SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

55,093 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF and Intel Arc A750 form a desktop pairing that sits in a curious position: a 14-core Arrow Lake processor with a 91st percentile ranking against all CPUs, matched with a GPU that lands at the 66th percentile. The data shows a substantial gap between the CPU’s compute potential and the GPU’s rendering limits, which shapes every workload discussion that follows. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay data.

Balance and Bottleneck

The most striking observation from the FACT PACK is the delta between the CPU’s average benchmark score of 55093 and the GPU’s 20582. This 2.7-to-1 ratio suggests the Arc A750 will be the primary constraint in most gaming and real-time graphics workloads. The CPU’s 91st percentile versus the GPU’s 66th percentile reinforces the imbalance: the processor is operating near the top of its class while the graphics card sits closer to the middle of the pack.

Look at the PassMark physics score of 2998 and the floating point math score of 131546 for the CPU. These indicate strong compute throughput that can feed frames quickly. However, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 12534 and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 reveal that the graphics pipeline cannot always keep pace with what the CPU can generate. In CPU-bound scenarios — such as simulation-heavy games, physics calculations, or data compression tasks — the 245KF’s PassMark data compression score of 460123 will shine. In GPU-bound scenarios — high-resolution rendering, ray tracing, or texture-heavy scenes — the A750 becomes the limiting factor.

The single-thread performance of the CPU, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5173 and PassMark single-thread score of 4715, indicates the processor can handle frame pacing and draw calls efficiently. But the GPU’s pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s, while respectable for its class, cap the ultimate output. Benchmark results indicate that at 1080p, the CPU’s headroom means the GPU will be the bottleneck in most titles. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s workload increases further, widening that gap.

The data compression score of 460123 versus the encryption score of 33381 shows the CPU’s strength in parallel integer tasks, but those tasks rarely matter in gaming. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 17.20 TFLOPS is the relevant number for shader work, and it places the A750 firmly in the mid-range segment. The combined percentile of 79 for this pairing reflects a system where the CPU overdelivers relative to the GPU, creating a scenario where users might consider a stronger graphics card later without changing the processor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5173 and PassMark single-thread score of 4715 position it well for high-refresh 1080p gaming. However, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 12534 suggests that achieving very high frame rates in demanding titles will be limited by the A750. Expect the CPU to push well beyond 144 FPS in esports titles, but the GPU may hold frame rates lower in modern AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 14 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 43110, provide ample headroom for encoding and broadcasting while gaming. The lack of integrated graphics on the 245KF means the Arc A750 must handle both rendering and any encoding tasks, but the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, which cover modern streaming APIs. The data shows no dedicated encoder specifications, but the CPU’s multithread capability can offload encoding via software if needed.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36647 and PassMark integer math score of 98854 indicate strong performance in rendering timelines and applying effects. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 suggests it can accelerate some compute-based effects, though its 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit large project files. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s on DDR5 dual-channel further supports smooth timeline scrubbing.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 15391 and R15 multicore score of 3693 show solid performance for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 17.20 TFLOPS and 28 ray tracing cores provide acceleration for GPU renderers, but the 8 GB VRAM may become a constraint for complex scenes. The combined picture suggests a capable entry-to-mid-level rendering workstation.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 460123 and floating point math score of 131546 indicate fast compilation and code analysis. The CPU’s 14 cores handle parallel builds efficiently, while the single-thread score of 4715 ensures responsive IDE interaction. The GPU’s compute score of 5368 in PassMark GPU compute suggests moderate acceleration for tasks like unit testing with GPU compute.

Student and office work: The PassMark single-thread score of 4715 and the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking make everyday tasks effortless. The GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 732 supports basic 2D acceleration, and the 8 GB VRAM is irrelevant for office workloads. The CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 225 W TDP mean the system draws noticeable power, but performance far exceeds office software requirements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is current for Arrow Lake processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing substantial bandwidth for future storage or expansion cards. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible but leaves the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes unused for graphics.

The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 225 W, and the suggested PSU for the graphics card is 550 W. This leaves headroom for additional components, as the CPU and GPU combined draw 350 W under load, leaving about 200 W for the rest of the system within the suggested PSU rating. The GPU requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, which are standard on most modern power supplies.

A sensible next upgrade would be a stronger GPU, given the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking. The processor’s 14 cores and 5.20 GHz boost clock can support a much faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support means future GPUs can utilize the full bandwidth, though the current Arc A750 only uses PCIe 4.0. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to extract more performance, though the 125 W TDP suggests thermal headroom for modest gains.

Memory upgrades are straightforward with dual-channel DDR5, and the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for most workloads. The lack of ECC memory support means this is not ideal for mission-critical servers, but for gaming and content creation, standard DDR5 is adequate. The platform does not include integrated graphics on this CPU, so a discrete GPU is mandatory, which is already part of this build.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads while accepting mid-range graphics performance. For gamers at 1080p with moderate settings, the Arc A750’s 66th percentile ranking and 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput deliver playable frame rates, while the CPU’s single-thread score of 4715 ensures smooth frame pacing. Content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36647, even if GPU-accelerated rendering hits the 8 GB VRAM ceiling.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the PassMark data compression score of 460123 and the 14 cores, which handle parallel builds efficiently. Students and office workers will find the system vastly overpowered for their needs, but the 91st percentile CPU ensures longevity for future software demands. Small business workstations that run data analysis or financial modeling will leverage the CPU’s floating point math score of 131546, while the GPU handles visualization tasks adequately.

The CPU’s 91st percentile versus the GPU’s 66th percentile suggests this build is for users who plan to upgrade the GPU later. The processor’s 5.20 GHz boost clock and 24 MB shared L3 cache make it a strong foundation for a multi-year system. The GPU’s end-of-life production status means it is a current purchase but not future-proof, reinforcing the idea that this is a transitional build.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4715 and the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 12534 are the primary indicators.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A750’s 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests playable frame rates in most titles, likely ranging from 60 to 100 FPS depending on the game’s optimization. The GPU’s 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM handle 1080p textures without issue. The CPU’s 5.20 GHz boost clock ensures that frame generation is not CPU-limited in most scenarios.

At 1440p, the GPU’s pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s becomes the limiting factor, and frame rates will drop proportionally. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 places the GPU in the mid-range tier, suggesting 1440p ultra will see frame rates in the 40-70 range for demanding titles. The CPU’s performance headroom means the GPU will be fully saturated at this resolution.

At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and 17.20 TFLOPS will struggle with modern AAA games. Expect frame rates below 30 in the most demanding titles, though lighter esports games may still reach playable levels. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36647 is irrelevant at this resolution because the GPU is the sole bottleneck. For high-refresh gaming, the pairing is best suited to 1080p, where the CPU’s single-thread strength and the GPU’s mid-range rasterization meet.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, which reflects the CPU’s 91st percentile and the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking against all components.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is listed as N/A, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU’s DDR5 support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: How does the Arc A750 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582, which is 0.1% higher than the Arc B570’s 20556, essentially a tie in performance.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the Arc A750?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, and the GPU itself has a TDP of 225 W.

Q: Does the CPU support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 36647, which places the CPU in the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 55093, with a percentile ranking of 91 among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D with an average score of 54762, a 0.6% difference favoring the Intel chip. The Intel Core 7 253PQE scores 55919, which is 1.5% higher, and the Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 56004, 1.6% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K scores 54053, 1.9% lower than the 245KF.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20582, with a percentile ranking of 66. Its nearest rival is the Intel Arc B570 at 20556, a 0.1% difference favoring the A750. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, 0.2% lower, while the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, 0.5% lower.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its closest rival by 0.6% while the GPU is statistically tied with its nearest competitor. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 43110 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36647 demonstrate strong multi-core capability. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 85631 show competent DirectX and Vulkan performance, though not class-leading.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF with the Intel Arc A750. The CPU is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, based on Arrow Lake architecture, and the GPU is from the Alchemist generation on Xe-HPG architecture. The combined percentile of 79 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all desktop builds.

The CPU’s 91st percentile and the GPU’s 66th percentile create a system that is CPU-dominant. The processor’s 14 cores and 14 threads, with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, make it a strong performer for its class. The GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus provide 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is solid for its segment but not exceptional.

The build class is desktop, meaning this is a stationary system with full-size components. The GPU is dual-slot and requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 225 W, combining for 350 W under load. The overall tier from the percentiles is upper-mid-range, with the CPU providing top-tier compute and the GPU offering mid-range graphics.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF features 14 cores and 14 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. It is built on TSMC’s 3 nm process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The architecture is Arrow Lake, part of the Core Ultra Series 2, and it uses the Intel Socket 1851.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

Benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36647 and single-core score of 5173. The R20 scores are 15391 multicore and 2172 single-core, while R15 scores are 3693 multicore and 521 single-core. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 43110, single-thread score of 4715, floating point math of 131546, integer math of 98854, and data compression of 460123. The CPU also scores 33381 in data encryption and 37912 in extended instructions.

These scores indicate strong performance in multi-threaded workloads like rendering and compilation, while the single-thread scores support responsive gaming and daily tasks. The 91st percentile ranking places it above most CPUs, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, which it edges by 0.6%. The CPU’s 24 MB shared L3 cache helps with gaming and data-intensive applications, though the lack of integrated graphics requires a discrete GPU.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 uses the DG2-512 chip on Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The base clock is 2050 MHz with a boost of 2400 MHz, and memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

The GPU has 3584 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 28 ray tracing cores. Its pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and displays via 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0.

Benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612, Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 85631. PassMark tests show G3D score of 12534, G2D score of 732, and GPU compute score of 5368. The DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are 65, 72, and 70 respectively, while DirectX 9 scores 181.

These scores place the GPU at the 66th percentile, with its nearest rival being the Intel Arc B570, which it matches at 0.1% difference. The 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced lighting, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity. The 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is adequate for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p performance, while the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures. The GPU is end-of-life in production status, indicating it is a mature product with established drivers.