SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

54,053 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and TSMC's 3 nm process node. It has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, offering a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also includes support for ECC memory and a PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes. The chip integrates Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 25,066 points in multi-core and 2,132 points in single-core. The multi-core score places it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors tested. The single-core result is strong for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded tasks. The PassMark multithread score is 43,047, while the single-thread score is 4,714. These numbers indicate a balanced processor that handles both heavily parallel workloads and latency-sensitive tasks well.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K features a hybrid architecture with 14 cores and 14 threads, all running at native speeds without hyper-threading. The base clock of 4.20 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz provide a wide frequency range, allowing the chip to scale from power-efficient operation to high-performance bursts. The 3 nm process node from TSMC contributes to efficiency, while the 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die suggest a dense, modern design.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration delivers low-latency access to frequently used data, which is critical for gaming and content creation workloads. The L3 cache is not as large as some competing chips, but the fast L2 and high clock speeds compensate in many scenarios.

Benchmark results show the CPU achieving a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066 and a single-core score of 2,132. In PassMark, the multithread score is 43,047, and the single-thread score is 4,714. The PassMark integer math score is 98,524, while floating-point math reaches 130,678. Extended instructions score 37,617, and data encryption hits 33,286. These figures indicate strong performance across a range of computational tasks.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 245K sits within a narrow band. The Intel Xeon 6505P has an average score of 53,701, which is 0.7% lower than the 245K's average of 54,053. The Intel Core i7-14700F trails by 0.8% with a score of 53,620. The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D leads by 1.3% with an average score of 54,762. These small deltas mean the 245K is effectively performance-equivalent to these competitors in aggregate benchmarks.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15,368 and R15 multi-core score of 3,850 translate to strong rendering and encoding performance. The single-core scores of 2,169 in R20 and 322 in R15 support fast application launch times and responsive UI interactions. The PassMark physics score of 3,081 indicates capable simulation performance, useful for engineering and scientific applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's socket and does it support DDR5 memory?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-14700F?

A: The 245K has an average benchmark score of 54,053, which is 0.8% higher than the Core i7-14700F's average score of 53,620. The difference is minimal, indicating near-identical aggregate performance.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, providing basic display output and media acceleration without a dedicated GPU.

Q: What is the TDP and does it require a large power supply?

A: The TDP is 125 W. The suggested PSU for a system with this CPU and an Intel Arc A350 GPU is 200 W, which is modest for a desktop build.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing users to adjust clock speeds beyond the stock 5.20 GHz boost if their motherboard and cooling support it.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides 20 lanes of PCIe Gen 5, which is sufficient for a high-bandwidth GPU and fast NVMe storage.

Q: What is the release date and MSRP?

A: The CPU was released on 2024-10-23 with a launch MSRP of $319.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K achieves an average benchmark score of 54,053, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. This is a high ranking, indicating that the processor outperforms roughly nine out of ten CPUs in the database. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, scores 54,762, which is 1.3% higher, while the Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53,701, 0.7% lower. The Core i7-14700F scores 53,620, 0.8% lower, and the Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53,469, 1.1% lower. These tight margins mean the 245K is competitive with, but not decisively ahead of, its closest peers.

In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 25,066 is strong for a 14-thread processor. The single-core score of 2,132 is equally impressive, suggesting the chip handles both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads well. The PassMark multithread score of 43,047 and single-thread score of 4,714 corroborate this balance. The data compression score of 458,817 and random string sorting score of 55,098 indicate robust performance in data-intensive tasks, while the find prime numbers score of 414 shows moderate performance in specialized integer workloads.

The GPU, an Intel Arc A350, has no benchmark scores in the data pack. Its percentile ranking is 50, meaning it sits at the median of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 71, which reflects the strong CPU carrying the overall system performance. The GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest, suggesting it is suited for entry-level gaming and basic compute rather than high-end rendering.

Who Should Build It

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K targets users who need strong multi-core performance for productivity without the cost of a higher-end HEDT platform. Its 91st percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for content creators running video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066 indicates it can handle demanding tasks like batch image processing or code builds with ease. The PassMark multithread score of 43,047 supports this, showing strong parallel throughput.

Gamers building a system with this CPU will find it capable of driving high frame rates, particularly when paired with a more powerful GPU than the Arc A350. The single-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 score of 2,132, is sufficient for most game engines that rely on a few fast threads. For students and office users, the CPU's 14 cores and high boost clock provide headroom for multitasking across many applications without slowdowns.

Small business workstations benefit from the CPU's ECC memory support, which enhances data integrity in financial or scientific computing. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for fast storage and expansion cards, future-proofing the platform. The 125 W TDP means a standard air cooler can handle it, and the 200 W suggested PSU for the full system keeps power requirements modest.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors. This means upgrades within the same platform are limited to other Arrow Lake chips. The socket supports DDR5 memory, and the dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for current applications. Users looking to upgrade memory can install higher-capacity DDR5 modules, though the platform's bandwidth ceiling remains the same.

The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is enough for a high-end graphics card and one or two NVMe SSDs. The Arc A350 GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is narrower than the CPU's Gen 5 capability but sufficient for its 4 GB memory footprint. The GPU has a TDP of 25 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 200 W, leaving ample headroom for additional drives or peripherals.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a more powerful GPU, as the Arc A350 is the weakest link in the system. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck a mid-range or even high-end graphics card in most workloads. Alternatively, users could add more DDR5 memory if their current capacity is limiting, though the exact capacity is not specified in the data pack. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, which can extend its useful life without a full platform change.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4,714 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,132, is well-suited for high-refresh gaming. However, the Arc A350 GPU is limited by its 4 GB memory and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, making it unlikely to sustain high frame rates at high resolutions. Estimated FPS figures would be modest, likely below 60 FPS at 1080p in demanding titles.

Streaming: The 14 cores and strong multi-threaded scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066, provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The CPU can handle x264 encoding while gaming without significant frame drops, though the GPU's lack of dedicated encoding hardware may shift the load to the CPU.

Video editing: The PassMark multithread score of 43,047 and data compression score of 458,817 indicate strong performance in video editing tasks like timeline scrubbing and export rendering. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15,368 further supports this, making the 245K a capable choice for 1080p and some 4K editing workflows.

3D rendering: With a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066, the CPU handles CPU-based rendering engines like Blender Cycles or V-Ray well. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance offers some acceleration, but the 4 GB VRAM may limit complex scenes. The CPU is the primary workhorse here.

Software development: The high single-thread score of 4,714 and integer math score of 98,524 make the CPU responsive for code compilation and debugging. The 14 threads help parallelize build systems, reducing wait times for large projects.

Student and office work: The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures smooth performance in everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet analysis. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics handle display output, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic builds.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is a desktop GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip. It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1937 MHz, with an effective data rate of 15.5 Gbps. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units. It also includes 6 ray tracing cores, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores.

The GPU's clock speeds are fixed at 2000 MHz for both base and boost. This yields a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. These numbers place the Arc A350 in the entry-level segment, with a percentile ranking of 50 among all GPUs. The lack of benchmark scores in the data pack means its real-world performance must be inferred from these specifications.

With a 25 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 200 W, the Arc A350 is extremely power-efficient. It is a single-slot card with no display outputs, indicating it is intended for compute tasks or as a secondary GPU. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is adequate for its bandwidth needs. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. Its ray tracing capabilities are present but limited by the low 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K with the Intel Arc A350 GPU in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a high-end mainstream processor with a 91st percentile ranking, while the GPU is an entry-level component at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile for the system is 71, reflecting a strong CPU paired with a weak GPU. This imbalance means the system's overall performance is heavily weighted toward CPU-bound tasks.

The build class is desktop, indicating a traditional tower form factor. The CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 25 W TDP mean the system has modest power requirements, with a suggested PSU of 200 W. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, which can improve performance without changing the GPU. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage, but it remains available for purchase.

The overall tier is mid-range, driven by the CPU's high percentile. This system is best suited for productivity tasks that leverage the CPU's multi-core strength, such as video editing, software development, and 3D rendering. Gaming performance is limited by the GPU, making it suitable only for esports titles or older games at low settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is significantly more powerful than the Intel Arc A350, creating a clear bottleneck in GPU-bound workloads. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile means that in gaming and graphics-intensive tasks, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU has ample headroom to drive a much faster GPU, and the 200 W PSU suggests there is room to upgrade.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and data processing, the CPU will perform at its full potential, with the GPU having minimal impact. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066 and PassMark multithread score of 43,047 demonstrate the CPU's capability, while the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS is insufficient to accelerate these tasks meaningfully. For users who primarily run productivity applications, the bottleneck is irrelevant.

For gaming, the GPU's 4 GB memory and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture detail and resolution. The CPU's single-thread performance is more than adequate, so frame rates will be dictated by the GPU. The estimated FPS in modern games at 1080p would likely be low, around 30-50 FPS on medium settings, based on the GPU's specifications. Upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier model would unlock the CPU's full gaming potential.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K and Intel Arc A350. The data pack contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. These estimates should be treated as approximations, not guaranteed performance levels.

The CPU's single-core score of 4,714 in PassMark and 2,132 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can feed a GPU with data quickly, avoiding CPU bottlenecks in most games. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors. For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, estimated FPS at 1080p low settings could reach 60-100 FPS, as these games are less demanding on GPU memory and bandwidth.

For AAA games at 1080p high settings, the GPU's 4 GB memory is likely insufficient, causing texture streaming issues and frame drops. Estimated FPS would be in the 30-50 range for titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed Mirage. At 1440p, the GPU would struggle further, with estimates falling below 30 FPS. The GPU's 6 ray tracing cores are present, but the low compute throughput means ray tracing would be impractical at playable frame rates. Overall, this system is best for low-demand games or older titles, not high-refresh or high-resolution gaming.