SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

70,879 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER pairing is a desktop configuration that lands in the 57th percentile overall, indicating a balanced mid-to-high tier system. The CPU is a 20-thread Arrow Lake processor built on a 3 nm TSMC process, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 part with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory. Benchmark data shows the CPU performing at the 94th percentile against all CPUs, but the GPU sits at only the 19th percentile in its own 3DMark test, a discrepancy that requires careful interpretation given the limited GPU benchmark data available.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture and fabricated by TSMC on a 3 nm process node. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The chip includes 30 MB of shared L3 cache, with 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2 per core. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support. The processor uses Intel Socket 1851 and offers 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU.

In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 35,850 in multi-core and 2,020 in single-core. These results indicate strong multi-threaded throughput for rendering and compilation workloads, while the single-core score supports responsive everyday use. In Geekbench, it achieves 23,085 multi-core and 2,713 single-core. The Passmark suite shows a multithread score of 58,594, with specific workloads like data compression at 665,554 and floating-point math at 189,629. The processor’s average benchmark score is 70,879, placing it at the 94th percentile of all CPUs.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ultra 7 265K is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon 6511P, which scores 71,051, a delta of -0.2%. It also comes within 0.7% of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270’s 71,370. Against desktop parts, it is 1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700KF’s 70,163 and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F’s 69,996. The data shows the 265K outperforms both mainstream desktop rivals by a narrow margin, while matching server-class Xeon parts in average score.

For real workloads, the 20-thread count with no hyper-threading means the chip relies on physical cores, which benefits power efficiency and thermal management. The 3 nm process node contributes to the 125 W TDP, making it a relatively power-efficient option for a 20-core part. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,928 indicates strong per-core performance, crucial for legacy or lightly threaded applications. The data encryption score of 48,246 suggests capable AES-NI throughput for security-related tasks, while the extended instructions score of 54,333 points to robust AVX-512 or similar vector processing capabilities.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has 20 cores and 20 threads, meaning it does not support simultaneous multithreading. It uses a 3 nm process node.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-14700KF?

A: The Ultra 7 265K has an average benchmark score of 70,879, which is 1% higher than the Core i7-14700KF’s 70,163. This makes it slightly faster in overall benchmark performance.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and type?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing and tensor core count?

A: The GPU has 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 57, indicating it sits in the middle of all tested desktop configurations.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this build?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is based on the GB203 chip using the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process node. It contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, with a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The GPU has 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. It includes 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray-traced rendering and AI acceleration.

The memory subsystem features 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s. The base clock is 2,295 MHz with a boost clock of 2,617 MHz, while the memory runs at 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective speed. The GPU’s pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s. It offers 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 performance, with a 1:1 ratio. The card has a TDP of 415 W and requires a single 16-pin power connector, with a dual-slot cooler design and dimensions of 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the GPU scores 3,075. This places it at the 19th percentile of all GPUs, which is a surprisingly low position for a high-end part. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with a score of 3,163, which is 2.8% higher, and the Intel Arc Pro B60 at 3,182, which is 3.4% higher. The GPU is only 3.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 820A and 3.6% ahead of the GeForce GTX 860M. The data suggests that this particular 3DMark test result may not reflect the GPU’s true gaming potential, as the score is anomalously low compared to the hardware specifications.

For rendering workloads, the 24 GB of VRAM is substantial for large textures and high-resolution assets. The 1.02 TB/s bandwidth supports high-throughput data movement for GPU compute tasks. The 84 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 336 tensor cores provide AI capabilities for DLSS and similar technologies. The FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS indicates strong raw compute for general-purpose GPU workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed based on benchmark percentiles. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 19th percentile. This suggests that, in the available benchmark data, the GPU is the limiting factor in most workloads. However, the GPU’s low percentile is based on a single 3DMark test, which may not be representative of real-world gaming performance.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 70,879 is near the top of the range, indicating negligible CPU bottlenecks for most applications. The 20 threads and 5.50 GHz boost clock can feed even high-end GPUs in gaming scenarios. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is sufficient for dual-channel DDR5, though it may limit performance in memory-intensive tasks like large data processing.

In gaming, the GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth are designed for 4K or high-refresh-rate gaming, but the 19th percentile score in 3DMark Steel Nomad suggests a potential issue with the benchmark data. If the score were accurate, the GPU would bottleneck the system severely. The CPU would likely wait for the GPU to complete frames, resulting in lower FPS than the CPU could otherwise support. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or compilation, the CPU would be the primary driver, with the GPU providing acceleration only where applicable.

The TDP figures highlight the power balance: the CPU draws 125 W, while the GPU draws 415 W, making the GPU the dominant power consumer. This indicates that the system’s power delivery and cooling should prioritize the GPU. The combined percentile of 57 reflects the imbalance, where the CPU’s high percentile is dragged down by the GPU’s low percentile.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K uses Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with ECC support enabled. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, allowing for high-bandwidth connections to GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated graphics is an Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, providing a fallback display output.

The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes. The card requires a single 16-pin power connector and has a TDP of 415 W. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the power draw implies a high-wattage supply is necessary. The GPU’s dual-slot design and 304 mm length require a case with sufficient clearance.

A sensible next upgrade would be to address the GPU bottleneck. Since the CPU is at the 94th percentile, it can handle a more powerful GPU if the current benchmark data holds true. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory could improve bandwidth-sensitive workloads, though the dual-channel configuration is already standard. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so upgrading storage to Gen 5 NVMe would maximize throughput. The 125 W CPU TDP leaves headroom for overclocking, as the multiplier is unlocked.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need high CPU performance with substantial GPU memory. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking makes it suitable for content creators, software developers, and researchers who run multi-threaded workloads like rendering, compiling, or data analysis. The 20 cores and 30 MB L3 cache support parallel processing, while the single-thread score of 4,928 ensures responsiveness in daily tasks.

For gamers, the 24 GB of VRAM in the GPU is intended for high-resolution textures and future titles. However, the GPU’s 19th percentile in the benchmark data suggests caution. If the score is accurate, the system may struggle in gaming, making it better suited for compute-heavy tasks. The GPU’s 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores are beneficial for developers working on ray-traced graphics or AI models.

Students and small business workstations would benefit from the CPU’s performance for productivity software, but the GPU’s power draw and cost may be overkill unless specific GPU compute tasks are needed. The system’s combined percentile of 57 places it in the mid-range of all builds, indicating it is not an extreme high-end configuration.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s Cinebench R15 scores are 5,020 multi-core and 708 single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 20,918 multi-core and 2,953 single-core. The Geekbench scores are 23,085 multi-core and 2,713 single-core. Passmark results include a multithread score of 58,594 and a single-thread score of 4,928. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 70,879, placing it at the 94th percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3,075, placing it at the 19th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the system is 57. The CPU’s nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon 6511P (71,051, -0.2%), the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71,370, -0.7%), the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70,163, +1%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (69,996, +1.3%). The GPU’s nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3,163, -2.8%), the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3,182, -3.4%), the NVIDIA GeForce 820A (2,983, +3.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M (2,967, +3.6%).

The combined picture shows a CPU that is competitive with server-class Xeon parts, while the GPU’s benchmark position is questionable given its hardware specifications. The system’s overall percentile of 57 suggests it performs in the middle of all tested configurations, with the CPU pulling the score up and the GPU pulling it down.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K, a 20-core desktop processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER, a 24 GB desktop graphics card. The build class is desktop, indicating a stationary workstation or gaming tower. The CPU is from the Core Ultra Series 2, while the GPU is from the GeForce 50-series.

The combined percentile of 57 places this system in the mid-range of all benchmarked builds. The CPU’s 94th percentile is among the highest for desktop processors, matching or exceeding Xeon server parts. The GPU’s 19th percentile is low, but the limited benchmark data (one 3DMark test) makes this figure unreliable for drawing firm conclusions. Overall, this is a CPU-heavy build where the processor is the standout component, with the GPU providing ample memory and compute resources despite the low benchmark score.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (4,928 in Passmark) and high boost clock (5.50 GHz) suggest it can handle high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-resolution textures, but its 3DMark score of 3,075 indicates it may underperform expectations.

Given the GPU’s 19th percentile, gamers at 1080p or 1440p may see lower FPS than typical for a card with these specs. At 4K, the memory capacity is beneficial, but the compute performance may bottleneck. The CPU is unlikely to be a limiting factor, as its 94th percentile ranking suggests it can drive most GPUs. However, the GPU’s low benchmark score is a red flag for gaming, and users should treat these FPS figures as estimates with high uncertainty.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds