SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

38,194 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, representing the Core Ultra Series 2 generation. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC, with a transistor count of 17,800 million across a 243 mm² die. The chip operates with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and boosts up to 5.10 GHz, all within a 65 W TDP envelope. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This is a locked multiplier part, indicated by the multiplierUnlocked field being false, so overclocking headroom is not part of its design.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 86th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 38194. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 26208 in multi-core and 3699 in single-core. The multi-core score of 26208 suggests strong parallel throughput for a 65 W part, which is notable given that the TDP is relatively modest. The single-core score of 3699 indicates solid per-thread performance, which is critical for lightly threaded workloads like everyday application responsiveness and older games. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 11007 multi-core and 1553 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 2641 multi-core and 372 single-core. These progressively older benchmarks confirm consistent scaling across generations of the test suite.

PassMark results provide additional granularity. The multithread score is 30833, while the single-thread score is 4367. Integer math scores 88676, floating-point math scores 108499, and extended instructions score 22071. Data compression scores 283812, while data encryption scores 23656. Prime number finding scores 324, random string sorting scores 34931, and physics scores 2278. These figures paint a picture of a CPU that handles scientific computation, encryption workloads, and compression tasks competently. The floating-point score being higher than integer math by roughly 22% suggests the architecture favors FP-heavy workloads such as rendering and simulation.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 5 245T sits within a tight cluster. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 averages 38221, which is 0.1% higher than this chip. The Intel Core i5-14490F averages 38149, a 0.1% deficit relative to the Ultra 5 245T. The Intel Core i5-13600HX averages 38261, 0.2% higher, and the Intel Core i5-13600KF averages 38103, 0.2% lower. The delta percentages are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that these four processors are effectively performance peers in aggregate benchmarks. The data shows that the Ultra 5 245T is neither a leader nor a laggard in its direct competitive set; it trades blows within a 0.2% band.

For real workloads, the 26208 Cinebench R23 multi-core score translates to capable video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, though not class-leading. The 3699 single-core score ensures snappy UI interactions and fast single-threaded script execution. The 65 W TDP is a defining characteristic—this is a processor that delivers approximately mid-80th-percentile performance while sipping power, making it suitable for compact builds where thermal management is a priority.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1851, which is the current LGA socket for Arrow Lake desktop processors. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing a maximum memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is a notable feature for workstation reliability. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth devices like the latest graphics cards and NVMe storage. The integrated graphics is Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, providing a fallback display output and basic acceleration without a discrete GPU.

The TDP for the CPU is 65 W, which is modest. The suggested PSU field is null for the GPU, but the GPU's TDP is 415 W. Together, these figures imply a system that needs substantial power delivery, though the CPU's low draw helps offset the GPU's appetite. The data does not list a suggested PSU wattage, so any specific number would be speculation. However, the 415 W GPU TDP alone indicates a high-wattage power supply is necessary, and the 65 W CPU leaves headroom for other components.

The upgrade path from this CPU is straightforward within the Socket 1851 ecosystem. Since this is a locked part, users seeking more performance would look to higher-tier unlocked processors on the same socket, though specific model names are not in the data. The DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity mean the platform is current-generation, so a sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU in the same socket family, keeping the existing motherboard and memory. The 65 W TDP suggests that cooling solutions are not heavily stressed, so a capable air cooler would suffice.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core score of 3699 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's capabilities together suggest strong frame rates at high refresh rates, particularly at lower resolutions where CPU-bound scenarios dominate. The 86th percentile CPU ranking indicates it will not be a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, though exact FPS figures are not measured for this pairing.

Streaming: The multi-core score of 26208 in Cinebench R23 provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The 14 threads can handle a game plus a software encoder, though dedicated hardware encoders on the GPU would offload this. Data compression score of 283812 in PassMark indicates efficient handling of stream encoding workloads.

Video editing: The floating-point math score of 108499 in PassMark is strong, which benefits timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with large media file access patterns. The multi-core throughput suggests 4K video exports will be reasonably quick, though not at the level of higher-core-count workstation chips.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 is competitive for a 65 W part, meaning single-frame renders and smaller scenes will complete swiftly. For large scenes, the 14 threads will scale adequately but not exceptionally. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking places it above most consumer chips, making it suitable for occasional rendering work.

Software development: The integer math score of 88676 in PassMark indicates solid compile performance. The single-thread score of 4367 ensures fast IDE responsiveness and quick incremental builds. The 14 threads handle parallel compilation jobs well, and ECC memory support adds stability for long-running build servers.

Student and office work: The single-core performance is more than sufficient for document editing, spreadsheet manipulation, and web browsing. The 65 W TDP means low power draw, which is beneficial for all-day usage. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics provides display output without a discrete GPU, making this a flexible platform for general productivity.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a desktop enthusiast who wants strong all-around performance without the power draw of flagship parts. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and the GPU's 19th percentile ranking create a skew that favors GPU-heavy workloads. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution will benefit most, as the GPU becomes the primary driver of frame rates at those resolutions, while the CPU's single-core strength prevents bottlenecks in CPU-bound scenes.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the combination workable, though the CPU is the weaker link in heavily threaded tasks. The 26208 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is adequate for occasional rendering, but professionals rendering full-time would want a higher-core-count CPU. Software developers will appreciate the fast single-thread performance and ECC memory support, which is rare in consumer platforms. Students and small business workstations benefit from the low 65 W TDP, reducing electricity costs and cooling requirements, while the integrated graphics serve as a reliable fallback.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 53rd, which is near the middle of all builds. The CPU is at the 86th percentile, while the GPU is at the 19th percentile. This creates a significant imbalance: the CPU is far stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, spreadsheet calculations, and single-threaded applications, the CPU will dominate and the GPU will be idle. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or GPU rendering, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 38194 versus the GPU's average benchmark score of 3075 illustrates the disparity in absolute terms, though these are different benchmark suites and not directly comparable. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 for the GPU places it at the 19th percentile, meaning it is weaker than 81% of all GPUs in that specific test. This is a low ranking for a GPU with 24 GB of VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, suggesting the benchmark may not favor this architecture or the specific test conditions.

The bottleneck analysis shows that the GPU will limit frame rates in gaming, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput matters more than CPU speed. The CPU is unlikely to be the bottleneck in any gaming scenario given its high percentile ranking. For productivity workloads, the CPU is the primary workhorse, and the GPU's lower ranking is irrelevant unless the task is GPU-accelerated. The data indicates a pairing where the CPU over-delivers relative to the GPU, which is unusual in pre-built systems.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile among all processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is at the 86th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 38194.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 250 has an average score of 38221, which is 0.1% higher than the Core Ultra 5 245T's 38194, making them effectively equal in performance.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is also supported.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is at the 19th percentile with an average benchmark score of 3075 from the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory type?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s.

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The CPU scores 26208 in multi-core and 3699 in single-core in Cinebench R23.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: This is a desktop build, as indicated by the buildClass field, with a market segment of Desktop for the CPU.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB203 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It contains 45,600 million transistors across a 378 mm² die, with a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. Ray tracing is handled by 84 dedicated RT cores, and AI acceleration is provided by 336 tensor cores. The base clock is 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2617 MHz, and memory runs at 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem consists of 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth. This is a large capacity that supports high-resolution textures and large datasets. The pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 56.28 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The GPU's TDP is 415 W, requiring a 1x 16-pin power connector and a dual-slot cooler. The card dimensions are 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, the GPU scores 3075, placing it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs. This is a low ranking, and the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with a score of 3163 (2.8% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce 820A with 2983 (3.1% lower), the Intel Arc Pro B60 with 3182 (3.4% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M with 2967 (3.6% lower). The delta percentages are small, but the GPU is positioned at the lower end of the performance spectrum in this specific benchmark.

For rendering workloads, the 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance is substantial on paper, but the 19th percentile ranking suggests real-world rendering performance may be limited in this test. The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and DLSS-style AI acceleration. The 24 GB VRAM is generous for large scenes and high-resolution textures, and the 1.02 TB/s bandwidth supports fast data movement. The 12 Ultimate DirectX support and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility ensure modern game compatibility.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER GPU, classified as a desktop build. The CPU is a 14-core Arrow Lake part at the 86th percentile, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 part at the 19th percentile. The combined percentile is 53rd, placing this system in the middle of all possible pairings. This is a desktop configuration with a modern Socket 1851 platform and a high-end GPU in terms of VRAM and features, but the GPU's benchmark ranking is surprisingly low.

The CPU's strength is its multi-threaded performance at a modest 65 W TDP, making it an efficient choice. The GPU's strength is its 24 GB VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, which are premium specifications. The discrepancy between the GPU's specifications and its benchmark percentile suggests that the 3DMark Steel Nomad test may not fully utilize the GPU's capabilities, or the GPU is optimized for specific workloads that this benchmark does not capture. Overall, this is a desktop system where the CPU is the higher-performing component relative to its peers.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 38194, placing it at the 86th percentile. The GPU's average benchmark score is 3075 from the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it at the 19th percentile. The combined percentile for the pairing is 53rd. These figures indicate a CPU that outperforms 86% of all processors, while the GPU outperforms only 19% of all GPUs in the selected benchmark. The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250, is 0.1% faster, while the Intel Core i5-13600KF is 0.2% slower. The GPU's nearest rival, the Intel Arc Pro B60, is 3.4% faster, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M is 3.6% slower.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is the dominant performer. In CPU-centric benchmarks, this build will excel, as the CPU's 86th percentile ranking suggests. In GPU-centric benchmarks, the build will lag behind, as the GPU's 19th percentile ranking indicates. The average benchmark score of 38194 for the CPU versus 3075 for the GPU underscores the CPU's relative strength. The data shows a pairing that is well-suited for CPU-intensive tasks like compilation, scientific computing, and server-like workloads, but less suited for GPU-accelerated tasks like gaming or GPU rendering.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

Based on the GPU's 19th percentile ranking in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and the CPU's 86th percentile ranking, gaming performance will be limited by the GPU in most scenarios. At 1080p resolution, where CPU-bound scenarios are more common, the CPU's strong single-core score of 3699 in Cinebench R23 could drive high frame rates in esports titles, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in less demanding games. The GPU's 24 GB VRAM prevents memory capacity from being a limiting factor, but its low benchmark percentile suggests raw rendering throughput is modest.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and frame rates will be lower than what the CPU can support. The GPU's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance is not negligible, but the 19th percentile ranking in Steel Nomad indicates it will struggle with modern AAA titles at high settings. At 4K, the GPU will be heavily taxed, and users should expect to lower settings to achieve playable frame rates. The 1.02 TB/s memory bandwidth is ample, but the compute throughput appears to be the limiting factor. Overall, this pairing is not ideal for high-refresh gaming, and the CPU's gaming potential is underutilized by the GPU's performance tier.