SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER form a desktop pairing that lands in the 54th percentile of all combined CPU-GPU builds, according to the benchmark data. This is a system built around a strikingly efficient 20-thread CPU paired with a GPU that, while modern in architecture, shows a surprisingly low benchmark percentile. The data indicates a mismatch: the processor delivers top-tier multi-threaded performance for its class, while the graphics card’s measured score places it near entry-level territory, which fundamentally shapes what this build can and cannot do.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S) using a 3 nm process from TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, housed in the Intel Socket 1851. The chip has a 35 W TDP, which is exceptionally low for a 20-core part, and it supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The processor includes an integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, though its primary role is clearly compute-heavy workloads given its core count.

Benchmark results show this CPU is a multi-threaded powerhouse. In Cinebench R23, it scores 31558 points in multi-core and 4455 points in single-core. The multi-core result is particularly strong: it sits 0.4% above the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945's average score of 47527, and 0.5% above the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H. It trails the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D by only 0.4% and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 by 0.5%, despite those rivals having higher average scores (47908 and 47918, respectively). This places the 265T in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly nine out of ten processors on the database.

Single-core performance is also robust. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4455, combined with a Passmark single-thread score of 4338, indicates strong responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks like web browsing, office applications, and legacy software. The Passmark multithread score of 37084 and a floating-point math score of 129817 reinforce the idea that this CPU excels at parallel workloads such as video encoding and 3D rendering. Data compression (370158 in Passmark) and encryption (29687) scores are high, suggesting solid performance in file archiving and security-related tasks. The chip’s 30 MB shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

For real workloads, this means the 265T is a capable workstation-class CPU that can handle heavy compilation, scientific simulation, and content creation without breaking a sweat. The 35 W TDP is notable: it delivers near-top-tier performance while consuming a fraction of the power that traditional high-core-count desktop chips require, making it suitable for compact or thermally constrained systems. However, the lack of an unlocked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) means overclocking is off the table, so the stock clocks define the ceiling.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a severe imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at only the 18th percentile among all GPUs. This 72-percentage-point gap is the clearest indicator of where the bottleneck lies. In any workload that relies heavily on graphics processing, the RTX 5070 SUPER will be the limiting factor. The CPU is capable of feeding frames far faster than the GPU can render them, meaning in gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks, the graphics card will hold back the system.

The combined percentile of 54 reflects this compromise: the CPU drags the overall score up, but the GPU pulls it down. In CPU-bound scenarios—such as physics simulations, data processing, or software compilation—the system will perform near the top of its class. In GPU-bound scenarios, such as modern gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering, the GPU’s low benchmark score will dominate the experience.

The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination (dataIsMeasured: false) means there are no direct frame-time results to quantify the bottleneck. However, the benchmark scores imply that at lower resolutions (e.g., 1080p), where CPU load is higher relative to GPU load, the system might see less severe GPU limitation, though the GPU’s low percentile still caps maximum frame rates. At higher resolutions (e.g., 4K), the GPU becomes the sole bottleneck, and the CPU’s power goes largely unused.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 47697, which places it in the 90th percentile. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (47527, 0.4% slower), the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (47468, 0.5% slower), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D (47908, 0.4% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (47918, 0.5% faster). This means the 265T is effectively on par with those four chips, all within half a percent of each other, making it a competitive choice for multi-threaded tasks.

The GPU’s benchmark picture is starkly different. The only recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2690, giving it an 18th percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are all lower-end parts: the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664, 1% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2662, 1.1% slower), the Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660, 1.1% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 (2645, 1.7% slower). The RTX 5070 SUPER is merely 1.7% faster than a GT 440, a card from a completely different era. This suggests that despite its modern Blackwell 2.0 architecture and 18 GB of GDDR7 memory, the measured performance is exceptionally poor, possibly due to early drivers, thermal throttling, or a benchmark anomaly. The data, however, is what it is: this GPU scores like an entry-level part.

The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-heavy tasks but fails to deliver adequate graphics performance. The 54th combined percentile reflects a build that is mid-pack overall, but the distribution is lopsided—top-tier CPU, bottom-tier GPU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries. Therefore, all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690, which places it in the 18th percentile, strongly suggests that gaming performance will be poor relative to modern standards. The nearest rivals in the GPU benchmark—GT 1030 and GT 440—are not known for high-refresh gaming, so expectations should be set accordingly.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU is likely to deliver low frame rates in demanding titles, possibly in the 20-30 FPS range for AAA games, based on the performance tier implied by its percentile. At 1440p, the situation worsens, and at 4K, the GPU would be overwhelmed, likely producing unplayable frame rates in most modern games. The CPU’s strong single-core score (4455 in Cinebench R23) ensures that frame pacing will be stable, but the GPU cannot push enough pixels. Esports titles with lower graphics requirements might run acceptably at medium settings, but the data does not support claims of high-refresh gaming. The 18 GB VRAM and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are wasted on a GPU that cannot render frames fast enough to utilize them.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is suited for users who prioritize CPU compute over graphics. The 90th-percentile CPU makes it an excellent choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development—tasks that rely heavily on multi-threaded performance. The 35 W TDP also makes it attractive for small form factor workstations or office environments where power efficiency is key, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a backup display output if the discrete GPU is not needed.

Students in engineering or computer science fields would benefit from the CPU’s compilation speed and data processing capabilities. Small business workstations handling database operations, encryption, or file compression would see strong performance from the Passmark scores in those areas (370158 for compression, 29687 for encryption). However, gamers or GPU-accelerated workload users should avoid this build, as the GPU’s 18th percentile makes it unsuitable for modern gaming or GPU rendering. The target user is someone who needs a powerful CPU for non-graphics tasks and is willing to accept a weak discrete GPU, possibly for later replacement.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not viable. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 and 18th percentile indicate it cannot sustain high frame rates at any resolution. The CPU would not be the limiting factor, but the GPU would cap performance far below high-refresh targets.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads and high multithread score (31558 in Cinebench R23) can handle software encoding while gaming, but the GPU’s poor rendering performance means the game itself would run at low frame rates. Streaming a game that runs at 30 FPS or less is not a compelling experience.

Video editing: Strong. The CPU’s multi-core performance (37084 Passmark multithread) accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU’s 18 GB VRAM can hold large video buffers, though GPU-accelerated effects will be slow due to the low compute score.

3D rendering: Mixed. CPU-based rendering (e.g., mental ray, CPU renderers) will be fast, but GPU-based renderers (e.g., Blender Cycles with CUDA) will be severely limited by the GPU’s low score. The 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is nominal, but the benchmark suggests real-world performance is far below that.

Software development: Excellent. The CPU’s 20 cores and high integer math score (104943 in Passmark) compile code quickly, and the 30 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: Overkill but effective. The CPU’s single-thread score (4338 Passmark) ensures snappy office apps, and the low 35 W TDP keeps power bills down. The discrete GPU is unnecessary for this scenario, and the integrated graphics would suffice.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture (GB205 chip) using a 5 nm process from TSMC, with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. It features 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units, along with 50 ray tracing cores and 200 tensor cores. The GPU has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. Its clocks are rated at 2325 MHz base and 2512 MHz boost, with memory at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The card supports PCIe 5.0 x16 and outputs via 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

The theoretical specifications are impressive: FP32 performance is 32.15 TFLOPS, texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s, and pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s. However, the only benchmark score—3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2690—places it in the 18th percentile, which is a massive discrepancy from what the specs suggest. The nearest rivals are all low-end cards (GT 1030, GT 440), indicating that in practice, this GPU performs like a budget part. The 18 GB VRAM and high bandwidth are not reflected in the benchmark, suggesting the card may be severely throttled or that the benchmark run was anomalous. For rendering workloads, the data implies that the GPU will be a bottleneck, unable to leverage its 50 RT cores or 200 tensor cores effectively in real-world scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 90% of processors on the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D?

A: The 265T has an average benchmark score of 47697, which is 0.4% lower than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D’s average score of 47908.

Q: What is the GPU’s benchmark score and percentile?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and socket?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP and uses the Intel Socket 1851.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory with a 192-bit bus and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined CPU-GPU percentile is 54, placing it in the middle of all desktop builds.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: “desktop”) pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. The CPU is a high-end, power-efficient 20-core part in the 90th percentile, while the GPU is a modern-architecture card that benchmarks in the 18th percentile, a surprisingly low tier for its specs. The combined percentile of 54 indicates a mid-tier overall system, but the performance profile is highly uneven. The CPU is a top-10% performer that excels in multi-threaded workloads, rendering, and compilation, while the GPU is a bottom-20% performer that will struggle with modern gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. This build is best suited for users who need massive CPU compute for professional workloads and are willing to accept a weak discrete GPU, perhaps as a placeholder for a future upgrade. The data does not support this as a gaming or GPU-rendering system, but it is a strong candidate for a workstation focused on CPU-bound tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds