SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

48,995 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + Intel Arc A580: Desktop Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's Arrow Lake-based Core Ultra 5 245 processor with the Intel Arc A580 graphics card, creating a desktop build that sits at the 89th percentile overall. The CPU alone ranks at the 90th percentile against all processors, while the GPU holds the 87th percentile position against all graphics cards. The benchmark data indicates a well-matched pair for mainstream desktop workloads, though no measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is built on Arrow Lake architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC with 17,800 million transistors packed into a 243 mm² die. This desktop processor features 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning it operates without hyperthreading — each core handles one thread. The base clock runs at 3.50 GHz with a boost capability up to 5.10 GHz, providing substantial single-thread headroom for latency-sensitive workloads. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache, which collectively supports the memory subsystem's dual-channel DDR5 interface with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory support is included, a feature that appeals to workstation and small-business users who require data integrity.

The Cinebench results reveal a processor that excels in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded scenarios. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 32,924 points places it in strong contention with its nearest rivals, while the single-core score of 4,648 points demonstrates excellent per-thread performance. The R20 scores of 13,828 multi-core and 1,952 single-core, along with R15 scores of 3,318 multi-core and 468 single-core, show consistent scaling across benchmark generations. PassMark results further characterize the workload profile: multi-thread performance at 38,706, single-thread at 4,394, floating-point math at 120,548, integer math at 91,187, and data compression at 400,942. These scores indicate a processor that handles both productivity tasks and compute-heavy applications with equal facility. The extended instructions score of 33,304 and encryption score of 30,236 suggest strong capabilities for cryptographic workloads and SIMD-heavy code.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 5 245 sits within a tight performance band. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G by just 0.4% in average benchmark score and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 by 0.5%, while leading the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H by 0.6% and the Core i5-14600K by 0.8%. This grouping places the CPU in a competitive mid-to-high tier where architectural differences translate to minimal real-world deltas. The lack of hyperthreading is partially offset by the high core count and efficient Arrow Lake design, making it well-suited for compile tasks, rendering, and multi-tasking environments.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows an 89th-percentile desktop build, with the CPU contributing a 90th-percentile rank and the GPU at 87th percentile. The processor's average benchmark score of 48,995 is nearly identical to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G at 49,196, differing by only 0.4%. The GPU's average score of 57,756 places it just 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, while sitting 0.8% ahead of the Intel Arc A570M and 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the Arc A580 scores 2,229 points, which reflects its DirectX 12 Ultimate capabilities. Geekbench results show an OpenCL score of 91,657 and a Vulkan score of 79,381, indicating that the GPU performs better under OpenCL compute workloads than under Vulkan graphics operations. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,924 is a strong indicator of sustained all-core performance, while the single-core score of 4,648 supports responsive daily use and gaming. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,394 corroborates the single-core strength. The data shows a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other, resulting in a system that avoids severe bottleneck scenarios in most applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile alignment — 90th for CPU, 87th for GPU, 89th combined — suggests a well-balanced desktop configuration. The CPU's 0.8% lead over the Core i5-14600K in average score indicates it has sufficient headroom to feed the GPU in most scenarios, while the GPU's proximity to the RX 6950 XT (within 1.1%) means it can keep pace with the processor's output in graphics-bound tasks. However, the data reveals that the GPU is the more likely limiting factor in gaming workloads, as evidenced by its lower percentile rank and the fact that the CPU's single-thread performance (4,648 in R23 single-core) exceeds what most current games require for high frame rates.

In compute-heavy productivity tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU's 14 cores and strong multi-thread scores (32,924 in R23 multi-core) will drive performance, and the GPU's compute capabilities (12.29 TFLOPS FP32) can assist in accelerated workloads. The PassMark floating-point score of 120,548 for the CPU indicates robust math throughput, which complements the GPU's parallel compute for tasks like physics simulations or financial modeling. The data suggests that in gaming at lower resolutions, the CPU can push frame rates higher, but the GPU will cap performance at higher resolutions and detail settings. Conversely, in productivity software that uses both CPU and GPU, the system can leverage both components effectively without a pronounced bottleneck.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 with the Intel Arc A580. All frame-rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,229 and its 87th-percentile ranking suggest it can handle modern titles at 1080p with high-to-ultra settings, though players targeting 1440p or 4K will need to adjust settings. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,648 in R23 single-core) ensures that frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios remains consistent, reducing stutter in open-world games or esports titles at high refresh rates.

Based on the GPU's position relative to the RX 6950 XT (within 1.1%) and its 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, estimated 1080p ultra performance would land roughly in the 60-100 FPS range depending on the title, with lighter esports games exceeding that and demanding AAA titles falling toward the lower end. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate would likely produce playable frame rates in the 40-70 FPS range with reduced settings. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility make it well-suited for modern game engines, while the 24 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capabilities that may require upscaling to maintain playable frame rates.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who need a balanced system for both productivity and gaming without overspending on components that would sit idle. Gamers playing at 1080p with high-refresh monitors will find the CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's 87th-percentile ranking sufficient for smooth gameplay. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering software will benefit from the CPU's 14 cores and the GPU's OpenCL compute score of 91,657, which accelerates rendering tasks. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the multi-thread score of 38,706 in PassMark and the 24 MB L3 cache, which reduces compilation times. Students and small business users handling office applications, spreadsheets, and web development will find the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,394 PassMark single-thread) more than adequate, while the ECC memory support provides an extra layer of stability for data-critical work. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and the 175 W TDP of the GPU indicate a system that can be cooled with modest components, making it suitable for compact desktop builds.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation), fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that rivals higher-tier cards from the previous generation. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1700 MHz with a boost clock of 2000 MHz, while the memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The compute configuration includes 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, producing a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 12.29 TFLOPS and FP16 of 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicate solid compute capabilities for content creation.

The 24 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated RT support, though the GPU's overall performance tier suggests that full ray tracing at high resolutions will be challenging. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,229 places the card in the 87th percentile, and its average benchmark score of 57,756 puts it within 1.1% of the RX 6950 XT — a remarkable positioning that shows Intel's Arc architecture is competitive in synthetic workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 91,657 demonstrates strong compute throughput for rendering applications, while the Vulkan score of 79,381 indicates good driver optimization for Vulkan-based games. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. The dual-slot design with 2x 8-pin power connectors and a suggested PSU of 450 W makes it compatible with most mid-range power supplies.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core Ultra 5 245's core and thread configuration?

A: The CPU has 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning it operates without hyperthreading, with each core handling a single thread.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 245 compare to the Core i5-14600K in average benchmark score?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245 has an average benchmark score of 48,995, which is 0.8% higher than the Core i5-14600K's score of 48,618.

Q: What is the Arc A580's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation and data-integrity-focused applications.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this desktop build?

A: The combined build ranks at the 89th percentile, with the CPU at the 90th percentile and the GPU at the 87th percentile.

Q: What APIs does the Arc A580 support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, along with 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs.

Q: How does the Arc A580 compare to the RX 6950 XT in average benchmark score?

A: The Arc A580's average benchmark score of 57,756 is 1.1% lower than the RX 6950 XT's score of 58,392.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing Intel's Core Ultra 5 245 (Arrow Lake) with the Intel Arc A580 (Alchemist). The CPU's 90th-percentile ranking and the GPU's 87th-percentile ranking place this system in the upper tier of mainstream desktop configurations, with an overall combined percentile of 89. The CPU's launch MSRP is $270, and it uses the Intel Socket 1851 with DDR5 memory support. The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, and the CPU's TDP of 65 W keeps total system power manageable. The pairing is notable for its balance — neither component is dramatically stronger than the other — which means users get consistent performance across a wide range of applications without paying for unused headroom.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,648 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 87th-percentile ranking support 1080p gaming at high refresh rates, with estimated frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range for most titles at ultra settings. Esports games may exceed this range, while demanding AAA titles will land at the lower end.

Streaming: The 14 cores and strong multi-thread scores (32,924 in R23 multi-core) provide enough CPU headroom for software encoding while gaming, though the GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores means hardware encoding will rely on the CPU or the Arc A580's fixed-function media engine.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 38,706 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 91,657 combine to accelerate timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export times in editing software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,924 handles CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 throughput accelerates GPU-accelerated renderers, making this a capable entry-level rendering workstation.

Software development: The 24 MB L3 cache and PassMark integer math score of 91,187 support fast compilation times, and the ECC memory option provides stability for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (4,394 PassMark) handles web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet calculations with ease, while the GPU's display outputs support multi-monitor setups for productivity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) platform. Memory support is limited to DDR5 with a dual-channel configuration and 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which offers ample bandwidth for the current GPU (running on PCIe 4.0 x16) and future expansion. The GPU's suggested PSU of 450 W and the CPU's 65 W TDP mean the existing power supply likely has headroom for component upgrades, though the GPU's 2x 8-pin power connectors should be verified against the PSU's available cables.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU within the same PCIe slot, as the CPU's 90th-percentile ranking suggests it can drive more powerful graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. The 24 MB L3 cache and 14 cores provide sufficient compute capacity for future software workloads. The platform's DDR5 support means memory upgrades are straightforward, and the ECC option remains available for users who prioritize data integrity. The 3 nm process node and 65 W TDP suggest the CPU has thermal headroom for sustained operation, making it a stable foundation for a system that can evolve with component swaps over time.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + Intel Arc A580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

Intel Arc A580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds