SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

51,310 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + Intel Arc A750

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 24-core Arrow Lake processor with the company's Arc A750 graphics card, landing at the 79th percentile overall among all benchmarked combinations. The CPU is the standout component, sitting at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 66th percentile among all graphics cards. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A750's PassMark G3D score of 12534 places it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, which translates to solid 1080p and 1440p gaming performance. The GPU's pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s indicate it can feed modern displays at high refresh rates in less demanding titles. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient capacity for current game textures at 1080p and 1440p, though the 66th percentile GPU position suggests it will not sustain maximum settings at 4K.

Streaming: The Core Ultra 9 285T's PassMark data encryption score of 32061 and extended instructions score of 27477 demonstrate strong computational throughput for encoding workloads. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU can offload display tasks, while the 24 threads handle concurrent game and encoding loads. The CPU's 91st percentile position among all processors means there is ample headroom for streaming software overhead alongside gaming workloads.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33573 places it firmly in high-end desktop territory, with the nearest rival Intel Core i9-14900T scoring 51015 on average benchmark score, a mere 0.6% difference. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 provides hardware acceleration for effects and rendering tasks. The combination of 24 cores and 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 GPU compute handles 4K timeline scrubbing and export workloads effectively, though the GPU's 66th percentile position means it is not the primary driver in heavily GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3384 and R20 multicore score of 14100 show consistent scaling across benchmark generations. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 indicates competent DirectX 12 rendering performance. For CPU-based renderers, the 24 cores with 36 MB of shared L3 cache deliver strong performance; for GPU-accelerated renderers, the Arc A750's 3584 shading units and 28 ray tracing cores provide credible, if not class-leading, throughput.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 384140 and integer math score of 132433 demonstrate rapid compilation and data processing capabilities. The CPU's single-thread score of 4576 in PassMark and 4739 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate responsive build times for sequential compilation steps. The 91st percentile CPU ranking means developers working with large codebases will see quick iteration cycles, while the GPU's compute score of 5368 in PassMark GPU Compute handles shader compilation and local testing adequately.

Student and office work: The CPU's 35W TDP makes this an energy-efficient platform for sustained productivity workloads. The Arc A750's PassMark G2D score of 732 handles 2D desktop acceleration, while the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4576 ensures snappy application responsiveness. The combination of 24 threads and 8 GB VRAM is far beyond the requirements of document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing, making this system capable of years of office productivity without performance degradation.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 9 285T achieves an average benchmark score of 51310, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. This positions it 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900T (avg score 51015), 0.8% behind the Intel Core i9-13900F (avg score 51730), 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13850HX (avg score 50761), and 1.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (avg score 50718). These tight margins indicate the Core Ultra 9 285T sits in a highly competitive performance band where differences between flagship and near-flagship processors are minimal.

The Arc A750 achieves an average benchmark score of 20582, placing it at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc B570 (avg score 20556, 0.1% behind), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (avg score 20534, 0.2% behind), AMD Radeon R9 M390X (avg score 20662, 0.4% ahead), and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (avg score 20480, 0.5% behind). The GPU's competitive position against these varied architectures shows it delivers consistent performance across different benchmark methodologies.

The combined percentile of 79 places this pairing in the upper quintile of all CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU's 91st percentile significantly outpaces the GPU's 66th percentile, creating a processor-heavy balance where the Arc A750 is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's multicore scores show particular strength: Cinebench R23 multicore at 33573, PassMark multithread at 39931, and floating point math at 137923 all indicate exceptional parallel processing capability. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 and PassMark G3D score of 12534 demonstrate competent but not exceptional graphics performance relative to the CPU's standing.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This bandwidth figure is substantial for the GPU's class and supports high-resolution texture streaming. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The GPU's base clock of 2050 MHz and boost clock of 2400 MHz provide the operating frequency envelope, with the boost clock representing the maximum sustained frequency under load.

The GPU contains 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. The pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s indicate balanced rasterization and texturing throughput. The 28 ray tracing cores provide DirectX 12 Ultimate support with hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 66th percentile GPU position suggests ray tracing performance will be moderate rather than transformative. The FP32 compute of 17.20 TFLOPS and FP16 of 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) provide the arithmetic throughput for compute workloads.

Benchmark results show the GPU's DirectX 12 performance at a PassMark score of 70, DirectX 11 at 72, and DirectX 10 at 65. The DirectX 9 score of 181 is notably higher, reflecting the architecture's strength in legacy API workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 demonstrate strong cross-platform compute performance. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 5368 indicates the GPU handles general-purpose compute tasks competently but not exceptionally. For rendering workloads, the combination of 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth supports 1080p and 1440p content creation, while the 28 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supporting applications. The GPU's 6nm TSMC process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die provides the physical foundation for these capabilities.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 9 285T compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900T?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285T has an average benchmark score of 51310, which is 0.6% higher than the Core i9-14900T's 51015. This places the two processors in essentially the same performance tier, with the Core Ultra 9 285T holding a marginal edge in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory operates at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 9 285T supports ECC memory. It uses dual-channel DDR5 memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's power consumption and socket type?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285T has a TDP of 35W and uses the Intel Socket 1851. This low TDP makes it suitable for compact desktop builds despite its 24-core configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Arc A750 has 28 dedicated ray tracing cores based on the Xe-HPG architecture. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing features.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582, which is 0.1% higher than the Arc B570's 20556. This makes them statistically equivalent in aggregate performance, despite being different generations of Intel graphics architecture.

Q: What is the CPU's integrated graphics capability?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285T includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. This provides basic display output and light graphics acceleration without requiring the discrete Arc A750.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-heavy balance in this pairing. The Core Ultra 9 285T sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A750 sits at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. This 25-percentile gap indicates the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads such as gaming at high resolutions and GPU-accelerated rendering. The CPU's average benchmark score of 51310 versus the GPU's 20582 reinforces this disparity, with the CPU delivering nearly 2.5 times the aggregate benchmark performance of the GPU.

In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data compression, and multi-threaded productivity tasks, the Core Ultra 9 285T's 24 cores and 24 threads provide exceptional throughput. The PassMark multithread score of 39931 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33573 demonstrate the CPU can handle heavily parallel workloads without breaking a sweat. However, in GPU-bound scenarios like gaming at 1440p and 4K, the Arc A750's 66th percentile position means frame rates will be constrained by the graphics card, not the processor.

The estimated FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that at 1080p, the GPU will be the primary constraint in modern titles, with the CPU's high single-thread score of 4576 in PassMark ensuring it can feed the GPU adequately. At 1440p and above, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factors, with the CPU idling well below its maximum capacity. For mixed workloads such as streaming while gaming, the CPU's 24 threads provide ample headroom, but the GPU's compute score of 5368 in PassMark GPU Compute may limit encoding acceleration in some applications. The overall balance favors CPU-heavy workloads, with the GPU acting as a capable but not class-leading graphics solution.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize processor performance while maintaining competent graphics capability. Gamers playing at 1080p will find the Arc A750's 66th percentile GPU position adequate for most titles, with the CPU's 91st percentile ensuring no processor-related frame drops. Gamers at 1440p can expect playable frame rates in most games, though the GPU's 8 GB VRAM may require texture quality reductions in the latest titles. 4K gaming is possible but will require significant settings compromises given the GPU's mid-pack position.

Content creators working with CPU-intensive workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering in CPU-based engines, and large data processing will benefit from the Core Ultra 9 285T's 24 cores and 35W TDP. The PassMark data compression score of 384140 and floating point math score of 137923 indicate rapid processing of large datasets and complex calculations. The GPU's OpenCL score of 98554 provides supplementary acceleration for GPU-compute tasks, though it will not match the CPU's relative performance level.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's integer math score of 132433 and random string sorting score of 47695, which indicate fast data manipulation and sorting operations. The 91st percentile CPU ranking ensures quick build times, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 85631 supports graphics development work. Students and small business users running productivity suites, web applications, and light creative tools will find this system vastly overprovisioned, making it a long-lasting investment. The 35W CPU TDP also makes this an attractive option for compact desktop workstations where thermal management is a concern.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is a 24-core, 24-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture with a 3nm TSMC process. The base clock of 1.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz represent a wide frequency range, allowing the chip to idle efficiently while scaling to high performance when needed. The 35W TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core desktop processor, made possible by the efficient 3nm process node. The CPU contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark performance shows the CPU's strength in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4739 and PassMark single-thread score of 4576 indicate excellent per-core performance, while the R23 multicore score of 33573 and PassMark multithread score of 39931 demonstrate outstanding parallel scaling. The PassMark data encryption score of 32061 and extended instructions score of 27477 show robust cryptographic and SIMD throughput, while the find prime numbers score of 345 and physics score of 2842 indicate specialized workload performance.

The CPU's nearest rival comparisons show it trading blows with other high-end desktop and mobile processors. The 0.6% advantage over the Core i9-14900T and 1.1% advantage over the Core i7-13850HX demonstrate the Core Ultra 9 285T holds its own against Intel's previous generation flagships. The 0.8% deficit to the Core i9-13900F and 1.2% advantage over the Ryzen 9 5900XT place it in a tight competitive band where small benchmark variations determine the leader. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s over dual-channel DDR5 provides adequate data throughput for the 24 cores, while ECC memory support makes this suitable for error-sensitive workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285T uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest storage and expansion cards. The Arc A750 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slot and provides ample bandwidth for the GPU's 8 GB memory. The platform's memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is a potential upgrade point, as faster DDR5 modules could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads.

The Arc A750 has a TDP of 225W and requires a 550W suggested PSU, with power delivered through 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin connectors. The CPU's 35W TDP leaves substantial power headroom for future upgrades, as the combined CPU and GPU power draw of 260W is well within the 550W suggested PSU rating. This means users could upgrade to a more powerful GPU without necessarily upgrading the power supply, provided the new GPU's power requirements remain within the PSU's capacity.

The GPU's production status is end-of-life, with the successor being Battlemage. This means the Arc A750 is no longer in active production, though it remains a viable option for new builds. The CPU's production status is active, with a launch date of January 6, 2025 and a launch MSRP of $549. The GPU's launch MSRP is 289 USD. A sensible next upgrade would be the GPU, given the CPU's 91st percentile position versus the GPU's 66th percentile, as this would better balance the system's performance profile. The CPU's 24 threads and 36 MB L3 cache provide longevity for future workloads, making it a solid foundation for incremental upgrades over several years.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T with the Intel Arc A750, creating a system that prioritizes processor performance while maintaining competent graphics capability. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking among all processors makes it a top-tier choice for compute-intensive workloads, while the GPU's 66th percentile position provides solid mid-range graphics performance. The combined 79th percentile ranking places this system in the upper quintile of all CPU-GPU pairings benchmarked, though the significant gap between CPU and GPU performance creates an unbalanced profile.

The Core Ultra 9 285T's 24 cores, 35W TDP, and 5.40 GHz boost clock make it a versatile processor for both productivity and gaming. The Arc A750's 8 GB GDDR6 memory, 28 ray tracing cores, and 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide capable 1080p and 1440p gaming, plus hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The system excels in CPU-bound workloads such as software development, video encoding, and 3D rendering in CPU-based engines, while GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering will be constrained by the Arc A750's mid-pack position. This pairing represents a sensible choice for users who need exceptional processor performance and are willing to accept good-but-not-great graphics performance, with the option to upgrade the GPU later to better match the CPU's capabilities.