SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Its base clock is 1100 MHz, but it boosts up to 5.30 GHz, which is a substantial frequency range that allows the chip to scale from power-efficient idle states to demanding single-threaded workloads. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, which is notable for workstation reliability. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 770, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor itself.

Benchmark data shows this is a high-performing CPU relative to the broader market. The processor sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors tested. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 36,517, while the single-core score is 5,155. These numbers translate to strong performance in both heavily threaded workloads and lightly threaded applications. The R20 multi-core score of 15,337 and single-core score of 2,165 reinforce this pattern, as does the R15 multi-core score of 3,680 and single-core score of 519.

Real-world workload interpretation: the Cinebench multi-core results suggest this CPU can handle video rendering, 3D scene compilation, and other parallel compute tasks with ease. The single-core scores indicate responsive performance in everyday applications, spreadsheet calculations, and lightly threaded games. PassMark data adds further context — the multi-thread score of 43,036, integer math score of 157,324, and floating-point math score of 108,779 point to strong number-crunching capability. Data compression score of 538,254 and encryption score of 34,415 show solid throughput in storage-related and security-related tasks. Notably, the extended instructions score of 29,719 suggests good SIMD and AVX performance, which benefits scientific computing and media encoding.

The 35 W TDP is a critical specification. This is a remarkably low power envelope for a 24-core processor, and it explains the lower base clock of 1100 MHz. The chip is designed to boost aggressively when needed but sip power at idle or under light loads. This makes it an excellent choice for systems where thermal management and power efficiency are priorities, such as compact desktops or always-on workstations.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the i9-13900T delivers an average benchmark score of 61,723. The Intel Core i9-13900K scores 61,766, which is only 0.1% higher, meaning the T-series variant essentially matches the K-series flagship in overall benchmark average despite its dramatically lower TDP. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61,834 (0.2% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13900KF scores 61,841 (0.2% higher). The Intel Xeon 636 scores 61,360, which is 0.6% lower. This clustering of scores within a 0.8% band indicates that the i9-13900T delivers performance statistically indistinguishable from these top-tier alternatives in aggregate benchmarks, which is extraordinary given its power rating.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-13900T compare to the Intel Core i9-13900K in average benchmark scores?

A: The i9-13900T has an average benchmark score of 61,723, while the i9-13900K scores 61,766. The delta is only -0.1%, meaning the T-series chip effectively matches the K-series in overall performance despite its much lower 35 W TDP.

Q: What is the memory support for this CPU?

A: The i9-13900T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically associated with workstation-class reliability.

Q: What integrated graphics does the i9-13900T include?

A: The processor includes Intel UHD Graphics 770, providing a basic display output capability without requiring a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the socket compatibility for this processor?

A: The i9-13900T uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform associated with Raptor Lake desktop processors.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the i9-13900T?

A: The boost clock is 5.30 GHz, while the base clock is 1100 MHz. This wide frequency range allows the chip to balance power efficiency with high single-threaded performance when needed.

Q: How does the i9-13900T perform in Cinebench R23 multi-core tests?

A: The multi-core score is 36,517, and the single-core score is 5,155. These results place the processor in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs tested.

Q: What PCIe specification does the CPU support?

A: The i9-13900T provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU only, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with the GB205 chip containing 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The GPU features 6,400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. It includes 50 ray tracing cores and 200 tensor cores, which are dedicated hardware units for RT and AI-accelerated workloads. The base clock is 2325 MHz with a boost clock of 2512 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.

Memory configuration consists of 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. This is a substantial memory pool that supports high-resolution textures and large datasets. The pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 32.15 TFLOPS for FP32 and 32.15 TFLOPS for FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio for these precision levels. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully compatible with modern graphics APIs.

The TDP is 275 W, requiring a 1x 16-pin power connector. The card is dual-slot with dimensions of 245 mm length, 115 mm height, and 40 mm width. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, ensuring compatibility with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support.

However, benchmark data for this GPU is limited and concerning. The only available test result is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 2,690. This places the GPU at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, which is surprisingly low. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M with a score of 2,664 (1% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 with 2,662 (1.1% higher), the Intel Arc Pro B50 with 2,660 (1.1% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 with 2,645 (1.7% higher). These are all entry-level or older GPUs, and the RTX 5070 SUPER scores within 1.7% of them. This suggests that either the benchmark result is anomalous, or the GPU's performance in this specific test is far below what its specifications would imply. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 2,690, which is the same as the single 3DMark result, so there is no additional data to provide context.

For rendering workloads, the 18 GB VRAM and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are theoretically sufficient for large scenes and high-resolution textures. The 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features. However, the benchmark score raises questions about real-world performance. The 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute is respectable on paper, but the percentile ranking suggests the GPU may underperform in practice for this test.

# Who Should Build It

The target user for this CPU+GPU pairing is nuanced. The CPU is clearly a powerhouse for productivity, sitting at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. The i9-13900T's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with its low 35 W TDP, make it ideal for content creators who run multi-threaded rendering tasks, video editors working with high-resolution footage, and software developers compiling large codebases. The PassMark multi-thread score of 43,036 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,517 support these use cases. Data encryption score of 34,415 and data compression score of 538,254 indicate strong performance for security-related tasks and file archiving.

The GPU, however, presents a different story. With an 18th percentile ranking and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,690 that rivals the GeForce GT 1030, the RTX 5070 SUPER cannot be recommended for gaming at any resolution based on current data. Gamers targeting 1080p, 1440p, or 4K would all be better served by alternatives that score higher. The GPU's 18 GB VRAM is generous, but benchmark results indicate the processing power is not there to utilize it effectively in 3D workloads.

For small business workstations, the CPU's ECC memory support and low power consumption make it an attractive option for file servers, database servers, or development machines. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display capability without needing a discrete GPU, which could save power and cost in headless server configurations. However, the RTX 5070 SUPER in this pairing adds little value for such workloads unless specific CUDA-based compute tasks are required, and even then the low benchmark scores are a concern.

Students and professionals who run CPU-intensive applications like MATLAB, simulation software, or 3D modeling tools would benefit from the i9-13900T's strong multi-core and single-core performance. The 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded responsiveness, while the 24 cores handle parallel workloads efficiently. The 35 W TDP also means the system runs cooler and quieter, which is beneficial in shared workspaces or small offices.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between this CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the processor. The i9-13900T sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 5070 SUPER sits at the 18th percentile among all GPUs. This creates a situation where the CPU is capable of far more than the GPU can deliver in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming scenarios, the GPU would be the limiting factor, potentially bottlenecking the CPU's ability to feed frames. The CPU's high single-thread score of 5,155 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can handle game logic and physics calculations without issue, but the GPU's low 3DMark score means frame rates would be constrained by graphics processing.

For CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering in CPU-based engines, or data processing, the GPU plays a minor role, and the CPU's performance would dominate. In this context, the system is well balanced because the GPU's weakness does not impact CPU-centric tasks. However, for any workload that relies on GPU acceleration — including gaming, GPU-based rendering, or machine learning inference — the RTX 5070 SUPER becomes the clear bottleneck. The combined percentile of 55 for this pairing reflects this imbalance, placing it in the middle of the pack despite the CPU's top-tier ranking.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured directly, can be inferred from the GPU's benchmark position. Since the GPU scores within 1.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 — a legacy card — the expected frame rates in modern games would be low, likely unplayable at high settings. The CPU would be underutilized in such scenarios, waiting for the GPU to complete frame rendering. Conversely, in non-graphics workloads, the system operates without a bottleneck because the GPU is not involved.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900T uses Socket 1700, which is the platform for Raptor Lake desktop processors. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology based on budget and performance needs. The dual-channel memory bus means two memory modules are recommended for optimal bandwidth. ECC memory support is a key feature for users who require data integrity in workstation applications.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, so the current pairing is fully compatible with the platform's bandwidth capabilities. The system also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which can serve as a fallback display output or for troubleshooting GPU issues. The CPU's TDP of 35 W means the power delivery system does not need to be extensive, but the GPU's 275 W TDP requires a suitable power supply. The GPU uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, so the PSU must support this connector type.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-performing model. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking indicates it has substantial headroom, and a more capable GPU would better utilize the CPU's processing power in graphics workloads. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures that any modern GPU can be installed without bandwidth limitations. Memory upgrades are also possible, as the platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing users to move to faster memory modules or higher capacities as needed. The 36 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample on-chip storage for frequently accessed data, so cache upgrades are not a concern.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900T delivers strong benchmark results across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 3,680 and single-core is 519. In R20, multi-core reaches 15,337 and single-core 2,165. In R23, multi-core scores 36,517 and single-core 5,155. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 43,036, single-thread score of 4,177, integer math of 157,324, floating-point math of 108,779, data compression of 538,254, data encryption of 34,415, extended instructions of 29,719, physics of 2,497, and random string sorting of 63,358. The average benchmark score is 61,723, placing the CPU at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has only one benchmark result: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 2,690. This places the GPU at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2,690. The nearest rivals are all within 1.7% of this score, including the Quadro K1100M, GeForce GT 1030, Intel Arc Pro B50, and GeForce GT 440.

The combined picture is a system where CPU performance is top-tier but GPU performance is near-entry-level based on available data. The combined percentile is 55, which reflects the average of the CPU's high ranking and the GPU's low ranking. This pairing would excel in CPU-intensive tasks but would struggle in GPU-accelerated workloads. The data suggests that the RTX 5070 SUPER's benchmark score is disproportionately low compared to what its specifications might suggest, but without additional benchmark data, this single result stands as the only measured evidence.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER in a desktop-class configuration. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 35 W TDP, designed for high performance in a power-efficient envelope. The GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 18 GB of GDDR7 memory and a 275 W TDP, based on the GB205 chip.

The overall tier of this build, based on percentiles, is mixed. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking places it among the top processors, while the GPU's 18th percentile ranking places it near the bottom of GPUs. The combined percentile of 55 indicates a mid-tier system overall, but this average masks the extreme disparity between components. For CPU-bound tasks, this is a high-end system; for GPU-bound tasks, it is a low-end system. Builders should consider this imbalance carefully, as the RTX 5070 SUPER's benchmark performance does not align with its modern architecture and generous VRAM allocation.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,690 and its 18th percentile ranking, gaming performance is expected to be poor. The GPU scores within 1.7% of the GeForce GT 440, a legacy entry-level card, which suggests that modern games would run at low frame rates even at 1080p with low settings. The 18 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for any current game, but the processing power to render frames appears to be lacking. At 1440p or 4K resolutions, the GPU would likely struggle significantly, with frame rates dropping to unplayable levels in demanding titles.

The CPU, with its 5,155 single-core score in Cinebench R23, would not be the limiting factor in gaming. It can handle game logic, physics, and AI calculations without bottlenecking. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is not intended for gaming, so the discrete GPU is the sole graphics processor. Given the GPU's benchmark position, estimated frame rates in modern AAA titles would be in the low single digits to low tens of FPS, depending on the game and settings. Esports titles at low settings might achieve playable frame rates, but the data does not support expectations of a smooth gaming experience. These are estimates only, as no measured FPS data is available for this combination.