SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

51,310 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER combination presents a striking imbalance in raw benchmark performance, but the bottleneck direction depends entirely on the workload. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51,310, placing it firmly in high-end desktop territory. The GPU, by contrast, ranks in only the 18th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2,690 from the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This 91st versus 18th percentile gap suggests the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-bound tasks, while the CPU will dominate compute-heavy workloads.

In gaming scenarios, the bottleneck will almost always be the GPU. The RTX 5070 SUPER's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,690 is within 1.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 (score 2,645), a result that places it near the bottom of the GPU percentile distribution. Even with the CPU's strong single-threaded Passmark score of 4,576 and multicore score of 39,931, the graphics card's modest raw output will cap frame rates well before the processor reaches its limits. The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for game logic, physics, and streaming overhead, but the GPU's pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s will determine the actual rendering ceiling.

For productivity and compute workloads, the bottleneck flips decisively to the CPU—or rather, the CPU becomes the strength. The Ultra 9 285T delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33,573 and a single-core score of 4,739, which are strong numbers for a 35W TDP part. The Passmark multithread score of 39,931 and floating-point math score of 137,923 indicate that the CPU can sustain heavy computational loads without becoming the constraint. In these scenarios, the GPU's lower percentile ranking matters less because the workload relies on the processor's arithmetic throughput rather than rasterization.

The combined percentile of 55 for this pairing reflects the wide spread between the two components. The CPU's performance is roughly comparable to the Intel Core i9-14900T (average score 51,015, delta 0.6% in favor of the Ultra 9) and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (average score 50,718, delta 1.2% in favor of the Ultra 9). The GPU, however, sits in a completely different performance tier, with rivals like the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (score 2,664, delta 1%) and Intel Arc Pro B50 (score 2,660, delta 1.1%) clustering tightly around its score. This means that in any workload where the GPU is the primary execution unit, the system will perform like a low-end graphics platform despite having a top-tier processor.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5070 SUPER's benchmark results do not support high-refresh gaming at competitive settings. With a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,690 and a percentile rank of 18, the GPU aligns with entry-level graphics hardware. The CPU's single-thread Passmark score of 4,576 ensures the processor will not hold back frame pacing, but the GPU's 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are insufficient for sustaining high frame rates at 1440p or 4K with modern titles. Users targeting 1080p medium settings may achieve playable results, but high-refresh monitors will remain underutilized.

Streaming: The Ultra 9 285T's 24 cores and 24 threads provide substantial headroom for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcast overhead. The Passmark data compression score of 384,140 and integer math score of 132,433 indicate strong throughput for encoding workloads. However, the GPU's limited rendering performance means the stream will be constrained by the graphics card's ability to produce frames in the first place. The CPU can handle the encoding load, but the overall stream quality will suffer from the GPU bottleneck.

Video editing: This workload favors the CPU's multicore strength. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33,573 and Passmark multithread score of 39,931 provide solid performance for timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export tasks. The GPU's 18 GB of GDDR7 memory and 192-bit bus offer enough capacity for 4K video previews, but the low pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s will slow GPU-accelerated effects and color grading. Editors working mainly with CPU-based codecs will see good results; those relying heavily on GPU acceleration will notice the constraint.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here. With a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3,384, R20 multicore of 14,100, and R23 multicore of 33,573, the Ultra 9 285T delivers strong performance for CPU-based rendering engines. The Passmark floating-point math score of 137,923 reinforces this capability. The GPU's 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores exist, but its low benchmark percentile means GPU-accelerated renderers like those using OptiX will perform at entry-level levels. For production rendering, this system is a CPU-first workstation with a token GPU.

Software development: Compilation and code analysis benefit from the CPU's 24 threads and high cache structure. The L3 cache of 36 MB shared across cores, combined with a Passmark single-thread score of 4,576, supports fast incremental builds and responsive IDEs. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, making this pairing acceptable for developers who occasionally need modest graphics capability. The data encryption score of 32,061 and extended instructions score of 27,477 indicate solid cryptographic and SIMD performance for security-focused development.

Student and office work: For document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing, this system is massively overprovisioned on the CPU side. The 91st percentile CPU ranking ensures zero lag in office applications, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output. The discrete GPU's low performance is irrelevant for these tasks. Students and office workers will experience excellent responsiveness, though the system's power allocation of 35W TDP for the CPU and 275W for the GPU is excessive for typical office workloads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is the current LGA 1851 socket for Arrow Lake desktop processors. Memory support is DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and ECC memory capability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. This platform is current-generation and offers a clear path for future upgrades within the same socket generation.

The most obvious upgrade path is the GPU. The RTX 5070 SUPER's 18th percentile ranking is the system's primary weakness, and replacing it with a higher-performing graphics card would dramatically improve gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The PCIe 5.0 x16 slot and 275W GPU TDP with a 1x 16-pin power connector mean the platform can accommodate a wide range of modern graphics cards. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide ample bandwidth for both the GPU and a Gen 5 NVMe SSD.

The CPU itself is near the top of its lineup. The Ultra 9 285T is the flagship Ultra 9 in the Arrow Lake-S family, so there is no higher-performing CPU on this socket to upgrade to. Users who need more compute performance would need to consider a different platform entirely. However, the 35W TDP provides excellent power efficiency, meaning the existing cooling and power delivery are unlikely to be stressed.

The PSU headroom is dictated by the 275W GPU TDP combined with the 35W CPU TDP. The total system power draw is modest by high-end desktop standards, so most quality power supplies with a single 16-pin connector will suffice. The absence of a suggested PSU in the data means no specific wattage recommendation is available, but the low CPU TDP gives builders flexibility in power supply selection. The dual-slot GPU design and 245mm length fit comfortably in most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a higher-performing GPU from the same generation, keeping the CPU and platform intact. The CPU's 91st percentile performance will not bottleneck any modern graphics card, so users can upgrade the GPU without worrying about CPU-induced limitations. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory or a Gen 5 NVMe drive would improve storage and memory-bound workloads, though the dual-channel memory bus already provides 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p medium settings: The RTX 5070 SUPER's benchmark scores suggest playable performance at 1080p with medium quality presets in most titles. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures no CPU-side frame drops, but the GPU's 18th percentile limits resolution and quality headroom. Gamers who prioritize CPU-heavy simulation or strategy titles over GPU-intensive shooters may find this acceptable.

Content creators working in CPU-bound applications: The Ultra 9 285T's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33,573 and Passmark multithread score of 39,931 make this an excellent platform for video encoding, 3D rendering in CPU-based engines, and batch photo processing. The GPU's limitations matter less in these workflows, though GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than on systems with higher-performing graphics cards.

Software developers and data scientists: The 24-core, 24-thread CPU with 36 MB of L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth handles compilation, unit testing, and data processing efficiently. The Passmark data compression score of 384,140 and encryption score of 32,061 support database workloads and secure communication tasks. The GPU's modest performance is adequate for basic visualization but not for deep learning training.

Students in STEM fields: The combination of strong CPU performance and low power draw (35W TDP) makes this an efficient workstation for engineering simulations, mathematical computing, and programming coursework. The integrated graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU fails, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations.

Small business workstations: For office productivity, accounting software, and database management, the CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures responsiveness across all applications. The GPU's low performance is irrelevant for these tasks, and the system's dual-slot, 245mm GPU footprint fits standard business cases. The 35W CPU TDP also helps keep electricity costs and cooling requirements modest.

Not recommended for: Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K high-refresh experiences, GPU-accelerated renderers, or AI researchers training large models. The GPU's 18th percentile ranking will be the primary frustration point in these scenarios, and the 18 GB VRAM, while substantial, cannot compensate for the low raw compute throughput.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB205 chip, manufactured on a 5nm process at TSMC with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The GPU features 6,400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. Clock speeds are 2,325 MHz base and 2,512 MHz boost, producing a pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute throughput is 32.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1).

Memory configuration includes 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1,750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. This capacity is generous for the performance class, but the 192-bit bus width limits bandwidth compared to wider-memory GPUs. The 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores provide ray tracing and AI acceleration hardware, though their effectiveness is constrained by the overall low compute throughput.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,690 places the GPU in the 18th percentile among all GPUs. This score is only 1% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (score 2,664) and 1.1% higher than both the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (score 2,662) and Intel Arc Pro B50 (score 2,660). These rivals are all entry-level or legacy products, indicating that the RTX 5070 SUPER's raw rasterization performance is comparable to low-end hardware despite its modern feature set.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's RT cores and tensor cores exist but deliver performance consistent with the low benchmark percentile. The 50 RT cores will handle ray-traced effects in games and DXR-based renderers, but the 201.0 GPixel/s pixel rate limits overall output. The 18 GB VRAM is sufficient for large textures and complex scenes, but the 672.0 GB/s bandwidth may become a constraint in memory-intensive workloads. The dual-slot, 245mm length design with a 1x 16-pin power connector makes installation straightforward, and the 275W TDP is moderate for a modern GPU.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, so all frame rate figures in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning these are analytical projections rather than empirical results.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,690 and its 18th percentile ranking, estimated gaming performance would be modest. The CPU's single-thread Passmark score of 4,576 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,739 indicate the processor can feed frames efficiently, but the GPU's 201.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will cap frame rates. At 1080p resolution, players might expect playable frame rates (above 30 FPS) in less demanding titles at medium settings, but competitive first-person shooters at high refresh rates would be challenging.

At 1440p, the GPU's 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 18 GB VRAM provide enough capacity for high-resolution textures, but the low pixel rate will likely result in sub-60 FPS performance in modern AAA titles. At 4K, the system would struggle to maintain 30 FPS in most games. The GPU's nearest rivals—the GeForce GT 1030 and GT 440—are historically associated with 720p to 1080p gaming at low to medium settings, and the RTX 5070 SUPER's similar benchmark score suggests comparable expectations.

The CPU's 91st percentile ranking means that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as large-scale strategy games or simulation titles with many entities, the Ultra 9 285T will provide smooth frame pacing. The 24 cores and 24 threads can handle complex game logic without bottlenecking. However, in GPU-bound scenarios—which describe the majority of modern game rendering—the RTX 5070 SUPER will be the limiting factor. Users should expect the gaming experience to resemble that of a low-end graphics card paired with a high-end processor.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T paint a picture of strong all-around performance. In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 3,384 in multicore and 477 in single-core. Cinebench R20 scores are 14,100 multicore and 1,990 single-core. Cinebench R23 delivers 33,573 multicore and 4,739 single-core. These numbers show consistent scaling across Cinebench versions, with the multicore-to-single-core ratio indicating efficient multi-threading across the 24 cores.

Passmark results provide additional context. The multithread score is 39,931, single-thread is 4,576, integer math is 132,433, floating-point math is 137,923, data compression is 384,140, data encryption is 32,061, extended instructions is 27,477, find prime numbers is 345, physics is 2,842, and random string sorting is 47,695. The average benchmark score across all tests is 51,310, placing the CPU in the 91st percentile among all CPUs.

The CPU's nearest rivals show tight competition. The Intel Core i9-14900T has an average score of 51,015, which is 0.6% lower than the Ultra 9 285T. The Intel Core i9-13900F scores 51,730, which is 0.8% higher. The Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50,761 (1.1% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50,718 (1.2% lower). This places the Ultra 9 285T in a competitive cluster where no single CPU dominates by a significant margin.

The GPU benchmark consists of a single test: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 2,690. This score places the GPU in the 18th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (score 2,664, 1% lower), NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (score 2,662, 1.1% lower), Intel Arc Pro B50 (score 2,660, 1.1% lower), and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 (score 2,645, 1.7% lower). The tight clustering of these scores indicates that the RTX 5070 SUPER performs at the level of entry-level graphics hardware from previous generations.

The combined picture is a system with a top-decile CPU and a bottom-quintile GPU. The combined percentile of 55 reflects this split. The CPU can handle demanding computational workloads with performance comparable to or better than recent high-end Intel and AMD processors, while the GPU delivers entry-level graphics performance. This asymmetry defines the system's character: it is a powerful workstation CPU paired with a token graphics solution.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multicore performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T scores 33,573 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which places it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 SUPER compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2,690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 1% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2,664), 1.1% higher than the GeForce GT 1030 (2,662), and 1.7% higher than the GeForce GT 440 (2,645).

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the GPU use?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T supports ECC memory and uses dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and socket type?

A: The CPU has a 35W TDP and uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is compatible with the Arrow Lake-S platform.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T with the RTX 5070 SUPER. All frame rate expectations are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's thermal design power and physical size?

A: The GPU has a 275W TDP, uses a dual-slot design, measures 245mm in length, 115mm in height, and 40mm in width, and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-S codename. It is manufactured on a 3nm process at TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 1.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and the TDP is 35W—an exceptionally low power draw for a 24-core part. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is not supported.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This structure supports the 24 threads with substantial per-core capacity and a large shared pool for multi-threaded workloads. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with ECC capability, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, enabling fast NVMe storage and GPU connectivity. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

Benchmark results show strong single-thread and multicore performance. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,739 and Passmark single-thread score of 4,576 indicate excellent per-core efficiency, which is notable given the 35W TDP. The multicore results—Cinebench R23 multicore of 33,573 and Passmark multithread of 39,931—demonstrate that the 24 cores scale well under load. The Passmark floating-point math score of 137,923 and integer math score of 132,433 show balanced arithmetic capability across both numeric domains.

The CPU's 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs places it above the Intel Core i9-14900T (average score 51,015, 0.6% lower), the Intel Core i7-13850HX (50,761, 1.1% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (50,718, 1.2% lower), while trailing the Intel Core i9-13900F (51,730, 0.8% higher). These margins are small, indicating that the Ultra 9 285T performs at the same level as recent high-end desktop and mobile processors despite its low power envelope.

For real workloads, the CPU excels in multi-threaded productivity applications. The data compression score of 384,140 supports fast file archiving and database operations. The encryption score of 32,061 enables secure communication without significant performance degradation. The extended instructions score of 27,477 indicates solid SIMD throughput for scientific and engineering applications. The physics score of 2,842 is lower than the other Passmark categories, suggesting that the CPU's floating-point-heavy physics simulations are less optimized than other workloads.

The launch MSRP is $549, and the processor was released on 2025-01-06. The production status is active, and the part number is SRQD3. The 35W TDP makes this an energy-efficient choice for always-on workstations, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for data-critical environments. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a functional display output even without the discrete GPU, offering a fallback for troubleshooting or basic office use.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds