SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

83,807 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and TSMC's 3 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, paired with a 125 W TDP. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is limited to dual-channel DDR5, providing a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, alongside ECC memory support. The processor integrates Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units for basic display output, though its primary workload is compute-heavy tasks. It uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes.

Benchmark data places the Core Ultra 9 285K in the 96th percentile among all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance. Its average benchmark score is 83,807, which is marginally lower than the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus at 84,003, a delta of -0.2%. The AMD EPYC 4584PX scores 83,090, showing the 285K is 0.9% ahead, while the AMD EPYC 9135 scores 82,980, a 1% advantage for the 285K. The AMD EPYC 7F72 leads slightly with 85,072, meaning the 285K trails by 1.5%. These rival comparisons position the 285K as a high-end desktop part that competes closely with server-class silicon in raw throughput.

In multi-threaded workloads, the 285K achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,522, while its single-core score is 2,377. The Cinebench R20 results show 24,003 multicore and 3,388 single-core. Geekbench scores are 26,702 for multicore and 2,870 for single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 67,260, a single-thread score of 5,087, and specific sub-tests like data compression at 790,052, data encryption at 57,745, floating-point math at 224,324, and integer math at 172,379. These numbers indicate strong performance across both parallel and single-threaded tasks, making the CPU suitable for heavy computational loads. The 3 nm process node and 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die contribute to its efficiency and capability.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop processor with 24 cores and 24 threads, lacking simultaneous multithreading. The architecture, Arrow Lake, is built on a 3 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 243 mm² housing 17,800 million transistors. The base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.70 GHz allow for high single-thread responsiveness, while the 36 MB shared L3 cache and per-core L2 cache of 3 MB support data-heavy workloads. The CPU's 125 W TDP is modest for its core count, making it a power-conscious choice for high-end desktops.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both multi-core and single-core scenarios. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,522 places it 0.9% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4584PX and 1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9135, though it trails the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus by 0.2% and the AMD EPYC 7F72 by 1.5%. This suggests the 285K is competitive with server processors in rendering tasks, though not the absolute leader. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2,377, combined with a Geekbench single-core score of 2,870, indicates strong per-thread performance, likely benefiting from the high boost clock.

PassMark sub-tests further characterize the CPU. The data compression score of 790,052 and data encryption score of 57,745 show robust throughput for archival and security tasks. Floating-point math at 224,324 and integer math at 172,379 indicate solid arithmetic performance, while the extended instructions score of 62,277 highlights SIMD capability. The physics score of 3,938 and random string sorting at 94,927 round out a profile suited for scientific computing and data manipulation. The 96th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that this is a top-tier part, though the average benchmark score of 83,807 is just below some rivals, meaning it is not the absolute fastest.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the Core Ultra 9 285K's single-core performance is critical. A Geekbench single-core score of 2,870 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,377 suggest it can handle frame generation in CPU-bound scenarios, though the GPU pairing (Intel Arc A350) is a limiting factor. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck most gaming workloads, but the actual frame rates will depend heavily on the GPU.

Streaming and content creation benefit from multi-core strength. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,522 and PassMark multithread score of 67,260 indicate the CPU can handle encoding and rendering simultaneously. The 0.9% lead over the AMD EPYC 4584PX in average benchmark score suggests it competes with server chips in these tasks, making it capable for live streaming with software encoding.

Video editing relies on both single-thread and multi-thread performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 26,702 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 24,003 show strong parallel processing for timeline rendering and effects. The data compression score of 790,052 aids in exporting large video files, while the 36 MB L3 cache improves random access to footage.

3D rendering workloads are heavily multi-threaded. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,522 places the 285K just 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus, making it nearly as fast for ray tracing and mesh generation. The PassMark floating-point math score of 224,324 supports complex geometry calculations.

Software development benefits from single-thread speed for compilation and multi-thread for linking. The single-thread PassMark score of 5,087 and Cinebench R20 single-core score of 3,388 ensure fast code parsing, while the multithread score of 67,260 accelerates build processes. The extended instructions score of 62,277 aids in cryptographic and vectorized code.

Student and office work does not require this level of performance. The 285K's scores are overkill for word processing or spreadsheets, but the integrated graphics and 125 W TDP make it a functional if oversized choice. The 96th percentile ranking means it will handle any productivity task with ease, but the power draw and platform cost are unnecessary for such use.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K achieves an average benchmark score of 83,807, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. This score is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus at 84,003, 0.9% higher than the AMD EPYC 4584PX at 83,090, and 1% higher than the AMD EPYC 9135 at 82,980. It trails the AMD EPYC 7F72 by 1.5%, which scores 85,072. This indicates the 285K is at the top of desktop CPU performance, competing with server parts.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc A350 has a percentile ranking of 50 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark data is provided. The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 73, suggesting the system is above average but not exceptional. The CPU's high percentile (96) contrasts sharply with the GPU's mid-range percentile (50), creating an imbalance where the CPU vastly outperforms the GPU in raw compute.

The Cinebench R15 results show a multicore score of 6,494 and single-core of 359, while R20 scores are 24,003 and 3,388. Geekbench multicore is 26,702 and single-core 2,870. PassMark single-thread and singlethread scores are both 5,087. These figures indicate consistent performance across different benchmarking suites, with the CPU excelling in both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. The CPU's 96th percentile is a strong indicator of its position, but the GPU's 50th percentile pulls the combined system percentile down to 73.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and Intel Arc A350. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's strong single-core performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2,870 and PassMark single-thread score of 5,087, suggests it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound games. However, the GPU's specifications—4 GB GDDR6 memory, 64-bit bus, and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth—indicate it is a low-end part, limiting overall gaming performance.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 48 texture units suggest it can handle esports titles like competitive shooters at moderate frame rates, but demanding AAA games will likely struggle. The 4 GB VRAM may be insufficient for modern textures, causing stuttering or reduced detail. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms it is mid-pack, not a high-performance gaming card.

For 1440p or 4K gaming, the Arc A350 is likely inadequate. The 768 shading units and 24 ROPs limit pixel throughput, and the 64-bit memory bus restricts bandwidth to 124.0 GB/s, which is low for high-resolution textures. The CPU's performance would not be the bottleneck; instead, the GPU would cap frame rates well below what the 285K can support. Estimates suggest 1080p gaming is feasible for older or less demanding titles, while newer games may require lower settings.

Who Should Build It

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is aimed at power users who need extreme multi-threaded performance. Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,522, which is 0.9% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4584PX. 3D renderers can leverage the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 24,003 for faster output, while software developers will appreciate the PassMark multithread score of 67,260 for quicker builds.

Gamers targeting high-refresh 1080p with CPU-bound titles can use the 285K's single-core strengths, but the Arc A350 GPU limits them to low or medium settings. For 1440p or 4K gaming, this pairing is not recommended due to the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM. Students and office workers should avoid this build, as the 96th percentile CPU is overkill for basic tasks, and the GPU's lack of display outputs (none are listed) means a discrete GPU is mandatory.

Small business workstations running scientific simulations or data analysis can utilize the CPU's floating-point math score of 224,324 and data compression score of 790,052. The ECC memory support is a critical feature for data integrity in such workloads. However, the GPU's low performance means it is not suitable for GPU-accelerated tasks like machine learning or CUDA-based rendering.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is a graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, featuring the DG2-128 chip built on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It has 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory running at 1937 MHz, translating to 15.5 Gbps effective. It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

The GPU's compute capabilities include 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 ROPs. It has 6 ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores are listed. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, while FP16 is 6.144 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The TDP is a very low 25 W, with a suggested PSU of 200 W, indicating it is an entry-level, power-efficient card.

In terms of API support, it is DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU is end-of-life, with a predecessor of Xe Graphics and successor of Battlemage. It has a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, but its average benchmark score is 0 due to no benchmark data. The lack of display outputs (listed as "None") means this is not a typical consumer GPU for direct monitor connection, which is unusual for a graphics card.

The Arc A350's performance is limited by its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus. The 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is low for modern games, and the 768 shading units restrict compute throughput. The 25 W TDP is extremely low, suggesting it is designed for low-power or embedded applications rather than high-end gaming. The 50th percentile ranking places it in the middle of all GPUs, but the absence of benchmark scores makes direct comparisons difficult.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's core and thread count?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 24 threads, with no simultaneous multithreading.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 73, with the CPU at 96 and the GPU at 50.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 9 285K compare to the AMD EPYC 4584PX?

A: The 285K has an average benchmark score of 83,807, which is 0.9% higher than the AMD EPYC 4584PX's 83,090.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A350 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 9 285K supports ECC memory, using dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The Arc A350 has an FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc A350 is 200 W, and the GPU's TDP is 25 W.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, a 24-core desktop CPU, with the Intel Arc A350, a low-power GPU. The CPU is from the Core Ultra Series 2, using the Arrow Lake architecture on a 3 nm process, while the GPU is from the Alchemist generation (Arc 3) on a 6 nm process. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 73, indicating an above-average system overall.

The CPU's 96th percentile ranking makes it one of the strongest processors available, but the GPU's 50th percentile pulls the system down. The CPU's average benchmark score of 83,807 is competitive with server chips like the AMD EPYC 4584PX (83,090, 0.9% slower) and AMD EPYC 9135 (82,980, 1% slower), but trails the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus by 0.2%. The GPU has no benchmark scores, so its performance is inferred from its specs, which suggest entry-level capability.

This is a desktop build, meaning it is intended for stationary use. The CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 25 W TDP make it a relatively low-power combination for the CPU's performance level. The system's overall tier, based on the 73rd percentile, is solid mid-range, but the CPU is far more capable than the GPU, creating a lopsided configuration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Core Ultra 9 285K's 96th percentile ranking means it is near the top of CPU performance, while the Arc A350's 50th percentile places it in the middle of all GPUs. This creates a bottleneck where the GPU limits the system's overall performance in graphics-intensive tasks.

In gaming, the CPU's strong single-core performance (Geekbench single-core score of 2,870) would not be the limiting factor; instead, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth would cap frame rates. The FPS scaling from the CPU's scores suggests it can handle high-refresh 1080p, but the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is insufficient for high settings. The combined percentile of 73 reflects this imbalance, as the GPU drags down the average.

For CPU-bound workloads like rendering or video editing, the 285K would not be bottlenecked by the GPU, as these tasks rely on the CPU's 42,522 Cinebench R23 multicore score. The GPU's low 25 W TDP and lack of display outputs mean it is not intended for heavy graphics work, so the CPU dominates in such scenarios. The bottleneck is workload-dependent: GPU-heavy tasks are limited by the Arc A350, while CPU-heavy tasks are not.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-speed connectivity for storage and expansion cards. The CPU's 125 W TDP is moderate, and the GPU's suggested PSU of 200 W indicates a low total system power requirement.

For upgrades, the CPU is already at the top of its class, but the GPU could be replaced with a more powerful model. The 285K's 96th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a stronger GPU in gaming or rendering tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide future-proofing for next-generation GPUs, though the current Arc A350 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Memory support is limited to DDR5, with ECC capability for data integrity. The 36 MB L3 cache and dual-channel bus are sufficient for most workloads, but a future upgrade to higher-capacity DDR5 modules could improve performance. The platform's socket, Intel 1851, is specific to this generation, so a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard. The power supply headroom is ample, as the GPU's 200 W suggested PSU is conservative, leaving room for a higher-TDP GPU in the future.