SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Arc A750 pairing represents a desktop combination of a high-core-count Arrow Lake processor with a mid-range Alchemist graphics card. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all in-game performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from synthetic benchmark scores rather than direct frame-rate data. The CPU's performance ceiling is significantly higher than the GPU's, creating a system where the graphics card is the primary constraint in gaming workloads.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU-GPU pairing, gaming performance must be inferred from the benchmark scores of each component. The Intel Arc A750 produces a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 and a PassMark G3D score of 12534, placing it at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. These figures indicate the A750 can handle 1080p gaming at high settings for most titles, though it will struggle with 4K ultra settings due to its 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth.

At 1080p, the Arc A750's 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute should deliver playable frame rates in esports and older AAA titles. The GPU's 28 ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 66th percentile performance ranking suggests ray-traced workloads will require reduced settings or lower resolutions. The 2400 MHz boost clock provides adequate headroom for sustained performance, though the 225 W TDP means thermals will be a consideration in compact cases.

At 1440p, the A750's 8 GB VRAM becomes a limiting factor in texture-heavy titles. The 256-bit memory bus and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth help mitigate this, but the 66th percentile position relative to all GPUs indicates that high-refresh 1440p gaming is not realistic for demanding titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612, which is only 0.1% behind the Intel Arc B570 (20556 average), suggests similar performance to that newer card.

At 4K, the A750 falls short of delivering consistent 60 FPS in most modern AAA games. The 268.8 GPixel/s pixel rate and 537.6 GTexel/s texture rate are respectable but insufficient for 4K ultra settings. The PassMark DirectX 9 score of 181 versus DirectX 12 score of 70 highlights the card's architecture is optimized for modern APIs, so older titles may perform unpredictably.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 uses the DG2-512 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process, containing 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU features 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory operates at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed across a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that is adequate for 1080p but constrains higher resolutions.

Clock speeds are 2050 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, producing a pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance of 17.20 TFLOPS is solid for its class, and FP16 reaches 34.41 TFLOPS via the 2:1 ratio. The 28 ray tracing cores enable hardware RT, but their count is modest compared to higher-tier GPUs, explaining the 66th percentile overall ranking.

The A750 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it API-complete for modern titles. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, covering current monitor connectivity needs. The dual-slot cooler requires 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, with a suggested 550 W PSU. The GPU is marked end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor.

Benchmark results show the A750's PassMark G3D score of 12534 sits 0.1% above the Intel Arc B570 (20556 average) and 0.2% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534 average). For compute workloads, the PassMark GPU Compute score of 5368 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 indicate reasonable general-purpose compute capability, though neither figure is exceptional for rendering tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the Arc A750's 17.20 TFLOPS and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth can drive high refresh rates in competitive titles, but the 66th percentile GPU ranking means 144Hz+ performance is limited to less demanding games. The CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock and 5960 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensure no CPU-side bottleneck at these frame rates.

Streaming: The Core Ultra 7 265's 20 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 49682 and data compression score of 522983 indicate the CPU can handle simultaneous gaming, encoding, and streaming overhead without significant frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42216 places it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, making it well-suited for 4K video editing timelines. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth assist with effects rendering, but the 66th percentile GPU position means GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than with higher-tier cards.

3D rendering: The CPU's 42216 Cinebench R23 multicore score is only 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P (64823 average), indicating excellent multi-threaded rendering performance. The GPU's PassMark GPU Compute score of 5368 is modest, so GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles will perform at entry-level levels.

Software development: The 20-core CPU with 30 MB shared L3 cache handles compilation and virtual machine workloads efficiently. The PassMark integer math score of 134773 and find prime numbers score of 418 suggest strong single-threaded and multi-threaded computational capability for code compilation.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65 W TDP and integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU provide an efficient solution for document processing and spreadsheet workloads. The PassMark single-thread score of 4689 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the GPU's 3DMark score of 2612 is more than sufficient for basic graphical tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly shows the Intel Arc A750 is the limiting factor in gaming workloads. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 66th percentile creates a significant imbalance. In CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation, the PassMark physics score of 2923 reflects the GPU's compute limitations, while the CPU's 49682 multithread score far exceeds what the GPU can feed in gaming contexts.

At 1080p, the GPU will be the bottleneck in most titles, as the CPU's 5960 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensures frame delivery is never CPU-limited. At lower resolutions or in esports titles, the CPU's headroom means FPS scaling will be directly tied to GPU performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612, which is 0.1% below the Intel Arc B570, shows the GPU's performance ceiling.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's 42216 Cinebench R23 multicore score dominates, making the CPU the primary driver in rendering and compilation tasks. The GPU's 5368 PassMark compute score is sufficient for acceleration but does not create a bottleneck for CPU-heavy workflows. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU's dual-channel DDR5 support is adequate but not exceptional for memory-intensive applications.

The 30 MB shared L3 cache and 20-core configuration mean the CPU can handle far more parallel tasks than the GPU can accelerate graphically. This pairing makes sense for productivity-first systems where gaming is secondary, as the CPU's 93rd percentile performance will remain relevant long after the GPU becomes obsolete.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on TSMC's 3 nm process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. Base clock is 2.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, running at a 65 W TDP on Intel Socket 1851. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes.

Cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration yields a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42216 and single-core score of 5960, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. The average benchmark score of 64640 is 0.3% below the AMD EPYC 4464P (64823 average) and 0.3% above the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F (64438 average).

PassMark results show balanced performance: multithread score of 49682, single-thread score of 4689, floating point math at 172776, integer math at 134773, and extended instructions at 41478. Data compression scores 522983 while encryption scores 40456, indicating strong throughput for data-heavy workloads. The 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures excellent single-threaded responsiveness for everyday tasks.

The CPU's integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU provides basic display output and video decode capabilities, though the discrete A750 GPU handles all graphical workloads. The 20-thread configuration, while lacking Hyper-Threading, still delivers strong parallel performance as evidenced by the 42216 R23 multicore score. The 3 nm process node contributes to the 65 W TDP, making this an efficient processor for its performance class.

Who Should Build It

1080p gamers seeking a balanced desktop with upgrade potential will find the Arc A750 sufficient for current titles, though they should expect to lower settings for ray-traced games. The CPU's 93rd percentile performance ensures the system remains relevant for future GPU upgrades.

Content creators working with 4K video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 42216 R23 multicore score, which handles encoding and rendering workloads efficiently. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth assist with effects, but creators prioritizing GPU acceleration should consider a higher-tier card.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 cores and 30 MB L3 cache, with the 134773 integer math score indicating strong compilation throughput. The PCIe Gen 5 support provides future storage and peripheral bandwidth.

Students and small business users get a capable desktop for office applications, with the 65 W TDP keeping power costs low. The integrated graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or is removed.

Enthusiasts planning incremental upgrades can start with this pairing, knowing the CPU will not bottleneck a future high-end GPU. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking means it will remain competitive for years, while the 66th percentile GPU is the clear upgrade path.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 achieves an average benchmark score of 64640, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 scores are 42216 multicore and 5960 single-core, with Cinebench R20 scores of 6268 multicore and 884 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 49682 and single-thread score of 4689.

The Intel Arc A750 produces an average benchmark score of 20582, sitting at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2612, with Geekbench scores of 98554 in OpenCL and 85631 in Vulkan. PassMark G3D score is 12534, while GPU compute scores 5368.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 80th among all systems. The CPU's nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 4464P (64823 average, 0.3% higher), while the GPU's closest competitor is the Intel Arc B570 (20556 average, 0.1% higher). This pairing exhibits a significant performance gap between components, with the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking far exceeding the GPU's 66th percentile.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines Intel's Core Ultra 7 265 (Arrow Lake-S, 20 cores, 5.30 GHz boost) with Intel's Arc A750 (DG2-512, 8 GB GDDR6, 2400 MHz boost). The CPU is an active production part released January 2025 with a launch MSRP of $394, while the GPU is end-of-life with a launch MSRP of 289 USD.

The pairing occupies an unusual position: the CPU is a high-end productivity processor while the GPU is a mid-range gaming card. The combined 80th percentile ranking reflects this split — the system excels at CPU-bound tasks like rendering and compilation, while gaming performance is constrained by the GPU's 66th percentile standing.

For users prioritizing multi-threaded workloads, the Core Ultra 7 265's 42216 R23 multicore score makes this a compelling choice. Gamers should note the A750's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth limit resolution and settings headroom. The 65 W CPU TDP and 225 W GPU TDP suggest a modest power supply requirement, though the suggested 550 W PSU provides adequate headroom.

FAQ

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data available?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 265 compare to its nearest CPU rival?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 64640 is 0.3% lower than the AMD EPYC 4464P (64823 average) and 0.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F (64438 average).

Q: What is the Arc A750's performance relative to similar GPUs?

A: The A750's average score of 20582 is 0.1% higher than the Intel Arc B570 (20556 average) and 0.2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534 average).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 80th among all systems, reflecting the CPU's strong 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's more modest 66th percentile.

Q: What type of memory does the CPU support?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in gaming?

A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck in gaming. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and 5960 single-core R23 score far exceed the GPU's 66th percentile, meaning frame rates will be constrained by the Arc A750 in most titles.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds