SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 sits at the top of Intel's Core Ultra Series 2 lineup, built on the Arrow Lake architecture and fabricated on TSMC's 3 nm process node. This is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The absence of hyperthreading is notable; the chip relies entirely on its physical cores, with 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The 17,800 million transistors packed into a 243 mm² die speak to the density of the design, and the 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a flagship-class part with this core count.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 95th percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 75,488. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48,945 is the headline number here. That is a massive throughput figure, indicating strong performance in heavily threaded workloads such as 3D rendering, video encoding, and scientific computation. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 6,909 is equally impressive, suggesting the chip handles lightly threaded tasks like web browsing, office applications, and legacy software with ease. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,881 reinforces this interpretation. The Passmark multithread score of 56,602 and integer math score of 164,869 point to strong general-purpose computing, while the floating-point math score of 194,988 shows the FPU is not a bottleneck.

The nearest rival data shows this chip trading blows with enterprise-class silicon. The AMD EPYC 8224P scores 75,582, just 0.1% higher, while the AMD EPYC 4545P is 0.2% lower at 75,373. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D and Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 trail by 0.3% each. This means the Core Ultra 9 285 is essentially performance-equivalent to those server and workstation parts in aggregate benchmarks, despite being a desktop chip with a 65 W TDP. For real workloads, this translates to rendering times and compilation times that are competitive with much more expensive platform options. The data compression score of 602,121 and encryption score of 46,949 suggest strong archival and security-related performance, which matters for database work and file server duties.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285 uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the LGA 1851 platform designed for Arrow Lake desktop processors. The chip supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support, which is a notable feature for workstation users who need error-correcting memory for long compute jobs. The processor provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU itself, enabling high-bandwidth connections to the latest graphics cards and NVMe storage. The integrated graphics, Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, provide a fallback display output and basic acceleration without a discrete GPU.

The power situation is surprisingly modest for a 24-core flagship. The TDP is rated at 65 W, and the GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W. This combination means a typical 450 W power supply is sufficient for the whole system, which is unusual for a build with a high-end CPU and a discrete GPU. The GPU itself draws a 175 W TDP and requires two 8-pin power connectors, so the PSU must have those available. For users coming from older Intel platforms, this socket change means a new motherboard is required, and DDR5 memory is mandatory — there is no DDR4 support listed. The platform does support PCIe Gen 5, so users can take advantage of the fastest NVMe SSDs and future GPUs that use the Gen 5 interface.

A sensible next upgrade from this platform would be adding a higher-tier Arc GPU or a rival discrete graphics card, since the CPU has headroom to drive more powerful GPUs. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are more than enough for a x16 GPU plus a Gen 5 NVMe drive. The ECC memory support also means this platform could serve as a budget workstation where data integrity is critical, and adding more DDR5 capacity would be the first step. The 65 W TDP leaves significant thermal and power headroom in the system, so upgrading to a GPU with a higher power draw would not stress the platform's power delivery.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the memory support specification lists ECC memory as supported, which is a meaningful feature for workstation users running long computations or handling critical data.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Core Ultra 9 285 and the AMD EPYC 8224P?

A: The EPYC 8224P has an average benchmark score of 75,582, which is 0.1% higher than the Core Ultra 9 285's 75,488. This is a negligible difference, making the two effectively equal in aggregate performance.

Q: How much L3 cache does the Core Ultra 9 285 have?

A: The processor has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 192 KB of L1 cache per core and 3 MB of L2 cache per core.

Q: What power supply is recommended for a system with the Arc A580 GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc A580 is 450 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, so the combined system power draw fits within a 450 W power supply.

Q: Is the Core Ultra 9 285 good for single-threaded applications?

A: Yes. The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 6,909, and the Passmark single-thread score is 4,881, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. This indicates strong performance in everyday applications and games that rely on single-core speed.

Q: Does the Arc A580 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 24 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing and mesh shaders.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Core Ultra 9 285?

A: The dual-channel DDR5 memory controller provides a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

# Who Should Build It

The Core Ultra 9 285 paired with the Arc A580 targets users who need serious CPU throughput without a massive power budget. The 95th percentile CPU ranking and 91st combined percentile for the build place this system in the upper echelon of desktop performance. Content creators working with 4K video footage will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48,945, which handles rendering and export tasks efficiently. Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the Passmark multithread score of 56,602 and integer math score of 164,869, which are direct indicators of compilation throughput.

The 65 W TDP makes this an attractive option for small business workstations or office environments where power consumption and heat output are concerns. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for users running financial models or scientific simulations where a bit flip could corrupt results. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the multicore performance useful for simulation software and virtual machines, while the single-core performance keeps the desktop responsive. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will get solid frame rates from the Arc A580, as the GPU sits in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, though the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck in gaming scenarios.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core Ultra 9 285 and the Arc A580 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 87th percentile. In gaming workloads, the GPU will almost always be the limiting factor, as the CPU's single-core performance is strong enough to feed the GPU at high frame rates. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,909 indicates the CPU can handle game logic and draw calls without stuttering, but the Arc A580's 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance caps the pixel throughput. For 1080p gaming, the GPU is likely the bottleneck; for 4K gaming, the GPU will be even more clearly the limiting component.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's 24 cores and 48,945 Cinebench R23 multicore score dominate tasks like video rendering and 3D modeling, while the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth handle GPU-accelerated effects and viewport rendering. In mixed workloads like video editing with GPU acceleration, the two components complement each other, but the CPU has more headroom relative to the GPU. The data indicates that users upgrading from this GPU to a higher-tier model would see substantial performance gains in gaming and GPU compute tasks, while the CPU would remain the strong foundation.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Core Ultra 9 285 with the Arc A580. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Arc A580's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,229, Geekbench OpenCL score of 91,657, and Vulkan score of 79,381 indicate mid-range gaming performance. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient memory throughput for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, with the CPU's strong single-core performance ensuring consistent frame pacing. At 1440p, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and users may need to lower settings to maintain high refresh rates. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM capacity becomes a concern for texture-heavy titles, and the 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will struggle with demanding scenes. The 24 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but performance in RT-heavy games will be modest given the GPU's overall compute level. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support means the GPU is feature-complete for modern games, but the raw performance places it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, which translates to solid 1080p gaming and entry-level 1440p.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 75,488, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P, scores 75,582 for a delta of -0.1%, meaning the two are statistically tied. The AMD EPYC 4545P trails by 0.2%, and both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D and Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 are 0.3% behind. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4,933 and single-core score of 696 show consistent scaling across benchmark generations. The Cinebench R20 scores of 20,556 multicore and 2,901 single-core continue this trend, and the R23 scores of 48,945 and 6,909 confirm the CPU's position at the high end.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 57,756, placing it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, scores 58,085 for a delta of -0.6%, meaning the Arc A580 trails by a small margin. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57,367 for a delta of 0.7% in favor of the Arc A580, and the Intel Arc A570M is 0.8% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT leads by 1.1% with a score of 58,392. The combined percentile for this build is 91, indicating that the pairing of a 95th-percentile CPU with an 87th-percentile GPU creates a system that is well above average overall, though the GPU drags the combined score down from the CPU's level.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285, a 24-core Arrow Lake processor, with the Intel Arc A580, a mid-range Xe-HPG graphics card. The CPU is a flagship part in the Core Ultra Series 2, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 5 product. The combined percentile of 91 places this system in the top 10% of all desktop builds, which is a strong overall tier. The CPU is the star of the show, with its 95th-percentile ranking and benchmark scores that rival enterprise processors. The GPU, while respectable at the 87th percentile, is clearly the weaker link in the pairing.

This build makes sense for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads like rendering, compiling, and scientific computing, while still wanting a capable GPU for moderate gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP and 450 W suggested PSU indicate a power-efficient system that does not require exotic cooling or a massive power supply. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 and DDR5, ensuring the system is not obsolete in the near term. The CPU's ECC memory support adds a workstation dimension that few desktop platforms offer.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6 nm process, with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU runs at a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz for 16 Gbps effective speed. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads. The 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units provide a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute throughput is 12.29 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 24.58 TFLOPS using the 2:1 ratio.

The GPU includes 24 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,229 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 79,381 indicate strong DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance, respectively. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 91,657 suggests good compute performance for GPU-accelerated workloads like video encoding and image processing. The 87th-percentile ranking places this GPU in the upper-mid range of all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 0.6% higher and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE at 0.7% lower. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM make this a capable card for 1080p ultra gaming and 1440p high settings, though the 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute limits performance in the most demanding titles.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the Arc A580's 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth should drive frame rates well above 60 FPS in most titles, with the Core Ultra 9 285's single-core performance ensuring no CPU bottlenecks. At 1440p, frame rates will drop, but the GPU's 87th-percentile ranking still allows for playable performance in competitive titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with the Passmark multithread score of 56,602 indicating strong parallel throughput. The GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS of compute can also offload encoding tasks if needed, though the CPU alone is more than sufficient.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48,945 ensures fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing in 4K projects. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth handle effects and color grading, while the ECC memory support on the CPU provides data integrity for long render sessions.

3D rendering: The 24 cores deliver a Passmark floating-point math score of 194,988, making CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar software highly efficient. The GPU's 24 ray tracing cores also accelerate RT-based renders, though the 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is modest for GPU rendering.

Software development: The Passmark integer math score of 164,869 and data compression score of 602,121 indicate fast compilation and file I/O. The 36 MB of L3 cache and 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide low-latency access to code and fast NVMe storage.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP keeps power costs low, and the single-core Cinebench R23 score of 6,909 ensures responsive productivity applications. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EU provides a backup display output, and the platform's ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running office tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + Intel Arc A580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Intel Arc A580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds