SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

83,807 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and Intel Arc A770 form a desktop pairing that targets different extremes of the performance spectrum. The CPU sits at the 96th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 90th percentile among all graphics cards, and the combined configuration ranks at the 93rd percentile. This is a system where the processor is clearly the dominant component, and the Arc A770, while capable, is the limiting factor in graphics-bound scenarios. The data for this specific combination includes no measured FPS rows, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed results.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A770’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 places it near the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, which scores 69000 on the average benchmark and is only 0.3% ahead. This level of GPU performance supports 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, but 4K high-refresh is not realistic. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2377 and Geekbench single-core score of 2870 indicate strong per-thread performance, which is essential for maintaining high frame rates, but the GPU will cap maximum FPS in most modern titles.

Streaming and content creation: The Ultra 9 285K excels here. Its Passmark multithread score of 67260 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42522 provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle video previews and effects, though the Arc A770’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means 3D rendering tasks will take longer than with higher-tier GPUs. The CPU’s data compression score of 790052 and encryption score of 57745 support fast file handling during exports.

Video editing: The combination of 24 cores and 24 threads on the CPU, along with a 36 MB shared L3 cache, processes timeline scrubbing and effect application smoothly. The GPU’s 4096 shading units and 256 texture mapping units assist with GPU-accelerated effects, but the 128 raster output pipelines limit pixel-heavy operations. For 4K video editing, the CPU will handle most of the heavy lifting, while the GPU accelerates previews and final renders. The system’s dual-channel DDR5 memory with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for multi-track timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 24003 and R15 multicore score of 6494 indicate strong ray-tracing CPU performance in software renderers. The GPU’s 32 ray tracing cores and 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 throughput provide hardware acceleration in supported engines, but the Arc A770’s 90th percentile position means it will trail dedicated workstation GPUs. For single-frame renders, the CPU is the primary engine; for interactive viewports, the GPU takes over.

Software development: The Ultra 9 285K’s Passmark integer math score of 172379 and extended instructions score of 62277 speed up code compilation and unit testing. The 3 nm process node and 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die indicate efficient execution. The GPU’s Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support handle graphics debugging, while the CPU’s 5.70 GHz boost clock reduces single-threaded build bottlenecks. The 16 GB VRAM allows large asset caches for game development.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for basic tasks, but the data shows why it would be responsive. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 5087 and Geekbench single-core score of 2870 ensure instant application launches. The GPU’s 16 GB memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth handle multiple 4K displays via the 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. Office suites will run smoothly, and the CPU’s 125 W TDP is manageable for a desktop environment.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 9 285K compare to its closest rival, the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus?

A: The 285K has an average benchmark score of 83807, which is 0.2% lower than the 290K Plus’s 84003. This places the 285K effectively at parity with its immediate successor, with a negligible performance difference in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the Arc A770’s position relative to NVIDIA and AMD workstation cards?

A: The Arc A770’s average benchmark score of 68809 is 1.5% below the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (69870) and 1.7% below the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (69986). It sits 0.4% above the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (68562) and 0.3% below the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (69000).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory, and what memory type is required?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K supports ECC memory. It uses DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a total bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This is relevant for workstation builds where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined configuration ranks at the 93rd percentile among all systems. This reflects the high CPU percentile (96th) and the somewhat lower GPU percentile (90th), resulting in an overall strong but not top-tier system.

Q: Is the Arc A770 still in production?

A: No, the Arc A770 is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of 2022-10-11. Its successor is Battlemage, though no performance data for that product is available in this data set.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K had a launch MSRP of $589, and the Intel Arc A770 had a launch MSRP of 329 USD. These figures represent the initial pricing at release.

Q: How does the CPU’s single-core performance compare to its multi-core performance?

A: The CPU’s Geekbench single-core score is 2870, while its multi-core score is 26702, a ratio of roughly 9.3x. This indicates strong scaling across its 24 cores, with each core still capable of competitive single-threaded tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 uses the DG2-512 chip on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective. The GPU has 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output pipelines, producing a pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s.

The compute capabilities are defined by 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the absence of dedicated tensor cores means AI-accelerated workloads rely on the FP16 path. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969, Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284 collectively place it at the 90th percentile among all GPUs.

For rendering, the Arc A770’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is well-suited for large textures and high-resolution assets in 3D applications. The 16 GB VRAM allows scenes that exceed 8 GB, which is common in modern content creation. However, the 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest compared to higher-tier GPUs, meaning unbiased rendering will be slower. The ray tracing cores support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible games and renderers, but the overall RT performance is mid-range.

The GPU’s 225 W TDP and suggested 550 W PSU indicate a power-hungry card, though the dual-slot design with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin connectors is standard for this class. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the 16 GB frame buffer, and the display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0) support modern high-refresh monitors. The GPU’s end-of-life status suggests it is a legacy product, but the benchmark scores show it remains competitive with older workstation cards like the Quadro P6000.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates the CPU is the stronger component. The Ultra 9 285K sits at the 96th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A770 sits at the 90th percentile among all GPUs. This 6-percentile gap means the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the CPU’s high single-core scores (Cinebench R23 single-core 2377, Geekbench single-core 2870) can drive high frame rates, but the GPU’s 3DMark score of 2969 caps the actual output. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 68809 is 0.3% below the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, which is a mining card, not a gaming product, further indicating the Arc A770’s gaming position.

In CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, software compilation, or physics simulations, the CPU takes the lead. The Passmark physics score of 3938 and floating point math score of 224324 show strong computational throughput. The GPU’s role in these tasks is secondary, handling graphics output or acceleration in specific APIs. The 16 GB VRAM prevents memory-related bottlenecks, but the GPU’s compute throughput (19.66 TFLOPS FP32) is insufficient to match the CPU’s processing power in multi-threaded workloads.

The FPS scaling is estimated, not measured, but based on benchmark scores, the CPU would not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p in most titles until the GPU’s limits are reached. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, with the CPU having significant headroom. The system’s overall balance favors CPU-heavy tasks, making it a better fit for content creators and developers than for pure gamers seeking maximum frame rates.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 and its position at the 90th percentile suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, with 1440p requiring some settings adjustments for demanding games. The CPU’s high single-core performance supports high refresh rates at 1080p, but the GPU will likely cap FPS around 60-100 in modern AAA games at ultra settings, depending on the title.

For esports titles, the CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 5087 and the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth should allow frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p, as these games are typically CPU-light. At 1440p, the Arc A770’s 4096 shading units will still deliver playable frame rates, but ultra settings may push the GPU to its limits. At 4K, the 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for textures, but the 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will result in frame rates below 60 FPS in many titles, making 4K gaming only viable with reduced settings or upscaling.

The lack of measured FPS data means these are qualitative expectations. The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, is a mining card with no gaming optimization, so the Arc A770’s driver maturity and game-specific optimizations will influence actual performance. The CPU’s massive multi-core advantage (Cinebench R23 multicore 42522) means any frame drops will be GPU-related, not CPU-related.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. The 96th percentile CPU with 24 cores and 24 threads is ideal for software developers who compile large codebases, as the Passmark integer math score of 172379 accelerates build times. Video editors working with 4K or 8K footage will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 24003, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM handles large preview buffers. 3D artists using CPU-based renderers will see excellent performance, though GPU-accelerated renders will be slower.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p who play less demanding titles will find this system capable, but those seeking 4K high-refresh gaming should look elsewhere. Students and office workers will experience extreme responsiveness, though the system is overprovisioned for these tasks. Small business workstations handling data analysis or scientific computing will leverage the CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 67260 and ECC memory support for reliability.

The Arc A770’s end-of-life status means it is not a future-proof choice, but for users who already own it or find it at a reduced price, the CPU provides a strong foundation. Content creators who use the GPU for video encoding via its dedicated media engines will find the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K streaming and recording.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture (codename Arrow Lake-S). It is manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 3.70 GHz, boosting to 5.70 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability and a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

Benchmark results show the CPU’s strengths. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42522 and R20 multicore score of 24003 indicate excellent multi-threaded performance, placing it at the 96th percentile. The Geekbench multi-core score of 26702 reinforces this. Single-core performance is strong but not class-leading: Cinebench R23 single-core 2377, Cinebench R20 single-core 3388, and Geekbench single-core 2870. The Passmark suite shows a balanced profile: multithread 67260, integer math 172379, floating point math 224324, extended instructions 62277, and data encryption 57745. The data compression score of 790052 is notably high, benefiting file archiving and compression workloads.

The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus (0.2% faster average), AMD EPYC 4584PX (0.9% slower), and AMD EPYC 9135 (1% slower). These are all server or high-end desktop parts, indicating the 285K competes at the top of the desktop segment. The 125 W TDP is modest for this core count, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking for users who want to push beyond stock clocks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, a flagship Arrow Lake processor, with the Intel Arc A770, an end-of-life Alchemist-generation GPU. The CPU is the defining component, holding the 96th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 90th percentile among all GPUs. Together, the configuration ranks at the 93rd percentile overall, placing it in the top tier of desktop systems but not at the absolute peak.

The pairing is unconventional: a top-tier CPU with a mid-to-high-tier GPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 83807 dwarfs the GPU’s 68809, creating a system that excels in CPU-bound workloads. The build class is desktop, with the CPU using the Intel Socket 1851 and the GPU using PCIe 4.0 x16. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, while the GPU’s is 225 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. This is a capable workstation-class system for professionals, but gamers may find the GPU limiting at higher resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 83807, placing it at the 96th percentile. Its nearest rival, the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus, scores 84003, a 0.2% advantage. The AMD EPYC 4584PX is 0.9% slower at 83090, and the AMD EPYC 9135 is 1% slower at 82980. The AMD EPYC 7F72 is 1.5% faster at 85072. The CPU’s key scores include Cinebench R23 multicore 42522, Geekbench multi-core 26702, and Passmark multithread 67260.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 68809, placing it at the 90th percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, scores 69000, a 0.3% advantage. The AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 is 0.4% slower at 68562, the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 is 1.5% faster at 69870, and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 is 1.7% faster at 69986. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 2969, Geekbench OpenCL 109175, and Geekbench Vulkan 94284.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU provides 96th-percentile performance and the GPU provides 90th-percentile performance. The 6-percentile gap means the GPU is the bottleneck in graphics-heavy tasks, but the CPU ensures no computational limits in non-graphics workloads. The combined percentile of 93 reflects the system’s overall strong position.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses the Intel Socket 1851, which supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with ECC capability. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the platform is current, with room for future upgrades. The CPU’s TDP of 125 W and the GPU’s TDP of 225 W suggest a suggested PSU of 550 W, which provides headroom for additional drives or peripherals.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the Arc A770 is end-of-life and the 90th percentile is the limiting factor. The CPU’s 96th-percentile performance means it will not bottleneck a higher-tier GPU. The 16 GB VRAM on the current GPU is sufficient, but a successor with higher compute throughput would improve gaming and rendering performance. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support allows future GPUs to run at full bandwidth, and the DDR5 memory support is current.

The CPU’s unlocked multiplier and 125 W TDP allow overclocking to extend its lifespan, though the benchmark scores already show it near the top of its class. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is sufficient for the CPU’s 24 cores, but users with memory-intensive workloads could consider higher-speed DDR5 kits, though the data does not specify supported speeds. The platform’s ECC support is valuable for workstation reliability, and the 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes can accommodate NVMe storage or other expansion cards.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds