SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

38,194 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process node. The chip carries 17,800 million transistors within a 243 mm² die, and its base clock sits at 2.20 GHz with a boost clock reaching 5.10 GHz. This is a 65 W TDP part, positioning it as a mainstream desktop CPU that balances performance with power efficiency. The processor uses a dual-channel DDR5 memory controller with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation-oriented builds.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This arrangement provides ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data, which is critical for workloads that exhibit high cache locality. The 14 threads are not hyperthreaded, meaning each core handles exactly one thread — a design choice that prioritizes raw core efficiency over thread oversubscription.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a strong mainstream performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 26,208 points in multi-core and 3,699 points in single-core. The single-core score is particularly impressive, indicating excellent per-thread performance that will benefit lightly threaded applications. The multi-core result, while not class-leading, is respectable for a 65 W part and suggests the chip can handle demanding productivity workloads without thermal throttling concerns.

The PassMark suite reinforces this assessment. The multithread score of 30,833 and single-thread score of 4,367 show solid all-around capability. Integer math scores 88,676, floating-point math reaches 108,499, and extended instructions hit 22,071. Data compression scores 283,812, while data encryption lands at 23,656. The find-prime-numbers test, often a proxy for cache and memory latency sensitivity, scores 324. Random string sorting completes at 34,931, and physics calculations score 2,278. These results indicate the chip is well-rounded, with no obvious weak points in common compute patterns.

The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, and its average benchmark score is 38,194. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 250, which averages 38,221 — a delta of just -0.1%, placing the Intel chip essentially at parity. The Intel Core i5-14490F scores 38,149, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i5-13600HX averages 38,261, a -0.2% delta, and the Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38,103, a 0.2% difference. This cluster of rivals shows that the Ultra 5 245T sits in a highly competitive segment where performance differences are within measurement noise.

For real workloads, the Cinebench numbers translate to strong multi-threaded rendering performance in applications like Blender or video encoding, while the single-core scores suggest snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and good performance in games that rely on a few fast threads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the LGA 1851 platform. This socket is designed for Intel's Arrow Lake desktop processors, making it a modern foundation for a new build. Memory support is limited to DDR5, which means builders must use current-generation memory modules. The dual-channel memory controller provides 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for feeding the 14 cores and the integrated GPU alike.

PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This enables high-bandwidth connections for a discrete GPU and one or more Gen 5 NVMe SSDs. The integrated graphics is Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, which offers a baseline display output and hardware acceleration for media tasks, though the system is clearly intended to pair with a discrete GPU for serious graphics work.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, but the suggested PSU for the GPU is 200 W. This is a modest power requirement that leaves substantial headroom for a range of power supplies. The combination of a 65 W CPU and a 25 W GPU means the total system draw is low, so even a modest PSU will comfortably run this platform. However, the available headroom suggests that a user could later install a much more powerful GPU without necessarily needing to upgrade the power supply, provided the 200 W suggestion is respected as a minimum.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve installing a more capable discrete GPU, as the PCIe Gen 5 x16 slot (or x8, depending on configuration) is ready for high-end cards. The CPU's 14 cores and 24 MB of L3 cache will not bottleneck modern graphics cards in most scenarios, and the 65 W TDP leaves thermal and power headroom for the entire system. Alternatively, users could expand memory to the maximum supported by the platform, though the FACT PACK does not specify a maximum capacity. The ECC memory support is a differentiating feature that may appeal to users running memory-intensive compute tasks where data integrity is paramount.

# Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this combination consists of CPU scores from the FACT PACK; there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU pairing. The GPU has an empty benchmark array, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all performance analysis for the GPU must be framed as estimates derived from its specifications and the CPU's measured scores.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 38,194, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. The combined percentile for the CPU-GPU pair is 68. The GPU, the Intel Arc A350, sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 0, which reflects the absence of benchmark data rather than a literal zero-performance result.

The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250, scores 38,221, a delta of -0.1% — essentially identical. The Intel Core i5-14490F is 0.1% behind the Ultra 5 245T, and the Intel Core i5-13600KF is 0.2% ahead. This tight clustering indicates that the Ultra 5 245T is extremely competitive within its segment, delivering performance that is indistinguishable from its closest competitors in aggregate benchmarks.

The combined picture is that this is a system with a strong, modern CPU and a low-power discrete GPU. The CPU will not be the limiting factor in most workloads; its 86th percentile standing means it outperforms the vast majority of installed CPUs. The GPU, by contrast, is an entry-level part, and its 50th percentile position suggests it will deliver average performance among all GPUs, though the lack of measured data makes this an inference from its specifications rather than a measured fact.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T and the Intel Arc A350 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and robust multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 26,208, PassMark multithread of 30,833) indicate that it can feed even high-end graphics cards in most scenarios. The GPU, with its 50th percentile position, is the clear performance limiter in gaming and graphics-intensive workloads.

In gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck at high resolutions and with demanding settings, as its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will constrain texture quality and frame rates. The CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 3,699, PassMark single-thread of 4,367) means it will not hold back the GPU in most titles, particularly at 1080p where CPU overhead is more significant. However, the GPU's modest compute power (3.072 TFLOPS FP32) will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could theoretically support.

For productivity workloads, the CPU dominates. Multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will scale well across the 14 cores, and the CPU's 86th percentile standing ensures it outperforms most alternative processors. The GPU's role in such workloads is limited to acceleration in specific applications (e.g., GPU-accelerated rendering or encoding), where the Arc A350's 6 RT cores and Xe-HPG architecture can provide some assistance, but its 4 GB VRAM will limit the size of datasets it can handle.

The bottleneck analysis is clear: the GPU limits gaming performance, while the CPU provides ample headroom for future GPU upgrades. In FPS terms, the estimated frame rates (discussed later) will be lower than what a more powerful GPU paired with this CPU would achieve, but the CPU will not be the constraining factor in the current configuration.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity tasks but have modest graphics requirements. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, with its 14 cores and 86th percentile CPU ranking, is well-suited for content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or process large datasets. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,208 indicates the CPU can handle demanding rendering workloads, while the PassMark data compression score of 283,812 suggests efficient handling of archive operations and data-heavy tasks.

Software developers will find the CPU's performance appealing, particularly for compilation and testing, where the multi-core score translates to faster build times. The ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability for long-running compute jobs. Students and office workers building a small workstation will appreciate the low TDP (65 W) and modest power requirements, which allow for compact, quiet builds.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations are a secondary audience. The Arc A350, while entry-level, can handle esports titles and older games at playable frame rates, though the 4 GB VRAM and 50th percentile GPU standing mean high settings and high resolutions are out of reach. The system is not suitable for high-refresh gaming or 1440p/4K gaming, as the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Small business workstations that prioritize CPU throughput for office applications, spreadsheet analysis, and database work will benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread (4,367 PassMark) and multi-thread (30,833 PassMark) scores. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU is available for workloads that need it.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350 is not equipped for high-refresh gaming. With a 25 W TDP and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1080p in demanding titles. The CPU is capable, but the GPU limits the experience to low settings and moderate refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 24 MB of L3 cache are ample for software encoding at reasonable quality settings. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,208 indicates the CPU can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without significant performance degradation, though the GPU's limited gaming performance means streamed titles will run at modest quality.

Video editing: The CPU is well-suited for video editing. The PassMark floating-point math score of 108,499 and integer math score of 88,676 indicate strong compute for effects and transitions. The GPU can accelerate certain encoding tasks via its Xe-HPG architecture, but 4 GB VRAM limits the complexity of GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench scores (R15 multi-core 2,641, R20 multi-core 11,007, R23 multi-core 26,208) demonstrate strong multi-threaded rendering performance. The GPU's 6 RT cores and 48 TMUs provide some acceleration in ray-traced workloads, but the 25 W TDP and 3.072 TFLOPS make it a minor contributor relative to the CPU.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the CPU's multi-core performance. The PassMark multithread score of 30,833 and data compression score of 283,812 indicate efficient handling of build processes and source code management. The ECC memory support is a plus for long compile sessions.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3,699, PassMark single-thread 4,367) ensures responsive application usage. The low 65 W TDP keeps the system quiet and cool, and the 25 W GPU means the total system draw is minimal, reducing heat in shared spaces.

# Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and the GPU's specifications.

The Intel Arc A350 is an entry-level GPU with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. The boost clock is 2000 MHz, yielding 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. This places the GPU at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, suggesting average performance for the time of its release.

In practical gaming terms, this GPU is suited for 1080p gaming at low to medium settings in less demanding titles. Esports games like Counter-Strike or League of Legends should run at playable frame rates, possibly exceeding 60 FPS at low settings. More demanding AAA titles will likely require reduced resolution or aggressive settings to maintain 30-60 FPS. The 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality, and the 64-bit memory bus will constrain bandwidth-sensitive scenarios.

The CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3,699) ensures that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming. At 1080p, the CPU will not hold back the GPU in most titles, meaning frame rates will be determined by the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be even more constrained, and the CPU's advantage will be moot.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 26,208 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250?

A: The average benchmark score for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is 38,194, while the AMD Ryzen 7 250 averages 38,221 — a delta of -0.1%, indicating essentially identical performance.

Q: What memory type does the system support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is also supported.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A350 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. All frame rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and PCIe support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and suggested PSU?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 25 W, and the suggested PSU is 200 W.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is a discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process node with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It uses the DG2-128 chip and is part of the Alchemist generation. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, with 6 RT cores for ray tracing. The base and boost clocks are both 2000 MHz, and the memory operates at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest amount of VRAM and bandwidth, which will limit the GPU to 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings and will constrain texture-heavy workloads. The GPU's pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 3.072 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1).

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it API-compliant with modern games and applications. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which provides sufficient bandwidth for its performance class. The card is single-slot with no display outputs, indicating it is intended for compute or auxiliary use rather than as a primary display adapter. The TDP is 25 W, and the suggested PSU is 200 W.

The GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, though its average benchmark score is 0 due to missing data. Its predecessor is Xe Graphics, and its successor is Battlemage. The GPU is end-of-life, so it is no longer in active production.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit its usefulness to light acceleration tasks. The 4 GB VRAM will constrain the size of scenes that can be rendered with GPU acceleration. In the context of this system, the GPU serves as a complement to the CPU — the CPU handles the heavy lifting in multi-threaded tasks, while the GPU offers modest acceleration for graphics-adjacent workloads. The 50th percentile standing indicates the GPU is average among its peers, but its low TDP and small footprint make it suitable for compact or low-power builds.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds