a server-class compute powerhouse.

The Ryzen 5 5600GT, despite its higher clock speeds (3.60 GHz base, 4.60 GHz boost), cannot overcome the sheer core-count deficit. Its 6 cores and 12 threads are a fraction of the EPYC's resources. In Cinebench, which scales well with core count, the EPYC's advantage is overwhelming. The Ryzen also lacks ECC memory support, has a dual-channel memory bus, and offers only 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, all of which limit its applicability in server environments.

Who should pick the EPYC 7713P? Anyone running multi-threaded server or workstation workloads where Cinebench scores are representative: rendering, scientific computing, virtualization, or data processing. The 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and 204.8 GB/s memory bandwidth support heavy I/O and memory-bound tasks. The EPYC's 74th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20,024, places it near the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (19,928, 0.5% delta) and Intel Core i7-11800H (19,998, 0.1% delta).

Who should pick the Ryzen 5 5600GT? Desktop users who need a well-rounded processor with integrated graphics. The Radeon Vega 7 iGPU means no discrete graphics card is required for basic display output. The Ryzen also has a 74th percentile ranking, with an average benchmark score of 20,733, which puts it slightly ahead of the EPYC's average. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-12490F (20,802, -0.3% delta) and Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (20,826, -0.4% delta). The Ryzen's 65 W TDP makes it far more power-efficient than the EPYC's 225 W TDP, and its unlocked multiplier allows overclocking.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD EPYC 7713P has 64 cores and 128 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache size?

A: The EPYC 7713P has 256 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen 5 5600GT has 16 MB of L3 cache. The EPYC's L3 is 16 times larger.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 5600GT have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Radeon Vega 7 integrated graphics. The EPYC 7713P has no integrated graphics.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The EPYC 7713P supports ECC memory. The Ryzen 5 5600GT does not support ECC.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The EPYC 7713P has an average benchmark score of 20,024. The Ryzen 5 5600GT has an average benchmark score of 20,733. The Ryzen is slightly higher.

Q: What are the memory bus widths?

A: The EPYC 7713P has an eight-channel memory bus with 204.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Ryzen 5 5600GT has a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Where Each One Wins

The EPYC 7713P wins every Cinebench test in the head-to-head data, making it the clear choice for multi-core rendering and compute-heavy tasks. Its 301% advantage in Cinebench R23 multi-core means it can complete large rendering jobs roughly four times faster than the Ryzen 5 5600GT. The EPYC also wins on memory bandwidth (204.8 GB/s versus 51.2 GB/s), PCIe lanes (128 Gen 4 versus 16 Gen 3), and ECC support. For server virtualization, database workloads, scientific simulations, or any task that can use 128 threads, the EPYC is the only rational choice.

The Ryzen 5 5600GT wins in areas not measured by the head-to-head Cinebench tests. Its higher clock speeds (4.60 GHz boost versus 3.68 GHz) give it an edge in lightly threaded tasks that rely on single-core frequency. The integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics make it a complete desktop package, eliminating the need for a separate GPU in basic systems. Its 65 W TDP is much lower than the EPYC's 225 W, making it suitable for compact and power-conscious builds. The unlocked multiplier allows enthusiasts to push performance further, which the EPYC does not offer.

The Ryzen 5 5600GT also shows strengths in its broader benchmark suite. In Geekbench, it scores 7,986 multi-core and 1,843 single-core. In PassMark tests, it achieves 69,566 in integer math and 39,817 in floating point math. Its single-thread PassMark score is 3,348. These results are not directly comparable to the EPYC, since the EPYC lacks these specific benchmarks in the database, but they indicate a well-rounded desktop processor.

The average benchmark scores tell a nuanced story. The Ryzen 5 5600GT averages 20,733, slightly ahead of the EPYC's 20,024. This suggests that in a mix of workloads beyond Cinebench, the Ryzen can hold its own despite its massive core-count disadvantage. The Ryzen's nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12490F, scores 20,802, which is only 0.3% higher. The EPYC's nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-11800H, scores 19,998, which is 0.1% lower.

In practice, the choice comes down to workload type. The EPYC 7713P is for scale-out, multi-threaded, memory-intensive server workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600GT is for desktop computing, light productivity, and gaming with integrated graphics. The data does not support the Ryzen as a server processor, nor the EPYC as a desktop processor. Each wins in its intended domain.