SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

48,995 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + Intel Arc A770: A Balanced Desktop Pairing

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and Intel Arc A770 form a desktop-class pairing that sits at the 90th percentile among all CPU and GPU combinations, according to the composite benchmark data. This combination leverages Intel's Arrow Lake architecture on the CPU side and Xe-HPG graphics on the GPU side, delivering strong multi-threaded compute and high-bandwidth rendering capabilities. The CPU posts an average benchmark score of 48,995, placing it at the 90th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 68,809 also lands at the 90th percentile against all GPUs, with a combined percentile of 90. The data indicates a well-matched duo where neither component dramatically outstrips the other, though the performance profile differs significantly across workload types.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process with 21,700 million transistors across a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). This powers a 16 GB GDDR6 memory subsystem on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. For a rendering workload, this bandwidth is substantial — it allows the GPU to feed its 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation pipelines without stalling, which is critical for texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution output.

The pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s are indicative of strong fill-rate capabilities. In practice, this means the Arc A770 can handle high-resolution rasterization tasks and complex texture filtering with relative ease. The FP32 throughput of 19.66 TFLOPS places it in a competitive tier for general compute and shader work, while the FP16 rate of 39.32 TFLOPS (at a 2:1 ratio) offers headroom for workloads that leverage reduced precision, such as certain machine learning inference tasks or mixed-precision rendering techniques.

Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 32 dedicated RT cores. This is not a token inclusion; it enables hardware-accelerated ray-traced effects in supported titles. However, the benchmark data does not isolate RT performance, so its impact must be inferred from the overall 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969. That score, while not directly comparable to raster-only tests, suggests the GPU can maintain playable frame rates in DX12 titles with ray tracing enabled, though users should temper expectations for the heaviest RT workloads, as the RT core count is modest relative to higher-tier competitors.

The API support is comprehensive: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern game engines and rendering APIs, including mesh shaders and variable rate shading where supported. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,175 and Vulkan score of 94,284 provide cross-API performance data. The Vulkan score trailing OpenCL by roughly 14% suggests the driver stack handles compute-oriented APIs well, while Vulkan rendering may have slight overhead or optimization gaps in certain workloads. For rendering professionals, the OpenCL strength is notable, as many renderers (e.g., Blender Cycles, Octane) leverage OpenCL for GPU compute.

The GPU's percentile placement at 90th percentile against all GPUs, with an average score of 68,809, places it within striking distance of professional-grade cards. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, scores 69,000 (a delta of -0.3%, meaning the Arc A770 trails by just 0.3%), while the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 scores 68,562 (the Arc leads by 0.4%). The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 are 1.5% and 1.7% ahead, respectively. This indicates the Arc A770 sits in a performance band that competes with last-generation workstation cards, making it viable for entry-level professional rendering, though the end-of-life production status means driver updates and long-term support are limited.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score of 48,995 places it at the 90th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49,196 (the Intel CPU trails by 0.4%), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49,228 (trailing by 0.5%), the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48,698 (the Ultra 5 245 leads by 0.6%), and the Intel Core i5-14600K scores 48,618 (leading by 0.8%). This clustering within a 1.3% spread demonstrates that the Ultra 5 245 performs on par with a broad range of mid-range and previous-generation high-end CPUs, making it a versatile choice for mixed workloads.

In Cinebench tests, the CPU scores 3,318 in R15 multi-core and 468 in single-core; 13,828 in R20 multi-core and 1,952 in single-core; and 32,924 in R23 multi-core with 4,648 in single-core. The R23 multi-core score of 32,924 is particularly strong for a 65 W TDP part, indicative of efficient power scaling under sustained loads. The single-core R23 score of 4,648 confirms robust per-thread performance, which matters for lightly threaded applications and gaming scenarios where single-thread speed is a limiting factor.

PassMark results paint a detailed picture of workload-specific strengths. The multi-thread score is 38,706, while single-thread scores 4,394. Data compression scores 400,942, an exceptionally high figure that suggests strong memory subsystem performance and efficient instruction handling — relevant for archiving, file servers, and database workloads. Data encryption scores 30,236, indicating competent AES and cryptographic throughput. Extended instructions score 33,304, reflecting strong SIMD and AVX-512-class performance. Floating point math scores 120,548, while integer math scores 91,187; the FP advantage suggests the architecture favors scientific and numerical workloads. Prime number finding scores a modest 365, and random string sorting scores 49,140, with physics scoring 2,569.

On the GPU side, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 is the primary gaming-relevant metric. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,175 and Vulkan score of 94,284 provide additional context for compute and cross-API performance. Combined, the CPU's 90th percentile and GPU's 90th percentile yield a combined percentile of 90, indicating that this pairing is balanced — neither component is a clear bottleneck at the aggregate level. However, the lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that real-world gaming performance must be estimated from these benchmark scores rather than taken from direct measurements.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor — notably, it lacks hyperthreading, as the thread count equals the core count. This is a design choice for the Arrow Lake architecture (codename Arrow Lake-S), which prioritizes efficiency and die size optimization over simultaneous multithreading. The base clock is 3.50 GHz, boosting up to 5.10 GHz, which is a substantial boost headroom of 1.6 GHz. The 65 W TDP is modest for a 14-core part, enabled by the 3 nm TSMC process node with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. This process node is a key enabler of the high clock speeds at relatively low power draw.

The cache hierarchy is tiered: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The per-core L2 allocation is generous, which helps with data locality and reduces latency for frequently accessed data. The 24 MB L3 is shared across all cores, providing a reasonable pool for multi-threaded workloads that benefit from shared data. For a 14-core design, this cache configuration supports both single-thread responsiveness and multi-threaded throughput.

Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This is a moderate figure — sufficient for most applications, though not exceptional for HEDT-level memory-intensive tasks. The inclusion of ECC memory support is notable for workstation and server use cases, where data integrity is paramount. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which offers high bandwidth for modern SSDs and GPUs, though the paired Arc A770 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the Gen 5 lanes are future-proofing rather than a current necessity.

Benchmark scores translate to real workload performance as follows. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,924 indicates strong rendering performance for CPU-based renderers like Blender or V-Ray — expect competitive times for 3D scene renders, though not at the level of high-core-count workstation chips. The single-core score of 4,648 is excellent for tasks like spreadsheet recalculation, web browsing, and legacy software that relies on single-threaded execution. The PassMark floating point score of 120,548 versus integer math of 91,187 shows a 32% advantage for floating-point, making this CPU well-suited for scientific computing, financial modeling, and any workload that relies heavily on FPU operations.

The data compression score of 400,942 is a standout — this is a top-tier result that suggests the CPU handles ZIP, 7-Zip, and database compression tasks exceptionally well, likely due to the combination of high single-thread speed and efficient L2 cache. Data encryption at 30,236 is adequate for VPN, disk encryption, and secure communications, though not a specialized crypto processor. The extended instructions score of 33,304 indicates strong SIMD performance for multimedia encoding and scientific libraries.

The nearest rivals contextualize this performance. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is only 0.5% ahead on average, meaning the Ultra 5 245 matches a 12-core Zen 4 part in aggregate benchmarks — a strong showing given the Ryzen 9's higher core count and typical multi-thread advantage. The Intel Core i5-14600K is 0.8% behind, meaning the Ultra 5 245 edges out a previous-generation mid-range enthusiast chip. These deltas are within noise, but they establish the Ultra 5 245 as a legitimate mid-range-to-upper-mid-range CPU.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The combined percentile of 90, with both CPU and GPU at exactly 90th percentile within their respective categories, suggests a balanced pairing at the aggregate level. However, workload-specific analysis reveals where each component takes the lead or becomes the limiting factor.

For CPU-bound workloads — such as physics simulations, data compression, encryption, and compile tasks — the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU's role is minimal. The PassMark physics score of 2,569 is modest, but the multi-thread score of 38,706 indicates the CPU can handle complex simulations. In these scenarios, the GPU's 90th percentile standing is irrelevant; the CPU's performance dictates the outcome. The CPU's 0.4-0.8% deltas against rivals suggest it will not be a significant bottleneck in most CPU-bound tasks, as it trades blows with the Ryzen 9 7900 and i5-14600K.

For GPU-bound workloads — such as 3D rendering with ray tracing, high-resolution gaming, and GPU compute — the Arc A770 is the limiting factor. The GPU's 90th percentile is slightly lower than the CPU's relative standing in certain CPU benchmarks (e.g., the CPU's R23 multi-core score of 32,924 is strong, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,969 is mid-pack). In gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the CPU's single-thread score of 4,648 will likely keep up with the GPU's rendering capabilities, but at 4K or with heavy RT effects, the GPU's raw throughput (19.66 TFLOPS FP32) will cap frame rates.

The dataIsMeasured flag is false, meaning no measured FPS rows exist for this combination. This is a critical caveat: FPS estimates must be derived from benchmark scores. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 suggests the GPU can handle DX12 titles at high settings, but without direct FPS data, the precise balance point is uncertain.

Evidence from percentiles: the CPU's nearest rivals include the Ryzen 9 7900 (a 12-core part) and Xeon Gold 5318H (a server chip), indicating the CPU performs above its core-count class. The GPU's rivals are professional cards (Quadro P6000, Radeon Pro WX 8200), indicating it performs near workstation levels. This suggests that in gaming, the GPU will typically be the bottleneck at higher resolutions, while at lower resolutions or in CPU-intensive games, the CPU may be the limiter. The absence of measured FPS data means this is an inference, not a measurement.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

There is no measured FPS data available for this CPU and GPU combination. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 and its 90th percentile standing, the Arc A770 should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles at 1080p and 1440p with high or ultra settings. The 16 GB VRAM buffer is ample for current game textures at 1440p and even 4K, where VRAM consumption can exceed 10 GB in recent titles. The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high-resolution texture streaming without significant stutter.

The CPU's single-core R23 score of 4,648 indicates it can feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios without bottlenecking, as most games are not fully multi-threaded. The 14-core design provides headroom for background tasks while gaming, such as streaming or recording.

For esports titles (e.g., Counter-Strike 2, Valorant), which are heavily single-thread bound, the CPU's high boost clock of 5.10 GHz should enable very high frame rates (often 200+ FPS) at 1080p, though this is an estimate. For AAA titles at 1440p, the GPU's FP32 throughput of 19.66 TFLOPS suggests frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range at high settings, again an estimate. For ray-traced titles, the 32 RT cores will provide some acceleration, but expect frame rates to drop by 30-50% compared to rasterized performance, consistent with the RT core count relative to the FP32 throughput.

The GPU's end-of-life status is a consideration for gaming longevity — newer games may rely on features or driver optimizations that are no longer actively developed for this architecture. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with current titles, but future titles may push beyond what this hardware can handle at high settings.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) processors. This socket is not backward compatible with older Intel platforms, so upgrading the CPU within the same motherboard is limited to other Arrow Lake parts. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, providing a path to higher-capacity or higher-speed DDR5 modules. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is a potential upgrade point — opting for faster DDR5 kits could improve memory-bound workloads, though the memory controller's limits are not specified.

The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes is a forward-looking feature. A future GPU upgrade to a PCIe Gen 5 card would benefit from this bandwidth, though the current Arc A770 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is not a bottleneck. A sensible CPU upgrade within the socket would be a higher-tier Arrow Lake part with more cores or higher clocks, though specific models are not listed in the data.

On the GPU side, the Arc A770's suggested PSU is 550 W, and the GPU TDP is 225 W. The CPU TDP is 65 W, so the total system draw is well within a 550 W PSU's capacity, leaving headroom for drives, fans, and peripherals. However, a more powerful GPU upgrade would require a higher-wattage PSU — the data does not specify a limit beyond the suggested 550 W for the current GPU.

The GPU is end-of-life with a successor named Battlemage, per the data. A sensible next upgrade would be to a Battlemage GPU when it becomes available, assuming it offers higher performance and better driver support. Alternatively, users could move to a different vendor's GPU within the PCIe 4.0/5.0 slot, but the data does not provide specific model recommendations.

Memory expansion is straightforward: the dual-channel DDR5 support allows for additional modules, and ECC support is a plus for workstation reliability. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes can accommodate a Gen 5 NVMe SSD for faster storage, which would complement the CPU's strong data compression scores for file-heavy workflows.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 90, with both the CPU and GPU individually ranking at the 90th percentile against all CPUs and GPUs respectively.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically associated with workstation and server platforms.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A770?

A: The GPU has 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, provided by 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for gaming performance with this combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU pairing. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, the GPU has a TDP of 225 W, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A770 still in production?

A: No, the GPU is listed as end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) processors.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245, a 14-core/14-thread Arrow Lake desktop CPU, with the Intel Arc A770, a 16 GB Xe-HPG architecture GPU. It is a desktop-class configuration, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and the GPU's 90th percentile ranking produce a combined percentile of 90, placing this system in the upper echelon of desktop builds. The CPU's average benchmark score of 48,995 and the GPU's average score of 68,809 are both strong for their respective categories.

This is a balanced mid-to-high-end desktop build. The CPU provides excellent multi-threaded performance for its 65 W TDP, competitive with the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and Intel Core i5-14600K, while the GPU offers workstation-class compute performance with 16 GB of VRAM. The absence of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated, but the component benchmarks suggest a system capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming and solid 1440p performance. The CPU's strong data compression and floating-point scores make it suitable for content creation, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and OpenCL performance support GPU-accelerated rendering.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need balanced performance across CPU- and GPU-intensive workloads. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions will find the combination adequate for high settings, though not for extreme frame rates — the GPU's 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 512 GB/s bandwidth support modern titles, but the lack of measured FPS data means users should temper expectations. For content creators, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,924 and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,175 indicate strong rendering and compute capabilities for video editing, 3D modeling, and effects work. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly beneficial for large textures and complex scenes.

Developers will appreciate the CPU's data encryption score of 30,236 and extended instructions score of 33,304, which support compilation and cryptographic workloads. Students and small business workstations benefit from the CPU's ECC memory support and the GPU's OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility, which cover a wide range of professional applications. However, the GPU's end-of-life status is a caveat — users planning long-term use should consider the lack of future driver optimizations. The CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads (no hyperthreading) are sufficient for parallel workloads, and the 3 nm process node ensures energy efficiency, keeping operational costs low for always-on workstations. For users prioritizing raw gaming frame rates, a more powerful GPU would be needed, but for a balanced desktop that handles both productivity and gaming, this pairing is well-suited.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds