AMD EPYC 7713P vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and the AMD EPYC 7713P are both built on the same fundamental Zen 3 architecture, yet they serve completely different market segments. The Ryzen 5 5600 is a 6-core desktop processor with a 65 W TDP, while the EPYC 7713P is a 64-core server processor with a 225 W TDP. Despite the massive difference in core count and price, both processors sit at the 74th percentile in the database’s performance rankings, with average benchmark scores of 20468 and 20024 respectively. This creates an interesting comparison where the desktop chip holds its own in aggregate scoring, but the server chip dominates in every head-to-head benchmark included in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD EPYC 7713P has 64 cores and 128 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The EPYC part offers over ten times the core count.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 has an average benchmark score of 20468, while the EPYC 7713P has an average score of 20024. The Ryzen 5 5600 is slightly ahead by about 2.2 percent in this aggregate metric, despite having far fewer cores.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The EPYC 7713P supports eight-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s, which is four times higher.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The EPYC 7713P has a shared L3 cache of 256 MB. The Ryzen 5 5600 has a shared L3 cache of 32 MB. The EPYC part has eight times the L3 cache capacity.

Q: Are both processors based on the same architecture?

A: Yes, both use the Zen 3 architecture. The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer codename, while the EPYC 7713P uses the Milan codename. Both are manufactured on a 7 nm process node by TSMC.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 has a TDP of 65 W. The EPYC 7713P has a TDP of 225 W. The EPYC part consumes significantly more power, which is expected given its much higher core count.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the Zen 3 core architecture, but they are packaged and configured very differently. The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer design on the AMD Socket AM4 platform, while the EPYC 7713P uses the Milan design on the AMD Socket SP3 platform. The process node is identical at 7 nm from TSMC, but the transistor counts diverge dramatically. The Ryzen 5 5600 contains 4,150 million transistors on a die size of 74 mm². The EPYC 7713P contains 33,200 million transistors spread across 8 dies, each measuring 81 mm².

The cache hierarchy is similar in structure but vastly different in capacity. Both parts have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache differs significantly: the Ryzen 5 5600 has 32 MB shared, while the EPYC 7713P has 256 MB shared. This eightfold difference in L3 cache is critical for server workloads that frequently access large datasets.

The memory subsystem also reflects their different roles. The Ryzen 5 5600 uses dual-channel DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The EPYC 7713P uses eight-channel DDR4 with 204.8 GB/s of bandwidth. Both support ECC memory, which is notable for the desktop part since ECC is typically a server feature. The PCIe connectivity is another major divergence: the Ryzen 5 5600 provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the EPYC 7713P provides 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. This makes the EPYC part suitable for large-scale storage and networking configurations.

The EPYC 7713P has a locked multiplier, while the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier. The Ryzen part also includes integrated graphics, whereas the EPYC part does not. The market segments are clearly defined: the Ryzen 5 5600 targets desktop users, and the EPYC 7713P targets server and workstation environments.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records six head-to-head benchmark results, all from the Cinebench suite. In every single test, the AMD EPYC 7713P wins decisively. The Ryzen 5 5600 does not record a single win across these benchmarks.

In Cinebench R15 multicore, the EPYC 7713P scores 6978 against the Ryzen 5 5600’s 1845. This represents a delta of -73.6 percent for the Ryzen part, meaning the EPYC is approximately 3.8 times faster. The single-core result in R15 tells a similar story: the EPYC scores 984 versus 260 for the Ryzen, again a -73.6 percent delta. This is notable because single-core performance is typically where desktop parts excel, but the EPYC’s higher boost clock of 3.68 GHz compared to the Ryzen’s 4.40 GHz does not prevent the EPYC from winning.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore scores are 29076 for the EPYC and 7689 for the Ryzen. The delta remains at -73.6 percent. The single-core R20 scores show 4104 for the EPYC and 1085 for the Ryzen. The persistent -73.6 percent delta across all six tests indicates a consistent performance gap that scales uniformly with the core count difference.

Cinebench R23 multicore shows the largest absolute gap: the EPYC 7713P scores 69229, while the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 18309. The single-core R23 result is 9773 for the EPYC and 2584 for the Ryzen. The uniformity of the delta percentage across both multicore and single-core tests suggests that the EPYC’s advantage is not merely from having more cores, but also from architectural efficiencies that allow each core to deliver higher throughput in these workloads.

The benchmark data clearly shows that for any multithreaded or single-threaded Cinebench workload, the EPYC 7713P is the superior processor by a wide margin. The Ryzen 5 5600’s higher boost clock of 4.40 GHz does not translate into a win in any recorded test against the EPYC’s 3.68 GHz boost clock.

Specification Differences

The specification sheet reveals the fundamental differences between these two processors. The core count is the most obvious: 6 cores and 12 threads for the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 64 cores and 128 threads for the EPYC 7713P. The base clock also differs: the Ryzen runs at 3.50 GHz, while the EPYC runs at 2000.00 MHz (2.00 GHz). The boost clock is higher on the Ryzen at 4.40 GHz compared to the EPYC’s 3.68 GHz.

The TDP is a major separator: 65 W for the Ryzen versus 225 W for the EPYC. This reflects the power requirements of running 64 cores versus 6 cores. The socket is different, with the Ryzen using AM4 and the EPYC using SP3. The memory bus width differs: dual-channel for the Ryzen and eight-channel for the EPYC. Memory bandwidth follows, with 51.2 GB/s for the Ryzen and 204.8 GB/s for the EPYC.

The PCIe lane count is 20 for the Ryzen and 128 for the EPYC, both Gen 4. The transistor count is 4,150 million for the Ryzen and 33,200 million for the EPYC. Die size is 74 mm² for the Ryzen and 8x 81 mm² for the EPYC. The L3 cache is 32 MB for the Ryzen and 256 MB for the EPYC.

The release dates differ: the Ryzen 5 5600 launched on 2022-04-19, while the EPYC 7713P launched on 2021-03-14. The launch MSRP for the Ryzen 5 5600 is $199. The launch MSRP for the EPYC 7713P is $5010. The multiplier is unlocked on the Ryzen and locked on the EPYC. The part numbers are also distinct: 100-000000927 for the Ryzen and 100-000000337100-000000337WOF for the EPYC.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear picture for different use cases. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 is the appropriate choice for desktop workloads where power efficiency and single-thread responsiveness matter. Its 65 W TDP, 6 cores, and boost clock of 4.40 GHz make it suitable for general computing, gaming, and everyday productivity tasks. Its average benchmark score of 20468 places it in the same percentile as the EPYC, but it does so with a fraction of the power draw and a much smaller physical footprint.

The AMD EPYC 7713P is the clear winner in all recorded Cinebench benchmarks, with scores that are consistently 73.6 percent higher than the Ryzen 5 5600. Its 64 cores, 128 threads, and 256 MB of L3 cache make it the appropriate choice for server and workstation environments that require massive parallel processing, high memory bandwidth, and extensive PCIe connectivity. The eight-channel memory bus and 128 PCIe lanes are essential for enterprise storage, virtualization, and compute-intensive applications.

Users who prioritize single-thread performance in desktop applications should consider the Ryzen 5 5600, as its boost clock is higher and its unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking. However, the benchmark data shows that even in single-core Cinebench tests, the EPYC 7713P outperforms the Ryzen 5 5600. The EPYC’s single-core scores are consistently higher across R15, R20, and R23, despite its lower boost clock.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: the EPYC 7713P is the superior processor for any workload measured in the database, but it comes with a 225 W TDP and a server-class platform. The Ryzen 5 5600 offers competitive aggregate performance at a much lower power envelope and is the logical choice for desktop builds. The EPYC 7713P is the logical choice for server deployments where raw throughput and scalability are paramount. The database records 6 wins for the EPYC and 0 wins for the Ryzen in head-to-head tests, making the performance hierarchy unambiguous.