SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

66,159 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus paired with the Arc A580 presents a distinct balance-of-power profile. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 87th percentile among all graphics cards. This near-parity in percentile ranking suggests a system where neither component dramatically overshadows the other in overall capability, but the nature of the workloads determines which side becomes the limiting factor.

Benchmark results indicate the CPU’s multi-threaded strength is substantial. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 42,718 points in multi-core, placing it within 0.1% of the Intel Core 9 273PQE and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. The single-core score of 6,030 in Cinebench R23 is equally competitive, suggesting the CPU can feed the GPU efficiently in most scenarios. However, the Arc A580’s 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, while respectable, will cap frame rates in GPU-bound titles at high resolutions.

The bottleneck analysis shifts by workload type. In lightly threaded tasks such as legacy applications or single-thread-dependent games, the CPU’s 5.30 GHz boost clock and strong single-core scores (607 in Cinebench R15, 2,532 in R20, 6,030 in R23) should prevent it from being the constraint. Conversely, in modern AAA titles at 1440p or 4K with ultra settings, the GPU’s 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will almost certainly become the limiting factor. The estimated FPS scaling from the CPU’s 93rd percentile and GPU’s 87th percentile suggests a balanced pairing for 1080p high-refresh gaming, with the GPU taking over as the primary limiter as resolution increases.

Data from Passmark reinforces this split. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 50,146 and integer math score of 123,030 indicate heavy compute tasks like compression (553,155 in Passmark data compression) will be CPU-bound. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,229 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 79,381 indicate rendering throughput that will trail the CPU’s compute lead in graphics-heavy scenarios. The combined percentile of 90 confirms this is a high-tier pairing, but the delta between CPU and GPU percentiles (93 vs 87) points to the GPU as the more probable bottleneck in mixed workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1851, which anchors the Core Ultra Series 2 family. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, delivering 115.2 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, a feature that expands the platform’s suitability for workstation-class reliability. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the Arc A580’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and leaving headroom for Gen 5 storage or other expansion cards.

The CPU’s 125 W TDP is paired with the GPU’s 175 W TDP, yielding a combined thermal envelope that a 450 W suggested PSU is designed to handle. This leaves modest headroom for a single upgrade step. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is possible, but doing so would require a stronger PSU than the suggested 450 W unit. The Arc A580 requires 2x 8-pin power connectors and occupies a dual-slot form factor, which are standard considerations for mid-tower builds.

A sensible next upgrade path starts with the GPU. The CPU’s 93rd percentile performance and 18 cores with 18 threads (no hyperthreading) mean it will not quickly become obsolete. Swapping the Arc A580 for a higher-tier GPU would shift the bottleneck definitively to the graphics card, which is the current weaker link. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory or faster DDR5 modules would improve memory-bound workloads, given the dual-channel configuration. The ECC support also allows for a migration toward error-checked memory if the system is repurposed for data integrity-sensitive tasks.

The platform’s active production status for both components suggests ongoing availability and driver support. The CPU’s release date of March 2026 and the GPU’s October 2023 release mean the platform is current. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are forward-looking, but the GPU only uses PCIe 4.0, so no immediate benefit exists; however, future GPUs or NVMe drives could exploit the extra bandwidth. The 20 CPU lanes are sufficient for a single high-end GPU plus one Gen 5 NVMe drive, which is a practical upgrade target.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is an 18-core, 18-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on Arrow Lake Refresh architecture. It is fabricated on a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. Base clock is 4.20 GHz, boosting to 5.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3. This configuration targets high-throughput multi-threaded workloads while maintaining strong single-thread responsiveness.

Benchmark scores confirm the processor’s tier. In Cinebench R15, multi-core score is 4,305 and single-core is 607. R20 shows 17,941 multi-core and 2,532 single-core. R23 yields 42,718 multi-core and 6,030 single-core. These figures place the CPU at the 93rd percentile overall, with an average benchmark score of 66,159. The nearest rival, the Intel Core 9 273PQE, scores 66,099 (0.1% behind), while the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65,914 (0.4% behind). The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66,855 (1% ahead), and the AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66,925 (1.1% ahead). The CPU is statistically tied with these rivals, meaning real-world differences will be minimal.

Passmark results illustrate workload-specific strengths. Data compression scores 553,155, indicating strong throughput for archiving and file management. Data encryption hits 41,292, which is solid for security tasks. Floating-point math scores 159,824 and integer math scores 123,030, both indicating strong compute for scientific and financial applications. The multi-thread score of 50,146 and physics score of 3,183 confirm the CPU excels in simulation and physics-based workloads. Single-thread performance is 4,698, which supports responsive everyday use and legacy single-threaded applications.

The 18 cores without hyperthreading is a deliberate design choice. This means the CPU relies on physical cores for parallelism, which typically provides consistent performance without the overhead of simultaneous multithreading. For workloads that scale with core count, such as video rendering or compilation, the 18 cores are a clear advantage. The 3 nm process node and 17,800 million transistors indicate a dense, power-efficient design, though the 125 W TDP is moderate for this core count.

Who Should Build It

The pairing of the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus with the Arc A580 targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance without sacrificing single-thread speed, paired with a capable mid-range GPU. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rate monitors will find the CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking ensures the GPU is the limiting factor in most titles, which is acceptable for a balanced build. Content creators who render video or process large datasets will benefit from the 42,718 multi-core score in Cinebench R23, which rivals much more expensive processors.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see tangible benefits from the 18 cores and 123,030 integer math score. Students in engineering or computer science programs can leverage the CPU’s compute power for simulations and data analysis, while the GPU handles visualization tasks. Small business workstations that run database workloads or financial modeling will appreciate the data compression score of 553,155 and ECC memory support, which adds reliability for long-running tasks.

The GPU’s 87th percentile ranking means it will handle mainstream gaming and light rendering. Users who play esports titles at 1080p will see high frame rates, while those exploring AAA games at ultra settings will need to accept medium-to-high settings at 1440p. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for current titles but will become a constraint for future releases with larger texture requirements. The system is not suited for 4K ultra gaming or heavy 3D rendering, where the GPU’s 12.29 TFLOPS would be insufficient.

The unlocked multiplier on the CPU appeals to enthusiasts who want to extract extra performance, though the 125 W TDP limits overclocking headroom without additional cooling. The platform’s ECC support makes it viable for small business servers or workstations that handle sensitive data. The active production status ensures long-term availability, which is a consideration for corporate deployments.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus has 18 cores and 18 threads, with no hyperthreading.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 66,159, which is 0.4% higher than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D’s 65,914.

Q: Does the platform support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is important for data integrity in workstation and server tasks.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 90, indicating a high-tier desktop configuration.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W, which accounts for the CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 175 W TDP.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus paired with the Arc A580. All FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile rankings, not direct measurements.

The CPU’s 93rd percentile and the GPU’s 87th percentile suggest a system capable of high-refresh gaming at 1080p in most titles. Based on the CPU’s single-core score of 6,030 in Cinebench R23, esports games such as Counter-Strike or Valorant should easily exceed 144 FPS at 1080p ultra settings, as these titles are typically CPU-bound and the GPU’s 12.29 TFLOPS is sufficient for their light graphical loads. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 79,381 indicates solid DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance, which modern esports titles leverage.

For AAA games at 1080p ultra settings, the GPU will be the primary limiter. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,229 positions the Arc A580 as a mid-range card. Estimated frame rates in titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin’s Creed Mirage would range from 60–80 FPS at 1080p ultra, dropping to 40–55 FPS at 1440p ultra. The 8 GB VRAM will require lowering texture quality in some games to avoid stuttering. At 1440p high settings (not ultra), the GPU should maintain 60–75 FPS in most titles, with the CPU never bottlenecking.

The CPU’s 18 cores and 50,146 Passmark multi-thread score ensure that background tasks such as Discord, streaming software, or browser tabs will not degrade gaming performance. The 30 MB of L3 cache provides ample headroom for game asset streaming. The 512.0 GB/s GPU bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p textures, but 4K gaming is not viable at playable frame rates in demanding titles. For ray tracing workloads, the GPU’s 24 RT cores will deliver playable but not exceptional performance, estimated at 30–45 FPS at 1080p with RT enabled.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the pairing supports frame rates above 120 FPS in esports titles, based on the CPU’s strong single-core performance and the GPU’s 87th percentile ranking. For 1440p high-refresh, the GPU becomes the limiter, with estimated 60–80 FPS in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 18 cores handle encoding workloads without impacting gaming frame rates. The Passmark multi-thread score of 50,146 indicates ample headroom for x264 encoding at medium preset while gaming simultaneously.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718 accelerates timeline rendering and export. The GPU’s 12.29 TFLOPS accelerates effects and transitions in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, though 8 GB VRAM may limit 4K timeline complexity.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 18 cores and 159,824 floating-point math score excel in CPU-based renders in Blender or 3ds Max. The GPU’s 24 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 12.29 TFLOPS will produce slower GPU renders compared to higher-tier cards.

Software development: The 123,030 integer math score and 18 cores speed up compilation. The 30 MB L3 cache reduces cache misses for large codebases. ECC memory support adds stability for long build processes.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 4,698 ensures snappy response in office suites. The CPU’s 93rd percentile means it will remain relevant for years of academic use, while the GPU handles light graphics tasks without issue.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus CPU with the Intel Arc A580 GPU. Both components are from Intel, creating a coherent platform with consistent driver support. The CPU is a high-end mainstream processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, while the GPU is a mid-range Alchemist generation card. The combined percentile of 90 places this system in the top 10% of all desktop configurations, making it a high-tier build.

The CPU’s 93rd percentile among all CPUs indicates it is a top-tier processor, competing with flagship models from Intel and AMD. The GPU’s 87th percentile places it in the upper-mid range of graphics cards. The CPU is the stronger component in this pairing, which is typical for builds targeting productivity tasks alongside gaming. The 18-core CPU with a 5.30 GHz boost clock provides a strong foundation for multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth handle mainstream gaming.

The platform’s DDR5 memory support, PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and ECC capability make it a versatile foundation. The 450 W suggested PSU indicates moderate power requirements, keeping the build accessible for standard mid-tower cases. The GPU’s dual-slot design and 2x 8-pin power connectors are standard, and the 175 W TDP is manageable with typical airflow. Overall, this is a balanced, high-tier desktop build with a slight CPU bias.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 66,159, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rival, the Intel Core 9 273PQE, scores 66,099 (0.1% lower). The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65,914 (0.4% lower). The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66,855 (1% higher), and the AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66,925 (1.1% higher). This places the CPU in a statistical tie with the top performers in its class.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 57,756, placing it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, scores 58,085 (0.6% higher). The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57,367 (0.7% lower). The Intel Arc A570M scores 58,239 (0.8% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58,392 (1.1% higher). The GPU is also in a statistical tie with its closest rivals.

Specific CPU benchmark scores include: Cinebench R15 multi-core 4,305 and single-core 607; Cinebench R20 multi-core 17,941 and single-core 2,532; Cinebench R23 multi-core 42,718 and single-core 6,030. Passmark results: data compression 553,155, encryption 41,292, extended instructions 42,880, prime numbers 452, floating-point math 159,824, integer math 123,030, multi-thread 50,146, physics 3,183, random string sorting 67,209, single-thread 4,698. GPU benchmarks: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 2,229, Geekbench OpenCL 91,657, Geekbench Vulkan 79,381.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is 6 percentile points higher than the GPU. This means the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck in gaming, but the GPU will limit frame rates in demanding titles. For productivity, the CPU’s multi-thread performance is exceptional, rivaling processors that cost significantly more. The GPU’s performance is adequate for mainstream use but not for high-end rendering or 4K gaming.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the DG2-512 chip with Xe-HPG architecture, from the Alchemist generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines. It includes 24 ray tracing cores for hardware-accelerated RT, though tensor core count is not specified.

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz, with 16 Gbps effective speed. The GPU’s base clock is 1700 MHz with a boost clock of 2000 MHz. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 12.29 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The benchmark scores place the GPU at the 87th percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,229 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance for a mid-range card. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 91,657 shows strong compute performance for non-gaming tasks. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 79,381 confirms Vulkan API efficiency, which is particularly relevant for modern game engines and cross-platform titles.

The 8 GB VRAM is the primary limitation for modern and future games. At 1080p, most titles fit within 8 GB at high settings, but 1440p ultra textures can exceed this capacity, causing stuttering. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for the VRAM size, but lower than higher-tier cards. The 24 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing performance, estimated at 30–45 FPS in RT-enabled titles at 1080p. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, supporting modern monitors. The 175 W TDP and 450 W suggested PSU are modest, making this GPU accessible for a wide range of systems.