SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900F combined with the Intel Arc A350 is an unusual pairing that pairs a top-tier desktop CPU with an entry-level discrete GPU. The data in this profile is drawn exclusively from the provided FACT PACK; there are no measured frame rates for this specific combination. All gaming performance discussion is therefore estimated from the individual benchmark scores of the components.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support. It offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The benchmark data shows a processor with exceptional multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, it scores 39551 points in the multi-core test, while the single-core score is 5583 points. Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 20008 and a single-core score of 2570. The PassMark multi-thread score is 46532, with a single-thread score of 4506. The average benchmark score across all tests is 60008, placing the CPU in the 92nd percentile of all processors.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the i9-14900F is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, which has an average score of 60099, a delta of -0.2%. The delta against the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX is also -0.2%, with that chip scoring 60104. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D scores 59641, which puts the i9-14900F 0.6% ahead. The Intel Xeon Gold 6338T scores 60572, putting the i9-14900F 0.9% behind. These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating that the i9-14900F sits at the very top of desktop CPU performance, competing directly with the fastest mobile HX-series chips and a high-end server Xeon.

The PassMark sub-tests reveal the character of the performance. The integer math score is 177066, while the floating-point math score is 119550. The data compression score is 564207, and the data encryption score is 34644. The extended instructions score is 31084, and the random string sorting score is 63728. The find prime numbers score is 209, and the physics score is 2899. The high integer and floating-point scores indicate strong general-purpose compute for tasks like code compilation and scientific simulations. The massive data compression score suggests excellent throughput for archiving and database workloads. The relatively low prime number score suggests that the architecture is not optimized for that specific type of scalar workload, but the overall picture is one of sustained high throughput across a wide range of applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a desktop-class processor that uses the Intel Socket 1700. It is part of the Core 14th Gen series, which is the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on availability and cost. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are essential for the fastest NVMe storage and the most recent graphics cards, though the paired GPU in this profile only uses PCIe 4.0.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is low for a 24-core processor, but the boost clock of 5.80 GHz suggests that the actual power draw under full load could be higher. The suggested PSU for the entire build, driven by the GPU, is 200 W. This is a highly conservative figure, meaning that the power supply headroom is substantial. A user with a quality 200 W or larger PSU will have ample room for the CPU and GPU, and the platform does not require a high-wattage unit to function. The 65 W TDP also means that a capable air cooler is sufficient for stock operation, though the high boost clocks on all cores might benefit from a stronger cooling solution to maintain maximum frequencies.

The upgrade path for this platform is straightforward. Since the i9-14900F is already one of the most powerful consumer CPUs, a CPU upgrade on the same socket would not yield a significant performance gain. The more logical upgrade path is the GPU. The Arc A350 is a low-power entry-level card, and the platform's PCIe Gen 5 support and the CPU's massive compute power are more than capable of feeding a much faster graphics card. A user looking to improve gaming performance would replace the GPU with a higher-tier model, while the CPU would remain relevant for many years. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that a user on an older DDR4 system could carry over their memory, though a new build would likely opt for DDR5 for higher bandwidth.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core performance is exceptional, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2570 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583. These scores are more than sufficient to drive high frame rates in most games. However, the Arc A350 GPU is the limiting factor, as it is an entry-level part. The estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra settings would be low, likely below 60 FPS in modern titles. The CPU would not bottleneck the GPU in this scenario, but the GPU would prevent high-refresh gaming.

Streaming: The 32 threads of the i9-14900F are excellent for encoding video while gaming. The high multi-core score of 20008 in Geekbench and 39551 in Cinebench R23 indicate that the CPU can handle the encoding workload with minimal impact on game performance. The Arc A350 does not have significant encoding hardware that would offload this task, so the CPU would be the primary encoder. The system could handle a single-PC streaming setup at 1080p, but the low GPU performance would limit the game settings.

Video editing: The multi-threaded performance is a major asset here. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16611 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 46532 suggest that timeline scrubbing, rendering, and exporting will be fast. The 36 MB of L3 cache helps with large media files. The Arc A350's 4 GB of VRAM and 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth are insufficient for complex effects or 4K editing timelines, so the GPU would only accelerate basic tasks. The CPU does the heavy lifting.

3D rendering: This is a workload where the CPU excels. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3986 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 are top-tier numbers. A user rendering with CPU-based engines like Blender's Cycles or V-Ray will see very fast render times. The Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is low for GPU rendering, so the GPU would be a minor contributor. The CPU is the primary render engine, and it is highly capable.

Software development: The high integer math score of 177066 and the data compression score of 564207 are relevant for code compilation and version control operations. The 32 threads allow for parallel builds, and the single-core performance ensures fast UI responsiveness. The system is well-suited for compiling large codebases. The GPU is irrelevant for this workload, so the Arc A350's low performance is not a drawback.

Student and office work: For document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets, the i9-14900F is vastly overqualified. The single-core performance will make every interaction snappy. The Arc A350 is more than enough for 2D desktop rendering and video playback. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and the 25 W TDP of the GPU mean the system is quiet and cool, making it suitable for a shared or quiet environment. The primary downside is the cost of the CPU for tasks that a much cheaper chip could handle.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly indicates a severe imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The i9-14900F is in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Arc A350 is in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the build is 71. This suggests that the CPU is the dominant component in terms of raw processing power, while the GPU is an average performer among all GPUs.

In gaming workloads, the bottleneck is unequivocally the GPU. The CPU's single-core scores are high enough to sustain high frame rates, but the Arc A350's 4 GB of VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will limit texture detail and resolution. The GPU will be at 100% utilization in most gaming scenarios, while the CPU will be underutilized. The FPS scaling will be constrained by the GPU's rendering throughput, not the CPU's ability to feed it frames.

In productivity and compute workloads, the bottleneck shifts to the CPU, which is the component doing the heavy lifting. The GPU's 48 TMUs and 24 ROPs are low, and its 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is entry-level. For tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the primary processor, and the GPU will have a negligible role. The system is a CPU-centric build where the GPU serves only as a display output and basic acceleration.

The lack of measured FPS data for this pairing means the exact gaming bottleneck cannot be quantified, but the CPU's 92nd percentile rank versus the GPU's 50th percentile rank is a clear indication that the CPU has far more headroom than the GPU can use. Any upgrade to a faster GPU would yield a massive increase in gaming performance. An upgrade to a faster CPU would yield almost no benefit in gaming, as the current CPU is already at the top of its class.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-14900F has an average benchmark score of 60008, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, showing that it outperforms the vast majority of processors. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, has an average score of 60099, which is only 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX is similarly close at 60104, also 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D scores 59641, putting the i9-14900F 0.6% ahead. The Intel Xeon Gold 6338T scores 60572, putting the i9-14900F 0.9% behind.

The Intel Arc A350 has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is 0. It has a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs. This means it is an average GPU, sitting at the midpoint of the performance distribution. There are no nearest rivals listed for the GPU.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer, and the GPU is a mid-pack performer. The CPU's scores in Cinebench and Geekbench are in the range of the fastest desktop and mobile processors. The GPU, with no measured scores, must be assessed on its specifications alone. The 768 shading units and 24 ROPs are low, and the 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is consistent with an entry-level discrete GPU. The combination results in a system that is extremely powerful for CPU-bound tasks but limited for GPU-bound tasks like gaming.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. The target audience is professionals and enthusiasts who work with heavily multi-threaded applications and do not require high-end graphics performance.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the i9-14900F's 32 threads and high benchmark scores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 46532 are indicative of a processor that can handle demanding production workloads. The Arc A350 is a weak point for GPU-accelerated effects, but it is sufficient for basic display output.

Software developers will find the CPU's integer math score of 177066 and data compression score of 564207 useful for building large projects. The single-core performance also ensures that the IDE remains responsive.

Students and office workers who need a reliable system for general tasks would be well-served, but the CPU is overkill for this use case. The low TDP of both the CPU and GPU means the system is energy-efficient and quiet, which is a benefit in a shared workspace.

Gamers at 1080p resolution with low to medium settings might find the system acceptable for less demanding titles, but the Arc A350's 4 GB VRAM will be a significant limitation for modern games. This is not a gaming-first build; it is a productivity-first build with basic gaming capability.

Small business workstations that rely on database operations or scientific computing will benefit from the CPU's throughput. The ECC memory support is a key feature for data integrity in such environments.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and there are no entries in measuredFpsUltraByGame. All frame rate expectations are therefore estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Given the CPU's 92nd percentile rank and high single-core scores, the processor is not a limiting factor in gaming. The Arc A350, with its 50th percentile rank and 4 GB of VRAM, is the primary constraint. At 1080p ultra settings, the estimated performance would be low. Modern AAA titles would likely run below 30 FPS, and even lighter esports titles might struggle to maintain 60 FPS at high settings.

The GPU's 64-bit memory bus and 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth will cause a bottleneck in texture-heavy scenes. The 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is roughly a third of what a mid-range card offers. Users would need to lower settings to medium or low and reduce resolution to 720p to achieve playable frame rates in most games. The CPU has ample headroom to support a much faster GPU, so the gaming experience is entirely dependent on the Arc A350's limited capabilities.

Build Overview

The Intel Core i9-14900F + Intel Arc A350 is a desktop-class build. It pairs the Core 14th Gen flagship CPU with an entry-level Arc 3 series GPU. The combined percentile of the build is 71, placing it above average overall, but this figure is heavily skewed by the CPU's 92nd percentile rank. The GPU's 50th percentile rank pulls the overall score down.

This is a CPU-centric build. The i9-14900F is a high-end processor designed for demanding workloads, while the Arc A350 is a low-power, entry-level graphics card. The system is best described as a professional workstation with a basic discrete GPU. It is not a balanced gaming rig. The CPU is a top-tier part that will remain relevant for years, while the GPU is an end-of-life product that will need to be replaced for any serious gaming or GPU-accelerated work.

The build is in the desktop class, as indicated by the buildClass field. It is suitable for tasks that require high CPU throughput, such as rendering, compiling, and data processing. The GPU is a secondary component that provides display output and minimal acceleration.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core i9-14900F?

A: The average benchmark score is 60008, which places the CPU in the 92nd percentile of all processors.

Q: How does the i9-14900F compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX has an average score of 60099, which is 0.2% higher than the i9-14900F's score. This is a negligible difference.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A350?

A: The Arc A350 has a memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s, using a 64-bit bus with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-14900F support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature useful for workstation and server environments.

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i9-14900F and Intel Arc A350 build is 71.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the build is 200 W.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is a discrete graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured by Intel on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It is part of the Alchemist generation, specifically the Arc 3 tier. The chip is designated DG2-128 and contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz. The memory runs at 1937 MHz, which translates to 15.5 Gbps effective, across a 64-bit bus. This results in a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. It includes 6 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1). The TDP is 25 W, and the card is single-slot with no display outputs. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed, and its percentile rank is 50. This means it is an average performer among all GPUs. The 4 GB of VRAM is a significant limitation for modern games, as many titles require more memory for high-resolution textures. The 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth is low, which will impact performance in memory-intensive workloads.

The 768 shading units and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are consistent with an entry-level card. It can handle basic 2D tasks and light 3D workloads, but it will struggle with modern games at 1080p ultra settings. The 6 ray tracing cores are present, but the low overall performance means ray tracing will be very slow. The card's lack of display outputs means it is intended for use as a secondary compute or encoding device, not as a primary display adapter. The GPU is end-of-life, with the predecessor being Xe Graphics and the successor being Battlemage.

In rendering workloads, the GPU's 96.00 GTexel/s texture rate and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate are low. The 3.072 TFLOPS is insufficient for GPU-accelerated rendering. The card is better suited for tasks like video decoding or basic compute acceleration, but its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus limit its utility. The combined picture is a GPU that is strictly entry-level, far below the capability of the CPU it is paired with.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900F

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds