SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and Intel Arc A580 pairing combines a high-end 20-core desktop processor with a mid-range Alchemist graphics card. This configuration targets 1440p gaming and productivity workloads, but the data is clear: no measured frame rate rows exist for this exact combination. All FPS figures in this analysis are estimated from the benchmark scores, not captured from live game testing.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU pairing, all gaming performance estimates are derived from the Arc A580’s benchmark scores and the Core Ultra 7 265KF’s processing power. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 places it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, indicating solid 1080p and capable 1440p performance. The Arc A580 delivers an estimated 60-80 FPS at 1080p ultra settings in most modern titles, with lighter esports games reaching well above 100 FPS.

At 1440p, the A580’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for ultra settings in most games but may require texture quality reductions in VRAM-heavy titles. The GPU’s 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 performance suggest that 1440p ultra is achievable at 40-60 FPS in demanding AAA games, while competitive titles will comfortably exceed 80 FPS. The 87th percentile GPU rank means this card outperforms a majority of installed GPUs, but it is not a high-refresh 4K solution.

For ray tracing, the Arc A580 includes 24 dedicated RT cores. Games with heavy ray-traced effects will see significant performance drops compared to rasterized rendering, but lighter RT implementation at 1080p is playable. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 API support ensures compatibility with modern graphics features, though driver maturity for day-one releases remains a variable.

The Core Ultra 7 265KF’s single-core performance — evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7021 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2759 — ensures that CPU-bound scenarios like high-FPS competitive gaming are not limited by processing power. The CPU’s 94th percentile rank means it exceeds nearly all other processors in the database, so in gaming, the Arc A580 will be the limiting factor in almost every scenario. Estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra range from 60 FPS in AAA titles to 120+ FPS in esports, while 1440p ultra yields roughly 40-80 FPS depending on title optimization.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between these two components is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Core Ultra 7 265KF sits at the 94th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 71910, while the Arc A580 sits at the 87th percentile of GPUs with an average score of 57756. This creates a configuration where the GPU is the primary bottleneck for gaming workloads, as the CPU has substantial headroom to feed even more powerful graphics cards.

Benchmark evidence shows the CPU’s multi-threaded dominance: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 and a Passmark multithread score of 58518. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU can generate frames faster than the GPU can render them, meaning the A580 will be pegged at maximum utilization while the CPU idles partially. At 1440p, the gap narrows slightly, but the GPU remains the constraint in most titles. The estimated FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a typical 25-30% drop, consistent with GPU-bound rendering rather than CPU limitations.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s 20 cores and 20 threads handle multi-threaded tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering efficiently, while the GPU’s 3072 shading units accelerate GPU-accelerated effects. The Arc A580’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 indicates strong compute capability for its class, but it cannot match the CPU’s raw integer and floating-point throughput in heavily parallel CPU workloads. The Passmark integer math score of 143351 and floating point math score of 189431 demonstrate that the CPU dominates general computation.

The combined percentile of 91 for this pairing reflects a system where the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU. This is not necessarily a flaw — it provides upgrade headroom for a future GPU swap without changing the processor. However, for gamers building specifically for current titles, the CPU is over-provisioned relative to the GPU, meaning some of the processor’s potential is unused in gaming scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the estimated frame rates of 60-120+ FPS in most titles make this system suitable for 120Hz monitors, though not consistently for 144Hz+ in AAA games. The CPU’s strong single-core performance ensures no frame time spikes from processor limitations, but the GPU’s 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 output caps maximum achievable FPS.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU with a 49736 Cinebench R23 multi-core score can handle x264 encoding alongside gaming without significant performance degradation. The Arc A580’s dedicated media encoders (implied by its modern architecture) offload encoding work, but the CPU has sufficient headroom for software encoding at 1080p60 with minimal frame loss.

Video editing: The CPU’s 20 threads and Passmark data compression score of 666589 accelerate timeline scrubbing and export tasks. The GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 12.29 TFLOPS compute assist with effects rendering and preview acceleration in DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro, though 8 GB VRAM may limit 4K multi-layer timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 49736 Cinebench R23 multi-core score places it in the top 6% of processors for CPU-based rendering workloads. The GPU’s 24 RT cores and 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing in Blender and similar applications, though render times will be longer than with higher-tier GPUs.

Software development: The 20-core processor with 30 MB of shared L3 cache handles parallel compilation workloads efficiently. The Passmark extended instructions score of 54513 and integer math score of 143351 indicate strong performance for code compilation, while the GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: This system is dramatically over-specified for document processing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The CPU’s single-core score of 7021 in Cinebench R23 ensures instantaneous application response, but the power consumption and cost are unjustified for such workloads. The system excels in multitasking scenarios with many background processes.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh or 1440p balanced settings and want a CPU that will remain relevant for years. The Core Ultra 7 265KF’s 94th percentile CPU rank means it will not bottleneck future GPU upgrades, making this an excellent foundation for a system that will see a graphics card replacement in 2-3 years. Gamers at 1440p who accept medium-high settings in demanding titles will find the Arc A580 adequate, while 1080p competitive players will appreciate the headroom.

Content creators working with 1080p or light 1440p video editing will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded power, and the GPU provides acceptable acceleration for effects and previews. Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant speedups from the 20 cores, and the CPU’s single-thread performance keeps interactive tools responsive. Small business workstations running virtualization or database workloads will leverage the 58518 Passmark multithread score, though the GPU adds little value for such tasks.

Users who game occasionally but primarily perform CPU-heavy work — rendering, compiling, simulation — will find the balance appropriate. The system is less suitable for 4K gaming enthusiasts or those who require maximum ray-traced performance, as the A580’s 8 GB VRAM and 24 RT cores are constraints. Students building a do-everything machine for gaming and coursework will find it capable, though the total system cost is higher than necessary for purely academic use.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture at TSMC’s 3 nm process node. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The CPU features a complex cache hierarchy: 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark scores show exceptional multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 49736, while single-core reaches 7021. Geekbench multi-core follows with 22913 and single-core with 2759. Passmark multithread at 58518 and single-thread at 4928 place this CPU in the top 6% of all tested processors. The 94th percentile rank confirms its position among enthusiast-class CPUs, rivaling AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX (0.2% ahead) and Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (0.8% ahead on average score).

The 20-core design with no hyper-threading (20 threads equals 20 cores) is notable. Each core operates independently, which benefits workloads with high core count scaling but may slightly reduce performance in lightly-threaded tasks with high cache contention. The 5.50 GHz boost clock ensures strong single-threaded performance for gaming and legacy applications. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the 125 W TDP limits voltage headroom without enhanced cooling.

Real-world implications: video encoding, 3D rendering, and code compilation will see near-linear scaling up to 20 threads. The 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for data-intensive workloads. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which this build accounts for with the Arc A580.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) using TSMC’s 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, paired with 24 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a 1700 MHz base clock and 2000 MHz boost clock, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Compute performance is rated at 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel fill rate reaches 192.0 GPixel/s and texture fill rate reaches 384.0 GTexel/s. The GPU uses a dual-slot cooler with two 8-pin power connectors and a 175 W TDP, requiring a 450 W suggested PSU. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 2.0 connectors.

Benchmark scores show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229, Geekbench OpenCL of 91657, and Geekbench Vulkan of 79381. The 87th percentile GPU rank places it near the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (0.6% ahead) and AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (0.7% ahead on average score). The FP32 throughput of 12.29 TFLOPS indicates capable 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p performance.

For rendering workloads, the 24 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity in 3D applications. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and compute shaders. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with mesh shaders and variable rate shading. The lack of tensor cores (null in the data) means no dedicated AI acceleration, though FP16 compute can handle some inference tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265KF uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with a 102.4 GB/s bandwidth limit. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, allowing for high-bandwidth NVMe storage and graphics cards. The Arc A580 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 slots, so no bandwidth bottleneck exists for the GPU.

The suggested PSU of 450 W for the GPU combined with the CPU’s 125 W TDP means a 600-650 W power supply is sufficient for the full system. The GPU’s dual 8-pin power connectors are standard on modern power supplies. The motherboard selection should prioritize robust VRM cooling for the CPU’s 125 W TDP, especially if overclocking is planned since the multiplier is unlocked.

A sensible next upgrade is replacing the Arc A580 with a higher-tier GPU. The CPU’s 94th percentile performance will not bottleneck even a top-end graphics card, so users can upgrade to a 4K-capable GPU without changing the processor or motherboard. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs storage and GPU bandwidth. Memory upgrades can scale from dual-channel DDR5, and the 30 MB L3 cache reduces dependency on memory speed.

The 3 nm process node and 17,800 million transistors suggest the CPU has thermal headroom for moderate overclocking, though the 125 W TDP limits extreme voltage increases. The socket 1851 platform is expected to support multiple future CPU generations, though the FACT PACK does not confirm this. For users planning a multi-year build, this platform provides a robust foundation.

FAQ

Q: Does this system support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A580 includes 24 dedicated RT cores with DirectX 12 Ultimate support, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible games.

Q: What resolution is best for gaming?

A: The GPU’s 87th percentile rank and 8 GB VRAM suggest 1080p ultra is the sweet spot, with 1440p viable at medium-high settings. 4K is not recommended due to the VRAM limit and 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 compute.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 7 265KF has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking. The 125 W TDP and 5.50 GHz boost clock provide headroom, but a capable cooler is required.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 91, indicating it outperforms 91% of tested desktop configurations in the database.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Core Ultra 7 265KF has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory. This build includes the Arc A580.

Q: What is the GPU’s power requirement?

A: The Arc A580 has a 175 W TDP and requires a 450 W suggested PSU. The CPU’s 125 W TDP means a 600 W power supply provides adequate headroom.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 7 265KF delivers standout CPU benchmark scores: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 49736 and single-core at 7021. Geekbench shows 22913 multi-core and 2759 single-core. Passmark multithread scores 58518, with single-thread at 4928. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 71910 places it at the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX (0.2% faster) and Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (0.8% slower).

The Arc A580 posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229, Geekbench OpenCL of 91657, and Geekbench Vulkan of 79381. Its average benchmark score of 57756 places it at the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (0.6% faster) and AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (0.7% slower).

The combined picture shows a CPU that is significantly more powerful than the GPU, with the processor ranking 7 percentile points higher. This imbalance favors CPU-heavy workloads like rendering and compilation, while gaming performance is constrained by the GPU. The combined percentile of 91 reflects a well-above-average system, but the GPU is the clear upgrade path for improved frame rates. The CPU’s 49736 Cinebench R23 multi-core score ensures that any future GPU upgrade will be fully utilized, making this a forward-looking build with excellent longevity.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + Intel Arc A580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

Intel Arc A580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds