SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

48,995 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and the Intel Arc A350 represents a specific desktop configuration that leans heavily on CPU capability while offering a modest GPU foundation. The data indicates a processor with strong multi-threaded and single-threaded credentials, paired with an entry-level graphics solution that provides a baseline for display output and light rendering tasks. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark scores, as no measured frame rate data exists for this exact combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It features a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation and stability-focused builds. The processor includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, offering a functional fallback for basic display tasks even without a discrete GPU.

Benchmark performance for the Core Ultra 5 245 is robust across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 32924 points in multi-core and 4648 points in single-core tests. These results place the CPU in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. The multi-core score suggests strong capability in heavily threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core score of 4648 is equally important, signaling excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks and applications that rely on one or two threads, such as web browsing, office productivity, and many games.

The PassMark results further illustrate the CPU's strengths. The multithread score of 38706 and the single-thread score of 4394 confirm a balanced performance profile. In specific computational tests, the CPU achieves 120548 in floating-point math, 91187 in integer math, and 400942 in data compression. These numbers indicate strong arithmetic throughput and data handling, which are relevant for scientific computing, financial modeling, and database operations. The extended instructions score of 33304 suggests good support for modern instruction sets, which can accelerate certain encryption and multimedia workloads. The data encryption score of 30236 indicates reasonable performance in security-related tasks, though it is not the CPU's peak area.

When compared to its nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 5 245 sits in a tight competitive band. It is 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, while being 0.6% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600K. These deltas are extremely small, meaning the Ultra 5 245 effectively trades blows with those processors in overall average benchmark score. The practical takeaway is that for real workloads, the Core Ultra 5 245 delivers performance on par with these established chips, with differences that would be imperceptible in most usage scenarios.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 5 245 holds an average benchmark score of 48995, which places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, indicating that the processor outperforms roughly nine out of ten CPUs in the database. The nearest rivals confirm its position: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G averages 49196 (0.4% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 averages 49228 (0.5% higher), while the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H and Intel Core i5-14600K trail by 0.6% and 0.8% respectively. This grouping suggests the Ultra 5 245 is a high-mid-range to high-end desktop CPU.

The integrated GPU, the Arc A350, has a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs, placing it exactly at the median. This means it performs better than half of the GPUs in the database but worse than the other half. The A350 has no benchmark scores listed, so its percentile is based on its specifications rather than measured results. The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 70, which reflects a system that is significantly above average overall, driven primarily by the CPU's strong showing.

It is important to note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, meaning all discussion of frame rates must be treated as estimates derived from the component scores. The CPU's high single-thread performance and the GPU's median standing suggest that in CPU-bound scenarios, the system would perform well, while in GPU-bound scenarios, the A350 would be the limiting factor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is a discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It features the DG2-128 chip with 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units. The GPU has 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing effects in supported titles. The A350 comes with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The memory operates at 1937 MHz, translating to 15.5 Gbps effective.

Clock speeds for the A350 are modest, with both base and boost clocks set at 2000 MHz. This results in a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 6.144 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. These numbers indicate that the A350 is designed for basic 1080p gaming at lower settings, as well as light creative workloads like photo editing and casual video playback. The 4 GB VRAM capacity is a significant constraint for modern games, which often require more memory for high-resolution textures and detailed environments.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and near-future game APIs. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides adequate bandwidth for its performance class. The A350 has a very low TDP of 25 W and a suggested PSU of 200 W, making it an efficient option for compact or low-power systems. It is a single-slot card with no display outputs listed, which implies it may be intended for compute or encoding tasks rather than primary display output, though the integrated graphics on the CPU can handle display duties.

The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with its predecessor being Xe Graphics and its successor being Battlemage. This indicates that the A350 is a product at the end of its lifecycle, though it remains functional for the tasks it was designed for. The 50th percentile ranking confirms that the A350 is an average performer, suitable for entry-level use but not for demanding gaming or professional rendering workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance distribution between the Core Ultra 5 245 and the Arc A350 is heavily skewed. The CPU sits in the 90th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 50th percentile. This creates a clear bottleneck scenario where the GPU is almost certainly the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks. In gaming, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4648 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can feed frames quickly, but the A350's modest 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM will constrain frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions and detail settings.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression, or video encoding, the system would perform exceptionally well, as the GPU is not involved. The CPU's multi-core score of 32924 in Cinebench R23 supports this, indicating that the processor can handle demanding multi-threaded tasks without issue. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering in applications that use the GPU, the A350 would be the limiting factor, though the CPU's high performance would prevent any additional slowdown from the processor side.

The combined percentile of 70 reflects a system that is above average but not top-tier, primarily because the GPU drags the overall score down from the CPU's high level. For users who prioritize CPU performance and do not require significant graphics power, this pairing makes sense. However, for anyone expecting balanced gaming performance, the A350 would need to be upgraded to fully utilize the CPU's capabilities. The lack of measured FPS data means this analysis is based on the benchmark scores, which consistently point to the GPU as the component that limits graphics-related performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A350 is not suited for high-refresh gaming at 1080p with modern titles. Its 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM will struggle to maintain high frame rates even at medium settings. The CPU's single-thread performance is strong, but the GPU will cap frame rates well below what a 144 Hz or higher monitor requires.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and strong multi-threaded score of 32924 in Cinebench R23 make it capable of handling game capture and encoding in software, though the GPU's lack of a dedicated encoder is a limitation. The A350's low TDP and 25 W power draw mean the system can stream efficiently without excessive heat or power consumption.

Video Editing: The CPU excels in video editing tasks, with a PassMark multithread score of 38706 and a data compression score of 400942 indicating fast timeline scrubbing and export times. The GPU can assist with certain effects, but its 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance with high-resolution footage or complex effects stacks.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 makes it a strong choice for CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray. The GPU's 6 ray tracing cores and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance can handle basic GPU rendering, but the 4 GB VRAM is a hard limit for complex scenes.

Software Development: The CPU's high single-thread score of 4648 and integer math score of 91187 make it excellent for compilation and code analysis. The 14 cores provide ample parallelism for build systems, and the 24 MB of shared L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code and data. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is more than adequate for typical student and office workloads. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking, while the GPU can handle basic display output if the integrated graphics are not used. The 65 W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, suitable for a dorm room or office environment.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this configuration is someone who prioritizes CPU performance for productivity tasks and does not have demanding GPU requirements. Gamers playing at 1080p with older or less demanding titles, or those willing to lower settings, could find the A350 sufficient, but the CPU's 90th percentile ranking is the main draw. Content creators working with video editing or software development will benefit most from the Core Ultra 5 245's strong multi-threaded performance, with the A350 serving as a basic display adapter.

Students and professionals in fields like engineering, finance, or data analysis would find this system excellent for computation-heavy tasks. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and PassMark scores in integer and floating-point math indicate strong performance in spreadsheets, simulations, and statistical analysis. Small business workstations that run office applications and light database tasks would also perform well, though the GPU is largely unnecessary for these workloads.

The system is not recommended for gamers seeking high frame rates in modern AAA titles, as the A350's 50th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM are clear limitations. Similarly, professional 3D artists or video editors working with 4K or higher resolution footage would require a more powerful GPU. For users who plan to add a stronger GPU later, this CPU provides a solid foundation, with the A350 serving as a temporary placeholder.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's overall performance ranking?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48995.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245 is 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 in average benchmark score, indicating essentially equivalent performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A350 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A350 has 6 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the combined system performance percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 70, indicating above-average overall performance.

Q: Is the CPU unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the Core Ultra 5 245 does not support overclocking.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is compatible with the Core Ultra Series 2 family. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is a valuable feature for workstation builds that require data integrity. PCIe Gen 5 is supported with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for modern SSDs and GPUs.

The system's integrated graphics, the Arc Xe-LPG with 64 EU, can serve as a display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails. The A350 has a TDP of 25 W and a suggested PSU of 200 W, meaning the overall system power requirements are modest. The CPU's TDP is 65 W, so a typical 300 W or 400 W power supply would provide ample headroom for upgrades.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A350 with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU's 90th percentile ranking has significant headroom for graphics-intensive workloads. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that a new GPU would have full bandwidth available. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory could benefit memory-intensive applications, given the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The platform is current for the Core Ultra Series 2, so the CPU itself is not the bottleneck; rather, the GPU is the clear component to upgrade for improved gaming or rendering performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build classified as a desktop system, pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 CPU with the Intel Arc A350 GPU. The CPU is a high-performing desktop processor in the 90th percentile, while the GPU is a median performer in the 50th percentile. The combined system percentile is 70, placing it above average overall. The CPU is a 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an entry-level Alchemist part with 4 GB of VRAM and a 25 W TDP.

The system is best described as a CPU-centric workstation or productivity machine, with the GPU serving as a basic display and light compute solution. The Core Ultra 5 245's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 score of 32924, makes it suitable for demanding CPU workloads, while the Arc A350's modest specs limit it to light gaming and basic creative tasks. This pairing is not designed for high-end gaming or professional GPU rendering, but it offers a solid foundation for users who prioritize processor performance and may upgrade the GPU in the future.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds