SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

70,879 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and Intel Arc A770 pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration that combines a 20-core Arrow Lake processor with a 16 GB Alchemist graphics card. This analysis relies entirely on synthetic benchmark data, as no measured frame rate rows exist for this exact combination. All FPS figures discussed below are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU scores, not direct gaming measurements.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance relationship between the Core Ultra 7 265K and the Arc A770 is heavily skewed toward the processor. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 90th percentile among all graphics cards, placing the combined system at the 92nd percentile overall. This narrow gap suggests the pairing is reasonably balanced, but workload-specific data reveals where the bottleneck shifts.

In multi-threaded CPU tasks, the 265K produces a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35850, which places it 1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700KF and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F. This level of compute throughput means CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation, data compression, and code compilation will not strain the processor. The PassMark physics score of 3731 and integer math score of 143242 indicate the CPU can feed the GPU without becoming a limiting factor in most gaming workloads.

The GPU, however, presents a different constraint profile. The Arc A770’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 places it 0.3% behind the NVIDIA CMP 90HX and 1.7% behind the NVIDIA Quadro P6000. In gaming scenarios, the GPU is the more likely bottleneck at higher resolutions, particularly at 4K where pixel throughput becomes dominant. The GPU’s pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s provide the raw fill capacity, but the FP32 performance of 19.66 TFLOPS caps shading complexity.

The CPU’s single-thread performance is equally important for frame pacing. A Geekbench single-core score of 2713 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2020 demonstrate strong per-thread capability, essential for games that rely on a primary render thread. The 5.50 GHz boost clock ensures that lightly-threaded workloads receive maximum clock response, while the 20 cores and 20 threads handle background tasks without competing for the same execution resources.

Memory bandwidth is a potential balancing factor. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s theoretical bandwidth, while the GPU accesses its 16 GB GDDR6 memory across a 256-bit bus at 512.0 GB/s. In CPU-bound scenarios at 1080p, the processor’s memory bandwidth may become the limiting factor for data-heavy game logic, whereas at 1440p and above, the GPU’s memory subsystem takes over as the primary constraint.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of both components, not direct measurements. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 90th percentile ranking suggest a system capable of high-refresh gaming at 1080p and solid 1440p performance, with 4K gaming requiring reduced settings for demanding titles.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU’s strong single-core performance (Geekbench single-core 2713, Cinebench R23 single-core 2020) is the dominant factor. Games that are CPU-bound at this resolution will benefit from the 5.50 GHz boost clock and the 30 MB L3 cache. The GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is adequate for driving high frame rates in esports and moderately demanding titles, but the lack of measured data means exact FPS numbers cannot be stated.

At 1440p ultra, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The Arc A770’s 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM capacity provide sufficient headroom for modern game assets, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2969 indicates performance roughly in line with workstation-class GPUs from previous generations. The GPU’s 32 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 rate suggests ray-traced workloads will see significant performance reductions.

At 4K ultra, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s are respectable but not top-tier, and the 90th percentile ranking places it below the most performant graphics cards. Estimated frame rates at this resolution would be playable for less demanding titles but would require settings adjustments for AAA releases. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is a positive factor, preventing capacity-related stuttering in most current games.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process node from TSMC. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and the thermal design power is rated at 125 W.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration provides 60 MB of total L2 cache across all 20 cores, which is substantial for data-intensive workloads. The 30 MB L3 cache serves as a shared pool for frequently accessed data, reducing memory latency in multi-threaded scenarios.

Benchmark results demonstrate balanced performance across synthetic workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35850 indicates strong multi-threaded throughput, while the single-core score of 2020 shows competitive per-thread performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 23085 and single-core score of 2713 corroborate this dual strength. PassMark results further detail the CPU’s capabilities: data compression scores 665554, data encryption scores 48246, extended instructions score 54333, floating point math scores 189629, and integer math scores 143242.

The nearest rivals provide context. The Intel Xeon 6511P averages 71051 points, which is 0.2% higher than the 265K’s average of 70879. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 averages 71370, 0.7% higher. Conversely, the Intel Core i7-14700KF averages 70163, putting the 265K 1% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F averages 69996, with the 265K leading by 1.3%. This positions the 265K as a high-end desktop processor that slightly outperforms the previous generation i7 and competes with server-class Xeon parts.

The 20 threads and 20 cores are identical in count, meaning no hyper-threading. This is a deliberate design choice for Arrow Lake. The PassMark multithread score of 58594 and single-thread score of 4928 indicate that the CPU excels in both parallel and sequential workloads, making it suitable for rendering, compilation, and simulation tasks that scale across cores, as well as legacy software that relies on single-thread speed.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets desktop users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance with competent 1440p gaming capability. The 94th percentile CPU ranking makes this system suitable for content creators who render video, compile large codebases, or run complex simulations, while the 90th percentile GPU provides adequate graphics acceleration for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

Gamers at 1440p with high refresh rate monitors will find this pairing appropriate, though the lack of measured FPS data means the exact performance envelope is estimated. The CPU’s single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2713) ensures that CPU-bound games achieve stable frame pacing, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM capacity handles modern game textures without capacity constraints.

Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35850, which shortens render times compared to lower-tier processors. The PassMark data compression score of 665554 and encryption score of 48246 indicate strong performance in file archiving and data security tasks. Software developers will appreciate the multithread score of 58594 for parallel builds and the extended instructions score of 54333 for SIMD-heavy code.

Students and small business users building a single workstation for coursework, office productivity, and occasional gaming will find this system overqualified but future-proof. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for data integrity in professional workloads, though it requires compatible DDR5 modules. The dual-channel memory bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate throughput for most applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s single-core performance (Geekbench 2713, Cinebench R23 single-core 2020) and 5.50 GHz boost clock are sufficient to drive frame rates beyond 144 Hz in competitive titles. The GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 throughput supports this, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact headroom is estimated. The 16 GB VRAM prevents capacity bottlenecks.

Streaming: The 20 cores and 20 threads provide ample resources for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay. The PassMark multithread score of 58594 indicates that the CPU can handle x264 encoding at high presets while maintaining game performance. The GPU also supports hardware encoding via its Xe-HPG architecture, offloading this workload.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35850 and Geekbench multicore score of 23085 indicate strong export performance in editors like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The PassMark floating point score of 189629 supports GPU-accelerated effects and color grading. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU assists with timeline previews of high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers will exploit the 20 cores fully, with the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20918 and R15 multicore score of 5020 providing evidence of scalability. The GPU’s 4096 shading units and 32 RT cores support GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender, though the 19.66 TFLOPS rate is mid-range.

Software development: The multithread score of 58594 accelerates parallel compilation, while the single-thread score of 4928 handles editor responsiveness and incremental builds. The extended instructions score of 54333 benefits code that uses AVX or similar instruction sets. The 30 MB L3 cache reduces cache misses in large codebases.

Student and office work: This system far exceeds the requirements for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The Geekbench single-core score of 2713 ensures snappy application launches, while the 20 cores handle background tasks without perceptible slowdown. The ECC memory support adds data integrity for long-running academic computations.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using a 6 nm process from TSMC, containing 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The DG2-512 chip is the largest in the Alchemist generation, featuring 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. The GPU has 32 dedicated ray tracing cores, though tensor core specifications are not listed in the FACT PACK.

Memory configuration is a highlight: 16 GB of GDDR6 across a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate. This capacity is generous for current games and provides headroom for texture-heavy mods or professional workloads.

Clock speeds are 2100 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost. The FP32 performance of 19.66 TFLOPS represents the peak compute throughput, while FP16 reaches 39.32 TFLOPS with 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s, indicating balanced fill and texturing capabilities.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 places the GPU at the 90th percentile overall. Geekbench OpenCL scores 109175 and Vulkan scores 94284, showing strong compute performance in both APIs. The nearest rivals are workstation and professional cards: the NVIDIA CMP 90HX scores 69000 (0.3% higher), AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 scores 68562 (0.4% lower), AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 scores 69870 (1.5% higher), and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 scores 69986 (1.7% higher). This places the A770 in professional GPU territory for compute performance.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game APIs. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. The dual-slot cooler requires 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 550 W and a TDP of 225 W.

Production status is end-of-life, with the successor being Battlemage. The launch MSRP was 329 USD, though this price information is provided for reference only.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system ranks at the 92nd percentile, reflecting the strong individual performance of both components. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 70879, while the GPU’s average is 68809. These figures establish the system as a high-tier desktop configuration.

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35850 represents strong multi-threaded performance, with the single-core score of 2020 showing competitive per-thread capability. The Geekbench scores of 23085 multicore and 2713 single-core corroborate this balance. PassMark results provide additional granularity: data compression 665554, encryption 48246, extended instructions 54333, floating point 189629, integer math 143242, multithread 58594, physics 3731, random string sorting 79752, and single thread 4928.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 and Geekbench compute scores of 109175 OpenCL and 94284 Vulkan indicate solid DirectX and compute performance. The 90th percentile ranking places it above most consumer GPUs, though the nearest rivals are all professional or specialty cards.

The CPU’s percentile rank of 94 places it in the top 6% of all processors, while the GPU’s 90th percentile places it in the top 10% of all graphics cards. The combined 92nd percentile reflects a system where neither component is dramatically weaker than the other, though the CPU is the stronger of the two.

Compared to rivals, the CPU is 0.2% behind the Xeon 6511P and 0.7% behind the Xeon Platinum 8270, but 1% ahead of the i7-14700KF and 1.3% ahead of the Ryzen 7 9700F. The GPU is 0.3% behind the CMP 90HX, 0.4% ahead of the MI25, 1.5% behind the Pro WX 8200, and 1.7% behind the Quadro P6000. These margins are narrow, indicating that the system competes closely with previous-generation high-end parts.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2. The memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, with ECC memory supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, enabling high-bandwidth storage and GPU connectivity.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. The GPU has a TDP of 225 W and requires a suggested PSU of 550 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 125 W. The combined power draw of approximately 350 W leaves headroom within the 550 W suggestion, though users with additional drives or peripherals should consider a higher-wattage unit.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A770 with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking and 20 cores suggest it can support higher-tier graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future GPUs will have full bandwidth available.

The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to extract additional performance, though the 125 W TDP may require enhanced cooling. The 3 nm process and 17,800 million transistors indicate a modern design that should remain relevant for several years. The GPU is end-of-life, with the successor Battlemage already announced, so users seeking maximum GPU performance may prefer to wait for that release.

The platform supports up to 20 CPU PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU and one or two NVMe drives. The dual-channel memory bus is a potential limitation for memory-bandwidth-intensive tasks, but the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for most workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and Intel Arc A770 system?

A: The combined system ranks at the 92nd percentile among all configurations, with the CPU at the 94th percentile and the GPU at the 90th percentile.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 265K compare to the Core i7-14700KF in benchmark scores?

A: The 265K has an average benchmark score of 70879, which is 1% higher than the i7-14700KF’s average of 70163.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A770 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A770 has 32 dedicated ray tracing cores as part of its Xe-HPG architecture, though the 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 rate indicates ray-traced workloads will see performance reductions.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Arc A770?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s bandwidth with a memory clock of 2000 MHz and 16 Gbps effective data rate.

Q: Is the Core Ultra 7 265K overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking. The CPU has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a 125 W TDP.

Q: What is the production status of the Intel Arc A770?

A: The Arc A770 is end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage. The GPU was released on 2022-10-11 and uses the Alchemist (Arc 7) generation.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 7 265K supports ECC memory, which provides data integrity for professional workloads. The memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Build Overview

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and Intel Arc A770 form a desktop-class build combining a 20-core Arrow Lake processor with a 16 GB Alchemist graphics card. The CPU is manufactured on a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, while the GPU uses a 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die.

This pairing sits in the high-performance desktop tier, with the combined 92nd percentile ranking placing it above the vast majority of systems. The CPU’s 94th percentile and the GPU’s 90th percentile indicate a configuration where the processor has slightly more headroom than the graphics card. The system is suitable for 1440p gaming, content creation, and professional workloads, with the CPU providing exceptional multi-threaded performance and the GPU offering solid compute capabilities and generous VRAM.

The build class is desktop, confirming this is a stationary workstation/gaming configuration rather than a mobile solution. With the CPU’s 20 cores and 20 threads, the 30 MB L3 cache, and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM, this system is equipped to handle demanding applications for years, though the GPU’s end-of-life status suggests a future upgrade may be warranted for maximum graphics performance.