SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

70,879 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and Intel Arc A580 pairing represents a distinctive desktop configuration, combining a high-end 20-core Arrow Lake processor with a mid-range Alchemist graphics card. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark data to assess the platform's capabilities across various workloads. It is important to note upfront that the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific combination; therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimated from the individual component benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A580's performance class, indicated by its 87th percentile ranking among all GPUs, positions it as a capable 1080p performer, but it is unlikely to sustain high refresh rates at maximum settings in the most demanding titles. The CPU's exceptional single-thread performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2713 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2020, ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, allowing the Arc A580 to operate at its full potential.

Streaming: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's robust multi-threading capabilities provide ample headroom for simultaneous gameplay and encoding. With a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35850 and a Passmark multithread score of 58594, the CPU can handle the encoding workload without significantly impacting frame pacing. The Arc A580 also supports modern APIs, including DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, which are essential for efficient hardware-accelerated encoding and streaming workflows.

Video Editing: This workload benefits from both strong CPU and GPU performance. The CPU's high multi-core scores in Cinebench R20 (20918) and Geekbench (23085) will accelerate timeline rendering and effect processing. Meanwhile, the Arc A580's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient memory bandwidth for handling 1080p and 1440p video projects, with the GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 compute power assisting with previews and GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is the clear workhorse in this scenario. Its 20 cores and 20 threads, combined with a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5020, deliver substantial computational power for CPU-based rendering engines. The Arc A580 can contribute to GPU-accelerated rendering, and its 24 RT cores suggest it can handle ray-traced workloads, though its performance will be a limiting factor compared to higher-tier GPUs.

Software Development: Compilation tasks are heavily multi-threaded and will scale well with the CPU's 20 cores. The Passmark data compression score of 665554 and integer math score of 143242 indicate strong performance in code compilation and data processing, which are common in software development. The CPU's support for ECC memory is a notable feature for developers working on critical or large-scale projects where data integrity is paramount.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is exceptionally overqualified for standard productivity tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance (Passmark singlethread score of 4928) ensures snappy application launches and responsive spreadsheet and document work. The dedicated GPU, while not necessary for this workload, provides a smooth desktop experience and supports multiple display outputs, including 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, which is beneficial for multi-monitor productivity setups.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system percentile of 91 reflects a high-performing platform overall, driven primarily by the CPU's excellent benchmark results. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K achieves a 94th percentile ranking against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 70879. This places it in a competitive position, with its nearest rivals being the Intel Xeon 6511P (average score 71051, -0.2% delta) and the Intel Core i7-14700KF (average score 70163, +1% delta). The data shows the 265K is effectively on par with these high-end processors, trading places within a 1.3% margin.

The Intel Arc A580's performance is more modest, with an 87th percentile ranking against all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 57756. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, has an average score of 58085, a delta of -0.6%, indicating near-identical performance. Interestingly, it also sits within 1.1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (average score 58392), though the delta of -1.1% shows the Arc A580 is the slower card in this comparison. The combined picture shows a workstation-class CPU paired with a mid-range GPU, a balance that favors compute and productivity tasks over extreme gaming performance.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) and features a DG2-512 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It houses 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, which contribute to its theoretical pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a substantial bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a key strength, offering the bandwidth necessary for high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

For ray tracing, the Arc A580 includes 24 dedicated RT cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games and applications. The GPU also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics features. In terms of raw compute, the card delivers 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 24.58 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 and Vulkan score of 79381 confirm its compute capabilities, and its 87th percentile ranking means it outperforms the majority of discrete GPUs in the database. For rendering, this translates to a card that is well-suited for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, as well as GPU-accelerated rendering tasks that can leverage its compute and RT hardware.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is a strong fit for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks but still require a dedicated GPU for gaming and graphics acceleration. Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, and software development will benefit most from the Core Ultra 7 265K's 20 cores and high multi-threaded scores, such as the 35850 in Cinebench R23. The Arc A580 provides the necessary graphics horsepower for hardware acceleration in these applications.

Gamers targeting high-refresh 1080p gaming will find the Arc A580 adequate for most titles, though users seeking maximum frame rates in demanding AAA games may need to adjust settings. The CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures a stable gaming experience, and its 94th percentile ranking means it will not hold back the GPU. Small business workstations that run complex simulations, data analysis, or virtualization will also benefit from the CPU's multi-threading and ECC memory support. This is a build for power users who demand top-tier CPU performance and are willing to pair it with a more modest, yet capable, GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The CPU features a 30 MB shared L3 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache per core. Its benchmark scores show a dominant multi-threaded performance profile, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35850 and a Passmark multithread score of 58594.

Real-world workload implications are clear: the CPU excels in heavily threaded tasks. The Passmark data encryption score of 48246 and extended instructions score of 54333 demonstrate strong performance in security and scientific computing workloads. Its single-thread performance is also exceptional, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2713 and a Passmark singlethread score of 4928, making it responsive in everyday tasks. The processor's 94th percentile ranking confirms it is a top-tier desktop CPU, and its nearest rivals show it is competitive with server-class Xeon processors and high-end consumer chips like the Core i7-14700KF.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265K uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is the foundation for the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. Memory support is provided through DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The platform also supports ECC memory, a feature typically found in workstation-class systems. For expansion, the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a significant upgrade path for high-speed storage and future GPUs, while the Arc A580 itself operates on a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The system's PSU headroom is determined by the components' power requirements. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 175 W, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W. This suggests a quality 450 W power supply is the minimum, but a more robust unit would provide headroom for overclocking, as the CPU multiplier is unlocked. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A580 with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's performance headroom (94th percentile) is significantly above the GPU's (87th percentile). The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU ensures that future high-end graphics cards will not be bottlenecked by the platform interface.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance is heavily skewed toward the CPU. In multi-threaded workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the Core Ultra 7 265K is the dominant component, and the Arc A580 is unlikely to be a limiting factor. For example, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35850 will drive rendering performance, while the GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance is supplementary.

In gaming, the bottleneck will almost certainly be the GPU. The Arc A580's 87th percentile ranking is respectable, but the CPU's 94th percentile ranking indicates a significant performance gap. While the CPU can easily feed frames to the GPU, the Arc A580 will be the component that limits frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions and graphics settings. The data shows no measured FPS scaling, but based on the percentile delta of 7 points, the GPU is the clear constraint in gaming scenarios. This is a classic CPU-heavy build where the processor is future-proofed, but the GPU may need an upgrade to unlock the CPU's full gaming potential.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 91, indicating that this pairing outperforms 91% of all configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K compare to the Intel Core i7-14700KF?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265K has an average benchmark score of 70879, which is 1% higher than the Core i7-14700KF's average score of 70163.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A580?

A: The Arc A580 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU has ECC memory support, a feature that is beneficial for data-intensive professional workloads.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the Intel Arc A580?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc A580 is 450 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 175 W.

Q: Which component is likely to be the bottleneck in gaming?

A: The Intel Arc A580 is the likely bottleneck in gaming, as its 87th percentile ranking is lower than the CPU's 94th percentile ranking.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Gaming Performance

As noted, there is no measured FPS data available for this specific CPU and GPU combination. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The Intel Arc A580's 87th percentile ranking and 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it is a solid 1080p gaming card. In less demanding esports titles, frame rates could exceed 100 FPS at high settings.

However, in demanding AAA titles, the 8 GB VRAM and mid-range compute power will likely limit performance to 60 FPS or below at maximum settings. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding games, and users should expect to lower graphics settings. The CPU's high single-thread performance ensures that it will not be a limiting factor, but the GPU's performance class is the primary determinant of the gaming experience. These are estimates and actual performance may vary.