SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900T sits on Intel Socket 1700, the LGA 1700 platform that anchors the Raptor Lake generation. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported, which broadens its compatibility range for workstation-oriented builds. The processor provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU itself, a high-bandwidth interconnect for storage and accelerator cards, while the Arc A750 GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This mismatch is not a practical limitation for the GPU, because PCIe 4.0 x16 still carries far more bandwidth than the GPU's 512.0 GB/s memory bus can consume in most workloads.

The platform's power envelope is notably lopsided. The i9-13900T carries a 35W TDP, a dramatically low figure for a 24-core part, while the Arc A750 demands 225W and a suggested 550W power supply. In practice, this means the CPU draws a fraction of the GPU's power budget, so the PSU headroom is entirely consumed by the graphics card and any system peripherals. A user moving from a lower-tier GPU to this Arc A750 should plan for a power supply in the 550W class, while the CPU itself will not stress even a modest PSU. The dual-slot GPU with a 6-pin plus 8-pin power connector requires a modern PSU with those cables; a budget unit lacking the 8-pin connector would need an adapter.

The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not a viable avenue for squeezing extra performance. The 35W TDP is a hard design point, and the locked multiplier reinforces that the 13900T is tuned for efficiency rather than enthusiast tuning. The GPU, meanwhile, is end-of-life, with Battlemage named as its successor, so the upgrade path for the graphics side is forward-looking: a future Battlemage card would likely require the same PCIe 4.0 x16 slot and 550W PSU class. For the CPU, the Socket 1700 platform is still active, so a future CPU upgrade could be a higher-bin Raptor Lake part, though the 13900T already sits near the top of the desktop stack with a 92nd percentile ranking. A sensible next upgrade, given the balance of this build, would be a GPU replacement first, since the CPU is far ahead of the graphics card in benchmark standing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU ranks in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 66th percentile. In a combined percentile of 79, the build is CPU-heavy, meaning the processor is the dominant component in most synthetic workloads. For gaming, the bottleneck is almost always the GPU, because the Arc A750's 8GB of GDDR6 and 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are far below the CPU's multi-threaded and single-threaded capabilities. The i9-13900T's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5155 and multi-core score of 36517 indicate it can feed any modern GPU without being a limiting factor, while the Arc A750's 66th percentile makes it the ceiling for frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios.

For productivity tasks, the bottleneck shifts. The GPU's compute score in PassMark is 5368, which is modest, while the CPU's integer math score of 157324 and floating-point math score of 108779 are strong. In workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering that are CPU-bound, the i9-13900T will be the main engine, and the GPU may sit idle. In GPU-accelerated tasks like ray tracing or compute-heavy rendering, the Arc A750's 28 RT cores and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factor, because the CPU is not the constraint. The data indicates a system where the CPU is overprovisioned for the GPU; users will see the GPU as the bottleneck in most interactive workloads, while the CPU's headroom is available for background tasks and multi-threaded productivity.

FAQ

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the Core i9-13900T has a locked multiplier, so overclocking is not possible without BCLK adjustments, and the 35W TDP is a fixed design target.

Q: What memory types are supported on this platform?

A: The Socket 1700 board supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, and ECC memory is supported, which is rare for a consumer desktop CPU.

Q: How does the i9-13900T compare to the Core i9-13900K?

A: The 13900T's average benchmark score is 61723, while the 13900K scores 61766, a delta of -0.1%. They are effectively equal in average synthetic performance.

Q: What PSU is recommended for this build?

A: The Arc A750's suggested PSU is 550W. The CPU has a 35W TDP, so the power supply is primarily dictated by the GPU's 225W TDP.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A750 is marked as end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor. It was released on 2022-10-11.

Q: Does the GPU have tensor cores?

A: The Arc A750 lists no tensor cores; it only has 28 ray-tracing cores. This affects AI-accelerated workloads but the card still supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Q: Can the GPU handle 4K gaming?

A: The 8GB GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1440p, but 4K would strain the 66th percentile GPU. No measured FPS data exists for this build.

Who Should Build It

This build targets a specific set of users where CPU power matters more than graphics. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolution will benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread score (Cinebench R23 single-core 5155) and multi-thread headroom, but the Arc A750's 66th percentile means they should stay at 1080p/1440p to avoid GPU bottleneck. Content creators—especially video editors and 3D modelers who rely on CPU rendering—will see the 24-core, 32-thread i9-13900T excel in multi-threaded tasks like encoding and compilation, with the GPU as a secondary accelerator. Developers writing multi-threaded code or running virtual machines will appreciate the 32 threads and 36 MB L3 cache, plus ECC memory support for data integrity.

Students and small business workstations can use the low 35W CPU TDP to build a quiet, power-efficient desktop that still delivers 92nd percentile CPU performance, but the GPU's 225W TDP and 8GB VRAM may be overkill for office tasks. The 10nm Raptor Lake architecture and 36MB shared L3 make it a strong workstation CPU, while the Arc A750's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8GB memory are suited for moderate GPU compute, like video encoding or light 3D rendering. The build is not ideal for AI researchers or heavy GPU compute users, given the lack of tensor cores and the GPU's 66th percentile.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is a 79th percentile desktop build. The CPU averages a benchmark score of 61723, sitting at the 92nd percentile against all CPUs. Its closest rivals are the Intel Core i9-13900K at 61766 (-0.1%), the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at 61834 (-0.2%), the Core i9-13900KF at 61841 (-0.2%), and the Xeon 636 at 61360 (+0.6%). This means the 13900T essentially matches the top-tier 13900K in average performance, despite a far lower 35W TDP, which confirms the efficiency of the low-power bin. The CPU's strongest individual scores are Cinebench R23 multi-core 36517 and PassMark integer math 157324, indicating heavy multi-threaded and integer-heavy workloads are its domain.

The GPU between an average score of 20582, at the 66th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the Arc B570 at 20556 (+0.1%), the RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534 (+0.2%), the Radeon R9 M390X at 20662 (-0.4%), and the Quadro M4000M at 20480 (+0.5%). The Arc A750 is essentially tied with the B570 and the RTX 3070 Mobile in average benchmark score, placing it in a mid-range laptop GPU performance tier. The GPU's own benchmarks show a DirectX 12 score of 70 and a G3D score of 12534, which are moderate numbers that reflect a mid-tier desktop graphics card. The combined percentile of 77 is pulled down by the GPU, since the CPU is at 92nd while the GPU is at 66th, indicating that the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is a DG2-512 chip built on TSMC's 6nm process with 21,700 million transistors and a 406 mm² die. It has 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs, along with 28 ray-tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2050 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). It uses 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The FP32 compute is rated at 17.20 TFLOPS, and FP16 at 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), giving it solid compute throughput for a mid-range card.

In benchmark tests, the GPU achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554, and a Vulkan score of 85631. The PassMark G3D score is 12534, with a GPU compute score of 5368. These scores indicate a GPU that handles DirectX 12 and Vulkan workloads well, but the DirectX 9 and 10 scores are notably low (181 and 65), suggesting older API performance is weaker. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it modern for current games. Its ray tracing is handled by 28 dedicated cores, but the lack of tensor cores limits AI-accelerated features like DLSS (though Intel's XeSS uses different hardware). The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s, which are mid-range figures. With a TDP of 225W and a suggested PSU of 550W, the GPU is power-hungry relative to the CPU's 35W, making the power supply a critical component.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination of CPU and GPU. All frame rate figures in this section are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The Arc A750's 66th percentile and its DirectX 12 score of 70 suggest it can handle 1080p and 1440p ultra settings in many titles, but the lack of measured data means these are projections, not results. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 5155) ensures that the CPU will not be the bottleneck in most games, so the GPU's 66th percentile is the practical limit for frame rates.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth should deliver high frame rates in esports and moderately demanding games, but the 8GB GDDR6 memory could be a limitation in modern titles that exceed 8GB. At 1440p, the same memory capacity and the GPU's 66th percentile will likely result in lower frame rates, with the GPU becoming the primary constraint. At 4K, the GPU is likely to struggle, since the 8GB VRAM and the 66th percentile put it below the demands of high-resolution textures. The build is therefore best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, not 4K. Without measured data, the precise FPS numbers remain uncertain, but the benchmark scores provide a clear relative picture: the GPU is the weak point, while the CPU offers ample headroom.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining an Intel Core i9-13900T processor with an Intel Arc A750 graphics card. The CPU is a Raptor Lake-S part, built on Intel's 10nm process, with 24 cores and 32 threads, a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost of 5.3 GHz, and a 35W TDP. The GPU is an Arc A750, an Alchemist-generation (Arc 7) part with 8GB GDDR6 memory, a 256-bit bus, and a 225W TDP. The combined percentile of 77 places this build in the upper tier of all desktop systems, but the breakdown is telling: the CPU is 92nd percentile, the GPU 66th. That means the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is a mid-tier component.

The build is a 10nm desktop platform with a locked multiplier, so it is not overclockable, but the CPU's performance is already near the top of the desktop range, matching the 13900K within 0.1% in average score. The GPU is end-of-life, but it still delivers a 66th percentile performance, making it a competent card for 1080p/1440p gaming. The combined percentile of 77 reflects the GPU's lower standing. This is a system where the CPU is the star, and the GPU is the limiting factor. It's a desktop that can handle CPU-heavy workloads with ease, but it's not a high-end gaming system; it's a balanced mid-tier build with a strong processor.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 36 MB shared L3 cache. The base clock is 1100 MHz and the boost clock is 5.3 GHz, with a TDP of 35W, making it a low-power part with high peak performance. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC support, and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The memory bus is dual-channel, though the memory bandwidth is not specified in the data.

Benchmark results show the CPU's strengths. In Cinebench R23, it scores 36517 multi-core and 5155 single-core, indicating excellent multi-threaded performance and strong single-thread speed. PassMark results include a multithread score of 43036, a single-thread score of 4177, and an integer math score of 157324, with floating-point math at 108779. The data compression score is 538254, data encryption at 34415, and extended instructions at 29719. The CPU's average benchmark score is 61723, placing it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Core i9-13900K (61766, -0.1%), Core Ultra 7 235HX Plus (61834, -0.2%), Core i9-13900KF (61841, -0.2%), and Xeon 636 (61360, +0.6%). This means the 13900T performs essentially at the level of the 13900K and 13900KF, despite a much lower TDP, and it edges the Xeon 636 by 0.6%. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic fallback, but it's far weaker than the Arc A750. The CPU is locked, so overclocking is not available, but the 35W TDP and 92nd percentile make it a highly efficient top-tier desktop processor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900T

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds