SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + Intel Arc A750: Desktop Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake desktop processor with a 35 W TDP, paired with the Intel Arc A750 graphics card (DG2-512, Xe-HPG architecture) in a desktop build. This combination sits at the 78th combined percentile across all CPU-GPU pairings, with the CPU at the 90th percentile for all CPUs and the GPU at the 66th percentile for all GPUs. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores below.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is current for Arrow Lake-S desktop processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The platform does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for workstation builds that require error-correcting memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 20 lanes from the processor itself, enabling high-bandwidth devices such as NVMe storage and discrete GPUs to operate at current-generation speeds.

The integrated graphics on the 265T is Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, which provides a fallback display output and basic acceleration if the discrete GPU is removed or fails. The CPU has a 35 W TDP, which is remarkably low for a 20-core part; this suggests the platform can be cooled with modest hardware, leaving thermal headroom for other components. The GPU, however, has a 225 W TDP and requires a suggested power supply of 550 W, along with one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector. This means the overall system power draw is dominated by the Arc A750, not the CPU, so a builder must size the PSU for the GPU's demands rather than the processor's modest envelope.

The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking via the ratio is not possible; performance tuning would rely on memory overclocking or BCLK adjustments if the motherboard supports them. The production status is Active for the CPU, while the GPU is End-of-life, with a successor named Battlemage already announced. For an upgrade path, the data indicates the platform is current but the GPU is at the end of its production cycle. A sensible next step would be to replace the Arc A750 with a newer-generation GPU when available, since the CPU's 90th percentile standing leaves headroom for a more powerful graphics card without the processor becoming the primary limiter. The 35 W CPU TDP also gives substantial PSU headroom; the 550 W suggested PSU for the GPU alone suggests that a larger power supply may be warranted if a future GPU upgrade increases power requirements, but the current CPU draws so little that the PSU budget is almost entirely available for graphics.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks show a processor that excels in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads. In Cinebench R23, the 265T scores 31558 in multi-core and 4455 in single-core. The multi-core score places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47697 across all tests. The nearest rivals illustrate its positioning: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 scores 47527 (0.4% behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D scores 47908 (0.4% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 scores 47918 (0.5% ahead). The Intel Core Ultra X9 378H scores 47468 (0.5% behind). This means the 265T is statistically indistinguishable from these high-end desktop and mobile parts, trading blows within a 1% band.

The GPU benchmarks show a mid-range performer. The Arc A750 scores 12534 in Passmark G3D, 2612 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 98554 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 85631 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Passmark GPU compute score is 5368. The GPU's average benchmark score is 20582, placing it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Arc B570 (20556, 0.1% behind), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, 0.2% behind), AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, 0.4% ahead), and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480, 0.5% behind). The A750 is effectively tied with these parts, which means it performs like a mid-range desktop GPU from the previous generation and a current-generation entry-level card.

The combined picture is a CPU that is top-tier for desktop processors, paired with a GPU that is solidly mid-range. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 66th percentile means the processor is the stronger component in this pairing. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, or data processing, the system will perform at a high level; for GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or GPU rendering, the graphics card will be the limiting factor. The combined percentile of 78 reflects this imbalance, with the GPU dragging the overall score down from what the CPU alone would achieve.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. This bandwidth is substantial for an 8 GB card and supports high-texture workloads at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU has 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 34.41 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. These numbers indicate a GPU that can handle modern games at medium-to-high settings at 1080p and is capable at 1440p with adjustments.

The ray tracing hardware includes 28 RT cores, which is a modest count for RT workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it is fully compliant with current graphics APIs and can run ray-traced effects where games implement them. The Passmark DirectX scores are 181 for DirectX 9, 65 for DirectX 10, 72 for DirectX 11, and 70 for DirectX 12. These scores suggest that the GPU performs better on older APIs relative to its overall standing, but the DirectX 12 score of 70 is lower than the G3D score of 12534 might imply, likely reflecting driver overhead or specific test workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 is a more modern indicator, showing the GPU can handle DX12 titles at playable frame rates.

For rendering workloads, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 indicate that the GPU is capable of compute acceleration. The Passmark GPU compute score of 5368 is lower than the G3D score, suggesting that compute-heavy tasks may not scale as well as graphics tasks. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for large 3D scenes or high-resolution textures, but for typical 1080p and 1440p rendering, it is adequate. The 512 GB/s bandwidth is a strong point, helping texture streaming and memory-intensive effects. The GPU's 66th percentile ranking means it is above average but not a high-end part; it will handle mainstream workloads but will not excel at 4K rendering or heavy RT effects. The card is dual-slot, uses one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, and has a 225 W TDP, which is moderate for its performance class.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU is at the 90th percentile for all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 66th percentile for all GPUs. This means the GPU is the bottleneck in most graphics-intensive workloads. For gaming, the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them, so frame rates will be limited by the Arc A750's output. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4455 in Cinebench R23 and Passmark single-thread score of 4338 ensure that even the most demanding game logic will not stall the system, but the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 12534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 cap the visual output.

For CPU-bound workloads, the balance reverses. The CPU's multi-thread score of 31558 in Cinebench R23 and Passmark multithread score of 37084 indicate that tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or data compilation will be handled quickly. The GPU's compute scores, while respectable, are not at the same tier; the Passmark GPU compute score of 5368 is lower than the CPU's integer math score of 104943, meaning that for pure compute tasks, the CPU may actually outperform the GPU in some scenarios. The FP32 performance of 17.20 TFLOPS on the GPU is higher than the CPU's floating-point score of 129817, but the CPU's cache hierarchy and multi-core design make it competitive for many workloads.

The FPS scaling, estimated from benchmark scores rather than measured, would show that at 1080p, the GPU limits frame rates in most games, while at lower resolutions or with reduced settings, the CPU could push higher FPS if the GPU could keep up. The 35 W CPU TDP versus the 225 W GPU TDP is a practical indicator: the GPU consumes over six times the power of the CPU, reinforcing that the graphics card is the dominant component in this pairing. In balanced workloads, the system performs well, but users should expect the GPU to be the upgrade target first if overall system performance needs improvement.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. The die contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 1.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration is substantial, providing fast access to frequently used data across all cores.

The CPU's benchmark scores reflect strong performance across a range of workloads. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3180 multi-core and 449 single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 13254 multi-core and 1871 single-core. The Passmark tests show a diverse set of results: data compression at 370158, data encryption at 29687, extended instructions at 28609, find prime numbers at 322, floating-point math at 129817, integer math at 104943, multithread at 37084, physics at 2391, random string sorting at 44400, and single-thread at 4338. The average benchmark score is 47697, placing the CPU in the 90th percentile.

The data compression score of 370158 is particularly strong, indicating that the CPU excels at compression and decompression tasks, which are common in file archiving and database workloads. The data encryption score of 29687 shows solid cryptographic performance. The integer math score of 104943 and floating-point math score of 129817 are both high, meaning the CPU handles both integer and floating-point workloads well. The find prime numbers score of 322 is a weaker result, but this is a specific test that may not reflect real-world performance. The physics score of 2391 is moderate, suggesting that physics simulations are not the CPU's strongest area, but the overall multi-thread performance compensates in most applications.

The 20 cores and 20 threads, with no hyperthreading, mean the CPU uses physical cores only. This is a design choice that can improve efficiency in some workloads but may reduce performance in heavily threaded applications that benefit from additional logical threads. The boost clock of 5.30 GHz is high, giving excellent single-thread performance as evidenced by the 4455 Cinebench R23 single-core score. The 35 W TDP is exceptionally low for this core count and clock speed, making the 265T a very efficient processor that can be cooled with low-profile coolers in compact builds.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity while maintaining a capable GPU for graphics tasks. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the Arc A750 sufficient for most titles at medium-to-high settings, with the CPU ensuring no frame drops from processor limitations. At 1440p, the GPU will be the limiting factor, but the 8 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth allow playable frame rates in many games. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 90th percentile multi-thread performance, which accelerates encoding and rendering tasks; the GPU's compute scores of 98554 in OpenCL provide additional acceleration where software supports it.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's high single-thread and multi-thread scores, which speed up compilation and testing. The data encryption score of 29687 is relevant for security-related development. Students and small business users building a workstation will find the system capable of handling spreadsheets, document processing, and light-to-moderate graphics work without strain. The 90th percentile CPU ensures that the system remains responsive under multi-tasking, while the 66th percentile GPU handles standard office graphics and video playback.

The low 35 W CPU TDP makes this an attractive option for users who want a quiet or compact desktop build, as the processor generates minimal heat. The GPU's 225 W TDP is standard for its class, requiring adequate airflow but not exotic cooling. The desktop build class means this is a stationary system, not a laptop, so portability is not a consideration. The combined 78th percentile ranking indicates that this is a solid mid-to-upper-tier desktop build, suitable for users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance without spending on top-tier components.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T scores 31558 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47697.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Arc B570 (20556), 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534), 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662), and 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480).

Q: What memory and PCIe support does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, and a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T and Intel Arc A750 combination. All FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores provided.

Q: What is the power consumption of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 225 W. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 550 W, with one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector required.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Arc A750 has 28 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612, indicating it can handle ray-traced workloads at mainstream settings.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T processor with the Intel Arc A750 graphics card. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake processor on Intel Socket 1851, with a 35 W TDP, 5.30 GHz boost clock, and a 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The GPU is an Intel Arc A750 with 8 GB GDDR6 memory, 512 GB/s bandwidth, 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance, and a 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 78th, indicating a solid mid-to-upper-tier desktop system.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 47697 places it near high-end rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D (47908, 0.4% ahead) and AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (47918, 0.5% ahead), while the GPU's average score of 20582 ties it with the Intel Arc B570 (20556, 0.1% behind) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, 0.2% behind). The GPU is End-of-life with a successor named Battlemage, while the CPU is Active. The system is best described as a high-CPU-performance desktop with moderate GPU performance, suitable for productivity-heavy tasks that also require graphics acceleration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 4455 in Cinebench R23 ensures that game logic and physics will not bottleneck frame rates, but the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 and Passmark G3D score of 12534 cap the visual output. At 1080p with medium settings, the system can likely push high frame rates in esports titles, but at 1440p, the GPU will limit performance to lower refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU's multi-thread score of 31558 in Cinebench R23 provides ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, even with the 35 W TDP. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth handle the graphics side, but the Passmark GPU compute score of 5368 suggests that hardware encoding on the GPU may be less robust than the CPU's software encoding.

Video editing: The CPU's 90th percentile multi-thread performance accelerates timeline rendering and export, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31558. The GPU's 98554 OpenCL score provides GPU acceleration in compatible editors, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit work with very high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: The CPU's floating-point math score of 129817 and integer math score of 104943 handle CPU-based rendering well, while the GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates GPU renderers. The 8 GB VRAM is a constraint for large scenes, but the 512 GB/s bandwidth helps with texture streaming.

Software development: The CPU's data compression score of 370158 and extended instructions score of 28609 speed up compilation and data processing. The single-thread score of 4338 in Passmark ensures responsive IDE performance, while the 20 cores handle parallel build systems effectively.

Student and office work: The CPU's 90th percentile ranking makes everyday tasks like spreadsheets, document editing, and web browsing feel instantaneous, with the 35 W TDP keeping power consumption low. The GPU's 66th percentile performance is more than adequate for office graphics, video playback, and light photo editing, though the 225 W TDP is overkill for these tasks.