SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

54,053 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is the clear performance anchor of this desktop pairing, sitting at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER sits at only the 19th percentile among all GPUs. This wide percentile gap indicates that the CPU is dramatically stronger relative to its competitive field than the GPU is relative to its own market segment. In practical terms, the processor will rarely be the limiting factor in any workload; the graphics card will be the primary constraint in GPU-bound tasks such as gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering.

Benchmark data reinforces this asymmetry. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066 and single-core score of 2,132 place it in the top tier of desktop processors. The GPU's only recorded benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 3,075, positions it near the bottom of the GPU percentile ranking, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3,163, 2.8% faster) and the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3,182, 3.4% faster). This means the RTX 5080 SUPER performs within a narrow band of those mid-range cards, not at the flagship tier its name might suggest.

For CPU-light, GPU-heavy workloads like 4K gaming, the RTX 5080 SUPER will dictate frame rates, and the Ultra 5 245K will sit largely idle. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios such as data compression, encryption, or physics simulations, the processor's Passmark scores — data compression at 458,817, encryption at 33,286, and physics at 3,081 — show it can handle intensive multi-threaded tasks without bottlenecking. The balance is thus workload-dependent: the CPU dominates in general compute, while the GPU constrains graphics throughput. Users pairing these parts should expect the graphics card to be the ceiling in any visually demanding application, with the CPU providing ample headroom for background tasks, streaming, or multitasking alongside gaming.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core Cinebench R15 score of 322 and R23 single-core score of 2,132 indicate strong per-thread performance, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates in esports titles. However, the GPU's modest 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,075, combined with its 19th percentile ranking, suggests that achieving very high refresh rates at 1440p or 4K will be difficult. At 1080p, the CPU can push frames, but the GPU will still cap maximum FPS in graphically intense scenes.

Streaming: The Ultra 5 245K's 14 cores and 14 threads, alongside a Passmark multi-thread score of 43,047, provide enough parallel throughput to encode video while gaming. The CPU's data encryption score of 33,286 and floating-point math score of 130,678 indicate it can handle the additional load of streaming software without significant frame drops, though the GPU's limited performance means the game itself may already be running near its graphical ceiling.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15,368 and R15 multi-core score of 3,850 suggest solid performance for rendering timelines and exporting projects. The GPU's 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth can accelerate effects and color grading, but its low benchmark percentile means GPU-accelerated renders will not be exceptionally fast. The combination works for 1080p and light 4K editing, but heavy multi-layer compositing may strain the GPU.

3D rendering: This workload is mixed. The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 98,524 and extended instructions score of 37,617 support physics simulations and CPU-based rendering. However, the RTX 5080 SUPER's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,075, which is 3.4% below the Intel Arc Pro B60, indicates that GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower than many competing cards. For render farms or quick preview renders, the CPU carries most of the weight.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread Passmark score of 4,714 and Cinebench R15 single-core score of 322 mean fast compilation of single-threaded code, while the multi-core scores handle parallel builds. The 24 MB shared L3 cache and DDR5 dual-channel memory support at 102.4 GB/s provide ample bandwidth for large codebases. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, so the Ultra 5 245K's 91st percentile ranking is the key asset.

Student and office work: The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4,714 and data compression score of 458,817 make everyday tasks like spreadsheet calculations, document formatting, and web browsing feel responsive. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU can drive a basic display, meaning the discrete GPU is unnecessary for such workloads, but its presence does not hinder them. This is an overpowered setup for basic productivity, as the CPU alone exceeds typical office requirements.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and the relative performance of the components. The CPU's percentile of 91 and the GPU's percentile of 19 indicate that gaming performance will be heavily GPU-limited across most titles.

At 1080p, the Ultra 5 245K's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 2,132) should allow high frame rates in CPU-bound games like strategy titles or simulation games, where the graphics load is moderate. However, the RTX 5080 SUPER's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,075, which trails the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 by 2.8%, suggests that even at 1080p, graphically intensive titles will see frame rates in the mid-range tier, not the extreme high end. Expect playable but not exceptional performance in AAA games at high settings.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck. The RTX 5080 SUPER's 24 GB memory and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth are ample for higher resolutions, but its compute throughput (FP32 of 56.28 TFLOPS) is not commensurate with a top-tier card, given its 19th percentile standing. Frame rates will drop further, and users should expect to reduce settings to medium or high to maintain smooth gameplay. The CPU's headroom means there is no processor-induced stutter, but the GPU will cap FPS.

At 4K, the situation worsens. The GPU's nearest rival, the Intel Arc Pro B60, is 3.4% faster in 3DMark Steel Nomad, and the NVIDIA GeForce 820A is only 3.1% slower, placing the RTX 5080 SUPER in a performance bracket well below flagship 4K cards. Ultra settings at 4K will likely produce frame rates in the low 30s or below for demanding titles. Users seeking 4K gaming should consider this pairing inadequate for ultra settings, though the 24 GB VRAM prevents memory-related crashes.

Since dataIsMeasured is false, these estimates carry uncertainty, but the percentile gap is decisive: the CPU will never hold the GPU back, while the GPU will consistently limit gaming performance at any resolution above 1080p.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing suits users who prioritize CPU compute power and need a discrete GPU for basic graphics tasks, rather than gamers seeking maximum frame rates. The Ultra 5 245K's 91st percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for content creators, software developers, and researchers who run multi-threaded workloads. For video editors working with 1080p or light 4K footage, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066 provides fast export times, and the GPU's 24 GB memory can hold large project files in VRAM.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU's single-thread Passmark score of 4,714 and multi-thread score of 43,047, which speed up both compilation and test runs. The 14 cores and 14 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the DDR5 memory support at 102.4 GB/s reduces data transfer delays. The GPU is secondary, so developers can use the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU for display output and reserve the RTX 5080 SUPER for occasional CUDA-accelerated tasks.

Students and office workers find this system overkill, as the CPU alone handles all standard productivity tasks with ease. The GPU adds cost and power draw (415 W TDP) without tangible benefit for word processing, spreadsheets, or web browsing. However, for a small business workstation that also needs occasional 3D visualization or GPU-accelerated analytics, the 24 GB VRAM is a plus, even if the raw GPU speed is modest.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings may find the pairing acceptable, but those targeting 1440p or 4K high refresh rates should look elsewhere. The RTX 5080 SUPER's 19th percentile ranking means it is not a high-end gaming card, despite its name. This build is for users who need a fast CPU and a functional GPU, not for those chasing maximum FPS.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, and it supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is relevant for workstation reliability.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This layout supports both single-thread responsiveness and multi-threaded throughput. Benchmark scores confirm this balance: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 25,066 places the CPU in the 91st percentile, while single-core at 2,132 is equally strong. The Passmark multi-thread score of 43,047 and single-thread score of 4,714 show consistent performance across different test methodologies.

Real-world workloads benefit from the high boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which drives the Cinebench R15 single-core score of 322. Data compression at 458,817 and random string sorting at 55,098 indicate strong memory subsystem performance, useful for database workloads. The floating-point math score of 130,678 and integer math score of 98,524 cover scientific and financial calculations. Extended instructions score of 37,617 supports modern SIMD workloads like encryption and media codecs. The CPU is unlocked (multiplierUnlocked is true), allowing overclocking for additional performance, though the TDP of 125 W sets a baseline power envelope.

The 3 nm process from TSMC is a key efficiency factor, though the CPU still draws 125 W under load. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides basic display output, which is a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or for power-saving office use. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-14700F (0.8% faster average score) and the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (1.3% faster), indicating that the Ultra 5 245K is competitive with previous-generation high-end chips but not a class leader.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing users to adjust clock speeds beyond the 5.20 GHz boost clock, subject to the 125 W TDP and cooling solution.

Q: What type of memory does this CPU support?

A: The Ultra 5 245K supports DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus, with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory for error-correcting workloads.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, alongside 3 MB of L2 cache per core and 192 KB of L1 cache per core.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU stronger relative to their respective markets?

A: The CPU is far stronger, ranking in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 19th percentile among all GPUs, meaning the CPU outperforms its peers more than the GPU does.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 25,066 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which places it among the top 9% of all CPUs.

Q: Does the GPU support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the RTX 5080 SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and near-future games.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Arrow Lake generation. This means future CPU upgrades are limited to other Socket 1851 processors, likely within the Core Ultra Series 2 family. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, so there is no bandwidth bottleneck on the graphics side. Memory support is DDR5 only, so users cannot reuse older DDR4 modules.

The GPU has a TDP of 415 W and requires a single 16-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is not specified in the FACT PACK, but given the 415 W GPU TDP and 125 W CPU TDP, a high-wattage power supply is necessary; the absence of a suggested PSU value means users must calculate headroom based on total system draw. The CPU's 125 W TDP is modest, leaving room for the GPU's power demands.

A sensible next upgrade would be a stronger GPU, as the RTX 5080 SUPER is the clear weak point in this pairing. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and PCIe Gen 5 support mean it can handle a more powerful graphics card without bottlenecking. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory or faster storage via PCIe Gen 5 lanes would benefit the CPU's data-heavy workloads. The platform is not outdated, but the GPU limits overall system performance, so upgrading the GPU first is recommended.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER GPU. The CPU is a high-performance Arrow Lake processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card from the GeForce 50-series. The combined percentile rank of this pairing is 55, indicating that the system sits near the median of all possible CPU+GPU combinations, despite the CPU's individual strength.

The class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use in a tower case, with the GPU's dual-slot design and 304 mm length requiring adequate case clearance. The CPU and GPU together have a combined TDP of 540 W (125 W CPU + 415 W GPU), which demands robust cooling and power delivery. The system is not a balanced gaming rig; it is a CPU-centric workstation with a mid-range GPU bolted on. The 55th combined percentile reflects this mismatch: the CPU pulls the system up, but the GPU drags it down.

For users who need raw CPU compute and only occasional GPU acceleration, this build offers strong value in processor tasks. For gamers or GPU-heavy creators, the pairing is suboptimal. The overall tier is mid-range due to the GPU's low percentile, even though the CPU is top-tier. This is a system for specific workloads, not general-purpose high-end computing.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 54,053, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Xeon 6505P with an average score of 53,701 (0.7% slower), followed by the Intel Core i7-14700F at 53,620 (0.8% slower) and the Xeon Phi 7290 at 53,469 (1.1% slower). The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is 1.3% faster with a score of 54,762. This tight grouping shows the Ultra 5 245K performs competitively with high-end server and desktop chips from the same era.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 3,075, based solely on the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it in the 19th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3,163, 2.8% faster), the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3,182, 3.4% faster), and the NVIDIA GeForce 820A (2,983, 3.1% slower) and GTX 860M (2,967, 3.6% slower). The RTX 5080 SUPER is thus surrounded by mid-range and older cards, not flagship GPUs.

Combined, the CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 19th percentile yield a system percentile of 55. The CPU contributes the vast majority of the system's performance, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 25,066 and Passmark multi-thread at 43,047. The GPU's 3DMark score of 3,075 is a minor contributor. This means the build's benchmark footprint is lopsided: exceptional for CPU tasks, mediocre for GPU tasks. Users should interpret any benchmark result with this imbalance in mind, as the CPU will dominate in mixed workloads while the GPU caps graphics performance.