SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

55,093 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER form a desktop build where the CPU is clearly the stronger component. The 245KF is a 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake-S processor with a 4.20 GHz base clock and 5.20 GHz boost clock, built on a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, offering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning it does not rely on simultaneous multithreading. Each core includes 192 KB of L1 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache, with a shared 24 MB L3 pool. The base clock sits at 4.20 GHz and the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz, giving the chip a high frequency advantage for both lightly threaded and fully loaded tasks. The CPU is built on a 3nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 243 mm² and a transistor count of 17,800 million. It uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The processor is unlocked, allowing manual frequency adjustments, and it does not include integrated graphics.

The benchmark results paint a strong picture for the 245KF. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 36,647 and the single-core score is 5,173. The R20 run shows 15,391 multicore and 2,172 single-core. The PassMark multithread score is 43,110, with a single-thread score of 4,715. These numbers indicate that the CPU handles both highly threaded and latency-sensitive tasks well. In PassMark subtests, the data compression score of 460,123 and floating-point math score of 131,546 suggest strong performance in archival, scientific, and financial workloads. The encryption score of 33,381 is more moderate, but the integer math score of 98,854 shows good general processing throughput.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the 245KF sits in a tight cluster. It is 0.6% above the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and 1.9% above the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K, while being 1.5% below the Intel Core 7 253PQE and 1.6% below the Intel Core i9-14900HX. The CPU’s 91st percentile against all CPUs means it outperforms 91% of the database’s processors. This places it in the upper echelon for desktop processors, making it suitable for demanding multi-core workloads such as video rendering, 3D simulation, and software compilation. The absence of SMT is compensated by the high core count and boost clock, which is why the multicore scores remain competitive.

Gaming Performance

Because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, all frame-rate figures in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 5,173 in Cinebench R23 indicates that it can handle high frame rates without becoming a limiting factor. However, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,690 places it in the 18th percentile among all GPUs, meaning 82% of GPUs in the database score higher. This suggests that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU is likely to deliver adequate frame rates, but the GPU will cap the performance. The GPU’s 18 GB of GDDR7 memory is generous for texture-heavy games, but the raw compute power, as reflected in the 3DMark score, is limited. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU load increases, and the frame rate will drop further. The CPU’s high boost clock and strong single-core performance mean that even at lower resolutions, the GPU will not be able to fully utilize the CPU’s headroom. Consequently, users who prioritize high-refresh gaming at high settings should look for a more powerful GPU, while those who play less demanding titles or at lower settings may find the pairing adequate.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistently strong. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3,693 multicore and 521 single-core. In R20, the scores are 15,391 and 2,172, and in R23 they are 36,647 and 5,173. The PassMark multithread score is 43,110, and the single-thread score is 4,715. The average CPU benchmark score is 55,093, which places the 245KF in the 91st percentile against all CPUs. The nearest rivals are closely matched: the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average score of 54,762 (0.6% lower), the Intel Core 7 253PQE scores 55,919 (1.5% higher), the Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 56,004 (1.6% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K scores 54,053 (1.9% lower). This shows the 245KF is a mid-to-high range desktop CPU.

The GPU’s only benchmark is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a score of 2,690. This places it in the 18th percentile against all GPUs, meaning it is outperformed by 82% of the database. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2,664, 1% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2,662, 1.1% lower), the Intel Arc Pro B50 (2,660, 1.1% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 (2,645, 1.7% lower). These are all older or entry-level graphics cards, which highlights the GPU’s low position in the performance hierarchy. The combined percentile for the build is 55, reflecting the mismatch between the CPU’s high performance and the GPU’s low performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU sits at the 91st percentile, while the GPU sits at the 18th. This is a severe imbalance: the CPU is far more powerful than the GPU. In workloads that are primarily CPU-bound, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU will be the limiting factor. In these scenarios, the GPU has little influence, and the CPU’s multicore scores will drive performance. For example, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,647 and PassMark multithread score of 43,110 indicate that the CPU can handle heavy processing tasks with ease.

For GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at high settings or GPU-accelerated rendering, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The 3DMark score of 2,690 shows that the GPU is not capable of high-end graphics performance. In a gaming scenario, the CPU’s headroom will be wasted because the GPU cannot keep up. The FPS scaling is not measured, but based on the CPU’s high single-core score and the GPU’s low percentile, it is safe to say that the GPU will cap the frame rate in most titles. The CPU will not be the bottleneck, but the GPU will limit the system’s overall gaming performance. The build is therefore unbalanced, with the CPU outperforming the GPU by a wide margin.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5nm TSMC process with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 2,325 MHz and a boost clock of 2,512 MHz. The memory is 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed as 1,750 MHz, which translates to 28 Gbps effective. The GPU has 6,400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operations units. It also features 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores, which are used for ray tracing and AI-based workloads. The pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 32.15 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is also 32.15 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio.

Despite these substantial specifications, the benchmark score of 2,690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 places the GPU in the 18th percentile. This indicates that the GPU’s real-world performance is low compared to the rest of the database. The 18 GB VRAM is a large amount, which is useful for high-resolution textures and memory-heavy workloads, but the compute performance is not in line with the memory capacity. The RT and tensor cores are present, but their performance is not directly measured by the 3DMark test. The GPU’s low percentile suggests that it is not suited for demanding gaming or rendering tasks, despite its modern features.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive. Software developers, content creators, and students who run virtual machines, compile code, or edit large media files will benefit from the CPU’s 91st percentile performance. The 14 cores and 14 threads, combined with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, provide strong multi-threaded and single-threaded throughput. The PassMark multithread score of 43,110 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,647 make the CPU a capable workhorse.

For gamers, the build is less suitable. The GPU’s 18th percentile means that most modern games at 1080p with ultra settings will be limited by the GPU. Users who play esports titles at lower settings may get acceptable frame rates, but the system is not built for high-refresh gaming. The CPU would be a good foundation for a future upgrade: the 245KF can support a more powerful GPU, but as configured, the GPU is the weak link. For small business workstations and office tasks, the CPU’s high single-thread performance is more than enough, and the GPU is not a limiting factor for typical office applications. However, the lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, so this pairing is the only way to get a display output.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics is listed as "N/A". A discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the CPU’s base and boost clock?

A: The base clock is 4.20 GHz and the boost clock is 5.20 GHz.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning no simultaneous multi-threading.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The GPU has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score?

A: The GPU scores 2,690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places it at the 18th percentile.

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The CPU scores 36,647 in Cinebench R23 multicore.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The build uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and the PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 275 W, so the combined power draw is 400 W, but the FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU wattage. A robust power supply is required to handle the two components, but no specific number is provided.

The CPU is unlocked, so the multiplier can be adjusted for overclocking. The GPU also has a boost clock of 2,512 MHz, but its performance is already at the 18th percentile, so overclocking may not yield significant gains. The most sensible next upgrade for this build would be to replace the GPU with a higher-performing model. Since the CPU is at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 18th, the CPU has ample headroom to drive a stronger GPU. The platform also supports DDR5, so users could increase memory capacity or speed, though the current dual-channel bandwidth is already high. The lack of an integrated GPU means the discrete GPU must be retained, but a higher-tier GPU would make the system more balanced.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build with a combined percentile of 55, meaning it outperforms 55% of all systems in the database. The CPU is an Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, a 14-core, 14-thread processor from the Arrow Lake-S family, with a 91st percentile performance rank. The GPU is an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER with an 18th percentile rank. The CPU is clearly the stronger component, and the overall system tier is defined by the CPU’s high performance and the GPU’s low performance. The build is a CPU-centric workstation, not a gaming rig. The CPU’s high multicore and single-core scores make it suitable for productivity, while the GPU’s low scores make it a limiting factor in any GPU-accelerated task.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core score of 5,173 can drive high frame rates, but the GPU’s 18th percentile limits the system to low or medium settings at 1080p. The 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 18 GB VRAM are not sufficient to sustain high frame rates at ultra settings in modern titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 43,110 multithread score provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, but the GPU’s low performance will still be the bottleneck for the game itself. The stream will be smooth, but the game frame rate will be low.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,647 and Passmark multithread score of 43,110 make it very capable for video editing, especially for previews and export. The GPU’s 18 GB VRAM can handle large timelines, but its low compute power may slow down GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s high multicore scores are ideal for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU’s low 3DMark score means GPU-accelerated rendering will be slow, so users should rely on the CPU for rendering.

Software development: The CPU’s high single-thread score (5,173) and 14 threads provide fast compilation and parallel builds. The GPU is not a limiting factor for most development tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU’s performance is overkill for typical office tasks, but it ensures smooth multitasking and responsive applications. The GPU is sufficient for display output and basic 2D work.