SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing of an Intel Core i9-14900F with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER presents a fascinating imbalance, but not in the direction most would expect. The CPU sits in the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU languishes in the 18th percentile among all graphics cards. That 74-percentile gap is enormous, and it fundamentally shapes what this system can and cannot do.

The CPU's benchmark data reveals extraordinary headroom. In Cinebench R23, the i9-14900F scores 39,551 in multi-core and 5,583 in single-core. The PassMark multi-thread score of 46,532 and single-thread score of 4,506 confirm a processor that can feed even the most demanding graphics workloads without breaking a sweat. The question becomes: what workload actually saturates the GPU before the CPU becomes relevant?

For gaming, the bottleneck is unequivocally the GPU. The RTX 5070 SUPER's single benchmark score — 2,690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 — places it alongside the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2,664, 1% slower), GeForce GT 1030 (2,662, 1.1% slower), and Intel Arc Pro B50 (2,660, 1.1% slower). These are entry-level or legacy graphics products. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 2,899 and floating-point math score of 119,550 indicate it can handle game physics and simulation workloads with massive overhead to spare.

The bottleneck shifts dramatically for productivity. The CPU's data encryption score of 34,644 and data compression score of 564,207 in PassMark demonstrate that compute-heavy tasks will be CPU-bound, with the GPU barely participating. The i9-14900F's 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial parallel throughput that the GPU cannot accelerate for these specific workloads.

Interestingly, the combined percentile of 55 reflects this imbalance — the system as a whole sits slightly above average, dragged down significantly by the GPU's weak showing. The data suggests a builder who prioritized CPU horsepower for productivity tasks while accepting modest graphics capability, or one who plans to upgrade the GPU shortly after initial assembly.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-14900F scores 60,008 in average benchmark score, placing it 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (60,099) and AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60,104), 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (59,641), and 0.9% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (60,572). These differences are negligible, indicating near-identical overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to other graphics cards?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER sits in the 18th percentile among all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,690 is just 1% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2,664) and 1.1% higher than both the GeForce GT 1030 (2,662) and Intel Arc Pro B50 (2,660). This places it in entry-level territory.

Q: What memory configurations does the CPU support?

A: The i9-14900F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop processor and may appeal to users running error-sensitive workloads.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: No. The i9-14900F has no integrated graphics (listed as "N/A"), meaning a discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output. This is consistent with the "F" suffix in Intel's naming, which denotes processors without iGPUs.

Q: What is the CPU's power requirement?

A: The i9-14900F has a TDP of 65 watts, which is modest given its 24-core, 32-thread configuration. This suggests efficient power management, though boost behavior may draw more power under load.

Q: Are there measured gaming frame rates available for this exact combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU pairing. All gaming performance discussion must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The i9-14900F achieves 5,583 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 39,551 in multi-core, a ratio of roughly 7:1. This indicates strong scaling across its 24 cores, though the single-core result also ranks highly, suggesting capable performance in lightly threaded applications.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a Raptor Lake-R architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 24 cores and 32 threads, a configuration that combines performance and efficiency cores. The base clock runs at 2.00 GHz with a boost clock up to 5.80 GHz, and the multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This arrangement supports the processor's ability to handle large working sets without constantly accessing main memory. The die size is 257 mm², and the processor supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC support as a notable feature for data-integrity-sensitive applications.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's high tier. The Cinebench R15 scores of 3,986 multi-core and 562 single-core establish a baseline. Cinebench R20 improves to 16,611 multi-core and 2,344 single-core. The R23 results — 39,551 multi-core and 5,583 single-core — are particularly telling, as R23 is a common reference for modern workstation and enthusiast comparisons.

Geekbench scores of 20,008 multi-core and 2,570 single-core align with these results. PassMark tests reveal specialized strengths: integer math at 177,066, floating-point math at 119,550, and extended instructions at 31,084. The data compression score of 564,207 and encryption score of 34,644 are strong indicators for archival and security workloads. Prime number finding scores 209, physics 2,899, and random string sorting 63,728.

The average benchmark score of 60,008 places the i9-14900F in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Ryzen 7 8745HX, Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, and Intel Xeon Gold 6338T — all score within 1% of it, indicating that the i9-14900F is firmly in flagship territory for desktop processors.

For real workloads, these numbers translate to exceptional performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, scientific computation, and software compilation. The 32 threads provide ample parallelism for heavily threaded applications, while the 5.80 GHz boost clock ensures snappy response in single-threaded tasks. The 65-watt TDP is remarkably low for this core count, suggesting the processor can deliver this performance in reasonably sized desktop systems.

# Who Should Build It

The target audience for this combination is unusual. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking makes it suitable for professionals who demand maximum processing power: video editors working with high-resolution footage, 3D artists rendering complex scenes, software developers compiling large codebases, and researchers running compute-intensive simulations. The data encryption and compression scores specifically benefit database administrators and security professionals.

Students in computer science or engineering fields would find the 24-core, 32-thread configuration ample for coursework ranging from parallel programming assignments to machine learning projects. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations where data corruption is unacceptable.

Small business workstations handling financial modeling, data analysis, or CAD software would benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded prowess. The PassMark integer math score of 177,066 and floating-point score of 119,550 indicate strong general-purpose number crunching. The physics score of 2,899 suggests acceptable simulation performance for engineering applications.

However, the GPU's 18th percentile ranking restricts this system's suitability for graphics-intensive tasks. Gamers seeking high frame rates at high resolutions would find the graphics card limiting, and content creators working with GPU-accelerated effects or ray-traced rendering would be disappointed. The system is better suited as a CPU-centric workstation where the GPU handles basic display output and light acceleration.

The dual-channel DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 interface provide a modern platform foundation. Builders who anticipate upgrading the GPU later can construct a system now with the i9-14900F and replace the graphics card when higher-tier options become available or budgets allow.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains zero entries in the measuredFpsUltraByGame field, and dataIsMeasured is false. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

The RTX 5070 SUPER's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,690 — placing it in the 18th percentile — indicates modest gaming capability. The nearest rivals — Quadro K1100M, GT 1030, Arc Pro B50, and GT 440 — are all entry-level or legacy cards. The GPU's 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is respectable for memory capacity but the raw compute power (32.15 TFLOPS FP32) is limited.

At 1080p resolution, the i9-14900F's single-thread performance (5,583 in Cinebench R23) ensures the CPU will not bottleneck most games. However, the GPU's performance will likely cap frame rates at low-to-medium settings for modern titles. Esports games with modest graphics requirements may run acceptably, but AAA releases at high detail settings would strain the GPU.

At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores provide ray tracing and DLSS capability, but the underlying rasterization performance is limited. Gamers should expect to rely heavily on upscaling technologies to achieve playable frame rates at higher resolutions.

The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,506 and physics score of 2,899 suggest that game logic, AI, and physics simulations will run smoothly. The bottleneck in gaming scenarios will consistently be the GPU, making this pairing more suitable for CPU-bound titles or older games than for modern graphically demanding releases.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process. The GB205 chip contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.3 million per mm². The GPU has 6,400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units.

Memory configuration is substantial: 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. This capacity is generous for content creation and AI workloads, though the bus width limits bandwidth compared to higher-tier cards.

Clock speeds are moderate: 2325 MHz base and 2512 MHz boost. The pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 32.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU includes 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores, enabling ray tracing and AI acceleration features.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,690 places the GPU in the 18th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the Quadro K1100M (2,664, 1% slower), GT 1030 (2,662, 1.1% slower), Arc Pro B50 (2,660, 1.1% slower), and GT 440 (2,645, 1.7% slower). These are not modern gaming cards; the GT 1030 and GT 440 are entry-level budget options, while the K1100M is a mobile workstation GPU from a previous generation.

The 275-watt TDP and dual-slot design require a single 16-pin power connector. The card measures 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting modern monitors. PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures compatibility with current motherboards.

For rendering workloads, the 18 GB VRAM is a bright spot — it can hold large scenes and textures that would exceed smaller memory pools. The tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-based features, while RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing. However, the raw compute throughput limits overall rendering speed, making this GPU more suitable for lighter 3D work or as a secondary accelerator.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 5.58 GHz single-core boost and PassMark single-thread score of 4,506 can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU's 18th percentile ranking limits overall performance. Estimated frame rates at 1080p would likely fall short of 144 Hz in most modern games, making this a poor choice for high-refresh esports or competitive gaming.

Streaming: The i9-14900F's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark multi-thread score of 46,532 suggests software encoding is viable. However, the GPU's limited performance would constrain game quality settings, and the NVENC encoder's effectiveness is not detailed in the data.

Video editing: The CPU excels here. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39,551 and Geekbench multi-core of 20,008 indicate fast timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export times. The GPU's 18 GB VRAM helps with GPU-accelerated effects, though raw rendering speed is limited by the 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering benefits from the 24-core, 32-thread configuration. PassMark floating-point math at 119,550 supports this. GPU rendering with the RTX 5070 SUPER would be slower than higher-tier cards; the 50 RT cores provide ray tracing support but the overall compute capacity is modest.

Software development: The CPU's high integer math score (177,066 in PassMark) and data compression score (564,207) speed up compilation, testing, and version control operations. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code. The GPU plays a minimal role here, making this pairing acceptable for developers.

Student and office work: Overkill for typical productivity tasks, but the i9-14900F's 65-watt TDP keeps power consumption reasonable. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,506 ensures responsive application performance. The GPU handles basic display output, though the 275-watt TDP makes this an inefficient choice for purely office-oriented systems.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing Intel's Core i9-14900F with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. The CPU ranks in the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 18th percentile among all graphics cards. The combined percentile is 55, placing the overall system slightly above the median.

The i9-14900F is a flagship 24-core, 32-thread processor with a 5.80 GHz boost clock, 36 MB L3 cache, and support for DDR4/DDR5 memory. It launched in January 2024 with a launch MSRP of $524. The RTX 5070 SUPER is a Blackwell architecture GPU with 18 GB GDDR7 memory, 6,400 shading units, and a late 2025 release date.

The pairing represents a lopsided configuration — exceptional computational horsepower paired with entry-level graphics. The combined percentile of 55 reflects this imbalance. Systems with more balanced CPU-GPU pairings typically achieve higher combined percentiles. This build prioritizes CPU-centric workloads such as compilation, rendering, and data processing over graphics-intensive applications.

Potential buyers should understand that the GPU is the limiting factor for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. The CPU provides a strong foundation for future GPU upgrades, and the platform supports modern connectivity including PCIe Gen 5 and dual-channel memory.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-14900F achieves an average benchmark score of 60,008, placing it in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (60,099, 0.2% faster), AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60,104, 0.2% faster), AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (59,641, 0.6% slower), and Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (60,572, 0.9% faster). These differences are within noise, indicating the i9-14900F performs on par with the best available processors.

Specific CPU benchmarks: Cinebench R15 scores 3,986 multi-core and 562 single-core. Cinebench R20 scores 16,611 multi-core and 2,344 single-core. Cinebench R23 scores 39,551 multi-core and 5,583 single-core. Geekbench scores 20,008 multi-core and 2,570 single-core. PassMark tests include data compression at 564,207, encryption at 34,644, extended instructions at 31,084, prime numbers at 209, floating-point math at 119,550, integer math at 177,066, multi-thread at 46,532, physics at 2,899, random string sorting at 63,728, and single-thread at 4,506.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER achieves an average benchmark score of 2,690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 18th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Quadro K1100M (2,664, 1% slower), GT 1030 (2,662, 1.1% slower), Arc Pro B50 (2,660, 1.1% slower), and GT 440 (2,645, 1.7% slower).

The combined picture is clear: the CPU is among the fastest available, while the GPU is among the slowest in the benchmark database. This creates a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but underperforms in graphics-intensive workloads. The 55th combined percentile reflects this significant performance gap between components.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900F uses Socket 1700, which is compatible with Intel 600-series and 700-series chipsets. The platform supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility for builders with existing DDR4 modules or those seeking DDR5's higher bandwidth. ECC memory support is included, a feature uncommon in consumer platforms.

PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16, fully utilizing this interface. The CPU's TDP is 65 watts, while the GPU's TDP is 275 watts, suggesting a modest power supply requirement for the combined system.

The suggested PSU field is null in the data, so no specific wattage recommendation is available. However, the 65-watt CPU and 275-watt GPU indicate that a mid-range power supply would suffice, with headroom for additional components.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU. The CPU's 92nd percentile performance provides substantial headroom for more powerful graphics cards. The 18th percentile GPU is the clear bottleneck in this system, and replacing it with a higher-performing model would dramatically improve gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

The locked multiplier on the i9-14900F means CPU overclocking is not possible, but the 5.80 GHz boost clock already delivers high performance. Memory upgrades to faster DDR5 kits could improve memory-bound workloads, though the dual-channel configuration is already standard.

The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs storage and expansion options. The 36 MB L3 cache and 24-core configuration ensure the CPU remains relevant for years. Builders seeking longevity should prioritize GPU upgrades as the primary path forward.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds