SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235

46,062 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and Intel Arc B570 pairing represents a modern desktop combination that targets high-refresh 1080p gaming and efficient productivity. The benchmark data shows a system with a strong CPU that outperforms its GPU in relative terms, creating a balance where the graphics card is the primary bottleneck in demanding titles. With a combined percentile of 77, this build sits comfortably above the median, offering a well-rounded experience for its intended class.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Arrow Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. This is a performance hybrid design, but notably it lacks hyper-threading, as the thread count matches the core count. The base clock is 3.40 GHz, which can boost up to 5.00 GHz, providing a wide dynamic range for both lightly-threaded and fully-loaded workloads. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, indicating a power-efficient design relative to its performance class.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This large cache allocation helps feed the 14 cores with data, which is reflected in its strong multi-threaded benchmark scores. In Cinebench R23, it scores 14769 points in multi-core and 2085 points in single-core. The multi-core result is a strong indicator of heavy productivity tasks like video rendering and software compilation, while the single-core score ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday use and applications that rely on fewer threads.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, a high ranking. Its average benchmark score of 46062 puts it in a tight race with its nearest rivals. It is essentially neck-and-neck with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, trailing by just 0.1%, and the Intel Core i9-13900HX, leading by 0.1% (as the deltaPct of -0.1% for the i9 means the Ultra 5 235 is 0.1% faster). It also leads the AMD EPYC 4364P and EPYC 7303 by 0.2%. This indicates the Core Ultra 5 235 delivers performance on par with a top-tier mobile HX-series chip and entry-level server processors, making it a very capable desktop part for its power envelope.

The PassMark results further illustrate its strengths. The multi-thread score of 37816 is high, while the single-thread score of 4516 is excellent. Specific workload tests show a floating-point math score of 117951 and an integer math score of 87948, highlighting strong arithmetic processing. The data encryption score of 29293 and data compression score of 390711 are also solid, suggesting good performance in security-related tasks and file archiving. The physics score of 2570 is a moderate result, indicating it can handle physics simulations in games but is not the primary strength of this chip. The extended instructions score of 32752 and find prime numbers score of 371 round out a profile of a versatile processor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is a desktop graphics card based on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage generation), built on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation pipelines. The card also includes 18 dedicated ray tracing cores. Clock speeds are fixed at a 2500 MHz base and boost, with memory running at an effective 19 Gbps. This configuration provides a fill rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s.

The memory subsystem is a key feature: it has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This is a notable amount of memory and bandwidth for this performance tier, which helps prevent bottlenecks at higher resolutions and with larger textures. The GPU's compute power is rated at 11.52 TFLOPS for FP32, with a 2:1 FP16 rate of 23.04 TFLOPS. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game APIs and features.

In benchmark scores, the Arc B570 achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649, its Geekbench OpenCL score is 83514, and the Vulkan score is 96844. The PassMark G3D score is 14195, with a compute score of 7281. These results place the GPU in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 20556. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which is just 0.1% faster. It also trades blows with the Intel Arc A750, leading by 0.1%, and significantly outperforms older parts like the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon R9 M390X, which are 0.4% and 0.5% slower, respectively. This performance level is competitive with a last-generation high-end laptop GPU, which is a strong showing for a desktop card.

The 10 GB VRAM is a forward-looking feature that allows it to handle modern game textures at high settings without running out of memory. The 380.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient to feed the 2304 cores. With its ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, the B570 is equipped for modern gaming features, though the raw performance level means ray tracing effects will need to be used judiciously, as indicated by the lower scores in more demanding games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 5 235 uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is a current-generation socket for desktop processors. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, but does not support ECC memory. This is a modern memory standard, and the high bandwidth is well-suited to the performance of the 14-core processor. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, offering high-speed connectivity for the latest NVMe SSDs and graphics cards.

The Intel Arc B570 has a TDP of 150 W and requires a 450 W power supply as suggested. It uses a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot width. The card is 272 mm long, so case compatibility is a factor. For upgrades, the platform has headroom. A user could potentially upgrade the CPU to a higher-tier 1851 socket part, and the PCIe Gen 5 support ensures the motherboard is not a bottleneck for future storage or GPU upgrades. The GPU itself could be upgraded to a more powerful model to match the CPU's high percentile, as the current GPU is the limiting factor in most scenarios.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU is low for a high-performance desktop chip, meaning a capable air cooler is sufficient and system power draw is modest. Combined with the 150 W GPU and a 450 W PSU recommendation, the entire system is power-efficient. This leaves significant headroom in the suggested PSU for future component upgrades or overclocking, though the CPU multiplier is locked. The platform supports the latest I/O standards, with the GPU using a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly indicates a CPU-heavy balance. The Core Ultra 5 235 sits in the 89th percentile of CPUs, while the Arc B570 is in the 65th percentile of GPUs. This 24-percentile-point gap suggests the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. This is a common pairing where the processor has significant headroom, ensuring it will not hold back the GPU in most gaming scenarios, and in fact has spare capacity for background tasks or productivity work while gaming.

The measured FPS data across games supports this analysis. In many titles at 1080p, the GPU is the limiting factor. For instance, in Cyberpunk 2077, the system produces 39 FPS at 1080p, which is a GPU-bound result. However, in lighter e-sports titles like Valorant, the 304 FPS at 1080p shows the CPU's strong single-thread performance can drive very high frame rates. The pair rank by FPS is 3021 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across all tested games of 86.9. This rank is lower than the combined percentile might suggest, indicating that while the components are individually strong, their combined gaming performance is average due to the GPU's lower relative standing.

The bottleneck shifts with resolution. At 1080p, the CPU is more likely to be the limit in very light games, as shown by the high FPS in Valorant and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck, as the FPS drops significantly across the board. The data shows this scaling: in Red Dead Redemption 2, FPS drops from 36 at 1080p to 27 at 1440p and 18 at 4K, which is a clear sign of GPU limitation. For productivity, the CPU's high percentile means it will not bottleneck the GPU in rendering tasks that use the GPU for acceleration, but the GPU's compute score of 7281 in PassMark will be the limiting factor in GPU-accelerated workloads.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at gamers who prioritize high refresh rates at 1080p and are willing to adjust settings for the most demanding titles. The measured FPS shows that for competitive shooters, this system is excellent. For AAA games, it can achieve playable frame rates at 1080p with some settings compromises, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2. It is less suited for 4K gaming, where the GPU's 65th percentile performance will struggle to maintain high frame rates in modern titles.

Content creators will find the Core Ultra 5 235 to be a powerful asset. Its Cinebench R23 score of 14769 in multi-core and PassMark multi-thread score of 37816 indicate it can handle video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation efficiently. The 10 GB VRAM on the GPU is also beneficial for GPU-accelerated rendering and working with large textures, though the GPU's compute performance will be a limiting factor compared to the CPU's capabilities. The system is also suitable for developers and students who need a responsive machine for coding, compilation, and multitasking, given the strong single-thread score of 4516 and the 14 cores for parallel builds.

For small business workstations, this system offers a good balance. The CPU's high multi-threaded performance can accelerate tasks like data analysis, financial modeling, and virtualization. The 65 W TDP and 450 W PSU requirement make it an energy-conscious choice for an office environment. The lack of ECC memory support may be a consideration for mission-critical server-like workloads, but for a standard professional workstation, this is not a major drawback. The GPU's performance is more than enough for office productivity and 2D design work.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is confirmed as measured, shows a clear performance profile. At 1920x1080, the system excels in e-sports titles. Valorant runs at 304 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 293 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 133 FPS. These high frame rates are ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. Other lighter titles also perform well, such as Roblox at 171 FPS and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 158 FPS.

For more demanding AAA games, the system provides playable performance at 1080p, but with compromises. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 176 FPS, which is excellent, but Cyberpunk 2077 only manages 39 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 is at 36 FPS. These results indicate that for the latest graphically intensive titles, users will need to lower settings from "Ultra" to achieve smoother gameplay. The Medium is particularly demanding, with only 28 FPS at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, performance drops significantly. The e-sports titles remain playable, with Valorant at 259 FPS and CS:GO at 201 FPS. However, AAA titles become more challenging. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 29 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 27 FPS. This suggests that 1440p gaming is only viable for lighter titles or with significant settings reductions. At 3840x2160, the system is not suitable for modern gaming, with most titles falling below 30 FPS. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 is at 19 FPS, and even lighter titles like Fortnite drop to 21 FPS. The 4K results are only playable for very undemanding games like Valorant at 207 FPS and CS:GO at 119 FPS.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 46062, placing it in the 89th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, scores 46030, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i9-13900HX scores 46098, making it 0.1% faster. The AMD EPYC 4364P and EPYC 7303 score 45970 and 45960, respectively, both 0.2% slower. These scores show the Ultra 5 235 is a top-tier performer for its class, matching the performance of high-end mobile and server parts.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 20556, placing it in the 65th percentile. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile with a score of 20534, which is 0.1% faster. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, making the B570 0.1% faster. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon R9 M390X score 20480 and 20662, respectively, making them 0.4% and 0.5% slower. This places the B570 in a competitive position against last-generation hardware.

The combined picture is a system with a high-performing CPU and a mid-range GPU. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking is a clear strength, while the GPU's 65th percentile is a more modest result. This creates a system where the processor is capable of supporting a much more powerful GPU in the future. The combined percentile of 77 reflects this overall strong performance, but the gaming benchmarks show that the GPU's relative weakness is the primary constraint on the system's gaming capabilities.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 with the Intel Arc B570 in a desktop configuration. It is a modern, power-efficient system built on the latest architectures from Intel, using the Socket 1851 platform and the Xe2-HPG graphics architecture. The CPU is a high-end 14-core processor, and the GPU is a mid-range card with 10 GB of VRAM. The overall tier of this build is solidly above average, as indicated by its combined percentile of 77.

The pairing is an interesting one. The CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU in relative terms. This means the system is well-balanced for CPU-intensive tasks like productivity and content creation, where the processor will not be a bottleneck. For gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor, but it still provides a good experience at 1080p. The system's class is clearly desktop, with a focus on performance and upgradeability. It is not a top-tier enthusiast build, but it is a competent and versatile system that sits in the upper-middle tier of performance.

The build is defined by its efficiency. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 150 W TDP, along with a suggested 450 W PSU, make it a system that does not require excessive power or cooling. This makes it an attractive option for users who want solid performance without the high power consumption and heat of top-tier components. The 10 GB VRAM on the GPU is a forward-looking feature that ensures it can handle modern game assets, even if the raw processing power is not top-tier.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 77, indicating it outperforms a significant majority of all possible system configurations.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375?

A: The Core Ultra 5 235 has an average benchmark score of 46062, which is just 0.1% higher than the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's score of 46030, making them essentially equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and its nearest competitor?

A: The Intel Arc B570 is in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which is only 0.1% faster with a score of 20534 versus the B570's 20556.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this system?

A: The average FPS across all games tested at all resolutions is 86.9, placing this pairing at rank 3021 out of 3732 pairs in the database by FPS performance.

Q: What kind of gaming performance can I expect in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system achieves 39 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077, indicating that you will need to lower settings for a smoother experience in this demanding title.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU and why is it significant?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has a memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s across a 160-bit bus. This is a substantial amount of bandwidth that helps the 10 GB of GDDR6 memory avoid becoming a bottleneck, which is beneficial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy workloads.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this system?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc B570 is a 450 W unit, which is a modest requirement when combined with the CPU's 65 W TDP, allowing for a power-efficient system build.