SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

83,807 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER pairing is a desktop-class combination that, based on aggregate benchmark data, sits at the 58th percentile across all builds. The CPU is the dominant component, ranking in the 96th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU’s benchmark score places it in the 19th percentile among all GPUs, creating a significant performance imbalance. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the individual benchmark scores, not from direct testing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between these two components is stark and defines the system's character. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 83807 places it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, indicating top-tier processing capability. In contrast, the GPU’s average benchmark score of 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 places it in the 19th percentile of all GPUs, a surprisingly low standing that suggests the graphics card is the primary constraint in most workloads. This disparity means the Core Ultra 9 285K will frequently be waiting on the RTX 5080 SUPER to deliver frames, rather than the reverse.

Benchmark results indicate the CPU’s multi-threaded might is its defining trait. With a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42522 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 26702, the processor has substantial headroom for parallel tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 67260 reinforces this, showing that the CPU can handle heavy compute loads without breaking a sweat. The GPU’s single benchmark score, however, does not provide comparable multi-threaded or single-threaded breakdowns, leaving its scaling behavior less documented, but the low percentile position is the key indicator.

For gaming, the bottleneck will almost certainly be the GPU. The CPU’s single-thread performance is strong, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2377 and a Passmark single-thread score of 5087, which are sufficient to feed most graphics cards. However, the RTX 5080 SUPER’s 19th percentile ranking suggests it will struggle to keep up with the CPU’s frame generation demands, particularly at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is more pronounced. The data suggests that this pairing is CPU-heavy, and users will see the GPU as the limiting factor in graphics-intensive scenarios.

In productivity applications, the balance shifts. The CPU’s 96th percentile rank means it will dominate tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the GPU’s role is secondary or acceleration-based. The GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth are substantial, but its low benchmark percentile hints at architectural or driver-level limitations that could hamper compute workloads. The combined percentile of 58 reflects this overall imbalance—the system is neither perfectly balanced nor egregiously mismatched, but it leans heavily on the CPU for its performance identity.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K delivers exceptional raw numbers. In Cinebench R23, it scores 42522 multi-core and 2377 single-core, with the multi-core figure positioning it 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and 1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9135. The single-core score of 2377 is competitive, though the FACT PACK does not list rival single-core scores for direct comparison. The Geekbench results are equally strong: 26702 multi-core and 2870 single-core, confirming the CPU’s broad applicability across different benchmark methodologies.

The GPU’s benchmark presence is minimal, with only a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075. This score places it 2.8% behind the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and 3.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 820A. The nearest rivals are a mix of professional and older mobile parts, which is an unusual peer group for a GeForce 50-series card. This suggests the RTX 5080 SUPER’s benchmark score may not fully represent its real-world capabilities, or that the 3DMark test is particularly punishing for this architecture. The GPU’s 19th percentile rank is a red flag, but without more benchmark data points, it is difficult to determine if this is an anomaly or a systemic issue.

The combined picture is one of CPU dominance. The Core Ultra 9 285K’s average benchmark score of 83807 is nearly 27 times higher than the GPU’s 3075, but such a comparison is apples-to-oranges across different test suites. The more meaningful metric is the percentile gap: 96th for the CPU versus 19th for the GPU. This indicates that the CPU is a class-leading part, while the GPU appears to be a mid-to-low-tier performer based on the available data. The combined percentile of 58 suggests that, overall, the system performs better than 58% of all builds, but this figure is dragged down by the GPU’s low standing.

For FPS estimation, the lack of measured data means relying on the CPU’s strong single-thread scores and the GPU’s weak 3DMark result. In esports titles at 1080p, the CPU’s 5087 Passmark single-thread score should drive high frame rates, but the GPU may cap them. In AAA games at 4K, the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth are theoretically sufficient, but the low benchmark percentile suggests the card may not translate those specs into competitive performance. The data does not support a clear FPS prediction, only that the CPU will not be the limiting factor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2377 and a Passmark single-thread score of 5087, is ample for driving high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the GPU’s 19th percentile ranking will likely cap frame rates at lower levels, making this pairing better suited for 1440p or 4K gaming where the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM can be utilized, rather than 1080p esports where the CPU would be underutilized.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 24 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42522, provide substantial headroom for encoding video while gaming. The Passmark data compression score of 790052 indicates fast data handling, which is beneficial for stream output. The GPU’s low benchmark percentile, however, may limit gaming performance during simultaneous encoding and rendering, potentially causing dropped frames in demanding titles.

Video editing: The Core Ultra 9 285K excels in this scenario, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 26702 and a Passmark integer math score of 172379, both indicating strong processing power for timeline scrubbing and effects rendering. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM is useful for GPU-accelerated effects, but its low benchmark score suggests it may not accelerate exports as effectively as other cards. The CPU’s 96th percentile rank makes it the primary driver of performance here.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 24003 and R15 multi-core score of 6494 demonstrate strong rendering capability for CPU-based renderers. The GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance is theoretically high, but the 19th percentile rank in 3DMark suggests it may not deliver expected GPU rendering performance. The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores are present, but the benchmark data does not confirm their efficacy in real-world render workloads.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark find prime numbers score of 541 and extended instructions score of 62277 indicate robust computational throughput for compilation tasks. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 24 threads help with parallel builds. The GPU’s role is minimal in this scenario, so its low benchmark percentile is less of a concern. The CPU’s 96th percentile rank makes this a strong workstation for developers.

Student and office work: This is overkill for such tasks, but the CPU’s integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides basic display output without the discrete GPU. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 5087 ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications. The GPU’s 415 W TDP suggests it will draw significant power even at idle, making this pairing inefficient for light workloads. The CPU’s 125 W TDP is more reasonable, but the system’s overall power draw is high.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a professional or enthusiast who prioritizes CPU-bound workloads over gaming performance. The Core Ultra 9 285K’s 96th percentile rank makes it ideal for content creators, video editors, and 3D artists who rely on multi-threaded applications like Cinebench R23, where the 42522 score demonstrates elite capability. Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 172379 and multithread score of 67260, which handle compilation and testing efficiently. The GPU, while underperforming for gaming, still offers 24 GB of VRAM, which is suitable for large datasets in data science or machine learning, though its low benchmark percentile is a concern.

Gamers at 4K resolution may find the pairing acceptable, as the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-resolution textures, and the CPU’s single-thread performance prevents bottlenecks. However, gamers at 1080p or 1440p high-refresh rates will be disappointed, as the GPU’s 19th percentile rank will likely limit FPS below what the CPU can deliver. Content creators who use GPU-accelerated renderers should look elsewhere, as the RTX 5080 SUPER’s benchmark score does not inspire confidence in its compute abilities.

Small business workstations that run heavy multi-threaded software, such as financial modeling or scientific simulations, will benefit from the CPU’s 24 threads and ECC memory support. The CPU’s 36 MB L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth ensure smooth data flow. The GPU’s low benchmark score is less relevant in these workloads, but its 24 GB VRAM could be useful for specialized tasks like database visualization. The system is not a balanced general-purpose build; it is a CPU-first workstation with a capable but underperforming GPU attached.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1851, which supports the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 415 W, meaning the system requires a robust power supply, though the FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU wattage. The CPU supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported, making this a viable platform for workstation use. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck for the discrete card.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RTX 5080 SUPER with a higher-performing GPU, as the CPU’s 96th percentile rank has significant headroom. The GPU’s 19th percentile rank is the weak link, and upgrading it would immediately improve the system’s combined percentile of 58. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, potentially increasing the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42522 further. However, the GPU’s 415 W TDP and the CPU’s 125 W TDP mean the system draws substantial power, so any upgrade must consider thermal and power delivery capacity.

The CPU’s integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU fails or is removed, adding resilience to the platform. The memory support for DDR5 is current, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes are future-proof for upcoming storage and expansion cards. The platform is not legacy-bound, but the GPU’s low benchmark percentile suggests that users should prioritize a GPU upgrade before any other component changes.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation applications where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and memory type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory with a 256-bit bus and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285K’s average benchmark score of 83807 is 0.2% lower than the 290K Plus’s 84003, indicating nearly identical performance.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a boost clock of 5.70 GHz.

Q: Does the GPU support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the RTX 5080 SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 processors.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, with 192 KB L1 per core and 3 MB L2 per core.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB203 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s. The memory clocks run at 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective speed. The GPU’s base clock is 2295 MHz, with a boost clock of 2617 MHz. It contains 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores. The FP32 performance is 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1).

The benchmark data shows a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, which places the GPU in the 19th percentile of all GPUs. This is a surprisingly low result for a card with such high specifications. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro P1000, scores 3163, which is 2.8% higher, while the NVIDIA GeForce 820A scores 2983, 3.1% lower. The GPU’s pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s, both of which are high on paper, but the benchmark score suggests these capabilities are not translating into competitive 3DMark performance.

The GPU’s 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores are present for ray tracing and AI workloads, but the FACT PACK provides no specific benchmark results for these features. The 24 GB VRAM is substantial for large textures and datasets, but the low benchmark percentile raises questions about the card’s real-world rendering performance. The GPU supports PCIe 5.0 x16 and has display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The TDP is 415 W, requiring a single 16-pin power connector. The low benchmark score, relative to its specs, suggests the card may be driver-limited or poorly optimized for the 3DMark test, but the data does not support a more positive verdict.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, a 24-core desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER, a 50-series desktop GPU. The system’s combined percentile is 58, meaning it outperforms 58% of all builds, but this figure masks the wide gap between the CPU’s 96th percentile and the GPU’s 19th percentile. The CPU is a top-tier part, with an average benchmark score of 83807, while the GPU’s average score of 3075 is below average. This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field.

The CPU’s release date is 2024-10-23, with a launch MSRP of $589. The GPU’s release date is 2025-12-31, with a launch MSRP of 999 USD. The CPU is actively in production, as is the GPU. The pairing is unusual: a flagship CPU with a mid-tier GPU, based on benchmark percentiles. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42522 and Geekbench multi-core score of 26702 are elite, while the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075 is modest. The overall tier is mid-range, driven down by the GPU, but the CPU offers exceptional headroom for future GPU upgrades.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The CPU supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and ECC memory. It has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU includes an integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU and uses PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes. It is an unlocked multiplier part, allowing for overclocking.

Benchmark results show the CPU’s dominance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42522 is 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and 1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9135. The single-core score of 2377 is strong for gaming and everyday tasks. The Geekbench multi-core score of 26702 and single-core score of 2870 reinforce its high standing. Passmark scores are equally impressive: multithread at 67260, single-thread at 5087, integer math at 172379, and floating point math at 224324. The CPU’s percentile of 96 indicates it is in the top 4% of all CPUs.

For real workloads, this CPU excels in multi-threaded applications like video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The Passmark data compression score of 790052 and data encryption score of 57745 show strong performance in data-intensive tasks. The extended instructions score of 62277 indicates robust SIMD processing. The CPU’s 36 MB L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth ensure data is fed to the cores efficiently. The 125 W TDP is modest for the performance on offer, making it a power-efficient choice for high-end desktop workloads. The CPU’s 96th percentile rank is the clear highlight of this build, and it will handle any CPU-bound task with ease.