SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900T + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900T

51,015 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900T and Intel Arc A770 form a desktop build that sits at the 90th combined percentile, with both components individually ranking in the 90th percentile of their respective categories. The CPU, a 24-core Raptor Lake part with a 35 W TDP, and the GPU, a 16 GB Xe-HPG card with 19.66 TFLOPS FP32, create a pairing that is strong in both multithreaded compute and high-resolution rendering. No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming analysis is estimated from benchmark scores rather than direct captures.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build holds a 90th combined percentile. The Intel Core i9-14900T sits at the 90th percentile among CPUs, and the Intel Arc A770 sits at the 90th percentile among GPUs.

Q: How does the i9-14900T compare to its closest rivals?

A: The CPU averages 51015 across benchmarks. It is 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13850HX (50761), 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (50718), and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (50448). It trails the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T (51310) by 0.6%.

Q: How does the Arc A770 compare to its closest GPU rivals?

A: The GPU averages 68809. It is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (68562) and 0.3% behind the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (69000). The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (69870) and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (69986) are 1.5% and 1.7% ahead, respectively.

Q: What memory and PCIe options does the platform offer?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with ECC support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Q: What are the power characteristics of this build?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP, the GPU has a 225 W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W. The GPU requires 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connectors.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this combination?

A: No measured FPS rows exist for the Intel Core i9-14900T with the Intel Arc A770. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is false. All frame-rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the production status of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is in active production, while the GPU is end-of-life. The GPU’s successor is Battlemage, and its predecessor is Xe Graphics.

Benchmark Performance

The combined 90th percentile is the headline figure. Both the CPU and GPU land in the top decile of their respective pools, making this a high-tier desktop pairing. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 51015, and the GPU’s average is 68809. These scores are not top-of-the-line, but they place the build comfortably within the 90th percentile of all benchmarked configurations.

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30803 and single-core score of 4348 show a processor that is strong in both heavy parallel workloads and lightly threaded tasks. The R20 results, 12937 multi-core and 1826 single-core, follow the same pattern, as do the R15 results of 3104 multi-core and 438 single-core. PassMark data adds depth: multithread score is 36239, single-thread 4016, integer math 138149, floating point 92699, data compression 436066, encryption 27062, extended instructions 23660, random string sorting 49484, prime number finding 164, and physics 2245.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within a narrow band. The i9-14900T leads the i7-13850HX by 0.5%, the Ryzen 9 5900XT by 0.6%, and the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 by 1.1%. The only rival ahead is the Core Ultra 9 285T, which is 0.6% higher. These deltas are small enough that the CPU is effectively at parity with its closest competitors.

On the GPU side, the Arc A770 averages 68809 across its benchmark set. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2969; in Geekbench OpenCL, 109175; and in Geekbench Vulkan, 94284. The GPU is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 and 0.3% behind the NVIDIA CMP 90HX. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 are 1.5% and 1.7% ahead, respectively. The overall picture is a balanced build where both components sit in the same performance tier, with neither dramatically outpacing the other.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is false. Consequently, all gaming frame-rate statements here are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than captured gameplay.

The GPU’s 90th percentile rank, 16 GB GDDR6 memory, 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 compute indicate that the Arc A770 should handle 1080p and 1440p ultra settings at high frame rates in most titles. The 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s. The 16 GB frame buffer is ample for high-resolution textures and modern game assets.

The CPU side is not a limiting factor for gaming. The single-thread PassMark score of 4016 and Cinebench R23 single-core 4348 show that the i9-14900T has strong per-core performance, and the 5.50 GHz boost clock is high for a 35 W part. The 32 threads can manage background tasks, such as streaming overlays or voice chat, without taxing the main game threads.

At 4K resolution, the GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS may become the ceiling, though the 512 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM are sufficient for textures. The data suggests the build is best suited to 1080p and 1440p gaming with high or ultra settings. These are estimates, not measured figures, so the actual frame rates could vary from the expectations set by the benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is defined by their TDPs: the CPU is a 35 W low-power part with a 1.10 GHz base and 5.50 GHz boost, while the GPU is a 225 W card with a 2100 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost. This power differential suggests that sustained all-core CPU workloads may be constrained by the 35 W envelope, whereas the GPU can draw its full 225 W.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts with resolution. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4016 PassMark and 4348 Cinebench R23 single-core are strong enough to keep the GPU fed, so the GPU’s 90th percentile is the likely limiting factor. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck because rasterization depends on the 19.66 TFLOPS and 512 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU’s 32 threads and 36239 PassMark multithread score are far more than typical games require.

For content creation, the balance is different. The CPU’s R23 multi-core 30803 and PassMark multithread 36239 indicate a powerful CPU, but the 35 W TDP may limit sustained all-core boost under heavy rendering loads. The GPU’s FP32 19.66 TFLOPS and FP16 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1) provide substantial compute, so the GPU could be the limiting factor in GPU-accelerated rendering. The 550 W suggested PSU suggests the overall system draw is modest, with the GPU as the largest consumer.

The data shows no single universal bottleneck. At 1440p or higher, the GPU is the limit; for CPU-heavy multithreaded tasks, the 35 W envelope is the constraint. This is a balanced build, but not one where both components can run at their absolute maximum simultaneously.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-14900T uses Intel Socket 1700 and the Raptor Lake architecture. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Arc A770 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the platform is current for fast storage and a future GPU upgrade, though the current GPU is on the previous PCIe generation.

The CPU is in active production, so a user can buy a new one today. The GPU is end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor. The most sensible next upgrade is to replace the Arc A770 with its Battlemage successor when available, since the CPU, memory support, and PCIe lanes remain current. The 550 W suggested PSU provides headroom for a GPU with a similar or higher TDP, though the exact headroom depends on the new card.

Memory can be chosen between DDR4 and DDR5 at build time, but not both. The dual-channel bus and 36 MB L3 cache are fixed. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are available for a high-speed NVMe SSD or a future GPU. The 35 W CPU TDP makes the platform efficient and suitable for small form factor builds, but the dual-slot GPU and 225 W TDP require a larger chassis and a 550 W PSU.

Who Should Build It

This build suits gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates, and content creators who need strong CPU multithreading and a capable GPU. The GPU’s 90th percentile and 16 GB VRAM handle high-resolution textures and modern game settings, while the CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads accelerate rendering and compilation.

For software developers, the 24-core, 32-thread CPU with a 36 MB L3 cache and a single-thread score of 4016 in PassMark is well suited to code compilation and testing. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes. Students and small business users benefit from the 35 W CPU TDP, which keeps power and cooling costs low, while the 90th percentile GPU can handle productivity, light 3D work, and occasional gaming.

The build is not ideal for users who need a tiny form factor, as the GPU is dual-slot and requires two power connectors. It is also not for 4K gaming at maximum frame rates, as the 19.66 TFLOPS GPU may be the limiting factor, even though the 16 GB VRAM is sufficient.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process at Intel. The base clock is 1.10 GHz, the boost clock is 5.50 GHz, and the TDP is 35 W. The die size is 257 mm². The cache hierarchy is 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel, with ECC. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and integrated graphics are UHD 770. The multiplier is locked, and the part number is SRN3U. The CPU is active in production and was released on 2024-01-07. The launch MSRP is $549.

The benchmark profile is strong. Cinebench R23 multi-core is 30803, single-core 4348; R20 multi-core 12937, single-core 1826; R15 multi-core 3104, single-core 438. PassMark multithread is 36239, single-thread 4016, integer math 138149, floating point 92699, data compression 436066, encryption 27062, extended instructions 23660, random string sorting 49484, prime number finding 2048, and physics 2245.

Relative to its rivals, the CPU is 0.5% ahead of the i7-13850HX and 0.6% ahead of the Ryzen 9 5900XT. It is 1.1% ahead of the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 and 0.6% behind the Core Ultra 9 285T. These are small margins, placing the CPU at the top of the 90th percentile without being the absolute fastest.

For real workloads, the single-core score of 4348 in Cinebench R23 means fast application responsiveness, while the multi-core 30803 handles 4K video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulation. The 35 W TDP is a key feature: it delivers high performance at low power, making it suitable for quiet, compact workstations and small-form-factor builds. ECC support adds data integrity for critical tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-14900T and the Intel Arc A770. The combined performance is at the 90th percentile, matching the 90th percentile of both components. The CPU average is 51015, and the GPU average is 68809. The system is a balanced, high-tier desktop configuration, though not the fastest available.

The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread processor with a 35 W TDP, and the GPU is a 16 GB card with a 225 W TDP and a 550 W suggested PSU. The GPU is end-of-life, while the CPU is active, so the platform is current. The build is suitable for 1440p gaming and content creation, and the 90th combined percentile confirms that it sits in the top 90% of all benchmarked systems.

The GPU’s launch MSRP is 329 USD. The CPU’s launch MSRP is 549 USD. These are the only price figures, and they are stated once each.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the DG2-512 chip with the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It has 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a density of 53.4 M/mm². The GPU has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 32 RT cores. The base clock is 2100 MHz, boost 2400 MHz, and memory clock 2000 MHz at 16 Gbps effective. The memory is 16 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, giving 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 19.66 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1).

The GPU is dual-slot, uses 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W. It uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU is end-of-life, released on 2022-10-11, with Battlemage as its successor and Xe Graphics as its predecessor.

Benchmarks show an average of 68809, with 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2969, Geekbench OpenCL at 109175, and Geekbench Vulkan at 94284. The GPU is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 and 0.3% behind the NVIDIA CMP 90HX. It is 1.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 1.7% behind the NVIDIA Quadro P6000. These are narrow margins, placing the Arc A770 in the 90th percentile.

For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth handle large textures and scenes, while the 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 accelerate 3D rendering and video processing. The 32 RT cores support ray tracing, and the 128 ROPs with 307.2 GPixel/s handle output to high-resolution displays.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 90th percentile, 16 GB VRAM, and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 suggest high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p ultra settings. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4016 PassMark and 4348 Cinebench R23 single-core ensure that game threads are not CPU-limited. No measured FPS exists, so these are estimates.

Streaming: The 32-thread CPU with a 36239 PassMark multithread score can handle encoding and streaming overlays while maintaining game performance. The 16 GB VRAM provides enough buffer for streaming software, though the GPU does not have a dedicated encoder specification in the data.

Video editing: The CPU’s 30803 Cinebench R23 multi-core and 36239 PassMark multithread scores accelerate timeline rendering and export, while the GPU’s 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 speeds up effects and GPU-accelerated previews. The 16 GB VRAM accommodates large 4K and 8K timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads with a 36 MB L3 cache handle parallel CPU rendering, while the GPU’s 32 RT cores and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 accelerate GPU rendering and ray tracing. The 512 GB/s bandwidth moves data quickly between the GPU and memory.

Software development: The single-core score of 4348 Cinebench R23 and the multithread score of 36239 make compilation and testing efficient. The 35 W CPU TDP and ECC memory support provide a stable, low-power workstation for developers.

Student and office use: The 35 W CPU TDP keeps power and cooling costs low, while the 90th percentile GPU handles office tasks, light 3D, and occasional gaming. The 16 GB VRAM is overkill for office work, but it future-proofs the build for any GPU-accelerated tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900T + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900T

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds