AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Comparison

The AMD EPYC 7713 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX are both 64-core, 128-thread Zen 3 processors built on the same 7 nm TSMC process, but they target different corners of the professional market. The EPYC 7713 is a server part for Socket SP3, while the Threadripper PRO 5995WX is a workstation chip for Socket WRX8. Benchmark results show a clear and consistent performance hierarchy between them, with the Threadripper PRO 5995WX winning every single head-to-head test by the same margin.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX wins all six shared Cinebench tests, and it wins each one by a uniform 13.3% margin. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Threadripper PRO scores 81,175 against the EPYC 7713’s 70,401. That is a decisive lead of nearly 11,000 points, reflecting the Threadripper’s higher boost clock of 4.50 GHz versus the EPYC’s 3.68 GHz. The single-core R23 result tells the same story: 11,460 for the Threadripper versus 9,939 for the EPYC, again a 13.3% gap.

The pattern holds across older Cinebench versions. In R20 multi-core, the Threadripper PRO 5995WX posts 34,093, while the EPYC 7713 manages 29,568. The single-core R20 scores are 4,813 and 4,174 respectively. Even in R15, the oldest test in the set, the Threadripper leads 8,182 to 7,096 in multi-core and 1,155 to 1,001 in single-core. The consistency of the 13.3% delta across every test suggests a fundamental clock-speed advantage rather than any workload-specific behavior.

Notably, the EPYC 7713 has no wins in any head-to-head benchmark. The Threadripper PRO 5995WX also has additional Geekbench results in its benchmark set, scoring 16,598 multi-core and 1,947 single-core, though the EPYC 7713 does not have corresponding Geekbench entries for direct comparison. The average benchmark scores tell a slightly different story: the EPYC 7713 averages 20,363 across all its tests, while the Threadripper PRO 5995WX averages 19,928. This counterintuitive result is because the EPYC’s benchmark set is dominated by Cinebench workloads, whereas the Threadripper’s set includes Geekbench, which pulls its average down.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on the Zen 3 architecture, but they come from different lineups. The EPYC 7713 is part of the EPYC 7003 series with the codename Milan, while the Threadripper PRO 5995WX belongs to the 5000 series with the codename Chagall PRO. This distinction matters because the EPYC uses the AMD Socket SP3, whereas the Threadripper uses the AMD Socket WRX8. The physical platform differences dictate which motherboards and memory configurations each chip can support.

The underlying silicon is nearly identical. Both use 7 nm process technology from TSMC, both pack 33,200 million transistors, and both have a die size of 8x 81 mm². The cache hierarchy is also the same: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 256 MB of shared L3 cache. Neither chip has 3D V-Cache. The core count is identical at 64 cores and 128 threads, and both are unlocked in the sense that the multiplier is not locked, though neither is marketed as an overclocking part.

The key architectural difference lies in clock speeds and power delivery. The Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, while the EPYC 7713 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 3.68 GHz. This 0.82 GHz boost advantage is the primary reason for the Threadripper’s consistent benchmark lead. The Threadripper also has a higher TDP at 280 watts against the EPYC’s 225 watts, which allows it to sustain those higher clocks under load.

Memory and I/O are identical on paper. Both support DDR4 with an eight-channel memory bus and a memory bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. Both have PCIe Gen 4 with 128 lanes from the CPU. Both have no integrated graphics. The production status is Active for both, and both are aimed at the Server/Workstation market segment.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the benchmark data, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX wins everywhere that matters for raw compute throughput. It is faster in every Cinebench test, both multi-core and single-core, which makes it the clear choice for rendering, simulation, and other heavily threaded workloads that scale with clock speed. The 13.3% advantage in multi-core R23 translates to a significant reduction in render times for a 64-core workload. Single-core performance is also superior, which benefits applications that rely on per-thread performance, such as legacy software or lightly threaded tasks.

The AMD EPYC 7713, despite losing every head-to-head benchmark, still has a role. Its lower TDP of 225 watts versus 280 watts means it can be deployed in denser server environments where power and cooling are constrained. The Socket SP3 platform is designed for multi-socket servers, whereas the Threadripper PRO’s Socket WRX8 is typically a single-socket workstation platform. The EPYC’s release date of March 2021 also makes it a more mature platform, while the Threadripper launched a year later in March 2022.

For users building a dedicated workstation, the Threadripper PRO 5995WX is the obvious winner. It offers higher performance in every measured benchmark and has a higher boost clock, which is the key differentiator. For server administrators deploying rack-mounted systems, the EPYC 7713’s lower TDP and server-class socket may be more appropriate, even if it sacrifices performance. The data shows a complete sweep for the Threadripper, but the EPYC’s value lies in its platform and power profile rather than its raw speed.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications, even though they share the same core architecture and process node. The most significant difference is the boost clock: the Threadripper PRO 5995WX boosts to 4.50 GHz, while the EPYC 7713 maxes out at 3.68 GHz. The base clocks also differ, with the Threadripper at 2.70 GHz and the EPYC at 2.00 GHz. This clock advantage is directly responsible for the Threadripper’s 13.3% lead in all shared benchmarks.

TDP is another differentiator. The Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a TDP of 280 watts, while the EPYC 7713 is rated at 225 watts. This 55-watt difference reflects the Threadripper’s higher clock speeds and the need for additional power delivery. The socket also differs: the EPYC uses AMD Socket SP3, while the Threadripper uses AMD Socket WRX8. This is a fundamental compatibility difference, as the two sockets are not interchangeable.

The release dates are different, with the EPYC launching on March 14, 2021, and the Threadripper launching on March 7, 2022. The part numbers also differ: the EPYC is 100-000000344100-000000344WOF, while the Threadripper is 100-000000444. The generation labels differ as well, with the EPYC labeled as “EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))” and the Threadripper as “Ryzen Threadripper (Zen 3 (Chagall))”. The launch MSRP also differs, with the EPYC at $7060 and the Threadripper at $6499.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is faster in every multi-core test. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 81,175 versus the EPYC 7713’s 70,401, a 13.3% advantage. The same margin appears in R20 and R15 multi-core tests.

Q: Do the two processors have the same core and thread counts?

A: Yes, both have 64 cores and 128 threads. They also share the same cache configuration: 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 256 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the main reason for the Threadripper’s benchmark lead?

A: The Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, while the EPYC 7713 boosts to 3.68 GHz. The higher clock speed gives the Threadripper a consistent 13.3% advantage across all Cinebench tests.

Q: Are the memory and PCIe capabilities identical?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 with an eight-channel bus and 204.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Both have PCIe Gen 4 with 128 lanes from the CPU, and both support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a lower power draw?

A: The EPYC 7713 has a TDP of 225 watts, while the Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a TDP of 280 watts. The EPYC’s lower TDP makes it more suitable for power-constrained server environments.

Q: Do the two processors use the same socket?

A: No, the EPYC 7713 uses AMD Socket SP3, while the Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses AMD Socket WRX8. They are not interchangeable, and each requires a different motherboard platform.