AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD Ryzen 3 30 Comparison

The AMD EPYC 7713 and AMD Ryzen 3 30 occupy opposite extremes of the computing spectrum, yet both post surprisingly similar aggregate benchmark scores. The EPYC 7713, a 64-core server behemoth from the EPYC 7003 series, is designed for massive parallel workloads, while the Ryzen 3 30, a 4-core mobile part from the Mendocino lineup, targets efficiency and portability. Despite their divergent purposes, their average benchmark scores are nearly identical, with the EPYC 7713 at 20363 and the Ryzen 3 30 at 20137. This places both processors at the 74th percentile among all CPUs, creating a fascinating comparison where the right choice depends entirely on the workload.

Where Each One Wins

The EPYC 7713 is the undisputed champion of heavily threaded, throughput-oriented tasks. Its 64 cores and 128 threads, combined with a massive 256 MB shared L3 cache, allow it to dominate multi-core rendering workloads. The data shows this clearly in Cinebench results: the EPYC 7713 scores 7096 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 29568 in R20 multi-core, and 70401 in R23 multi-core. These are server-class numbers that reflect its ability to process dozens of concurrent threads without breaking a sweat. The EPYC 7713 also offers eight-channel DDR4 memory support with 204.8 GB/s of bandwidth, making it suitable for memory-hungry server applications. Its 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide extensive I/O connectivity for enterprise storage and networking.

The Ryzen 3 30 wins decisively in efficiency and single-thread performance. With a boost clock of 4.10 GHz compared to the EPYC's 3.68 GHz, the Ryzen 3 30 achieves a PassMark single-thread score of 2465, which is the only direct single-thread benchmark available in the data. Its 15 W TDP is a fraction of the EPYC's 225 W, making it suitable for fanless or passively cooled mobile devices. The Ryzen 3 30 also integrates Radeon 610M graphics, eliminating the need for a discrete GPU in basic systems. Its PassMark results show strength in data compression (135834) and integer math (29846), suggesting it handles everyday computing tasks with ease. The Ryzen 3 30's smaller footprint—4 cores, 8 threads, and 4 MB L3 cache—makes it ideal for lightweight, battery-powered applications.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The EPYC 7713 uses Zen 3 architecture with the Milan codename, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It comprises eight separate dies, each measuring 81 mm², totaling 33,200 million transistors. The Ryzen 3 30, in contrast, uses the older Zen 2 architecture with the Mendocino codename, but is fabricated on a more advanced 6 nm process, also at TSMC, with a single 100 mm² die. This process advantage partially compensates for the older architecture, allowing the Ryzen 3 30 to achieve higher clock speeds while consuming far less power.

Cache configurations differ dramatically. The EPYC 7713 provides 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 256 MB L3 cache—an enormous pool that reduces memory latency for server workloads. The Ryzen 3 30 has the same per-core L1 and L2 sizes but only 4 MB of shared L3 cache, which is sufficient for its four cores but pales in comparison to the EPYC's capacity. Memory support also diverges: the EPYC 7713 uses DDR4 with an eight-channel bus and 204.8 GB/s bandwidth, while the Ryzen 3 30 uses LPDDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 88.0 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported on the EPYC 7713 but not on the Ryzen 3 30, reflecting their respective server and mobile market segments.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are limited because the two CPUs were tested with different benchmark suites. The EPYC 7713 was evaluated with Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, testing both multi-core and single-core performance. The Ryzen 3 30 was evaluated with PassMark tests covering data compression, encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating-point math, integer math, multithread, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread performance. No overlapping tests exist in the data, so direct score-for-score comparisons are impossible.

However, the data allows for indirect analysis. In Cinebench R23, the EPYC 7713's multi-core score of 70401 is approximately 7.1 times its single-core score of 9939, demonstrating excellent scaling across its 64 cores. The Ryzen 3 30's PassMark multithread score of 9027 versus its single-thread score of 2465 shows a scaling factor of about 3.7, which is reasonable for a 4-core, 8-thread processor. The EPYC 7713's Cinebench R15 single-core score of 1001 and R20 single-core score of 4174 indicate strong per-core performance, though the Ryzen 3 30's 4.10 GHz boost clock likely gives it an edge in lightly threaded tasks.

The nearest rival data provides additional context. The EPYC 7713's closest competitors by average score include the AMD EPYC 9454P (20422, -0.3% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 8500G (20425, -0.3%), Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (20454, -0.4%), and Intel Core i7-9700K (20271, +0.5%). The Ryzen 3 30's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (20249, -0.6%), AMD EPYC 7713P (20024, +0.6%), Intel Core i7-9700K (20271, -0.7%), and Intel Core i7-11800H (19998, +0.7%). Both processors sit within a narrow band of performance around the 20,000 average score mark, with the EPYC 7713 slightly ahead of the Ryzen 3 30 by about 1.1% based on their respective averages.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The AMD EPYC 7713 has 64 cores and 128 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 30 has 4 cores and 8 threads. This is a 16-fold difference in core count.

Q: What are the clock speeds of each processor?

A: The EPYC 7713 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 3.68 GHz. The Ryzen 3 30 has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz, making it faster in raw clock speed.

Q: How does power consumption compare?

A: The EPYC 7713 has a TDP of 225 W, while the Ryzen 3 30 has a TDP of 15 W. The Ryzen 3 30 consumes 15 times less power.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The EPYC 7713 supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen 3 30 does not. This makes the EPYC 7713 suitable for error-sensitive server applications.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each processor?

A: The EPYC 7713 offers 204.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth with eight-channel DDR4 support. The Ryzen 3 30 offers 88.0 GB/s with dual-channel LPDDR5 support.

Q: Do either of these processors have integrated graphics?

A: The Ryzen 3 30 includes Radeon 610M integrated graphics. The EPYC 7713 has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU for display output.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every specification category. The EPYC 7713 uses 64 cores and 128 threads, while the Ryzen 3 30 uses 4 cores and 8 threads. Clock speeds differ: the EPYC 7713 runs at 2.00 GHz base and 3.68 GHz boost, while the Ryzen 3 30 runs at 2.40 GHz base and 4.10 GHz boost. TDP is drastically different at 225 W versus 15 W. The EPYC 7713 uses AMD Socket SP3, while the Ryzen 3 30 uses AMD Socket FT6. Architecture differs with Zen 3 (Milan) versus Zen 2 (Mendocino). Process nodes differ with 7 nm versus 6 nm. The EPYC 7713 has a 256 MB shared L3 cache, while the Ryzen 3 30 has a 4 MB shared L3 cache. Memory support differs with DDR4 eight-channel versus LPDDR5 dual-channel. Memory bandwidth is 204.8 GB/s versus 88.0 GB/s. ECC support is present on the EPYC 7713 but absent on the Ryzen 3 30. PCIe support differs with Gen 4, 128 lanes versus Gen 3, 4 lanes. The EPYC 7713 has no integrated graphics, while the Ryzen 3 30 has Radeon 610M. Market segments differ with Server/Workstation versus Mobile. The EPYC 7713 has a launch MSRP of $7060, while the Ryzen 3 30 has no launch MSRP listed.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear division of purpose. The EPYC 7713 is the choice for server and workstation environments where multi-threaded throughput is paramount. Its Cinebench multi-core scores—7096 in R15, 29568 in R20, and 70401 in R23—demonstrate exceptional parallel processing capability that the Ryzen 3 30 cannot approach. The EPYC 7713's 64 cores, 256 MB L3 cache, eight-channel memory, and 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes make it suitable for virtualization, database processing, scientific computing, and content rendering. Its 225 W TDP is a non-issue in a server chassis where cooling is designed for high-power components.

The Ryzen 3 30 is the choice for mobile devices and low-power applications where efficiency is critical. Its 15 W TDP enables fanless designs and extended battery life, while its 4.10 GHz boost clock provides responsive single-thread performance for everyday tasks. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics eliminate the need for a separate GPU, and its PassMark results—particularly the 135834 data compression score and 29846 integer math score—show it handles typical consumer workloads competently. The Ryzen 3 30's 6 nm process gives it a manufacturing advantage despite using the older Zen 2 architecture, and its dual-channel LPDDR5 memory support is adequate for mobile use.

Neither processor is objectively better; they serve different markets. The benchmark data shows both achieve a 74th percentile ranking among all CPUs, but that ranking obscures their specialized strengths. The EPYC 7713 excels at what servers do best—processing many threads simultaneously—while the Ryzen 3 30 excels at what mobile devices need—low power consumption with adequate performance. Users requiring massive multi-core throughput should select the EPYC 7713; users prioritizing mobility and power efficiency should select the Ryzen 3 30. The data provides no scenario where these two processors would compete for the same socket or workload.