SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

66,159 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus?

A: The CPU has 18 cores and 18 threads, meaning it operates without hyper-threading. This is a 1:1 core-to-thread ratio, which is notable for a desktop processor in this class.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of this processor?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for manual overclocking if the user’s motherboard supports it.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, delivering a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop chip.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER comes with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s. The memory clock is listed at 2000 MHz with an effective speed of 32 Gbps.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 415 W. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the benchmark database. Its average benchmark score is 66159.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The GPU ranks in the 19th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 3075 based on the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This is a low ranking, suggesting the GPU is not a high performer relative to the entire database.

Q: Does the FACT PACK include measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: No. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. All FPS discussions in this analysis are estimates derived from benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

# Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus combined with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. The FACT PACK explicitly states that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component.

The CPU’s single-core strength is evident from its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6030, which places it in a strong position for gaming workloads that rely on per-core performance. The GPU, however, presents a challenge: its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 places it in the 19th percentile among all GPUs. This is a low score compared to the CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking. In gaming, the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor for frame rates at most resolutions.

At 1080p, where CPU load is higher relative to GPU load, the processor’s strong single-core performance might help push frame rates, but the GPU’s modest benchmark score suggests it will cap performance. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes even more dominant as a bottleneck. Estimated frame rates in demanding titles would be lower than what the CPU could theoretically support, meaning the RTX 5080 SUPER is the primary constraint.

Given the GPU’s 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, texture-heavy games at high resolutions should not run out of video memory. However, the raw compute performance, as reflected in the Steel Nomad score, is not exceptional. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS is decent, but not class-leading. In practice, this pairing would likely deliver playable but not high-refresh-rate performance at 1440p in AAA titles, with frame rates that are moderate rather than extreme. At 4K, the system would struggle to maintain high frame rates in graphically intensive games. The CPU’s potential is wasted in many gaming scenarios because the GPU cannot keep up.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is a desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture. It uses a 3 nm process node manufactured by TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a die size of 243 mm². The chip has 18 cores and 18 threads, with no hyper-threading, so each core handles one thread. Base clock is 4.20 GHz, boosting to 5.30 GHz. The multiplier is unlocked, meaning overclocking is possible if the motherboard supports it.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a substantial amount of cache, which helps with workloads that have high data reuse. The memory support is DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s and ECC capability, which is a feature more commonly seen in workstation or server chips.

Benchmark results show strong multi-core performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 42718, which is a very high number. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score is 17941, and the R15 multi-core score is 4305. Single-core scores are also solid: Cinebench R23 single-core is 6030, R20 single-core is 2532, and R15 single-core is 607. The PassMark multi-thread score is 50146, with a single-thread score of 4698.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the CPU is nearly identical in average benchmark score. The Intel Core 9 273PQE has an average score of 66099, which is only 0.1% lower than the Ultra 5 250KF Plus’s 66159. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65914, which is 0.4% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66855, which is 1% higher. The AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66925, which is 1.1% higher. In practical terms, this CPU trades blows with these top-tier chips, with differences that are within a margin of error.

The 18-core configuration without hyper-threading is interesting. In heavily threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the physical cores provide consistent performance without the overhead of thread switching. The PassMark data compression score of 553155 and encryption score of 41292 suggest strong performance in data-intensive tasks. The floating-point math score of 159824 and integer math score of 123030 indicate robust computational capability. The extended instructions score of 42880 and the find prime numbers score of 452 round out the picture of a well-rounded performer.

The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, which means it outperforms 93% of all processors in the database. This is a high-end chip for productivity and multi-threaded workloads, even though its gaming potential may be held back by the GPU pairing.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between this CPU and GPU is heavily skewed. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 19th percentile among all GPUs. This is a massive gap. The combined percentile for the build is 56, which reflects a mid-tier overall system, but the CPU is doing the heavy lifting.

In gaming workloads, the GPU will almost always be the limiting factor. The CPU’s strong single-core performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6030, is more than enough to feed frames to most GPUs. However, the RTX 5080 SUPER’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075 is low, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (score 3163, 2.8% higher), the Intel Arc Pro B60 (score 3182, 3.4% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce 820A (score 2983, 3.1% lower). These are not high-end gaming GPUs. The GTX 860M scores 2967, which is 3.6% lower. The GPU is in the company of entry-level or older cards, not modern flagship GPUs.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU will dominate the system’s performance. The GPU plays little role in these tasks, so the system would perform at a high level. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming or machine learning inference, the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM is generous, but the compute performance is not sufficient to fully utilize the CPU’s capabilities.

The FPS scaling across resolutions would follow a predictable pattern: at lower resolutions, the CPU matters more, and the system might achieve moderate frame rates; at higher resolutions, the GPU bottleneck becomes more severe, and frame rates would drop further. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the percentile gap strongly indicates the GPU is the limiting component in most gaming scenarios.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus has an average benchmark score of 66159, placing it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. This is a top-tier result. The nearest rivals show how tight the competition is: the Intel Core 9 273PQE scores 66099 (0.1% lower), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65914 (0.4% lower), the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66855 (1% higher), and the AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66925 (1.1% higher). The CPU is effectively tied with these high-end parts, with differences under two percent.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42718 and single-core score of 6030 are both strong. The PassMark multi-thread score of 50146 and single-thread score of 4698 confirm balanced performance across different benchmark suites. Data compression (553155), encryption (41292), and extended instructions (42880) all score well. These numbers indicate a CPU that handles both integer and floating-point workloads efficiently.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 3075, placing it in the 19th percentile among all GPUs. This is a low ranking. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (score 3163, 2.8% higher), the Intel Arc Pro B60 (score 3182, 3.4% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce 820A (score 2983, 3.1% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M (score 2967, 3.6% lower). These are all low-end or older graphics cards. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test is the only GPU benchmark available, and it shows the RTX 5080 SUPER performing at a level far below what its name suggests.

The combined percentile of the build is 56, which is in the mid-range. This reflects the mismatch between a high-end CPU and a low-end GPU. The overall benchmark picture is one of imbalance: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is a weak link that drags down the system’s gaming and GPU-accelerated performance.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC capability, and has a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is a modern interface for high-speed storage and graphics cards. The CPU has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support. The GPU requires a 415 W TDP and uses a single 16-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is not listed in the FACT PACK, so power supply headroom must be assessed qualitatively. Given the combined TDP of 125 W for the CPU and 415 W for the GPU, the system will require a substantial power supply, likely in the high-wattage range, but no specific number is available. The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, so case compatibility must be checked.

For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the obvious candidate. The CPU has plenty of headroom, as evidenced by its 93rd percentile ranking, and would pair well with a much stronger graphics card. Upgrading the GPU to a higher-performing model would unlock the CPU’s full potential in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The platform itself is modern, with PCIe Gen 5 and DDR5 support, so it does not need an immediate upgrade. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to extract more performance, but the current GPU bottleneck would still limit gains in GPU-bound tasks.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not well served by this pairing. The GPU’s 19th percentile ranking and low Steel Nomad score of 3075 mean frame rates will be modest. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 6030 in Cinebench R23 cannot compensate for the GPU’s limitations. High refresh rates at 1080p or 1440p are unlikely to be achieved in demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 18 cores and strong multi-thread score of 42718 in Cinebench R23 provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. However, the GPU’s weak performance would limit the gaming side of the stream. The system could handle streaming software well, but the game itself would run at lower frame rates.

Video editing: This is a strong use case. The CPU’s multi-core performance, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 50146 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42718, accelerates rendering and export times. The GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM can help with effects and previews, but its compute power is limited, so GPU-accelerated effects may be slower than expected.

3D rendering: The CPU is excellent for this workload. High scores in floating-point math (159824) and integer math (123030) indicate strong computational throughput. The GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is modest, so GPU rendering would be slower, but CPU-based rendering would benefit from the 18 physical cores.

Software development: Compilation tasks are typically multi-threaded and benefit from the CPU’s core count. The PassMark data compression score of 553155 is useful for build tools that compress or package files. The GPU is less relevant here. The system would be a capable development workstation.

Student and office work: This is overkill for most office tasks. The CPU’s single-core performance is strong, but so is its power draw. The GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM is unnecessary for document processing or spreadsheets. This scenario would not utilize the hardware effectively, and the system would be a poor match for typical student or office workloads that do not require heavy compute.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER in a desktop class configuration. The CPU is a high-end performer, sitting in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is a low-end performer, sitting in the 19th percentile. The combined percentile of the build is 56, which places it in the mid-tier overall.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 66159 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D and the Intel Core 9 273PQE. The GPU’s average score of 3075, however, puts it in the same league as the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and the Intel Arc Pro B60, which is not a flattering comparison. The system is effectively a high-end CPU held back by a low-end GPU.

The build class is desktop, which means it is intended for stationary use. The overall tier, based on percentiles, is unbalanced: the CPU is top-tier, the GPU is bottom-tier, and the combined result is a mid-tier system. Users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads would find this build capable, but those who focus on gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks would be disappointed.

# Who Should Build It

The target users for this build are those who need extreme CPU performance and do not require strong GPU capability. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering using CPU-based renderers would benefit from the 18 cores and high multi-thread scores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42718 and PassMark multi-thread score of 50146 indicate that this CPU can handle heavy workloads with ease.

Software developers who compile large codebases would also find the CPU useful. The high integer math score of 123030 and data compression score of 553155 suggest strong performance in build and packaging tasks. The GPU’s weakness is less relevant in this scenario.

Students in computer science or engineering fields could benefit from the CPU for computational workloads, but the GPU is not necessary for their tasks. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded productivity applications would also be well served, as long as they do not rely on GPU acceleration.

On the other hand, gamers should avoid this build. The GPU’s 19th percentile ranking and low Steel Nomad score of 3075 mean that gaming performance will be poor relative to the CPU’s capabilities. High-refresh gaming and 4K gaming are not realistic expectations. The system is a poor match for any scenario where GPU performance is important.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process. The GPU chip is the GB203, containing 45,600 million transistors on a die size of 378 mm², with a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². It has 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. The GPU includes 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, which are designed for ray tracing and AI workloads.

The memory subsystem is substantial: 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s. The memory clock is 2000 MHz, with an effective speed of 32 Gbps. This is a large pool of VRAM, which is more than enough for most gaming and content creation scenarios at high resolutions. The pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Despite these specifications, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 is low. The GPU ranks in the 19th percentile among all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are not high-end cards. The NVIDIA Quadro P1000 scores 3163, which is 2.8% higher, and the Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 3182, which is 3.4% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce 820A scores 2983, which is 3.1% lower, and the GTX 860M scores 2967, which is 3.6% lower. These comparisons suggest that the RTX 5080 SUPER, despite its modern architecture and large memory, does not deliver competitive rasterization performance.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which covers all modern graphics APIs. It uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and has display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The GPU is dual-slot, 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 40 mm wide, with a 415 W TDP and a single 16-pin power connector. For rendering workloads, the 24 GB of VRAM is a strong asset, but the low compute performance means that GPU rendering will be slower than expected. The tensor cores could assist with AI-based features, but the overall benchmark picture is one of a GPU that underperforms relative to its specifications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds