SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900

58,115 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14900 + Intel Arc A380E: A Disparate Desktop Pairing

This build pairs Intel’s 24-core Core i9-14900 desktop processor with Intel’s entry-level Arc A380E graphics card, creating a system where CPU capability vastly outstrips GPU resources. The processor ranks in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, and the combined system percentile is 71. This is a desktop-class configuration (buildClass: desktop) with no measured FPS data available for this exact combination; all gaming performance discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a Raptor Lake-R architecture part built on Intel’s 10 nm process, featuring 24 cores and 32 threads. Its base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, and it carries 36 MB of shared L3 cache alongside 2 MB of L2 per core and 80 KB of L1 per core. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, includes ECC memory support, and connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, and the chip has a 65 W TDP.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 31070, while the single-core score is 2212. Geekbench results show 18495 multi-core and 2488 single-core. The PassMark multi-thread score is 44578, with single-thread at 4323. More specialized PassMark tests reveal strengths in integer math (175010), floating-point math (120262), and extended instructions (30624), while data encryption scores 33540 and data compression reaches 550271. The average benchmark score is 58115.

Relative to nearest rivals, the i9-14900 sits within a tight competitive band. It trails the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M by 0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D by 0.5%, and the Intel Xeon w5-2545 by 0.7%, while leading the AMD EPYC 9015 by 1%. These delta percentages indicate that the i9-14900 is effectively performance-equivalent to a spread of high-end server and workstation processors in aggregate benchmarking, despite being a desktop part.

For real workloads, the 24-core/32-thread configuration with a 5.80 GHz boost clock means the CPU can handle heavily threaded compilation tasks, video encoding, and 3D rendering without strain. The strong single-core score of 2212 in Cinebench R23 suggests excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded applications like office suites and web browsing. The PassMark data compression score of 550271 indicates rapid file archiving and decompression, while the floating-point score of 120262 supports scientific computing and physics simulations.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380E is a DG2-128 chip based on the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It operates with a fixed base and boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, delivering 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Computing resources include 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 64.00 GPixel/s, texture rate is 128.0 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 4.096 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.192 TFLOPS (2:1).

The GPU’s TDP is 75 W, requires no power connectors, and suggests a 250 W PSU. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and offers 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Physically, it is a single-slot card measuring 254 mm in length, 127 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The production status is end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor.

The Arc A380E has no benchmark entries in the data pack, and its percentileVsAllGpus is 50, placing it at the median of all GPUs. The 6 GB VRAM capacity and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest by modern standards, and the 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 throughput positions it as an entry-level rendering solution. The 8 ray tracing cores provide some RT capability, but the low overall compute density means ray-traced workloads will be constrained. The 128.0 GTexel/s texture rate and 64.00 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings, but high-resolution or high-detail rendering will be limited.

The absence of tensor cores in the data pack means the GPU’s AI acceleration capabilities are not quantified. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support indicates feature-level 12_2 compliance, which is relevant for modern game APIs, but the raw performance ceiling is low relative to the CPU’s capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s 5.80 GHz boost clock and 2212 single-core Cinebench R23 score provide ample headroom for high frame rates, but the Arc A380E’s 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 GB VRAM will cap performance at lower resolutions and reduced settings. Expect 1080p gaming at medium presets to be the realistic ceiling, with higher refresh rates achievable only in esports titles that are not GPU-bound.

Streaming: The i9-14900’s 24 cores and 32 threads handle encoding workloads efficiently, with a PassMark multithread score of 44578 supporting simultaneous game capture and encoding. The GPU’s modest resources mean game performance will suffer during streaming at high settings, but the CPU can offload encoding tasks effectively.

Video Editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31070 and PassMark integer math score of 175010 indicate strong timeline rendering and export performance in editors like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU’s 6 GB VRAM may limit effects-heavy workflows, but 1080p editing with light effects is feasible.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s multi-threaded muscle (31070 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) excels in CPU-based renderers like Blender’s Cycles, while the GPU’s 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 will be slow for GPU-accelerated rendering. The 8 RT cores provide some ray tracing support, but the overall throughput is low.

Software Development: The 24-core/32-thread configuration with 36 MB L3 cache accelerates parallel compilation, and the PassMark extended instructions score of 30624 supports SIMD-heavy code. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this pairing acceptable for coding workloads.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s single-core performance (2212 Cinebench R23 single-core, 4323 PassMark single-thread) ensures snappy application responsiveness, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle basic display output without the discrete GPU. The Arc A380E adds little for office tasks but does not detract.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance between the i9-14900 and Arc A380E is stark. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 50th percentile means the GPU is the limiting factor in virtually every graphics-intensive workload. The CPU can deliver 31070 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, but the GPU’s 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 will saturate before the CPU reaches anything near its limits in gaming. The combined system percentile of 71 reflects this mismatch, pulled down by the GPU’s median standing.

In CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data processing, or physics calculations, the i9-14900 operates at full potential, with the GPU idle. In GPU-bound tasks such as gaming at 1440p or higher, the Arc A380E’s 186.0 GB/s bandwidth and 6 GB VRAM become the bottleneck, while the CPU waits. The FPS scaling from the CPU’s perspective is irrelevant because the GPU cannot translate the CPU’s compute headroom into frame rate. This system is best understood as a workstation-oriented CPU paired with an entry-level display adapter.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s key scores are: Cinebench R23 multi-core 31070, Cinebench R23 single-core 2212, Cinebench R20 multi-core 15910, Cinebench R20 single-core 2245, Cinebench R15 multi-core 4793, Cinebench R15 single-core 315, Geekbench multi-core 18495, Geekbench single-core 2488, PassMark multithread 44578, and PassMark single-thread 4323. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 58115, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data pack, making direct numerical comparison impossible. Its percentileVsAllGpus of 50 indicates median performance. The combined system percentile is 71, reflecting the CPU’s strong standing tempered by the GPU’s average position. The nearest rival comparisons for the CPU show deltas within 1% (ranging from -0.4% to 1% against the four listed competitors), but no such data exists for the GPU.

The overall picture is a system that benchmarks far higher in CPU workloads than GPU workloads. Any benchmark that stresses the processor will produce results near the top quartile, while GPU-focused benchmarks will land near the median.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users whose primary compute demands are CPU-bound and who need only basic graphics output. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, with the PassMark multithread score of 44578 and integer math score of 175010 supporting heavy build processes. Students in computer science or engineering programs can leverage the CPU’s single-thread performance (4323 PassMark single-thread) for everyday tasks, while the discrete GPU adds little beyond what the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides.

Small business workstations handling data processing, spreadsheet analysis, or database operations will find the CPU’s 550271 PassMark data compression score useful for file management. Content creators working in CPU-rendered video or 3D animation can utilize the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31070 for export tasks, though the GPU will not accelerate those workloads. Gamers should avoid this combination for anything beyond casual 1080p play, as the GPU’s 6 GB VRAM and 4.096 TFLOPS will limit modern titles. The system is not balanced for gaming and is better suited to compute-oriented professionals who need occasional graphics output.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-14900 faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D?

A: The i9-14900 trails the Ryzen 7 9850X3D by 0.5% in average benchmark score, making them effectively equivalent in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The Arc A380E has 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900 supports ECC memory alongside standard DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type?

A: The i9-14900 uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Xeon w5-2545?

A: The i9-14900 is 0.7% behind the Xeon w5-2545 in average benchmark score.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP?

A: The Arc A380E has a 75 W TDP and requires no power connectors.

Q: Does the GPU support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the Arc A380E supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900 uses Intel Socket 1700, which limits upgrades to other LGA1700 parts within the same platform. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus, giving builders flexibility in memory selection, though ECC support is available. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion cards. The 65 W TDP means the CPU is power-efficient for its performance class, requiring no exotic cooling.

The Arc A380E uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds. The GPU’s suggested PSU of 250 W is modest, and the 75 W TDP with no power connectors means the system has considerable PSU headroom for future upgrades. The CPU’s 65 W TDP combined with the GPU’s 75 W TDP leaves ample room in any standard power supply.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A380E with a higher-performing GPU, as the CPU can clearly support faster graphics. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes and 16-lane CPU connectivity will accommodate modern high-end cards. The memory subsystem can be upgraded from DDR4 to DDR5 if the motherboard supports it, though the dual-channel bus remains the same. The platform is mature, with the production status of the CPU listed as active, while the GPU is end-of-life, suggesting the GPU should be the first replacement priority.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class system pairing Intel’s top-tier 14th Gen Core i9-14900 processor with Intel’s entry-level Arc A380E graphics card. The CPU is a Raptor Lake-R architecture part on Intel’s 10 nm process, with 24 cores, 32 threads, and a 5.80 GHz boost clock. The GPU is a Xe-HPG architecture part on TSMC’s 6 nm process, with 1024 shading units and 6 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined system percentile is 71, reflecting a CPU in the 92nd percentile and a GPU in the 50th percentile.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 58115 places it among high-end desktop and workstation processors, competitive with Xeon and EPYC parts within a 1% delta. The GPU has no recorded benchmark scores, and its median percentile indicates average performance among all GPUs. This is fundamentally a CPU-centric build where the graphics card serves as a basic display output rather than a performance component. The system tier is upper-midrange overall, dragged down by the GPU despite the CPU’s excellence.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

The Arc A380E’s 4.096 TFLOPS FP32, 6 GB VRAM, and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest 1080p gaming at medium settings is achievable in most titles. Esports games like Counter-Strike or League of Legends, which are CPU-bound, could see higher frame rates thanks to the i9-14900’s 5.80 GHz boost clock and 4323 PassMark single-thread score. AAA titles at 1080p will likely require reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates, and 1440p or 4K gaming will be severely constrained by the GPU’s 6 GB VRAM and limited compute throughput.

The 8 ray tracing cores provide some RT capability, but the low overall FP32 performance means ray-traced effects will cause significant frame rate drops. The 128.0 GTexel/s texture rate supports moderate texture filtering, and the 64.00 GPixel/s pixel rate handles 1080p rasterization adequately. The CPU’s strong single-core performance (2212 Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that frame pacing and minimum FPS in CPU-bound scenarios will be excellent, but the GPU will cap maximum FPS in most modern titles. For competitive gaming at 1080p with low-to-medium settings, this pairing can deliver smooth experiences; for high-fidelity or high-resolution gaming, it will disappoint.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + Intel Arc A380E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900

Intel Arc A380E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds