SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

66,159 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus and Intel Arc A770 represent a unique all-Intel desktop pairing, combining a 3 nm Arrow Lake Refresh processor with a 6 nm Alchemist graphics card. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data, which indicates a top-tier CPU and a high-end GPU. It is important to note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; therefore, all gaming performance discussion is framed as an estimate derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is a desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It is a member of the Core Ultra Series 2, featuring a total of 18 cores and 18 threads. The lack of hyper-threading means the thread count matches the core count, a design choice that prioritizes efficient multi-core scaling. The CPU operates at a 4.20 GHz base clock and can boost up to 5.30 GHz, and it is multiplier-unlocked, allowing for user-driven overclocking. The silicon integrates 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, and while the core architecture is not specified, the cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor with exceptional multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 42,718 points in the multi-core test, a figure that places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This raw multi-core power is corroborated by a PassMark multi-thread score of 50,146 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17,941. For context, the average benchmark score of 66,159 puts it in a virtual tie with the Intel Core 9 273PQE, which scores 66,099 (a delta of 0.1%), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D at 65,914 (a delta of 0.4%). It is marginally behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, which scores 66,855, a difference of -1%.

Single-thread performance is equally robust. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,030 and the PassMark single-thread score of 4,698 demonstrate strong IPC (instructions per cycle) and high clock speeds, which are critical for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. This is further supported by a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 2,532 and a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 607. The processor also excels in specialized workloads, with PassMark scores for data compression (553,155), floating-point math (159,824), and integer math (123,030) indicating high throughput in scientific, financial, and data-processing tasks. The PassMark extended instructions score of 42,880 suggests robust SIMD performance, which is beneficial for multimedia encoding and certain professional applications.

In real workloads, this CPU is a high-end workstation-class part. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718 indicates that it can handle demanding video rendering, 3D model compilation, and software build tasks with significant headroom. The data shows that the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus sits alongside the Ryzen 9 7950X3D in overall processing power, making it a formidable competitor for productivity. The single-core performance, while not the absolute peak, is more than sufficient to drive high-refresh-rate gaming, as it prevents the CPU from becoming a limiting factor in most scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this desktop build, the balance between the CPU and GPU is complex, with each component dominating different workload types. The CPU, with its 93rd percentile ranking, is a top-tier performer, while the GPU, in the 90th percentile, is also a high-end part, but the gap between them is significant. This suggests that in many gaming scenarios, the Arc A770 will be the primary bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU's rendering load increases.

The benchmark data supports this interpretation. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718 is an absolute high-water mark, far exceeding the demands of game logic and physics. Conversely, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 is a measure of its graphics rendering capability. While there are no measured FPS data points, the delta between the CPU's top-tier percentile (93) and the GPU's high-end percentile (90) indicates that the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor. The system is more likely to be constrained by the GPU in graphically intensive tasks.

However, the bottleneck shifts in CPU-intensive workloads. In tasks like data compression (PassMark score of 553,155) or 3D rendering, the GPU is largely idle, and the system's performance is entirely dictated by the CPU. In these scenarios, the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is the star, and the Arc A770 plays a negligible role. The FPS scaling in games will follow a predictable pattern: at 1080p, the CPU's high single-thread score (4,698) will be able to feed the GPU more easily, but the GPU will still likely be the constraint. At 4K, the resolution scaling will place even more strain on the GPU, widening the performance gap and making the GPU bottleneck more pronounced. Thus, the data suggests a build that is exceptionally well-balanced for productivity, but in gaming, the GPU is the component that will determine the playable frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. This means that future CPU upgrades are limited to other processors that fit this socket. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory, which is a feature often sought after for workstation builds where data integrity is critical. The processor provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest SSDs and expansion cards, while the GPU utilizes a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The GPU is an Intel Arc A770, which is an end-of-life product with a successor named Battlemage. Its power requirements are specified by a 225 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W. Therefore, a 550 W power supply is the recommended baseline for this pairing, and this should provide adequate headroom for the entire system, including drives and other peripherals. The GPU requires a 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector configuration.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to replace the Arc A770 with a newer, more powerful GPU. The CPU's performance headroom, as evidenced by its 93rd percentile ranking, is substantial enough to support a faster graphics card without creating a significant CPU bottleneck. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU is current, and the CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide ample bandwidth for future storage devices. On the CPU side, an upgrade would involve moving to a higher-end Core Ultra Series 2 processor on the same Socket 1851, although the current 18-core part is already at the top of the performance tier for many applications. The memory and storage subsystems are also modern, with DDR5 support and Gen 5 lanes ensuring that the platform will not be a constraint for several years.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who require extreme multi-threaded processing power and solid 1440p or entry-level 4K gaming. The primary audience is content creators and professionals. Video editors will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718, which directly translates to faster rendering and export times. 3D modelers and animators will see similar benefits in viewport performance and final frame rendering, as the high core count and floating-point performance (PassMark score of 159,824) handle complex scenes effectively.

Software developers compiling large codebases will find the 18 cores and 18 threads a massive advantage, and the high single-thread score of 4,698 ensures snappy compilation for smaller projects and IDE responsiveness. Students in engineering or data science fields can run simulations and analyses without waiting. For small business workstations, the processor's high throughput in PassMark integer math (123,030) and data encryption (41,292) makes it suitable for database management, financial modeling, and secure transaction processing.

For gamers, the target is the enthusiast who plays at 1440p or 4K and values high detail settings. The Arc A770's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is a key asset, allowing for large texture packs and future game titles with high VRAM requirements. The CPU's strong single-core performance ensures that frame times remain consistent in CPU-bound scenarios. This is not a budget gaming build; it is a performance-oriented machine where the CPU is the dominant component, making it ideal for users who do a mix of heavy productivity and gaming.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following figures and expectations are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores.

The Intel Arc A770 is positioned in the 90th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 68,809. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 94,284 indicate that it is a capable performer for 1440p gaming. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, which is ample for high-resolution textures.

In gaming, the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, with its top-tier single-thread performance, will not hold the GPU back. At 1080p, the CPU can easily push high frame rates in esports titles. The limiting factor will be the GPU's raw rasterization power, as indicated by its 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance. In more demanding AAA titles, the system should deliver smooth gameplay at 1440p with high settings. At 4K, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, and players may need to adjust settings to maintain playable frame rates. The combination of a 93rd percentile CPU and a 90th percentile GPU suggests a system that is well-suited for high-refresh 1440p gaming, with the ability to handle 4K at moderate settings. Given the Arc A770's position relative to rivals like the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (delta of -0.3%) and AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (delta of 0.4%), frame rates are expected to be competitive with those cards.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is excellent for high-refresh 1440p gaming. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4,698 and the GPU's 90th percentile ranking suggest the system can push frame rates well above 60 fps in most titles, provided the GPU is not overloaded with ray tracing effects.

Streaming: The 18-core CPU is a streaming powerhouse. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718 provides ample headroom to encode video using the CPU (x264) while maintaining high in-game frame rates, effectively eliminating the need for a dedicated streaming PC.

Video editing: This is a primary strength. The high multi-core score directly translates to fast 4K video export times in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The 16 GB GPU memory also helps with timeline previews and applying effects.

3D rendering: Rendering in Blender or similar software will be extremely fast. The CPU's 18 cores and high floating-point math score (159,824) will churn through ray-traced frames, and the GPU can also be used for rendering via its 32 RT cores, though the CPU is the dominant force here.

Software development: Compiling large projects is a breeze. The 18 cores handle parallel compilation tasks efficiently, and the system's high integer math score (123,030) ensures fast code execution. The ample L3 cache (30 MB) helps with frequently accessed data.

Student and office work: This is overkill for basic tasks, but the responsiveness is unmatched. The high single-thread score ensures applications open instantly, and the platform's ECC memory support is a bonus for data-heavy academic research. It is a future-proof workstation for demanding academic software.

FAQ

Q: What is the primary bottleneck for gaming in this build?

A: Benchmark data indicates the Intel Arc A770 is the primary constraint in gaming. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile while the GPU is in the 90th, and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,969 is the limiting factor for frame rates, especially at higher resolutions.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus has an average benchmark score of 66,159, which is 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D's score of 65,914. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel part scores 42,718.

Q: Does this processor support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking. The base clock is 4.20 GHz and the boost clock is 5.30 GHz, leaving potential for manual tuning if the cooling solution allows.

Q: What type of memory does this platform require?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. It also has ECC memory support, which is a valuable feature for workstation reliability.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A770 has a production status of "End-of-life." Its predecessor is Xe Graphics and its successor is Battlemage.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for this system?

A: The suggested PSU wattage for the Arc A770 is 550 W. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, so a 550 W unit is the baseline for the combined system.

Q: What are the CPU's direct rivals in terms of performance?

A: The nearest rivals are the Intel Core 9 273PQE (delta 0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D (delta 0.4%), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus (delta -1%). The performance is essentially tied with these parts.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, a high-end desktop CPU, with the Intel Arc A770, a high-end desktop GPU, creating an all-Intel desktop system. The CPU is a top-tier processor, ranking in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with a massive 18 cores and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The GPU is slightly lower in relative standing, ranking in the 90th percentile of all GPUs, but it is still a powerful card with 16 GB of memory and a 256-bit bus.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 92, placing it in the top 8% of all system combinations. This indicates a very high-performance desktop build. The data shows a system that is heavily weighted towards CPU performance, making it an ideal choice for professional workloads such as video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, while still offering a strong gaming experience at 1440p. The overall tier is that of an enthusiast workstation, where the CPU is the star component and the GPU provides solid, but secondary, performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus achieves an average benchmark score of 66,159, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core 9 273PQE, with a score of 66,099, a delta of only 0.1%, indicating a statistical tie. In multi-core workloads, the CPU scores 42,718 in Cinebench R23 and 50,146 in PassMark multi-thread, confirming its position among the fastest desktop processors available. Single-core performance is also excellent, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4,698 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,030.

The Intel Arc A770 scores an average of 68,809, which places it in the 90th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,969, and it achieves 109,175 in Geekbench OpenCL and 94,284 in Geekbench Vulkan. This places it in a similar performance class to the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (delta of -0.3%) and the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (delta of 0.4%). The combined picture is a system with a top-10% CPU and a top-10% GPU, resulting in a 92nd percentile overall build. The CPU is the dominant component, providing exceptional processing power, while the GPU delivers high-end rasterization performance, making this a well-rounded and powerful desktop configuration.