SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER pairing represents a desktop build centered on a high-core-count processor and a 24 GB graphics card. Benchmark data shows the CPU in the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU’s single Steel Nomad score places it in the 19th percentile, a figure that requires careful interpretation given the limited test data. This combination is best understood as a processor-dominant platform, where the 20-core 265KF drives productivity and multi-threaded workloads, while the RTX 5080 SUPER provides a substantial memory buffer and modern feature set for graphics tasks. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS figures discussed below are estimated from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build holds a combinedPercentile of 57, indicating that the pairing outperforms roughly 57% of all recorded desktop configurations in the database. This figure blends the CPU’s strong 94th percentile standing with the GPU’s lower 19th percentile, resulting in a mid-pack overall position.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 265KF has an average benchmark score of 71910. It sits 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX (71797), 0.8% ahead of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71370), and 0.6% behind the Intel Xeon 6517P (72350) and 0.7% behind the Intel Xeon 6724P (72396). These deltas are all under one percent, meaning the 265KF trades blows with those server-class and high-end mobile chips.

Q: What is the GPU’s raw benchmark score and how does it compare to similar cards?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. That result is 2.8% lower than the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3163) and 3.4% lower than the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3182), while being 3.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce 820A (2983) and 3.6% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M (2967). The GPU’s percentileVsAllGpus is 19, which reflects the sparse single-test dataset rather than a typical gaming-tier ranking.

Q: Does this CPU include integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has integratedGraphics listed as "N/A." This means a discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output, which the RTX 5080 SUPER provides. Builders cannot rely on the processor alone for video output or troubleshooting.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The 265KF supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. This is a standard high-performance desktop configuration, with the bandwidth figure indicating sufficient throughput for the 20-core design.

Q: How many cores and threads does the 265KF have, and is it overclockable?

A: The processor has 20 cores and 20 threads, meaning it uses a 1:1 core-to-thread ratio without Hyper-Threading. The multiplier is unlocked (multiplierUnlocked: true), so users can manually adjust clocks. Its base clock is 3.90 GHz and boost clock is 5.50 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and power requirement?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER features 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s bandwidth. Its TDP is 415 W, and it requires a single 16-pin power connector. The card is dual-slot, 304 mm in length, and uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build can target high-refresh 1440p and 4K gaming, but the GPU’s benchmark position suggests frame rates will vary by title. The CPU’s single-core score of 7021 in Cinebench R23 is strong, which helps maintain high minimum frames, while the GPU’s 24 GB memory capacity allows for large texture loads. However, the GPU’s 19th percentile (from the single Steel Nomad test) implies that maxing out 240 Hz or higher refresh rates at 4K in demanding games may be optimistic; 1440p high-refresh is a more realistic target.

Streaming: The 20-core/20-thread CPU provides ample headroom for encoding and streaming overhead. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 ensures that simultaneous game capture and encoding are unlikely to strain the processor. The GPU’s lack of measured FPS in the data means streaming performance is inferred from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores rather than direct benchmarks.

Video editing: Video editing suites benefit from both multi-core CPUs and large GPU memory. The 265KF’s PassMark multi-thread score of 58518 and Geekbench multi-core of 22913 indicate fast rendering of timelines and effects. The RTX 5080 SUPER’s 24 GB frame buffer is more than sufficient for 4K or 8K previews and GPU-accelerated effects, though the GPU’s raw compute score (56.28 TFLOPS FP32) suggests it will handle decode and encode tasks without being the primary bottleneck.

3D rendering: This is where the CPU shines. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 places the 265KF in the top tier for desktop processors, and the PassMark floating-point math score of 189431 indicates strong geometry and physics calculations. For CPU-based renderers, the 20 cores will significantly reduce render times compared to 8- or 12-core parts. GPU rendering will rely on the RTX 5080 SUPER’s 10752 shading units and 84 RT cores, but the lack of measured game FPS does not directly translate to render performance; the compute specs suggest capable, if not class-leading, output.

Software development: Compilation and code analysis favor multi-core CPUs. The 265KF’s PassMark data compression score of 666589 and integer math score of 143351 demonstrate rapid handling of large codebases and build processes. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. The GPU’s role in development is minor, but the 24 GB memory can be used for local machine learning model training, given the tensor cores (336) and FP16 performance equal to FP32 at 56.28 TFLOPS.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for typical student or office tasks, but it handles them effortlessly. The single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core: 7021, PassMark single-thread: 4928) ensures snappy application loading and spreadsheet responsiveness. Power consumption is a consideration, as the CPU TDP is 125 W and the GPU TDP is 415 W, so a high-capacity PSU is required; the data does not provide a suggested PSU wattage, but the combined 540 W from TDP figures indicates a robust unit is needed.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite is extensive, with scores spanning rendering, math, and compression tests. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 is the headline figure, representing a 94th percentile standing among all CPUs. The Geekbench multi-core score of 22913 and PassMark multi-thread of 58518 corroborate this strong multi-threaded performance. Single-core performance is equally solid: Cinebench R23 single-core at 7021, Geekbench single-core at 2759, and PassMark single-thread at 4928. The average benchmark score of 71910 places the 265KF within 1% of four rival chips (AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX, Intel Xeon 6517P, Intel Xeon 6724P, Intel Xeon Platinum 8270), showing that it competes with both high-end mobile and server processors.

The GPU presents a more ambiguous picture. The only benchmark recorded is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 3075, yielding a 19th percentile vs. all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3163, -2.8% for the 5080 SUPER) and the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3182, -3.4%), but also the much older GeForce 820A (2983, +3.1%) and GTX 860M (2967, +3.6%). These deltas are small, but the rival list includes professional and legacy parts, not modern gaming GPUs. The 19th percentile is therefore not indicative of the 5080 SUPER being a low-end card; rather, the single test point and the specific workload (Steel Nomad) may not capture its gaming strengths. The GPU’s specifications (24 GB GDDR7, 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, 56.28 TFLOPS FP32) are high-end, but benchmark data is insufficient to rank it against contemporary gaming cards.

The combined picture is a desktop build where the CPU far outpaces the GPU in relative performance. The CPU’s 94th percentile vs. the GPU’s 19th percentile creates a significant imbalance, meaning the processor is capable of driving far more graphics performance than this GPU can deliver in the tested benchmark. The combinedPercentile of 57 reflects this trade-off: the build is above average overall, but the GPU drags down what would otherwise be a top-tier processor configuration.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` object is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming frame rates below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should not be treated as verified results.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core: 7021) ensures that the processor will not be a limiting factor in most titles. The GPU’s 19th percentile score in Steel Nomad, however, suggests that the 5080 SUPER may not deliver class-leading frame rates. Based on the GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 1.02 TB/s memory bandwidth, an estimated 120-170 FPS in esports titles (e.g., competitive shooters) is plausible, while demanding AAA games might see 80-110 FPS at 1080p ultra. These are rough estimates; the actual results depend on game optimization.

At 1440p ultra, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The 24 GB memory capacity prevents VRAM-related stutters, but the raw compute (56.28 TFLOPS) may limit frame rates to 60-100 FPS in modern games. The CPU’s 30 MB L3 cache and high boost clock of 5.50 GHz help maintain consistent frame pacing. For 4K ultra, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The 5080 SUPER’s bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s is adequate, but the 19th percentile score implies that 4K ultra at 60 FPS might only be achievable in lighter titles or with upscaling technologies. The lack of measured FPS means these figures are speculative; the data cannot confirm exact performance.

To summarize: expect the CPU to provide excellent frame time consistency, but the GPU’s actual gaming performance is unverified. The 24 GB frame buffer is future-proof for high-resolution textures, but the compute throughput may not fully utilize the CPU’s potential in GPU-bound scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) processors. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), meaning a PCIe 5.0 x16 GPU slot is available for the RTX 5080 SUPER, which also uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. This ensures no bandwidth bottleneck between the CPU and GPU.

The GPU’s TDP is 415 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 125 W, for a combined 540 W. The FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU wattage, but the power connectors (1x 16-pin for GPU) and TDP figures indicate that a high-capacity power supply is necessary. The GPU is dual-slot, 304 mm long, 137 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, so case clearance must be checked. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

A sensible next upgrade would be the GPU itself, as the CPU’s 94th percentile rank indicates significant untapped headroom. Swapping the RTX 5080 SUPER for a higher-performing graphics card (one with a higher 3DMark score) would likely push the combinedPercentile above 57. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory (the CPU supports dual-channel) could benefit memory-intensive workloads, but the current 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is already high. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future storage and GPU upgrades are compatible. The CPU’s active production status and unlocked multiplier mean it remains a viable overclocking platform for years.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over raw gaming frame rates. Content creators working with 4K video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the 265KF’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 and PassMark floating-point score of 189431. Software developers compiling large projects will see reduced build times thanks to the 20 cores and data compression score of 666589. The GPU’s 24 GB memory is suited for machine learning enthusiasts who need to load large models, though the compute power is modest.

Gamers should consider this build if they play at 1440p or 4K and prioritize visual fidelity over maximum FPS. The 24 GB GDDR7 memory allows for ultra texture packs, and the CPU’s high single-core performance (7021 in Cinebench R23) ensures stable frame delivery. However, those seeking 240 Hz esports performance at 1080p may find the GPU lacking, given its 19th percentile score. Students and office workers would be overpaying for performance they won’t use, but the system will handle any productivity task without breaking a sweat.

Small business workstations that run multi-threaded simulation or data analysis software will appreciate the CPU’s 20 threads and 30 MB L3 cache. The lack of ECC memory support is a caveat, but for most professional workloads, the performance is sufficient. The GPU adds CUDA acceleration potential (336 tensor cores) for AI inference tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S) and fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 3.90 GHz and boost clock is 5.50 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. It supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, but no ECC.

Benchmark results reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20889 and R15 multi-core of 5013 show consistent scaling across generations. The Geekbench multi-core score of 22913 and PassMark multi-thread of 58518 confirm this. The single-core performance is also strong: Cinebench R23 single-core at 7021, and PassMark single-thread at 4928. The 94th percentile vs. all CPUs means this is among the top 6% of processors in the database.

Real workload implications are clear. Video rendering (Cinebench scores), mathematical computation (PassMark integer math: 143351, floating-point: 189431), and data compression (666589) all benefit from the 20 cores. The lack of Hyper-Threading (20 threads = 20 cores) is a design choice, but the high clock speeds compensate. The 3 nm process node from TSMC contributes to power efficiency, with a TDP of only 125 W despite the high core count. The 17.8 billion transistors enable a dense design that fits an L3 cache of 30 MB, reducing memory latency for frequently accessed data.

For gamers, the CPU’s single-core boost of 5.50 GHz ensures that it won’t bottleneck most titles. For professionals, the multi-core scores place it in server-class territory, rivaling Xeon processors (as seen in nearestRivals where the 265KF is within 0.8% of the Xeon 6517P). The 20-core design is future-proof for upcoming software that scales well with core counts.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. The CPU is a 20-core Arrow Lake part with a 94th percentile CPU rank, while the GPU is a 24 GB GDDR7 card with a 19th percentile GPU rank based on a single benchmark. The combinedPercentile is 57, placing this build in the upper-middle tier of all recorded systems.

The CPU launches at a launch MSRP of $379, and the GPU at a launch MSRP of 999 USD. These are list prices and do not reflect street prices. The CPU is from the Core Ultra Series 2, released on 2024-10-23, while the GPU is from the GeForce 50-series, released on 2025-12-31. Both are active production parts. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, so the interface is fully compatible.

Overall, this build is a workstation-class CPU paired with a high-memory GPU. The tier is defined by the CPU’s dominance: the 265KF’s 94th percentile far exceeds the GPU’s 19th percentile, making this a processor-first system. For tasks like rendering, compilation, or simulation, the build is near the top of the heap. For gaming, the GPU’s performance is less clear due to insufficient benchmark data, but the 24 GB memory and modern architecture (Blackwell 2.0) suggest it is not a weak point, only an unverified one.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The 265KF’s 94th percentile vs. the 5080 SUPER’s 19th percentile creates a 75-percentage-point gap. In CPU-bound workloads (rendering, compression, math), the CPU will operate at near-peak efficiency, while the GPU idles. The PassMark multi-thread score of 58518 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 49736 are the primary drivers of this build’s productivity performance.

In GPU-bound workloads (gaming at high resolutions, ray tracing), the GPU is the limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075, while from a single test, indicates that the GPU does not have the raw compute to match the CPU’s capabilities. The FPS estimates (when extrapolated from the benchmark) would show the GPU capping frame rates at values well below what the CPU could handle. For example, a game that runs at 100 FPS on this GPU might run at 150 FPS with a stronger GPU, given the CPU’s headroom.

The bottleneck changes by workload. In 1080p gaming, the CPU is generally not the limit, but the GPU’s 19th percentile suggests it might be. In 4K gaming, the GPU is certainly the limit. In video editing, the CPU handles encoding while the GPU accelerates effects, so both are utilized. In 3D rendering with CPU-based engines, the GPU is nearly irrelevant. The data shows that the combinedPercentile of 57 is dragged down by the GPU; without the GPU, the CPU alone would place much higher. Therefore, users who plan to upgrade should replace the GPU first to achieve a more balanced system. The CPU’s 20 lanes of PCIe Gen 5 and dual-channel DDR5 support ensure that any future GPU will not be bottlenecked by the platform.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds