SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900F paired with the Intel Arc A750 is a desktop build defined by a striking imbalance: a CPU sitting in the 92nd percentile of all processors against a GPU in the 66th, for a combined percentile of 79. The data shows a flagship-class 24-core Raptor Lake Refresh processor feeding a mid-tier Alchemist graphics card, which creates a clear GPU-bound configuration in nearly every gaming scenario while leaving enormous headroom for compute, creation, and multitasking workloads. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database — all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not directly measured.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing's character is set by the gap between the two components' percentile positions. The i9-14900F ranks in the 92nd percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60008 — statistically indistinguishable from rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (60099, a delta of only -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60104, -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (59641, +0.6%), and even the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (60572, -0.9%). That is flagship-adjacent territory. The Arc A750, by contrast, sits in the 66th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 20582, in a statistical dead heat with the Intel Arc B570 (20556, +0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, +0.2%), the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, -0.4%), and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480, +0.5%).

The consequence is straightforward: in graphically demanding games, the A750 will be the limiter. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 2899 and single-thread score of 4506 indicate it can feed far faster GPUs than this one, so frames will scale almost entirely with graphics settings and resolution rather than processor load. Conversely, in CPU-heavy tasks — compilation, simulation, heavy multitasking during play — the GPU becomes the idle party. This is a build where the processor is over-provisioned for the graphics card, and the data makes that verdict unambiguous.

FAQ

Q: Is this build balanced for gaming?

A: No. The CPU sits in the 92nd percentile and the GPU in the 66th, giving a combined percentile of 79. The data shows a GPU-bound configuration in graphics-heavy games, with substantial unused CPU headroom.

Q: What CPU is in this build, and how fast is it?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F, a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake Refresh desktop processor with a 2.00 base clock and a 5.80 boost clock. It scores 39551 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 5583 in single-core, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the Arc A750 compare to rival GPUs?

A: Its average benchmark score of 20582 puts it within a fraction of a percent of the Intel Arc B570 (20556, +0.1%) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, +0.2%), and slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, -0.4%) and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480, +0.5%).

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this combination?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing; all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have, and what type?

A: The Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU rating is 550 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 and the GPU a TDP of 225, so a 550 W unit leaves reasonable headroom.

Q: Is the Arc A750 still in production?

A: No. Its production status is End-of-life, with the successor generation being Battlemage. The CPU, by contrast, is listed as Active.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-14900F is the heart of this build and its defining strength. It is a 24-core, 32-thread part built on Intel's 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry, with a 257 mm² die. The hybrid Raptor Lake-R architecture pairs performance and efficiency cores to reach that 24-core count while keeping the TDP at 65. Clocks span from a 2.00 base to a 5.80 boost, and the cache hierarchy is deep: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported — an unusual feature that leans this part toward workstation duty.

The benchmark scores translate that spec into a coherent picture. Cinebench R23 multi-core lands at 39551 with 5583 single-core; R20 shows 16611 multi and 2344 single; R15 shows 3986 multi and 562 single. The single-core figures are elite for a desktop part and explain why lightly threaded applications — most games, most office software, most IDEs — run without any CPU limitation. Geekbench returns 20008 multi-core and 2570 single-core, while PassMark records 46532 multithread, 4506 single-thread, 2899 physics, 177066 integer math, 119550 floating point math, 564207 data compression, 34644 encryption, 63728 string sorting, 209 prime finding, and 31084 extended instructions.

What does this mean for real workloads? The PassMark multithread score of 46532 and the R23 multi-core result of 39551 indicate the processor can chew through rendering, encoding, and compilation jobs that would saturate mainstream CPUs. Against its nearest rivals — all within a percentage point in average score — the i9-14900F trades blows depending on workload, effectively matching the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and 7945HX3D and the workstation-class Xeon Gold 6338T. One caveat: the multiplier is locked, so buyers cannot lean on overclocking to extract more. The "F" suffix also means no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU like the Arc A750 is mandatory, not optional.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform story favors longevity. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, a widely supported desktop socket, and accepts either DDR4 or DDR5 memory in dual-channel configurations — DDR5 being the forward-looking choice for a future-proof build. PCIe connectivity from the CPU is Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which exceeds the Arc A750's PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, meaning the GPU runs at its full intended link speed and a future Gen 5 card would not be constrained. The GPU's display outputs — one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 2.0 — support multi-monitor setups directly.

Power planning is simple. With a CPU TDP of 65 and a GPU TDP of 225, the suggested 550 W PSU provides headroom for the pair plus drives and fans. The card is dual-slot and draws auxiliary power through one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector, so most enclosures and any 550 W-class unit with those connectors will accommodate it.

The sensible next upgrade is clear from the percentiles: the GPU. Moving from a 66th-percentile graphics card to something in the CPU's own 92nd-percentile neighborhood would rebalance the system without touching the platform. The i9-14900F's physics and single-thread numbers show it can drive a substantially faster card in any modern title. A second consideration: the A750 is End-of-life with Battlemage as its successor line, so a same-family upgrade path exists. CPU-side, the 1700 socket and the locked multiplier mean the practical ceiling is already close to what this build reaches; the processor is not the part to replace.

GPU Analysis

The Arc A750 is built on the DG2-512 chip, an Xe-HPG design fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The die measures 406 mm² and packs 21,700 million transistors at a density of 53.4M per mm². It fields 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, 112 render output units, and 28 RT cores. Clocks run from a 2050 MHz base to a 2400 MHz boost, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The resulting theoretical output is solid mid-tier: 17.20 TFLOPS FP32, 34.41 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, 268.8 GPixel/s of pixel fill, and 537.6 GTexel/s of texture fill.

Memory is one of the card's strengths: 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a wide, fast configuration for its class. Ray tracing hardware is present in those 28 RT cores, and software support is modern, with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

The benchmark results frame what this hardware delivers in practice. PassMark G3D comes in at 12534, GPU compute at 5368, and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2612. Geekbench OpenCL reaches 98554 and Vulkan 85631. The PassMark DirectX splits — 181 for DX9, 65 for DX10, 72 for DX11, 70 for DX12 — along with 732 in G2D round out the profile. For rendering, the average score of 20582 places the card level with the Arc B570 and RTX 3070 Mobile, which translates into capable 1080p and workable 1440p gaming, competent hardware-accelerated ray tracing at moderate settings, and GPU compute throughput suitable for OpenCL workloads rather than heavy professional rendering farms. Tensor hardware is not listed for this part, so AI-accelerated features should not be a purchase driver here.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: the database contains no measured FPS figures for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so everything in this section is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed in-game capture.

Using the A750's G3D score of 12534, its 66th-percentile standing, and its parity with the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc B570 as reference points, the expectation is strong 1080p ultra-settings performance in most modern titles, with high refresh rates achievable in esports-style and lighter AAA games. At 1440p, the 512 GB/s of bandwidth and 8 GB frame buffer should hold ultra settings in well-optimized titles, though the most demanding recent releases may need settings reduced to keep frame rates smooth. Ray tracing is feasible thanks to the 28 RT cores, but at a card of this class the estimates suggest pairing it with upscaling or confining it to lighter RT implementations. At 4K, this percentile tier generally falls out of its comfort zone for AAA ultra-settings play. The 92nd-percentile CPU guarantees none of these limits come from the processor side — in CPU-bound scenarios like high-refresh competitive play at low settings, the i9-14900F's 4506 single-thread and 2899 physics scores indicate the frame ceiling will be far above what the A750 renders.

Benchmark Performance

The complete numbers, and what they say together. On the CPU side: Cinebench R15 at 3986 multi / 562 single, R20 at 16611 / 2344, R23 at 39551 / 5583, Geekbench at 20008 / 2570, and a PassMark suite spanning 46532 multithread, 4506 single-thread, 2899 physics, 177066 integer math, 119550 floating point, 564207 compression, 34644 encryption, 63728 string sorting, 209 primes, and 31084 extended instructions. Average CPU score: 60008, 92nd percentile.

On the GPU side: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2612, Geekbench OpenCL at 98554, Geekbench Vulkan at 85631, PassMark G3D at 12534, GPU compute at 5368, G2D at 732, and DirectX runs of 181 (DX9), 65 (DX10), 72 (DX11), and 70 (DX12). Average GPU score: 20582, 66th percentile.

The combined picture — a 79th percentile build — is that of an upper-tier desktop whose aggregate rank is dragged by its graphics card rather than lifted by its processor. The rival data reinforces both halves: the CPU statistically ties chips within a single percentage point, and the GPU does the same against its own cohort. Neither component is an outlier; the pairing is.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing Intel's Core i9 14th Generation flagship-adjacent processor with an Intel first-generation discrete Arc graphics card — an all-Intel, all-blue configuration spanning both companies' product lines. The i9-14900F (Raptor Lake Refresh, 24 cores, released January 2024, launch MSRP $524) provides top-tier compute; the Arc A750 (Alchemist/Arc 7, released October 2022, launch MSRP 289 USD, now End-of-life) provides mid-tier graphics. Tier by percentiles: a 92nd-percentile CPU, a 66th-percentile GPU, and a combined 79th-percentile system. In plain terms, this is an enthusiast-compute machine with mainstream gaming graphics — a creator-first rig rather than a pure gaming rig.

Who Should Build It

The performance data points to specific audiences. Content creators are the primary fit: video editors, 3D artists, and streamers whose workloads benefit from 24 cores and 32 threads will use every bit of the 39551 R23 multi-core score, while the A750 covers monitoring, preview, and moderate GPU-accelerated encoding. Software developers are a natural match — the 20008 Geekbench multi-core and 2570 single-core scores mean fast compilation and responsive IDEs, and ECC support adds a reliability angle for long-running jobs. Students and researchers running simulations or batch data processing will find the PassMark multithread score of 46532 well suited to the task. Small businesses needing a workstation for analysis, light CAD, or office multitasking get workstation-class CPU grunt with capable-enough graphics. Gamers are a qualified fit: those targeting 1080p, or selective 1440p, will get solid estimated performance — but gamers targeting 4K ultra or who want a GPU matched to this CPU's tier should look elsewhere for the graphics half of the build.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Estimated from the benchmark scores (no measured FPS exists for this pairing), the A750's 66th-percentile standing and G3D score of 12534 support high frame rates at 1080p in competitive and lighter titles, while the 92nd-percentile CPU — 4506 single-thread, 2899 physics — ensures the processor never sets the frame cap.

Streaming: This is one of the strongest scenarios for the pairing. The i9-14900F's 39551 R23 multi-core and 46532 PassMark multithread scores leave abundant cores to run encoding and broadcast software alongside the game, absorbing a workload that would choke a balanced-budget CPU.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing, effects, and exports all lean on the CPU here, and 24 cores at up to 5.80 GHz with 36 MB of shared L3 deliver flagship-adjacent throughput. The A750's 512 GB/s of bandwidth, 8 GB frame buffer, and 98554 Geekbench OpenCL score provide workable GPU acceleration for previews and export pipelines.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 39551 and R20 at 16611 indicate fast CPU rendering, statistically level with the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and 7945HX3D. GPU rendering is possible via OpenCL but the 66th-percentile card is a supporting actor, not the star, in this workload.

Software development: The 2570 Geekbench single-core and 4506 PassMark single-thread scores keep IDEs and interpreters snappy, while 20008 Geekbench multi-core crushes parallel builds, container workloads, and test suites. ECC memory support adds stability insurance for long-running build and CI tasks.

Student and office work: For documents, browsing, video calls, and multitasking, this build is heavily over-provisioned — which is the point of the pairing. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support, Gen 5 PCIe, three DisplayPort 2.0 outputs plus HDMI 2.1, and a 65-TDP processor make it a quiet, capable, multi-monitor desktop that will remain responsive under any office load the data can describe.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900F

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds