SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + Intel Arc A770: A Balanced 90th-Percentile Desktop Build

This pairing combines Intel's latest Arrow Lake-S desktop processor with Intel's flagship Alchemist-generation GPU, creating a fully-Intel desktop system that lands in the 90th percentile across all CPU and GPU benchmarks. The Core Ultra 7 265T is a 20-core, 20-thread processor built on a 3nm TSMC process, while the Arc A770 brings 16GB of GDDR6 memory and 4096 shading units to the table. Together, they form a coherent platform for productivity and 1440p gaming, though the data shows some interesting workload-specific characteristics that builders should understand before committing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the current LGA 1851 platform designed for Arrow Lake-S desktop processors. This is a desktop-class socket with PCIe Gen 5 support, offering 20 lanes from the CPU. The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported, which matters for users considering this for error-sensitive workstation tasks—the platform is oriented toward mainstream desktop use rather than server-grade reliability.

The processor carries a 35W TDP, which is remarkably low for a 20-core chip. This low TDP means that a modest air cooler will suffice, and more importantly, it gives builders substantial PSU headroom when combined with the GPU. The Arc A770, however, is a different story: it has a 225W TDP and requires a 550W suggested PSU. The power connectors are 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin, which is standard for a mid-range GPU. The combined system draw of roughly 260W for CPU and GPU alone means that a quality 550W unit will run the system comfortably, but there is limited headroom for aggressive overclocking or adding many peripherals. Since the CPU multiplier is locked, overclocking is not on the table anyway, so the 550W suggested PSU is a sensible match.

For future upgrades, the platform supports PCIe Gen 5 on the CPU lanes, so a next-generation GPU with PCIe 5.0 interface would run at full bandwidth. The 20 CPU lanes provide enough for a single high-end GPU plus a Gen 5 NVMe drive. Memory-wise, DDR5 is the only option, and the dual-channel configuration means that adding more RAM is straightforward. A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the Arc A770 with a higher-tier GPU when the budget allows, since the CPU's 90th percentile performance is unlikely to bottleneck modern graphics cards. The platform itself is current-generation, so motherboard and memory will not need replacement for several years.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 7 265T delivers strong multi-threaded performance across Cinebench iterations. In Cinebench R23, it scores 31,558 multi-core and 4,455 single-core. The R20 results are 13,254 multi-core and 1,871 single-core, while R15 shows 3,180 multi-core and 449 single-core. These numbers place the CPU at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47,697. The nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 scores 47,527 (0.4% slower), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D scores 47,908 (0.4% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 scores 47,918 (0.5% faster). The Intel Core Ultra X9 378H is 0.5% slower at 47,468. This means the 265T is effectively tied with these high-end Ryzen 9 parts—the differences are within noise margins.

The Passmark suite reinforces this picture. Multi-thread score is 37,084, single-thread is 4,338, integer math scores 104,943, and floating-point math hits 129,817. Data compression scores 370,158, while encryption is 29,687. Extended instructions reach 28,609, and random string sorting is 44,400. Physics simulation scores 2,391, and find prime numbers is 322. These results indicate a processor that handles mixed workloads with ease, particularly in floating-point and integer math where it excels.

The Arc A770 GPU sits at the 90th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 68,809. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2,969. Geekbench OpenCL reaches 109,175, and Vulkan scores 94,284. The nearest GPU rivals are the NVIDIA CMP 90HX at 69,000 (-0.3%), the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 at 68,562 (0.4%), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 at 69,870 (-1.5%), and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 at 69,986 (-1.7%). The A770 is thus firmly in the company of professional-grade workstation GPUs from the previous generation, though it trails the top-end Quadro and Radeon Pro cards by a small margin.

The combined picture is a system that delivers 90th-percentile performance in both CPU and GPU tasks. The CPU holds its own against Ryzen 9-class competition, and the GPU matches older workstation cards. This is a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other.

FAQ

Q: Does the Core Ultra 7 265T support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The platform is designed for mainstream desktop use, so users needing error-correcting memory should look elsewhere.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of this CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This is standard for a desktop platform and sufficient for most workloads.

Q: How does the Arc A770 compare to the NVIDIA Quadro P6000?

A: The A770 scores 68,809 on average, which is 1.7% lower than the Quadro P6000's 69,986. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the A770 scores 2,969, and its Geekbench OpenCL score is 109,175 versus the Quadro's position in the same performance tier.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The 35W TDP and locked multiplier mean this is not an overclocking-focused part; it is optimized for efficiency.

Q: What is the process node for the Core Ultra 7 265T?

A: It is built on TSMC's 3nm process, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The GPU, in contrast, uses a 6nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die.

Q: Does the Arc A770 support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern games and applications.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 90, meaning this build outperforms 90% of all possible CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a well-balanced system with workload-specific characteristics. The CPU's 90th percentile and the GPU's 90th percentile are aligned, but the nature of the workloads changes which component is the limiting factor. In multi-threaded CPU tasks like Cinebench R23 (31,558 multi-core), the CPU is clearly the driver of performance, and the GPU is irrelevant. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 (2,969), the GPU's capabilities are the sole determinant.

For gaming, the bottleneck depends on resolution and settings. At 1080p with lower settings, the CPU's single-thread performance (4,455 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 4,338 Passmark single-thread) becomes more important, and the 265T's performance here is solid but not exceptional—it is 90th percentile, not top-tier. At 1440p or 4K with ultra settings, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the A770's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance will dictate frame rates.

The Passmark physics score of 2,391 is notably lower than the multi-thread score would suggest, indicating that the CPU's physics simulation performance is a relative weakness. This could impact games that rely heavily on CPU physics. In contrast, the floating-point math score of 129,817 is strong, which benefits scientific computing and rendering workloads. The integer math score of 104,943 is also solid. Data compression at 370,158 is excellent, making this a good choice for file archiving and database workloads.

The GPU's 16GB VRAM is a significant asset—it exceeds the memory of the rival NVIDIA Quadro P6000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200, which are both older designs with less memory. For workloads that exceed 8GB, such as large texture sets in 4K gaming or machine learning inference, the A770 has an advantage. However, the GPU's compute performance in OpenCL (109,175) and Vulkan (94,284) places it behind the top workstation cards, so the memory advantage does not fully compensate for raw compute differences in GPU-accelerated rendering.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance and adequate GPU acceleration without paying workstation premiums. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and 20 threads make it well-suited for content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or compile large codebases. The Passmark data compression score of 370,158 indicates strong performance for database management and file server workloads, making this a viable small business workstation.

Gamers at 1440p with ultra settings will find the A770's 16GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth sufficient for modern titles, though the lack of measured FPS data means expectations should be tempered. The CPU's single-thread performance is adequate for gaming, and the 35W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, which is desirable for living-room builds or quiet office environments.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities for simulation and compilation tasks. The platform's DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide future-proofing for upcoming peripherals. Developers working on parallel code will appreciate the 20 cores and the strong integer math score of 104,943. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office productivity will find the system more than capable, with the low TDP reducing long-term energy costs.

The GPU's end-of-life status and 225W TDP mean this is not a system for enthusiasts seeking maximum frame rates or future upgradeability on the GPU side. However, for users who prioritize CPU performance and want a capable GPU without breaking the bank, this pairing is sensible. The Arc A770's 16GB memory is particularly attractive for users experimenting with AI workloads or large datasets, where memory capacity is often more important than raw compute.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 4,455 single-core score in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 2,969 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 provide a baseline for expectations.

At 1080p with high settings, the CPU will generally keep up with the GPU, and frame rates will be GPU-limited in most titles. The A770's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it can handle 1080p ultra in most games at 60+ FPS, with more demanding titles dropping to medium settings. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and ultra settings will likely produce frame rates in the 40-60 FPS range depending on the game. At 4K, expect 30-40 FPS on medium settings, with the 16GB VRAM preventing texture-related stuttering but the raw compute limiting overall performance.

The CPU's physics score of 2,391 in Passmark is a potential weak point for games with heavy CPU physics, such as large-scale destruction or simulation-heavy titles. In these cases, frame rates may dip below the GPU-limited baseline. Conversely, games that are primarily GPU-bound at higher resolutions will see consistent performance from the A770. Ray tracing performance is supported via 32 RT cores, but the 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 suggests that ray-traced effects will be costly; expect to use DLSS-style upscaling or lower ray-tracing settings to maintain playable frame rates.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip fabricated on TSMC's 6nm process. It contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2100 MHz and boosts to 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz effective 16 Gbps. The memory subsystem consists of 16GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Compute resources include 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 ROPs. The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 19.66 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU has 32 RT cores for ray tracing. The 16GB VRAM is a standout feature at this performance tier, exceeding what most comparable GPUs from the previous generation offered.

The benchmark results place the A770 at the 90th percentile, with an average score of 68,809. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 is a modern DirectX 12 test, and the Geekbench scores of 109,175 (OpenCL) and 94,284 (Vulkan) indicate strong compute performance for a consumer card. The nearest rivals are professional workstation cards, which suggests the A770 is well-suited for compute-heavy tasks like rendering and machine learning inference, despite being marketed as a gaming GPU.

The GPU's end-of-life production status is a concern for long-term support, but the 16GB VRAM gives it longevity for workloads that fit within that memory envelope. The dual-slot cooler and 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors are standard for its 225W TDP. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, supporting modern high-refresh monitors.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T (Arrow Lake-S, 3nm) with the Intel Arc A770 (Alchemist, 6nm). The combined percentile of 90 places this system in the top 10% of all benchmarked CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread processor with a 35W TDP, while the GPU is a 225W card with 16GB VRAM.

The system is designed for balanced performance across CPU- and GPU-intensive workloads. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking means it competes with high-end Ryzen 9 processors, while the GPU's 90th percentile puts it in the company of professional workstation cards. Neither component dramatically outperforms the other, making this a cohesive pairing.

The CPU's low 35W TDP is the defining characteristic—it delivers 90th-percentile multi-threaded performance while consuming a fraction of the power of competing high-end chips. This allows for a smaller, quieter cooling solution and lower electricity costs. The GPU, by contrast, is power-hungry at 225W, but this is offset by the CPU's efficiency. The total system power draw is manageable with the suggested 550W PSU.

This is not a system for enthusiasts seeking maximum gaming frame rates or overclocking headroom. The CPU's locked multiplier and the GPU's end-of-life status limit long-term tuning potential. However, for users who want a reliable, efficient, and balanced desktop for productivity and 1440p gaming, this pairing delivers strong performance in a practical package.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is a 20-core, 20-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S codename). It is manufactured by TSMC on a 3nm process, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 1.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The TDP is 35W, which is exceptionally low for a 20-core desktop chip.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are provided by Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The processor was released in January 2025 with a launch MSRP of $384.

Benchmark results show strong all-around performance. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,558 and single-core of 4,455 indicate excellent multi-threaded scaling and good single-thread performance. The Passmark multi-thread score of 37,084 and single-thread of 4,338 confirm this. Integer math scores 104,943, floating-point math scores 129,817, and data compression scores 370,158. Encryption at 29,687 and extended instructions at 28,609 are solid. The physics score of 2,391 is lower than expected, suggesting a relative weakness in physics simulation workloads.

The 90th percentile ranking places this CPU in the top 10% of all processors, competing directly with AMD Ryzen 9 parts. The average benchmark score of 47,697 is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (47,527), AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D (47,908), and AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (47,918). The Intel Core Ultra X9 378H is also within 0.5%. This means the 265T offers competitive performance with these high-end chips while consuming significantly less power (35W vs. much higher TDPs for those rivals).

For real-world workloads, the 20 cores and 20 threads handle multi-threaded applications like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded performance for everyday tasks. The 3nm process and 35W TDP make this an extremely efficient processor, ideal for systems where power consumption and heat generation are concerns. The lack of ECC support limits use in mission-critical server environments, but for desktop and workstation use, this is a compelling choice.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds