SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14900F + Intel Arc A580

This pairing combines Intel's top-tier Raptor Lake desktop processor with Intel's mid-range Alchemist graphics card, creating a desktop build that ranks at the 90th percentile overall. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread monster with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an 8 GB GDDR6 card with 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The data shows a system that excels in CPU-heavy productivity but delivers more modest GPU-bound gaming performance, making it a lopsided but capable configuration for specific workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which places it in the 12th, 13th, and 14th generation Core ecosystem. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, more established memory technology and the newer standard. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation-oriented builds that prioritize data integrity. The platform also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring high-bandwidth connectivity for modern NVMe drives and future expansion cards.

The GPU, the Intel Arc A580, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slot, albeit at the older standard's speeds. This is not a bottleneck in practice, as the Arc A580's 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance do not saturate a PCIe 4.0 link. The build's power requirements are manageable: the CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 175 W TDP, leading to a suggested power supply of 450 W. This means a standard mid-range PSU is sufficient, and builders do not need to invest in high-wattage units unless they plan future upgrades.

The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors, which is typical for mid-range cards, and it occupies a dual-slot form factor. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 2.0 connections, supporting multi-monitor setups. For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the CPU has significant headroom — it ranks at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 87th percentile. This means the GPU is the more likely upgrade target. Swapping the Arc A580 for a higher-tier GPU would better balance the system, as the CPU can handle far more demanding graphics cards without becoming a limiting factor. Conversely, upgrading the CPU further would yield diminishing returns, as it is already near the top of the desktop hierarchy.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data presents a clear picture of a system with exceptional CPU strength and solid, though not spectacular, GPU performance. The CPU's average benchmark score is 60008, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. This is nearly identical to its nearest rivals: it is only 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. It is also 0.9% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T. These margins are negligible, indicating that the i9-14900F is statistically tied with these top-tier competitors in overall CPU performance.

The GPU, the Intel Arc A580, has an average benchmark score of 57756, placing it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a tight cluster: it is 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, 0.8% behind the Intel Arc A570M, and 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. These deltas are all within a couple of percentage points, meaning the Arc A580 sits in a competitive mid-range tier where small performance differences separate products.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 90, which reflects the strong CPU contribution dragging the overall score upward. In specific CPU benchmarks, the i9-14900F shows its muscle: it scores 39551 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 16611 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 3986 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. Single-core scores are equally impressive, with 5583 in Cinebench R23, 2344 in Cinebench R20, and 562 in Cinebench R15. On the GPU side, the Arc A580 scores 2229 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 91657 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 79381 in Geekbench Vulkan. These numbers indicate a GPU that handles modern APIs competently but does not challenge higher-end cards.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It runs on a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.00 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.80 GHz, providing a wide frequency range that scales from power-efficient operation to high-performance bursts. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is ample for feeding the 24 cores.

The CPU's benchmark scores reveal a processor designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 is particularly telling — it places the chip among the fastest desktop processors available, just 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D in average benchmark score. The Passmark tests reinforce this: multi-thread performance scores 46532, integer math scores 177066, floating-point math scores 119550, and data compression scores 564207. These numbers indicate exceptional throughput for tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, scientific simulations, and database operations.

Single-thread performance is equally strong, with a Passmark single-thread score of 4506 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2570. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583 is competitive with the best desktop chips, meaning the CPU handles everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications with ease. The boost clock of 5.80 GHz is key here, as high single-core frequencies directly translate to snappy responsiveness in office work, web browsing, and legacy software. The CPU also supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the dual-channel bus means memory bandwidth is not a standout feature; the 36 MB L3 cache helps mitigate this in many workloads.

The 65 W TDP is notable for a 24-core processor. This figure is misleading in terms of actual power draw under full load, but it does indicate that the chip is designed with efficiency in mind, likely with power limits that prevent sustained maximum clocks across all cores. The unlock multiplier is false, meaning overclocking is not supported, so builders must rely on the stock boost behavior. The integrated graphics is listed as N/A, confirming that this is a "F" variant requiring a discrete GPU.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else and are willing to accept mid-range GPU capabilities. The data shows a 92nd percentile CPU and an 87th percentile GPU, so the primary audience is professionals and enthusiasts who run CPU-bound applications. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, as these workloads scale well with core counts. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and Passmark multi-thread score of 46532 are evidence of this capability.

Developers, particularly those working on large codebases, will find the CPU's performance valuable. The Passmark data encryption score of 34644 and extended instructions score of 31084 indicate strong performance in security and cryptography workloads, which are common in development and IT environments. Students in engineering or data science fields, who may run simulations or machine learning experiments, will also benefit from the CPU's throughput, though they should note the GPU's limitations for GPU-accelerated compute.

Small business workstations are another fit, especially those running virtualization, database management, or financial modeling. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running tasks where data corruption is unacceptable. Gamers, however, should be more cautious. The Arc A580's 87th percentile ranking means it handles 1080p and some 1440p gaming, but it is not a high-end card. Gamers at 1080p will see playable frame rates in most titles, but those seeking 4K or high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming should look elsewhere. The build is best suited for users who do occasional gaming but spend most of their time in CPU-intensive applications.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows in the data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component rankings. The GPU's 87th percentile ranking and its competitive position relative to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (1.1% behind) and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (0.7% ahead) provide a reference point for expected gaming performance.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 79381, the Arc A580 is capable of 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, with playable frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range for esports and older games. At 1440p, performance will dip, with many AAA titles falling to 40-60 FPS on ultra settings. The 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p textures, but 4K gaming will require reduced settings, and the 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate suggest the card is not designed for high-resolution rendering.

The 24 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance means ray tracing will be a performance hit, likely requiring DLSS or FSR upscaling to maintain playable frame rates. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, is a higher-tier card from a previous generation, and the Arc A580 is only 1.1% behind it in average score, suggesting the Intel card punches above its weight in synthetic benchmarks. However, real-world gaming can vary based on driver maturity and game-specific optimizations, which the data does not capture. Overall, gamers should expect a solid 1080p experience, a passable 1440p experience, and a poor 4K experience.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i9-14900F use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports 12th, 13th, and 14th generation Core processors.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported, making the CPU suitable for workstation builds where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i9-14900F has an average benchmark score of 60008, which is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W, based on the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 175 W TDP.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A580 has 24 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 5.80 GHz, while the base clock is 2.00 GHz.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² area, with a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, which drive its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. The base clock is 1700 MHz, boosting to 2000 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p gaming and light 1440p workloads, but the 8 GB capacity may become a limitation in future titles with high-resolution textures. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game engines and graphics APIs.

The 24 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests ray tracing will be computationally expensive. The FP16 performance is 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), which can accelerate certain compute workloads but does not match dedicated tensor cores found in NVIDIA GPUs. The tensor cores field is listed as null, meaning the Arc A580 lacks dedicated AI acceleration hardware, which may impact DLSS-style upscaling performance.

In benchmark terms, the GPU scores 2229 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 91657 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 79381 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score of 57756 places it at the 87th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (0.6% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (0.7% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (1.1% ahead). These tight margins indicate the Arc A580 is a competitive mid-range card, though its driver maturity and game-specific optimizations are not captured in these synthetic scores. For rendering workloads, the GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 provide decent compute throughput, but the lack of tensor cores means AI-accelerated rendering features are absent.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a top-tier Intel processor with a mid-range Intel graphics card. The CPU, the Intel Core i9-14900F, represents the peak of the 14th generation Core lineup, with 24 cores, 32 threads, and a 5.80 GHz boost clock. The GPU, the Intel Arc A580, is an Alchemist-generation card that targets the mainstream segment. The combined percentile of 90 reflects a system that outperforms the vast majority of desktop builds, driven primarily by the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is a traditional tower configuration with standard expansion capabilities. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 175 W TDP make power management straightforward, with a 450 W PSU being the suggested minimum. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors and occupies a dual-slot profile, fitting into most mid-tower cases.

The overall tier of this build is high-end on the CPU side and mid-range on the GPU side. This is a configuration for users who need maximum CPU throughput but do not demand top-tier graphics performance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 60008 places it in the same league as the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen 7 8745HX, while the GPU's score of 57756 competes with the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM and RX 6950 XT. The build is best described as a productivity powerhouse with gaming as a secondary consideration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The i9-14900F ranks at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A580 ranks at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. This gap is significant, and the data shows the CPU is capable of driving far more powerful graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. In CPU-bound workloads like video rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing, the system will perform at near-top-tier levels, with the CPU's 39551 Cinebench R23 multi-core score leading the way.

In GPU-bound workloads, however, the Arc A580 will be the limiting factor. The GPU's 2229 3DMark Steel Nomad score and 79381 Geekbench Vulkan score indicate it is a mid-range performer, and gaming frame rates will be constrained by the GPU's capabilities rather than the CPU's. The CPU's 5.80 GHz boost clock and 24 cores mean it will never be the bottleneck in gaming, even at lower resolutions. The bottleneck manifests in scenarios where the GPU is pushed to its limits, such as 1440p or 4K gaming with high settings, where the Arc A580's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will struggle.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, supports this assessment. At 1080p, the CPU can feed the GPU enough data to achieve reasonable frame rates, but at higher resolutions, the GPU's pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s become the limiting factors. The data shows the GPU is only 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM and 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in average score, but these rival cards may have different driver optimizations. For a balanced build, a user would need to pair this CPU with a GPU in the 95th percentile or higher to avoid bottlenecking in graphics-intensive tasks. As configured, the build is ideal for CPU-heavy professional work, with gaming performance that is acceptable but not exceptional.