AMD EPYC 7713P vs AMD Ryzen 3 30 Comparison

# AMD Ryzen 3 30 vs AMD EPYC 7713P

The AMD Ryzen 3 30 and AMD EPYC 7713P occupy dramatically different corners of the processor market, yet their average benchmark scores land within 0.6% of each other. The Ryzen 3 30 posts an average score of 20,137, while the EPYC 7713P trails slightly at 20,024—a margin so thin it places each chip in the other's nearest-rival list. Both sit at the 74th percentile of all CPUs, meaning the data treats them as statistical equals in overall performance despite their radically different designs. This parity is deceptive, however, because the two processors achieve their similar averages through entirely different benchmark profiles, with the Ryzen excelling in single-threaded work and the EPYC dominating in multi-threaded workloads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data reveals a clear split: the Ryzen 3 30 wins every PassMark test it has, while the EPYC 7713P's results come from Cinebench suites, where it posts staggering multi-core scores. The Ryzen's PassMark multi-thread score of 9,027 reflects its 4-core/8-thread configuration, while the EPYC's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 69,229 demonstrates what 64 cores and 128 threads can accomplish. In single-threaded performance, the Ryzen's PassMark single-thread score of 2,465 indicates strong per-core efficiency from its 4.10 GHz boost clock, whereas the EPYC's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 9,773—while impressive for a server chip—comes from a lower 3.68 GHz boost clock.

The Ryzen 3 30 shows particular strength in data compression, scoring 135,834 in PassMark data compression, a figure that dwarfs its other results. Its integer math score of 29,846 and floating-point math score of 14,448 suggest balanced arithmetic capability, while the extended instructions score of 6,075 points to decent SIMD performance. The EPYC's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 29,076 is roughly 3.2 times higher than its R15 multi-core score of 6,978, indicating excellent scaling across generations of the Cinebench workload. The Ryzen's random string sorting score of 14,431 and data encryption score of 6,461 round out a profile that favors mixed everyday tasks.

Neither chip holds a decisive edge in every category; the Ryzen's PassMark find prime numbers score of 20 is modest, while the EPYC's Cinebench R15 single-core score of 984 shows it can hold its own in lightly threaded scenarios. The Ryzen's physics score of 436 is surprisingly low for a modern processor, suggesting its Zen 2 architecture may not excel in physics simulations. The EPYC's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 69,229 is more than 7 times its single-core score of 9,773, quantifying the massive parallelism advantage of its 64-core design.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is fundamental. The Ryzen 3 30 uses Zen 2 architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process node, with a die size of 100 mm², while the EPYC 7713P employs Zen 3 on a 7 nm TSMC node, with a multi-die configuration of 8x 81 mm² and 33,200 million transistors. The Ryzen's Mendocino codename targets mobile efficiency, evidenced by its 15 W TDP and AMD Socket FT6, whereas the EPYC's Milan codename serves server workloads with a 225 W TDP on AMD Socket SP3.

Cache hierarchies differ sharply: both chips share 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, but the Ryzen's L3 cache is just 4 MB shared, while the EPYC offers 256 MB shared L3—a 64-fold increase. Memory support diverges accordingly, with the Ryzen using dual-channel LPDDR5 providing 88.0 GB/s bandwidth, versus the EPYC's eight-channel DDR4 delivering 204.8 GB/s. The EPYC supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen does not. PCIe connectivity also favors the server chip: the EPYC provides 128 Gen 4 lanes, while the Ryzen offers only 4 Gen 3 lanes.

The Ryzen integrates Radeon 610M graphics, making it a complete mobile solution, while the EPYC has no integrated graphics, relying on discrete GPUs in server environments. The Ryzen's base clock of 2.40 GHz and boost of 4.10 GHz exceed the EPYC's 2000.00 MHz base and 3.68 GHz boost, reflecting the mobile chip's focus on single-thread responsiveness. The EPYC's release date of March 2021 predates the Ryzen's September 2025 launch by over four years, yet both remain in active production.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 3 30 wins in scenarios prioritizing single-threaded performance and energy efficiency. Its 15 W TDP makes it suitable for fanless or passively cooled mobile devices, where the EPYC's 225 W TDP would require substantial cooling infrastructure. The Ryzen's integrated Radeon 610M graphics eliminate the need for a discrete GPU in basic systems, a clear advantage for compact laptops or embedded designs. Its LPDDR5 memory support suggests lower power consumption for memory operations compared to the EPYC's DDR4, and the dual-channel bus is sufficient for its 4-core workload.

The EPYC 7713P wins decisively in multi-threaded, server-oriented workloads. Its 64 cores and 128 threads, combined with 256 MB L3 cache and eight-channel memory, make it ideal for virtualization, database processing, and high-performance computing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 69,229 is roughly 7.7 times the Ryzen's PassMark multi-thread score of 9,027, though these tests differ in methodology. The EPYC's ECC memory support is critical for reliability in data centers, and its 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes allow extensive I/O expansion for storage and networking. The Ryzen's 4 PCIe Gen 3 lanes severely limit expansion, reinforcing its mobile orientation.

The Verdict

From the data, the Ryzen 3 30 is the appropriate choice for portable, power-constrained devices where single-thread performance and integrated graphics matter more than raw core counts. Its 74th percentile ranking and average score of 20,137 show it competes well with mainstream desktop and mobile processors, including Intel Core Ultra 7 165U and Core i7-9700K, which sit within 0.7% of its score. The EPYC 7713P, with its identical 74th percentile and average score of 20,024, targets server racks where 64 cores, 128 threads, and 256 MB L3 cache translate directly into throughput for parallel workloads.

The Ryzen's release date of September 2025 makes it the newer design, but the EPYC's 2021 launch does not diminish its capability in its intended role. The Ryzen's 4.10 GHz boost clock and 2.40 GHz base clock indicate better single-thread frequency headroom, while the EPYC's 3.68 GHz boost is respectable for a 64-core part. The Ryzen's lack of ECC memory and limited PCIe lanes disqualify it from serious server duty, while the EPYC's lack of integrated graphics and high TDP make it unsuitable for mobile use. Users prioritizing multi-threaded throughput and memory bandwidth should choose the EPYC; those needing portability and efficiency should select the Ryzen.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 30 has an average benchmark score of 20,137, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD EPYC 7713P's score of 20,024.

Q: How do the core counts compare between these two CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 3 30 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the EPYC 7713P has 64 cores and 128 threads—a 16-fold difference in core count.

Q: What memory types do these processors support?

A: The Ryzen 3 30 supports LPDDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, while the EPYC 7713P supports DDR4 memory with eight-channel configuration.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 3 30 includes Radeon 610M integrated graphics, while the EPYC 7713P has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Ryzen 3 30 has a TDP of 15 W, whereas the EPYC 7713P has a TDP of 225 W—a 15-fold difference favoring the mobile chip.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The EPYC 7713P supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen 3 30 does not.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 30 | AMD EPYC 7713P |

|---|---|---|

| Series | None | EPYC 7003 series |

| Cores | 4 | 64 |

| Threads | 8 | 128 |

| Base Clock | 2.40 GHz | 2000.00 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.10 GHz | 3.68 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 225 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FT6 | AMD Socket SP3 |

| Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 3 |

| Codename | Mendocino | Milan |

| Generation | Ryzen 3 (Zen 2 Mendocino) | EPYC (Zen 3 Milan) |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |

| Transistors | Not specified | 33,200 million |

| Die Size | 100 mm² | 8x 81 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | LPDDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Eight-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 88.0 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 4 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 128 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M | None |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Release Date | September 2025 | March 2021 |

| Launch MSRP | Not specified | $5010 |

| Part Number | Unknown | 100-000000337100-000000337WOF |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |