SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14900F + Intel Arc A770: Desktop Build Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake refresh flagship CPU with Intel's Arc A770 discrete GPU, creating a desktop system that ranks at the 91st percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU alone sits at the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 90th percentile among all graphics cards. The data presented here is derived entirely from synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh variant. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and can boost up to 5.80 GHz, though it is not multiplier-unlocked. The chip is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support. It connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 39,551 in multi-core and 5,583 in single-core. The multi-core result places it within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (which scores 60,099 average across all tests) and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (59,641 average). The single-core score of 5,583 in Cinebench R23 reflects the high 5.80 GHz boost capability, making it exceptionally responsive for lightly-threaded workloads. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,506 corroborates this strength.

The multi-threaded PassMark score of 46,532, combined with an average benchmark score of 60,008, demonstrates that this CPU excels in heavily parallel workloads. The data compression score of 564,207 and integer math score of 177,066 in PassMark indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks. Floating-point math scores 119,550, while extended instructions reach 31,084. The physics score of 2,899 in PassMark suggests capable simulation performance, though not class-leading.

The 65 W TDP is notably low for a 24-core processor, which implies thermal headroom for sustained workloads in appropriately cooled systems. The CPU's 92nd percentile standing among all CPUs means it outperforms roughly 92% of processors in the database, putting it in the upper echelon for desktop computing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 5,583 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,506 indicate excellent per-core performance that can feed high-refresh-rate displays. The 5.80 GHz boost clock ensures minimal latency in game logic and draw-call processing, though actual FPS will be constrained by the GPU's capabilities.

Streaming: With 24 cores and 32 threads, the CPU can handle game encoding and streaming workloads simultaneously without compromising game performance. The PassMark multithread score of 46,532 suggests abundant headroom for x264 encoding at high presets while gaming.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39,551 and PassMark floating-point math score of 119,550 indicate strong performance in rendering and effects-heavy timelines. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache helps keep frequently-accessed video data closer to the cores.

3D rendering: Multi-core rendering workloads will benefit from the 32 threads and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16,611. The 92nd percentile standing among all CPUs places this processor well above most consumer chips for CPU-based rendering tasks.

Software development: The PassMark data encryption score of 34,644 and random string sorting score of 63,728 indicate robust performance in compilation and data processing tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long build processes.

Student and office work: While overpowered for basic productivity, the single-core performance ensures snappy application launches and responsive spreadsheet manipulation. The 65 W TDP means lower cooling requirements compared to higher-power chips.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 60,008 across all tested workloads. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, scores 60,099 (0.2% faster), while the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX also scores 60,104 (0.2% faster). The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D trails by 0.6% at 59,641, and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T leads by 0.9% at 60,572. These margins are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the i9-14900F is effectively performance-equivalent to these high-end alternatives.

The GPU delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,175, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 94,284. Its average benchmark score of 68,809 places it at the 90th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest GPU rival, the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, scores 69,000 (0.3% faster), while the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 scores 68,562 (0.4% slower). The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 leads by 1.5% at 69,870, and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 leads by 1.7% at 69,986.

Combined, this CPU+GPU pairing reaches the 91st percentile among all builds. The CPU's 92nd percentile and GPU's 90th percentile are closely matched, suggesting a balanced system where neither component dramatically outclasses the other.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU percentiles (92nd vs. 90th) are nearly identical, indicating that this pairing is well-balanced for most workloads. In CPU-bound scenarios such as physics simulation, compression, and compilation, the i9-14900F's PassMark physics score of 2,899 and data compression score of 564,207 will be the limiting factor. In GPU-bound scenarios like 3D rendering at high resolutions, the Arc A770's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,969 and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will determine performance.

The CPU's single-thread performance (4,506 PassMark) is substantially ahead of what the GPU's raw compute (19.66 TFLOPS FP32) requires for most games, meaning the CPU will rarely bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions. However, at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, the CPU's headroom becomes irrelevant. The 65 W TDP of the CPU versus the 225 W TDP of the GPU suggests that the GPU will dominate system power draw, further pointing to the GPU as the limiting factor in sustained gaming workloads.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p: The CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 5,583) can push high frame rates, while the GPU's 90th percentile standing handles modern titles at high settings. The 16 GB VRAM provides ample headroom for texture-heavy games.

Content creators: Video editors and 3D artists will benefit from the CPU's 32 threads (Cinebench R23 multi-core 39,551) and the GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth for GPU-accelerated rendering. The combination handles both CPU and GPU rendering pipelines effectively.

Software developers: The CPU's data encryption (34,644 PassMark) and integer math scores (177,066) support rapid compilation. The ECC memory support adds data integrity for critical build environments.

Students and small business workstations: While more powerful than typical office needs, the 65 W TDP and ECC support make this viable for workstation-class tasks without excessive power costs.

GPU compute enthusiasts: The Arc A770's 4,096 shading units and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide substantial compute capability for OpenCL workloads, as evidenced by the Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,175.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900F compare to its closest rivals?

A: The CPU scores 60,008 average across all benchmarks, placing it within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (60,099) and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (59,641).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A770 features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth with 2000 MHz memory clock (16 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900F supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop processor.

Q: What API support does the GPU offer?

A: The Arc A770 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern gaming and compute APIs.

Q: What is the CPU's thermal design power?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is notably low for a 24-core processor and suggests efficient power management.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A770 is end-of-life with a successor named Battlemage, released on 2022-10-11.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU scores 68,809 average, placing it 0.3% behind the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (69,000) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (68,562).

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2100 MHz and boosts to 2400 MHz. It features 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. The GPU includes 32 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not specified.

Memory configuration consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. Compute performance reaches 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The GPU consumes 225 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested PSU, using a dual-slot cooler with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 2,969, placing it at the 90th percentile among all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,175 indicates strong compute throughput for general-purpose workloads, while the Vulkan score of 94,284 shows capable graphics API performance. The 16 GB VRAM is substantial for modern game textures and GPU compute tasks, and the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures data can flow quickly to the shading units. The ray tracing cores (32) provide hardware acceleration for DirectX 12 Ultimate titles, though their performance is not directly benchmarked in the provided data.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-14900F CPU with the Intel Arc A770 GPU. The CPU represents Intel's Core 14th Gen series with a Raptor Lake architecture, released on 2024-01-07 with a launch MSRP of $524. The GPU uses the Alchemist generation (Arc 7) with a Xe-HPG architecture, released on 2022-10-11 with a launch MSRP of 329 USD. The combined percentile ranking of 91 indicates this system outperforms 91% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database.

The CPU's 92nd percentile and GPU's 90th percentile place both components in the upper tier of their respective categories. The CPU's average benchmark score of 60,008 is nearly identical to its closest rivals, while the GPU's average of 68,809 is similarly competitive. This pairing is best classified as a high-end desktop workstation or enthusiast gaming system, suitable for demanding applications that leverage both CPU multithreading and GPU compute.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,583 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,506 indicate it can sustain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969, combined with its 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, suggests it can handle modern titles at 1080p and 1440p with high settings.

For esports titles that rely heavily on single-core CPU performance, the i9-14900F's 5.80 GHz boost clock should provide ample headroom for 144 Hz or higher refresh rates. For AAA games with demanding graphics, the Arc A770's 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 32 ray tracing cores place it in the mid-to-high range of GPU performance, though the lack of measured FPS means exact performance cannot be confirmed. The GPU's 90th percentile ranking suggests it outperforms 90% of GPUs in the database, which translates to strong 1080p and capable 1440p gaming in most titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, meaning the GPU's bandwidth requirements are fully satisfied by the available lanes. Memory support includes ECC, which is valuable for workstation use cases.

The GPU requires a 550 W suggested PSU, and with the CPU's 65 W TDP, the total system power draw is manageable for most mid-to-high-end power supplies. The GPU uses 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, which are standard on modern PSUs. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, running at PCIe 4.0 speeds without bottleneck.

For future upgrades, the CPU's socket (LGA 1700) is limited to Intel's 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen Core processors, meaning a CPU upgrade would require a motherboard change. The GPU, being end-of-life with Battlemage as its successor, could be upgraded to a newer Intel GPU or a competitor's product within the same power envelope. The 16 GB VRAM on the current GPU remains substantial, so an upgrade would primarily target higher compute performance rather than memory capacity. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures compatibility with virtually any modern GPU, and the 550 W suggested PSU leaves some headroom for a moderately more powerful GPU, though a significant upgrade may require a higher-wattage PSU.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900F

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds