SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900T

51,015 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER form a desktop pairing that presents an unusual contrast in raw capability. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Rapt Lake Refresh part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory. The data for this exact combination contains no measured FPS rows, so all performance framing in this analysis is estimated from the individual benchmark scores and percentile positions. This pairing represents a desktop class build with a combined percentile rank of 55, placing it in the middle of the performance distribution for all systems.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is anchored by the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The i9-14900T itself is a locked multiplier part, meaning it is not intended for overclocking, but it does support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility is a key upgrade consideration, as users can choose between the two memory types based on their existing motherboard and budget constraints. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation-class builds where data integrity is paramount. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output and basic acceleration, but it is not a substitute for the discrete GPU.

The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the processor itself, which is the primary interface for the RTX 5080 SUPER. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, so the connection is fully matched for bandwidth. The i9-14900T has a 35 W TDP, which is remarkably low for a 24-core part, but the GPU has a 415 W TDP. This disparity dictates the PSU headroom requirements. The system needs a power supply capable of handling the GPU’s draw, and the suggested PSU is listed as null in the data, so the analysis must rely on the TDP figures alone. The GPU’s 415 W TDP and single 16-pin power connector mean the power supply must have the appropriate cable and wattage capacity, though the exact number is not specified.

The most sensible next upgrade for a user on this platform would be to maximize memory bandwidth. Since the CPU supports DDR5, moving to a high-speed DDR5 kit would be a logical step for improving system responsiveness, though the exact speed is not in the data. The storage and expansion options are also defined by the platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support, which allows for the fastest NVMe drives. The platform is not forward-compatible with newer sockets, so the upgrade path is limited to swapping the CPU within the Socket 1700 family or improving the GPU. The RTX 5080 SUPER is already a high-tier card, so a GPU upgrade would be a lateral move at best. The CPU’s low TDP means cooling is not a bottleneck, allowing for a capable air cooler to maintain operation, but the GPU’s 415 W TDP requires robust case airflow to manage thermals.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores show a strong multi-core performer with a 90th percentile rank against all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, the i9-14900T scores 30803 points in multi-core and 4348 points in single-core. The multi-core score is the standout, placing it 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13850HX and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T by 0.6%, showing that it is competitive with the latest generation. The single-core score of 4348 is solid, but the multi-core result is what drives the average benchmark score of 51015. The PassMark multi-thread score of 36239 reinforces this, while the single-thread score of 4016 shows a balanced architecture. The data compression score of 436066 and integer math score of 138149 indicate strong throughput for productivity tasks.

The GPU’s benchmark data is sparse, with only a single result from 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075 points in this test, which places it in the 19th percentile against all GPUs. This is a surprisingly low percentile for a card with 24 GB of VRAM and a 1.02 TB/s bandwidth. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with a score of 3163 (2.8% higher), the Intel Arc Pro B60 with 3182 (3.4% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce 820A with 2983 (3.1% lower). This places the RTX 5080 SUPER in a mid-range bracket according to this specific test, which is not representative of its raw specifications. The combined picture is confusing: the CPU is near the top of the charts, but the GPU’s single benchmark score suggests it is a mid-tier card. This discrepancy indicates that the 3DMark Steel Nomad test may not be fully exercising the GPU’s capabilities, or the data is incomplete.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 51015 is 0.5% above the i7-13850HX and 0.6% above the Ryzen 9 5900XT. The GPU’s average score of 3075 is the only data point, so its position is less reliable. The combined percentile of 55 is a result of the high CPU score being dragged down by the low GPU percentile. In practical terms, the system will excel in CPU-bound tasks, but the GPU’s measured performance in this benchmark does not align with its 24 GB memory size and 10752 shading units.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance analysis reveals a significant bottleneck in the GPU for gaming workloads. The CPU’s 90th percentile rank versus the GPU’s 19th percentile rank shows a clear mismatch. For gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor, as the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075 suggests it cannot keep up with the CPU’s ability to feed frames. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4016 is high enough to handle most game logic, but the GPU’s rendering throughput is the constraint. The estimated FPS scaling would be directly tied to the GPU’s performance, meaning that at high resolutions, the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM would be an asset, but the raw performance per the benchmark is not there.

For content creation and productivity, the balance shifts. The CPU’s multi-core score of 30803 in Cinebench R23 is a dominant factor, so tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering that rely on the CPU will see excellent performance. The GPU can assist in GPU-accelerated rendering, but its benchmark score indicates it is not a top-tier compute card. The PassMark extended instructions score of 23660 suggests the CPU is well-suited for complex instruction sets, while the GPU’s FP32 performance of 56.28 TFLOPS is high on paper but not reflected in the 3DMark score. The bottleneck is workload-dependent: the CPU limits in single-threaded gaming scenarios, but the GPU limits in rasterization-heavy scenes.

The 35 W TDP of the CPU versus the 415 W TDP of the GPU is a power imbalance. The CPU is unlikely to throttle, but the GPU will draw significant power under load. The estimated FPS is not measured, so the exact scaling is unknown, but the data suggests that lowering resolution will not help if the GPU is the bottleneck. The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads are overkill for gaming, so the system is better balanced for mixed workloads where the CPU can handle background tasks while the GPU renders. The combined percentile of 55 indicates that the system is average overall, which is a direct result of the GPU’s poor benchmark showing.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to its nearest rival?

A: The i9-14900T scores 30803 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i7-13850HX and 1.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T by 0.6%.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-14900T supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation platforms.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile rank against all GPUs?

A: The GPU is in the 19th percentile against all GPUs, based on its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP?

A: The i9-14900T has a TDP of 35 W, which is very low for a processor with 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has an FP32 performance of 56.28 TFLOPS, which is the same as its FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 55, which places the system in the middle of all benchmarked builds.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a content creator who prioritizes CPU-heavy workloads over gaming. The i9-14900T’s 90th percentile rank and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30803 make it ideal for video editors, 3D artists, and software developers who compile large codebases. The 24 cores and 32 threads are sufficient for heavy parallel processing, and the low 35 W TDP means it can run in a smaller form factor without aggressive cooling. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM is a draw for those working with large textures or machine learning models, even if the 3DMark score is modest. This is not a system for gamers targeting high-refresh 1080p or 1440p, as the GPU’s 19th percentile rank would bottleneck the CPU’s potential.

Students and small business workstations could also benefit, but the GPU’s performance is a concern. For office tasks, the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4016 is more than adequate, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 could handle basic display output if the discrete GPU is not needed. However, the cost of the RTX 5080 SUPER is hard to justify if the primary use is not GPU-accelerated. Developers will appreciate the ECC memory support and the CPU’s data encryption score of 27062, which indicates strong security performance. The system is best suited for a professional who needs a powerful CPU for simulation, analysis, or encoding, and who can leverage the GPU’s memory capacity for specific tasks like rendering with large scenes or AI inference.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is built on the GB203 chip with the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process. It has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The memory subsystem is the card’s most impressive feature: 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s. This is a high-capacity configuration suited for 4K textures and large datasets. The clocks are set at a base of 2295 MHz and a boost of 2617 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz or 32 Gbps effective. The card has 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. For ray tracing, it has 84 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, it has 336 tensor cores.

The pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s, which are high figures on paper. The FP32 performance is 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at the same rate. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 is the only benchmark, and it places the card in the 19th percentile, which is a poor result for these specifications. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro P1000, scores 2.8% higher, and the Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 3.4% higher. This suggests the benchmark may be CPU-limited or the drivers are not fully optimized. For rendering, the RT and tensor cores are present, but the measured score does not validate their performance. The card’s TDP is 415 W, requiring a robust power supply, and it uses a dual-slot design with a single 16-pin connector. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting modern high-refresh monitors.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p, this system is not ideal. The GPU’s 19th percentile rank and 3DMark score of 3075 indicate it will struggle to maintain high frame rates, and the CPU’s power is wasted. The estimated FPS is low, and the system would be better suited for 4K gaming where the 24 GB VRAM can handle large textures, but the raw performance is still a concern.

Streaming is a mixed scenario. The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads can handle encoding at high quality without impacting game performance, but the GPU’s rendering capability is the limiting factor for the game itself. The PassMark multi-thread score of 36239 supports the CPU’s encoding strength, but the GPU must render the frames first.

Video editing is a strong suit. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30803 accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM helps with effects and color grading. The system will handle 4K multi-track timelines efficiently, with the CPU doing the heavy lifting.

3D rendering is also strong for CPU-based renderers. The PassMark floating-point math score of 92699 and integer math score of 138149 provide the compute power for complex scenes. GPU-based renderers will see less benefit due to the low 3DMark score, but the 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests some capability.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s 90th percentile rank. Compilation tasks will use all 24 cores, and the data compression score of 436066 speeds up build processes. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds.

Student and office work is overkill. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4016 is sufficient, and the integrated graphics can handle basic tasks. The discrete GPU’s power draw is unnecessary, but the system will be responsive for productivity applications.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i9-14900T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Rapt Lake Refresh part with a 35 W TDP, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and a 415 W TDP. The combined percentile is 55, placing it in the middle of all systems. The CPU is a top-tier performer in the 90th percentile, but the GPU’s 19th percentile rank drags the overall score down. This is a system with a massive CPU advantage and a GPU that underperforms its specifications in the available benchmark. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is mid-range due to the GPU’s poor showing, despite the CPU’s high standing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Rapt Lake Refresh architecture, built on a 10 nm process by Intel. It has a base clock of 1.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, which is a wide range for a 35 W TDP part. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 257 mm², and it supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU is not multiplier unlocked, so overclocking is not possible, but the boost clock is already high.

The benchmark scores show a processor that is strong in both single and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30803 is the headline, placing it in the 90th percentile and within 0.6% of the Core Ultra 9 285T. The single-core score of 4348 is also competitive. The PassMark scores are varied: the data compression score of 436066 is excellent, while the find prime numbers score of 164 is low, indicating a weakness in certain integer workloads. The floating-point math score of 92699 and integer math score of 138149 are strong. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 51015 is 0.5% higher than the i7-13850HX and 0.6% higher than the Ryzen 9 5900XT. The 24 cores and 32 threads make this a workhorse for parallel computing, and the 35 W TDP makes it highly efficient, though the actual performance per watt is not directly measured. The UHD Graphics 770 iGPU is present for basic display, but the discrete GPU handles all heavy graphics. This is a CPU that excels in productivity and content creation, with enough single-thread performance for general use.