SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

98%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

93,785 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm TSMC process. It dominates the CPU benchmark field with a 96th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A350 GPU sits at the 50th percentile. The pairing results in a combined 73rd percentile build, indicating a substantial imbalance where the CPU far outclasses the graphics component for most workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. It draws 125 W TDP and uses the Intel Socket 1851, featuring a 36 MB shared L3 cache alongside 192 KB L1 and 3 MB L2 cache per core. The chip is built on a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, and it supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus delivering 115.2 GB/s bandwidth, including ECC memory support.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a high-end workstation-class CPU. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 44,253 points multi-core and 2,439 points single-core. The multi-core result places it in the top tier for rendering and compilation tasks, while the single-core score of 2,439 indicates strong per-thread performance for legacy or lightly threaded applications. PassMark multithread score of 68,574 and single-thread score of 5,068 reinforce this dual strength.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 93,785 places it at the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6520P, scores 93,786 — a mere 0% difference, making them statistical equals. The AMD EPYC 4564P trails by 1.5%, the AMD EPYC 9175F by 1.9%, and the AMD EPYC 4565P by 2.1%. This puts the 270K Plus squarely in server-class territory for compute throughput, despite being a desktop part.

Real-world workload implications are clear. The 44,253 Cinebench R23 multi-core score supports heavy parallel workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and scientific simulations. The PassMark data compression score of 804,322 and integer math score of 175,986 indicate strong archival and database operations. The floating-point math score of 229,491 further confirms capability for scientific computing. The 36 MB L3 cache and 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth feed these cores adequately for multi-threaded tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: How does the 270K Plus compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The 270K Plus scores 93,785 on average, which is virtually identical to the Intel Xeon 6520P at 93,786 (0% difference), and it leads the AMD EPYC 4564P by 1.5%, the AMD EPYC 9175F by 1.9%, and the AMD EPYC 4565P by 2.1%.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this CPU support?

A: It supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 115.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the integrated graphics capability of this CPU?

A: It includes integrated Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

Q: What is the production status and release date?

A: The CPU is Active in production and was released on March 10, 2026.

Q: What is the process node and transistor count?

A: It is built on a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, and the CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 6,656, with a single-core score of 354. In Cinebench R20, it achieves 24,461 multi-core and 3,453 single-core. The Cinebench R23 scores — 44,253 multi-core and 2,439 single-core — are the most representative of modern rendering workloads. PassMark results include multithread at 68,574, single-thread at 5,068, physics at 4,064, and extended instructions at 63,506.

The CPU sits at the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 93,785. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6520P, matches it exactly with a 0% delta. The AMD EPYC 4564P is 1.5% slower, the AMD EPYC 9175F is 1.9% slower, and the AMD EPYC 4565P is 2.1% slower. This indicates the 270K Plus performs at the level of dual-socket server processors for many multi-threaded tasks.

The GPU, Intel Arc A350, has no benchmark scores listed in the data, but it holds a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 0. The combined build percentile is 73, reflecting the CPU's strength pulling the overall score upward despite the mid-range GPU.

The data reveals a stark contrast: the CPU is top-4% of all processors, while the GPU is exactly median. This means the combined benchmark picture is heavily skewed toward CPU-bound scenarios. For workloads that rely on the GPU, such as gaming or GPU rendering, the system will perform at roughly half the GPU performance percentile but with the CPU headroom to drive complex game logic and physics.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system exhibits a severe CPU-to-GPU performance imbalance. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile means the graphics card is the limiting factor in any GPU-bound workload. In gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A350 will cap frame rates and render times, while the CPU sits underutilized.

Benchmark data shows the CPU can handle massive data throughput — PassMark multithread at 68,574 and floating-point math at 229,491 — but the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest. The GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus further constrains texture-heavy workloads. For CPU-bound tasks like software compilation, data compression (804,322 PassMark score), or encryption (59,097), the bottleneck is entirely absent; the CPU runs at full potential.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured for this exact pairing, can be inferred from the percentile gap. A 46-percentile-point difference (96 vs 50) suggests that in gaming, frame rates will be limited by the GPU in nearly all scenarios, even at lower resolutions. The CPU's single-core score of 5,068 in PassMark is sufficient to feed even high-refresh displays, but the GPU cannot match that throughput. The bottleneck is conclusively the GPU for graphics workloads, with the CPU never being the constraint in any realistic scenario.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data contains no measuredFps entries, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing. These figures should be treated as qualitative expectations, not verified results.

Based on the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and its specifications — 768 shading units, 24 ROPs, 6 RT cores, and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 — the Arc A350 is positioned for entry-level 1080p gaming. The 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for older titles or low-to-medium settings, but modern AAA games at high settings will likely exceed the memory capacity. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking ensures it will never be a limiting factor, but the GPU's mid-range standing caps performance.

Estimated gaming behavior: at 1080p, the system should handle esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends at high frame rates, given the CPU's strong single-thread score of 5,068. At 1440p, the GPU becomes increasingly strained, and 4K gaming is likely beyond its capabilities due to both VRAM and compute limits. The 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests RT effects will heavily impact frame rates. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking indicates average performance among all GPUs, meaning it is neither a low-end outlier nor a high-end performer.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need exceptional CPU compute power but have modest graphics demands. Content creators working with multi-core rendering — such as 3D artists using Cinebench-based workloads — will benefit from the 44,253 R23 multi-core score. Software developers compiling large codebases will see the 68,574 PassMark multithread score translate into faster build times. Data analysts and scientists running simulations benefit from the 229,491 floating-point math score.

Students and small business workstations that run office productivity, spreadsheets, and light photo editing will find the CPU overkill but the system responsive. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output option, though the discrete Arc A350 handles more demanding visual tasks. Gamers at 1080p with esports or older titles will find the system viable, but the GPU limits modern AAA gaming at higher resolutions.

The 125 W TDP and 200 W suggested PSU for the GPU indicate a power-efficient build overall. The CPU's ECC memory support makes it suitable for workstation use where data integrity is critical. The production status of the CPU is Active, while the GPU is End-of-life, suggesting the GPU may be harder to source new.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is a 25 W graphics card built on the Xe-HPG architecture, also known as Alchemist from the Arc 3 generation. It uses the DG2-128 chip fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, with 6 RT cores for ray tracing. It lacks tensor cores, which limits AI acceleration compared to competing architectures.

Memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 1937 MHz, translating to 15.5 Gbps effective. The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz, producing 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.144 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s.

The GPU has no display outputs, meaning it must be paired with a CPU that has integrated graphics or a separate display adapter. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern API requirements. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and it is a single-slot card with no power connectors, requiring only a 200 W system PSU.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it at the median of the performance distribution. With no benchmark scores listed, the percentile is based on aggregate data. The 6 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing, but the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits complex rendering workloads. For rendering tasks like Blender or video editing, the GPU will handle light acceleration but will not compete with higher-tier graphics cards.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus CPU with the Intel Arc A350 GPU. The CPU is a 24-core, 24-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on Arrow Lake Refresh architecture with a 3 nm process. The GPU is from the Arc 3 Alchemist generation, built on a 6 nm process. The combined percentile ranking is 73, meaning this system outperforms 73% of all benchmarked desktop builds.

The pairing is unconventional: a top-4% CPU with a median GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 93,785 is comparable to server-class Xeon and EPYC processors, while the GPU's 50th percentile ranking indicates mid-range graphics capability. This results in a system that excels at CPU-intensive tasks but falls short in GPU-heavy scenarios. The CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 25 W TDP keep total power draw modest, with the suggested PSU at 200 W.

The build class is desktop, confirming it is a stationary workstation or gaming rig. The CPU's 96th percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile together produce the 73rd combined percentile, reflecting the CPU's dominant contribution. This build is best suited for users prioritizing compute performance over graphics, such as developers, researchers, or content creators who rely on CPU rendering rather than GPU acceleration.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's 5,068 PassMark single-thread score can drive high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM limit modern AAA gaming to 1080p with reduced settings. Estimated frame rates will be GPU-bound in most scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores handle encoding and overlays without strain, as evidenced by the 68,574 multithread score. The GPU can handle the rendering, but its modest 3.072 TFLOPS throughput may require lower game settings to maintain stream quality.

Video Editing: The CPU's 44,253 Cinebench R23 multi-core score accelerates timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 6.144 TFLOPS FP16 supports hardware-accelerated effects, but 4 GB VRAM may limit high-resolution previews.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar software will see exceptional performance from the 44,253 R23 multi-core score. GPU rendering is limited by the Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 4 GB memory, making it suitable only for small scenes.

Software Development: Compilation and testing benefit from the 175,986 PassMark integer math score and 804,322 data compression score. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache and 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth reduce build times for large projects.

Student and Office Work: For document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the CPU's 5,068 single-thread score ensures snappy responsiveness. The GPU's integrated graphics support and 50th percentile discrete performance handle basic visual tasks without issue.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds