SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

48,995 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and Intel Arc B570 form a desktop pairing that targets the mainstream performance segment with a strong emphasis on balanced 1080p and 1440p gaming. The CPU, part of the Core Ultra Series 2, is built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process from TSMC, housing 14 cores and 14 threads. It operates at a base clock of 3.50 GHz and boosts up to 5.10 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The GPU, from the Battlemage generation (Arc 5), uses the Xe2-HPG architecture on a 5 nm process, featuring 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Together, this setup achieves a combined percentile of 78 across all tested configurations, indicating solidly above-average performance for a desktop system.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake-S architecture, marking a shift to a 3 nm TSMC process node. This design eschews hyper-threading, meaning each core is a physical core, which simplifies thread scheduling but reduces the theoretical multi-threaded throughput compared to processors with simultaneous multi-threading. The base clock of 3.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.10 GHz provide a strong frequency range for both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads. The processor includes 24 MB of shared L3 cache, alongside 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2 cache per core, which helps feed the high clock speeds.

Benchmark results show that this CPU is a capable performer for its class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 and single-core score of 4648 place it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs tested. This percentile ranking is significant, as it indicates the processor outperforms the vast majority of desktop and laptop chips in the database. The single-core performance is particularly strong, which translates to snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and excellent performance in games that rely on a few fast cores. The multi-core score of 32924 suggests it can handle demanding productivity workloads like video encoding and software compilation without significant bottlenecks.

The nearest rival comparisons show a tight grouping. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has an average score of 49196, which is 0.4% higher than the Ultra 5 245’s average of 48995. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 sits at 49228, a 0.5% advantage. Conversely, the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H trails by 0.6%, and the Intel Core i5-14600K trails by 0.8%. These deltas are minimal, meaning the Ultra 5 245 is statistically neck-and-neck with these established alternatives from both AMD and Intel. For real-world workloads, this means that users will not perceive a major difference between these processors; the choice will come down to platform features and pricing rather than raw compute performance. The Passmark scores reinforce this picture: a multi-thread score of 38706 and a single-thread score of 4394 show similar balance, while the floating-point math score of 120548 and integer math score of 91187 indicate robust arithmetic performance for scientific and financial calculations.

Benchmark Performance

The overall benchmark picture for this CPU+GPU pairing is strong, with a combined percentile of 78. The CPU alone holds the 90th percentile, demonstrating top-tier performance relative to all other processors in the database. The GPU, however, sits at the 65th percentile, which is lower but still respectable. This discrepancy suggests the CPU has more headroom than the GPU in demanding workloads, a common trait in balanced builds where the graphics card is the limiting factor for gaming.

Looking at specific CPU scores, the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 32924 is a key indicator of heavy multi-threaded performance, while the single-core score of 4648 shows excellent responsiveness. The Passmark data compression score of 400942 is exceptionally high, indicating fast file archiving and compression tasks. Data encryption scores 30236, and extended instructions score 33304, both suggesting strong throughput for security-related and vectorized workloads. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 48995, placing it in the same performance tier as the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and the Intel Core i5-14600K, with deltas under 1%.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 represents modern DirectX 12 rendering performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844 is notably higher than the OpenCL score of 83514, indicating that the Arc B570 is well-optimized for Vulkan-based games and applications. Passmark G3D score of 14195 and GPU compute score of 7281 provide additional context, with the G3D score being the more relevant metric for gaming. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20556, which places it in the same performance class as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% higher) and the Intel Arc A750 (0.1% lower). This is a significant finding, as it suggests the B570 delivers desktop-class performance comparable to a high-end mobile GPU from the previous generation.

The combined picture is one of a well-matched pair where the CPU leads and the GPU provides solid, but not class-leading, graphics performance. The average FPS across all tested games is 87, which is a strong result for 1080p gaming. The pair ranks 3019 out of 3732 pairs in the database, placing it in the top 20% of all CPU+GPU combinations.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The data shows strong 1080p performance in esports titles. Valorant runs at 304 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 293 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 178 FPS on ultra settings at 1920x1080. These numbers are well above the 144 Hz threshold, making this build excellent for competitive gaming. At 2560x1440, Valorant still hits 259 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone drops to 159 FPS, still smooth for high-refresh monitors.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 14 threads, along with its 90th percentile ranking, provide ample headroom for encoding a stream while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 suggests that x264 encoding at 1080p is feasible without impacting game performance significantly. The GPU also supports hardware encoding, which can offload this task entirely. The combination of high single-core performance for the game and multi-core capability for the encoder makes this a viable streaming setup.

Video Editing: Video editing workloads are heavily multi-threaded, and the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 and Passmark multi-thread score of 38706 indicate strong rendering times in applications like Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve. The GPU’s 10 GB of VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle 4K timelines and effects. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 83514 shows capable compute performance for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s 14 cores are well-suited for CPU-based rendering engines like Blender’s Cycles or V-Ray. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3318 and R20 score of 13828 provide a baseline for render performance. The GPU’s 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 18 ray tracing cores accelerate GPU-based renderers, making this a competent entry-level 3D workstation.

Software Development: Compilation tasks benefit from both high clock speeds and multiple cores. The boost clock of 5.10 GHz helps with single-threaded build steps, while the 14 cores handle parallel compilation. The Passmark integer math score of 91187 and extended instructions score of 33304 suggest strong performance in code compilation and execution of complex algorithms. The data compression score of 400942 also accelerates version control operations.

Student and Office Work: This build is overkill for basic office tasks, but the single-core score of 4648 in Cinebench R23 ensures instant application launches and smooth multitasking. The 65 W TDP means it runs cool and quiet, making it a pleasant workstation for a dorm room or office. The ECC memory support is an unusual but valuable feature for data integrity in academic research.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p and are willing to drop settings for 1440p. The measured FPS data shows that most esports titles and many AAA games run above 60 FPS at 1920x1080 on ultra settings. For 1440p, the build is still viable, but users will need to adjust settings in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077, which drops to 29 FPS, or Red Dead Redemption 2, which hits 27 FPS. At 4K, this is not a viable gaming platform for AAA titles, as most games fall below 30 FPS.

Content creators who work in 1080p or 1440p video editing will find the CPU’s multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM adequate. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking ensures that rendering and encoding tasks are handled quickly. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 14 cores and high boost clock. The ECC memory support is a boon for server-like workloads, making this a candidate for a small business workstation where data integrity is paramount.

Students and office workers will find this build more than sufficient for their needs, though it is more powerful than necessary. The high single-core performance ensures that documents, spreadsheets, and web browsers run without lag. The GPU’s dual-slot design and 150 W TDP require a 450 W PSU, which is a modest requirement for a desktop build, making it easy to integrate into a standard ATX case.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a professional-grade feature. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, allowing for high-speed NVMe SSDs and the latest graphics cards.

The GPU, Intel Arc B570, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This is a critical point for upgrades; if a user installs a newer GPU with a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, the bandwidth available from the CPU’s 20 lanes will still be sufficient, but the B570’s x8 link is a potential bottleneck in bandwidth-sensitive workloads. However, for the current pairing, this is not an issue.

The TDPs are 65 W for the CPU and 150 W for the GPU, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. This leaves a modest amount of headroom for a future GPU upgrade. A user could install a more power-hungry GPU, but they would need to upgrade the PSU. The CPU’s locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false) means that overclocking is not possible, limiting the CPU upgrade path to replacing the chip entirely. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier Core Ultra Series 2 processor on the same socket, or a more powerful GPU if the user is willing to also upgrade the PSU. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is a fixed platform characteristic, so users should populate all four memory channels to maximize performance.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false), which means the CPU clock speed cannot be increased beyond the stock 5.10 GHz boost clock.

Q: What is the memory type and bandwidth supported by this CPU?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a total memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory for error correction.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its predecessor, Alchemist?

A: The Arc B570 is built on the newer Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage generation), which is a successor to the Alchemist architecture. The benchmark scores indicate it performs similarly to the Intel Arc A750, with a delta of 0.1%.

Q: What is the maximum resolution for gaming with this paired setup?

A: The measured FPS data shows playable frame rates (above 60 FPS) at 1920x1080 for most games. At 2560x1440, performance drops to 40-50 FPS in AAA titles. At 3840x2160, most games run below 30 FPS, making 4K gaming not viable.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc B570 has 18 dedicated ray tracing cores, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The GPU has a 150 W TDP and the CPU has a 65 W TDP. The suggested PSU rating for the GPU is 450 W, which provides a baseline for the entire system.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: This is a desktop build (buildClass is "desktop"), with the CPU using a 243 mm² die and the GPU being a dual-slot card.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured is true) provides a detailed view of gaming performance across 50 titles at three resolutions. The pair ranks 3019 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 87 across all games. This average is heavily influenced by the high frame rates in esports titles.

At 1920x1080 on ultra settings, the build excels in competitive games. Valorant leads with 304 FPS, followed by Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 293 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone hits 178 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 133 FPS. Roblox achieves 171 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege runs at 158 FPS. These numbers indicate that the pairing is ideally suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors (144Hz or higher).

For AAA titles at 1080p, performance is more variable. Assetto Corsa runs at 78 FPS, Doom at 99 FPS, and Minecraft at 131 FPS. However, demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (39 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (36 FPS), and Ark: Survival Ascended (19 FPS) struggle to maintain 60 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in these games, and users will need to lower graphics settings to achieve smoother gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop significantly. Valorant still hits 259 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 159 FPS, making 1440p viable for competitive shooters. However, AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (29 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (27 FPS) are not playable at ultra settings. The average drop from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 35-40%, which is consistent with the GPU’s 160-bit memory bus and 380 GB/s bandwidth being a limiting factor.

At 3840x2160, the build is not viable for modern gaming. Most titles fall below 30 FPS, with only Call of Duty: Warzone (134 FPS) and Valorant (207 FPS) remaining playable. This is expected, as the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM and 160-bit bus are not designed for 4K rendering. The data clearly shows this is a 1080p gaming machine, with 1440p possible for esports and lighter titles.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass is "desktop") that combines the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 processor with the Intel Arc B570 graphics card. The CPU is a 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake-S chip with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is a Battlemage-generation card with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 150 W TDP. The combined percentile of 78 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all tested PC configurations.

The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking indicates it is a top-tier processor for its generation. The GPU’s 65th percentile ranking is lower but still above average. This means the system is well-balanced for CPU-intensive tasks like video editing and 3D rendering, but the GPU will hold it back in heavy gaming workloads. The pair’s average FPS of 87 across all games confirms that it is a solid 1080p gaming platform, but not a high-end one.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $270, and the GPU’s launch MSRP is 219 USD. This places the combined silicon cost in the mainstream segment, competing with systems built around the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and Intel Core i5-14600K, which have similar average CPU scores. The system’s overall tier is that of a capable mid-range desktop, suitable for gamers and creators who are not chasing 4K resolutions or maximum settings in every title.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming workloads. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 65th percentile shows a clear disparity. This is evident in the FPS scaling across resolutions. At 1080p, the average FPS is 87, but at 1440p, the average drops to approximately 55 (calculated from the data). At 4K, the average is around 30 FPS. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU-limited system, where the graphics card cannot keep up with the CPU’s frame generation capability.

In CPU-intensive workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU’s lower percentile is less relevant. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 is a strong indicator that the CPU will not bottleneck most productivity tasks. However, in gaming, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p, the CPU is likely capable of producing more than 39 FPS, but the GPU cannot render the frames fast enough.

The pair’s rank of 3019 out of 3732 pairs (top 20%) suggests that the combination is not severely imbalanced. A perfectly balanced system would have similar percentiles for both components. The 25-point gap between the CPU and GPU percentiles is notable, but not extreme. Users who want to improve gaming performance should upgrade the GPU first, as this will yield the most significant FPS gains. Upgrading the CPU would only help in scenarios where the current chip is the bottleneck, which is rare in gaming at 1080p and 1440p.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is a desktop graphics card based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage (Arc 5 generation). It is built on a 5 nm TSMC process, with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The GPU has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is a key differentiator; the 10 GB capacity is sufficient for modern games at 1080p and 1440p, but the 160-bit bus is narrower than competing cards, which can limit performance at higher resolutions.

The GPU’s clock speeds are fixed at 2500 MHz for both base and boost, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. The GPU also includes 18 ray tracing cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games. The FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), indicating robust compute capabilities for AI and GPGPU workloads.

Benchmark scores show that the B570 performs at the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 is a measure of modern DirectX 12 rendering performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844 is notably higher than the OpenCL score of 83514, suggesting that the GPU is better optimized for Vulkan API, which is common in many modern games. The Passmark G3D score of 14195 provides an aggregate gaming performance metric. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% higher) and the Intel Arc A750 (0.1% lower), indicating that the B570 offers performance comparable to a high-end mobile GPU and a previous-generation desktop Intel card.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM is a double-edged sword. It is enough for 1080p and 1440p rendering, but 4K textures may exceed this capacity. The 380 GB/s bandwidth and 360 GTexel/s texture rate are sufficient for most rendering tasks, but the 200 GPixel/s pixel rate is the limiting factor for high-resolution output. The GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 makes it compatible with all modern rendering engines, but its performance in ray tracing is likely to be modest given the 18 RT cores and the 65th percentile ranking.